« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
CHAPTER 12 PERSONAL AND CROSS-MODAL
TRAVEL
1.
Introduction
1.1 This chapter includes information which was
collected from individual people in surveys like the
National Travel Survey and the Scottish Household Survey.
Such surveys provide "person-based" "cross-modal"
information, in contrast to most of the earlier chapters,
which tend to be based on particular modes of
transport.
1.2 The main change in this edition is the inclusion of
3 new tables of results from the National Travel
Survey:
- Table 12.7 - hours
travelled per person per year by purpose.
- Table 12.8 - Average
duration of trip by purpose.
- Table 12.9 - Trips per
person per year by main mode and number of cars
available to the household
1.3 The first nine tables provide some statistics, from
the National Travel Survey, about travel within Great
Britain by Scottish residents. Because its Scottish sample
is very small (
see section 4.1), the data for two or
three calendar years are combined and, even then, the
results may be subject to large percentage sampling errors,
due to the small number of cases upon which they are based
(
see section 3.6). Therefore, the
NTS-based statistics should be regarded
as broad indications (rather than precise measures) of the
relative use of different modes of transport.
2.
Main Points
2.1 The National Travel Survey's estimated average
number of trips, within Great Britain, per Scottish
resident per year was 991 in the two-year period 2002/03,
equivalent to an average of 2.7 trips per person per day.
The estimated average number of trips per person per year
has remained around the range 1,000 to 1,100 between
1985/86 and 2002/03, with fluctuations which could be due
to sampling variability (see
section 3.6). Since 1985/86, the
estimated number of trips by car has risen by 52%, but
there have been falls of 33% and 31% respectively in the
estimated numbers of trips for which "walking" or "local
bus" is the main mode.
(
Table 12.1)
2.2 Cars, vans and lorries accounted for over
three-quarters (77%) of the average of around 6,700 miles
which was travelled, within Great Britain, per year per
Scottish resident in 2002/03. Almost half the distance
(47%: about 3,100 miles) was covered as the driver, and a
further 30% (almost 2,000 miles) as a passenger. "Other
public transport" accounted for around 6%, 415 miles.
"Local bus" had the next highest share, with 5.3% of the
total distance travelled (356 miles). No other mode of
transport accounted for more than 5%: surface rail
accounted for 4.7% (313 miles - the apparent fluctuations
will reflect sampling variability, as discussed in
Section 3.6), walking for only 2.9%
(around 191 miles) and cycling for only 0.4% (26 miles).
(
Table 12.2)
2.3 The estimated average distance travelled per person
per year has increased by 43% between 1985/86 (under 4,700
miles) and 2002/03 (almost 6,700 miles), with some
fluctuations during the period, which may be attributed to
sampling variability (
see section 3.6). Almost all the increase
was accounted for by travel in a car as a driver (up from
around 1,900 miles to over 3,100 miles) or as a passenger
(up from about 1,300 miles to just under 2,000 miles).
(
Table 12.2)
2.4 Over the period since 1985/86, the average length of
a car trip has remained around 8-9 miles, compared to
around 4-5 miles for local bus trips and very roughly 30
miles for train trips, with fluctuations that may be due to
sampling variability.
(
Table 12.3)
2.5 In 2002/03, other personal business or other escort
(20%) was the most frequent purpose of a trip, and three
other purposes had large shares of the total: "shopping"
(19%), "commuting" (16%), and "visiting friends at home"
(12%). Again, there will be some fluctuations caused by
sampling variability.
(Table 12.4)
2.6 Of the trip purposes, "commuting" had the largest
share of the total distance travelled in 2002/03 (18%:
1,232 miles). "Visiting friends at home", "other personal
business", and "shopping" each accounted for 14-15% of the
distance travelled (1,019, 961, and 902 miles
respectively). "Holiday / day trip" accounted for 13%
(about 887 miles) and "business" travel for 10% (647
miles). As mentioned earlier, these figures relate to
journeys within Great Britain by Scottish residents. Some
of the apparent changes between one period and the next
will simply reflect sampling variability.
(
Table 12.5)
2.7 Between 1985/86 and 2002/03, there were increases in
the average length of trips for most purposes. For example,
the average length of commuting trips rose from 5.4 miles
to 7.7 miles, and the average length of shopping trips
increased from 2.9 miles to 4.7 miles, with sampling
variability likely to explain some period-to-period
fluctuations.
(
Table 12.6)
2.8 In 2002/03, Scottish residents spent an average of
346 hours per person per year travelling within Great
Britain: an average of nearly an hour per day. This figure
has not changed much since 1985/86, remaining between 313
hours and 372 hours (such variation could be due to
sampling variability). In 2002/03, 18% of the average hours
travelled per person were for commuting. Shopping and
"other personal business…" each accounted for 16%. There
have not been great changes in the total amount of time
spent travelling for most purposes: some apparent
period-to-period fluctuations may be due to sampling
variability.
(
Table 12.7)
2.9 Since 1985/86, the average duration of travel per
trip has remained between 19 minutes and 21 minutes. The
average is highest for holiday/day trip (down from 74
minutes in 1985/86 to 56 minutes in 2002/03) and business
trips (which varied between 28 and 36 minutes over the
period), and lowest for escort to education trips (around
10 minutes). Generally, the figures have been fairly
constant since 1985/86.
(
Table 12.8)
2.10 People in households with two or more cars made an
average of 1,114 trips per person per year in 2002/03,
about 12% more than the overall average of 991 trips per
person per year; those in "no car" households averaged 750
trips per person per year, 24% fewer than the overall
average. Residents of households with cars made most of
their journeys by car: 64% of journeys for "one car"
households and 75% for "2+ car" households. People in
households without a car averaged about twice as many trips
per person by foot, and more than four times as many trips
per person by local bus, as those in households with 2+
cars.
(
Table 12.9)
2.11 The Scottish Household Survey (
SHS) provides information about how
often people aged 17 or over drive. In 2004, 48% of men,
35% of women and 41% of all people aged 17+ said that they
drive "every day". A further 17% said they drove at least
once a week (but not every day), 4% drove less frequently,
5% had a full driving licence but "never" drove, and 35%
did not have a full driving licence. Some of the apparent
changes in figures over the 6 years of the survey may be
misleading, due to a change in the question in 2003:
previously, it was asked of the head of the household, or
his or her spouse/partner, about all adult members of the
household; since April 2003, it has been asked of one
randomly-selected adult member of the household about
him/herself.
(
Table 12.10)
2.12 The frequency of driving varied with age. In 2004,
55% of people aged 30 to 49 said that they drove every day.
As age rises the percentage falls to 11% for people aged 80
and over. The frequency of driving also varied with the
annual net income of the household of which the person was
a member. Around two thirds of people aged 17+ living in
households with an annual net income of £30,000 or more
said they drove every day, compared with less than a fifth
of those living in households with an annual net income of
up to £10,000. As far as location was concerned, 34% of
people aged 17+ in large urban areas drove every day
compared to around 54% of those in "accessible" rural
areas.
(
Table 12.10)
2.13 The
SHS asks adults (people aged 16 or over)
on how many days, in the last seven days, they made a trip
of more than a quarter of a mile by foot in order to go
somewhere (
e.g. to work, to the shops or to visit
friends) -
i.e. on how many days did they use walking as
a means of transport (as distinct from walking solely for
pleasure). In 2004, 53.2% of adults said that they had made
a journey of more than a quarter of a mile by foot to go
somewhere in the last seven days - a little more than in
1999 (51.7%), but less than the peak in 2001 (54.5%). The
differences could be due to sampling variability: each of
these percentages has a "95% confidence interval" of +/-
about 1% point. Young adults (aged 16-19) were the most
likely to have walked to go somewhere, with over two-thirds
reporting this compared with only about half of those in
their 50s and 60s, and one third of those aged 80 or above.
The percentage of adults who walked to go somewhere did not
vary greatly with household income.
(
Table 12.11)
2.14 The
SHS also asks adults how often, in the
last seven days, they made a trip of more than a quarter of
a mile by foot just for pleasure or to keep fit (jogging
and walking a dog were counted under these purposes). In
2004, 43.4% of adults said that they had done so at least
once - similar to the proportion in 2003 and slightly more
than in the first four years of the survey. Men were
slightly more likely than women to report that they had
walked for pleasure or to keep fit (men: 45%; women: 42%).
There was some variation with age: the percentage was
highest for those aged 30-39 (50%) and lowest for those
aged 80 or above (21%). There was also some variation with
household income: the percentage tended to rise with
income, and was highest (53%) for adults living in
households with an annual net income of over £30,000.
(
Table 12.11)
2.15 Information about the frequency of cycling is also
collected by the
SHS. In 2004, only 3% of adults said
that, in the previous seven days, they had made a trip of
more than a quarter of a mile by bicycle in order to go
somewhere. The percentage was slightly higher for men and
for younger adults. Only 4% said that, in the previous
seven days, they had made a trip of more than a quarter of
a mile by bicycle for pleasure or to keep fit. The
percentage was slightly higher for men, for those from the
higher household income bands, and for those living in
rural areas.
(
Table 12.12)
2.16 Labour Force Survey results show that, between 1994
and 2004, there has been an increase in the percentage for
whom a car or a van is the usual means of travel to work
(from 66% in 1994 to 69% in 2004) and decreases in the
percentages using buses (from 15% to 12%) and walking (from
14% to 12%). People who work at home are excluded from
these figures.
(
Table 12.13)
2.17 There appears to have been little change in recent
years in the average times taken to travel to work by the
main modes of transport (in 2004: 22 minutes by car; 32
minutes by bus and 12 minutes by foot). The occasional
fluctuations in the average times for 'rail' and 'other'
may be due to sampling variability.
(
Table 12.14)
2.18 The longer-term trends are shown by statistics from
the population censuses, which have collected information
about travel to work since 1966. Excluding those that
worked at home, the percentage of the working population
using cars to travel to work has increased from 21% in 1966
to 68% in 2001 and the percentage using buses has fallen
from 43% in 1966 to 12% in 2001. There has also been a
significant fall in the proportion of the working
population who walk to work, from 24% in 1966 to 12% in
2001.
(
Table 12.15)
2.19
SHS data can be used in more detailed
analysis of travel to work patterns. The
SHS shows that only 9.2% of employed
adults worked from home in 2004, up on the 1999 figure.
Over half of self-employed people worked from home.
(
Table 12.16)
2.20 Overall, the
SHS found that the majority (67%) of
adults who were employed and did not work at home used a
car or van to travel to work in 2004. This percentage
varied with sex (men: 70%, women: 65%), age (30-59 being
highest, at 70-71%), type of employment (only 59% of those
who work part-time), socio-economic classification (ranging
from 57% of those in semi-routine occupations to 81% of
small employers and sole traders) and annual net household
income (rising to 77% of those in the "£30,000+" band). The
other usual means of travel to work were: walking (13%);
bus (13%); rail (3%); bicycle (2%); and other modes (2%).
Use of such modes of transport also varied. For example: in
general, the greater the income of the household, the less
likely a person was to walk or use the bus to travel to
work; the percentage who walked to work was highest in
"remote" small towns (28%) and the percentage who commuted
by bus was highest in large urban areas (19%). The survey's
results suggest that, between 1999 and 2004, there has been
a slight decrease in the percentage walking to work, and an
increase in the percentage commuting by car or van,
consistent with the longer-term trends shown by Census
figures. However, some of the apparent year-to-year changes
could be due to sampling variability. For example, the
percentage commuting by car/van has a "95% confidence
interval" of +/- nearly 1.5% points, so the apparent rise
from 66.5% in 1999 to the peak of 68.6% in 2003, and the
subsequent fall to 67.4% in 2004, could be the result of
sampling variability.
(
Table 12.17)
2.21 The
SHS also collects information about the
usual main method of travel to school. In 2004, 51% of
children in full-time education at school usually walked to
school, 24% usually went by bus, 22% by car or van, 1% went
by train, 1% cycled and about 2% used other means of
transport (such as taxi or ferry). There was little
difference between the sexes, but the usual means of travel
varied greatly with age: 58% of pupils of "primary school"
age (those aged up to 11) usually walked to school compared
with only 42% of those of "secondary school" age (those
aged 12 and over); 27% of "primary" pupils went by car or
van compared with only 15% of "secondary" pupils; and only
12% of "primary" pupils usually travelled by bus compared
with 39% of those of "secondary" age. The percentage who
usually travelled by car or van tended to rise with
household income, to 29% of pupils from households with an
annual net income of £30,000 or more. The percentage who
walked to school was lowest (29-31%) for those living in
rural areas. The survey's results since 1999 suggest a
definite fall in the percentage who walk to school, a
slight fall in the percentage who travel by bus, and a
definite rise in the percentage who go by car. Some of the
apparent year-to-year changes may be due to sampling
variability: for example, the percentage walking to school
has a "95% confidence interval" of about +/- 2% points. The
2002 figure of 56.2% appears to have been unusually high
purely by chance (although the normal "margin of error is
+/- 2% points, sampling variability sometimes produces
results outside the normal expected range) but the overall
trend is definitely downwards, falling from 54.7% in 1999
to 51.1% in 2004. The
NTS shows that the percentage of pupils
aged from 5 to 16 who walk to/from school has decreased,
and the percentage who go by car has risen, between 1985/86
and 2002/2003.
(
Table 12.18 &
12.19)
2.22 According to the International Passenger Survey (
IPS), Scottish residents made an
estimated 3.8 million visits abroad in 2003 with about 3.6
million visits (94%) being made by air. Glasgow was the
main airport used and accounted for about 2.0 million
visits (53% of all visits abroad), followed by Edinburgh
(some 455,000 or 12%) and London Heathrow (367,000 or 10%).
Around 186,000 visits abroad (5%) were made by sea, and
roughly 52,000 (1%) were made using the Channel Tunnel.
(
Table 12.20)
2.23 Around four-fifths of Scottish residents' visits
abroad were made for holiday purposes. Of these, 1.9
million (49%) were on a package holiday whilst 1.1 million
(29%) travelled independently. There were 400,000 (10%)
visits abroad to visit friends or relatives and 310,000
visits abroad for business purposes (8%).
(
Table 12.20)
2.24 Over 69% (2.7 million) of Scottish residents'
visits abroad were made to
EU countries and visits to other
European areas totalled 395,000 (10%). Visits to Canada and
the
USA together totalled about 459,000
(12%).
(
Table 12.21)
2.25 The estimated number of visits abroad by Scottish
residents increased from almost 2.3 million in 1993 to over
3.8 million in 2003, a rise of 70%. There were large
percentage increases for each of the main purposes of
visit, and for each of the main areas visited. One should
not read too much into some of the apparent year-to-year
changes, which may be due to sampling variability.
(
Table 12.22)
2.26 Some information on travel between different parts
of Scotland is available from the Transport Model for
Scotland (
TMfS), which covers the area, broadly,
from the Borders, through Perth and Dundee, stretching
North East to Aberdeen and the surrounding area. The "base
year" of
TMfS is 2002.
2.27 It is estimated that, on an average weekday in
2002, over 5.2 million person-trips were made by car, bus
or train across the boundaries of one or more of the
"zones" which are within the area covered by the
TMfS. (The basis of these estimates is
explained in the "Notes and Definitions" and "Sources"
sections below.) Almost half of these trips were within
Glasgow and Strathclyde (excluding Ayrshire), a fifth were
within Edinburgh and the Lothians, and 8% were within
Aberdeen and the North East. Only 11% of trips were between
different
TMfS "sectors", with the largest such
flows being roughly 45,000 person trips in each direction
between Glasgow/Strathclyde and Ayrshire; around 40,000
person-trips each way between Edinburgh/Lothians and
Glasgow/Strathclyde; about 30,000 person trips each way
between Fife and Edinburgh/Lothians; and another 30,000 or
so person-trips each way between Central and
Glasgow/Strathclyde. The numbers travelling between the
area covered by the
TMfS and elsewhere in Scotland are
estimated to be around 10,000 each way per weekday.
(
Table 12.23)
2.28 Of the 5.2 million "inter-zonal" person trips per
weekday it is estimated that almost 4.3 million were by
car. These accounted for over four-fifths of the total, and
the main features of the pattern of trips by car were
similar to (but smaller than) those described in the
previous paragraph. There were also an estimated 0.9
million "inter-zonal" person-trips by bus or train per
weekday. Slightly over half of these were within
Glasgow/Strathclyde, and about 30% were within
Edinburgh/Lothians. The only flow between different
TMfS sectors which involved as many as
10,000 bus or train passengers each way per weekday was
between Glasgow/Strathclyde and Ayrshire.
(
Table 12.23)
2.29 There was an average of almost 4.3 million trips
per weekday by cars and goods vehicles. Over two-fifths
were within Glasgow/Strathclyde, and a sixth were within
Edinburgh/Lothians: in total, 87% were within
TMfS sectors. The largest flows between
areas were around 40,000 vehicles each way per weekday
between Glasgow/Strathclyde and Edinburgh/Lothians, and
about 35,000 vehicles each way per weekday between
Glasgow/Strathclyde and Ayrshire.
(
Table 12.23)
2.30 The
TMfS also produces estimates of the
number of trips which are made by car, bus or train across
the border with England. These suggest that, on an average
weekday, around 10,000 people travel each way between
Scotland and places in North East England, about 6,000
travel each way between Scotland and places in North West
England, and some 7,000 people travel to and from other
parts of England and Wales.
(
Table 12.24)
2.31 Over 146 million passenger journeys were made under
concessionary fare schemes in 2003-04, 22% more than in
2002-03. The increases between 2001-02, 2002-03 and 2003-04
should be interpreted with caution, because they reflect
the effect of changes to the arrangements for concessionary
fares. A national minimum standard of free off-peak local
bus travel for elderly and disabled people in Scotland was
introduced with effect from 30 September 2002. Because that
was midway through the 2002-03 financial year, the figures
for that year can show only part of the effect of the
introduction of the national minimum standard: the
statistics for the 2003-04 financial year are the first
which could show its full effect. However, the figures for
2003-04 are affected by another change: with effect from 1
April 2003, the national minimum standard of free off-peak
local bus travel for the elderly was extended to men aged
60-64 (who then became eligible to receive the same travel
benefits as women aged 60+ and men aged 65+). Therefore,
the increases between (a) 2001-02 and 2002-03 and (b)
2002-03 and 2003-04 are
both affected by the changes to the arrangements
for concessionary fares, and so do
not represent "normal" year-to-year changes. The
most used mode was bus travel with 141 million passenger
journeys (97% of the total). Figures for the past ten years
are only available for the Strathclyde Concessionary Travel
Scheme. Over that period, the number of concessionary fare
journeys increased by 11% from around 72 million in 1993-94
to around 79 million in 2003-04
(
Table 12.25)
2.32 In 2004 Traveline Scotland received over 603,000
telephone calls which was an increase of 30% over the
previous year. Its Web site recorded almost 1.8 million
hits in 2004, an increase of 81% on the previous year.
(
Table 12.26)
3.
Notes and Definitions
Travel by Scottish residents within Great Britain -
statistics from the National Travel Survey (
NTS)
3.1 The averages given in the tables are averages per
head of population, and they will vary greatly from person
to person: for example, there will be many people who do
not travel on business at all, and others who travel
thousands of miles on business.
3.2 A
trip is defined as a one-way course of travel
having a single main purpose. Outward and return halves of
a return trip are treated as two separate trips. If a
single course of travel involves a mid-way change of
purpose then it is split into two trips (but trivial
subsidiary purposes, such as a stop en route to buy a
newspaper, are disregarded).
3.3
Mainmode of transport: the mode that was used for the
longest stage of the trip, where a trip involves more than
one mode of transport (
e.g. a bus and then a train). In the text,
references to car trips include a few by van and lorry.
3.4
Length of a trip: the distance actually covered by
the traveller, as reported by the traveller and not the
distance "as the crow flies".
3.5
Other personal business: includes -
e.g. - trips to the bank, doctor, hairdresser,
library and church.
3.6
Sampling variability: Because the
NTS's Scottish sample is small (
see section 4.1), its results may be
affected by large percentage sampling errors. Chapter 8 of
the
"
NTS Technical Report 2000" provides
information about the possible scale of the sampling errors
for the survey's estimates for the three-year period
1998/2000. Tables on page 85 show the estimated "per person
per year" averages, and their associated "95% confidence
ranges", for different parts of Great Britain. The figures
given for Scotland for 1998/2000 were:
- average trips per person per year - 1,058, with a
95% confidence range of +/- 56 trips (
i.e. +/- 5%);
- average distance travelled per person per year -
7,210, with a 95% confidence range of +/- 583 miles (
i.e. +/- 8%).
Estimates based on smaller samples tend to be subject to
larger sampling errors, all else being equal. The estimated
numbers of trips made and distances travelled for some
modes of transport could be subject to proportionately much
greater sampling variability (because those modes were used
by only a few people in the sample). Therefore, some of the
apparent changes in some modes' figures in Table 12.2 may
be due to sampling variability: for example, the apparent
fluctuations in the "surface rail" figures (285 miles in
1985/86, 468 miles in 1989/91, 154 miles in 1992/94, 256
miles in 1995/97, 479 miles in 1998/2000 and 313 miles in
2002/03) are inconsistent with the changes in the overall
figures for rail passenger numbers for the same period. It
is likely that the fluctuations in the
NTS results reflect the inclusion (by
random chance) in the sample of more rail users, or greater
rail users, in some years than in other years. Similarly,
some of the
NTS results in other tables may be
affected noticeably by sampling variability.
Frequency of driving, walking and cycling; and
usual main methods of travel to school and travel to
work - statistics from the Scottish Household Survey (
SHS)
3.7 These notes do not cover the statistics on travel to
work in
Tables 12.13 to 12.15, which
are from the Labour Force Survey and the Census of
Population.
3.8
Annual net household income: this is the
net income (
i.e. after taxation and other deductions)
which is brought into the household by the highest income
householder and/or his/her spouse or partner, if there is
one. It includes any contributions to the household
finances made by other members of the household (eg "dig
money"). In the case of households for which any of the
main components of income were not known (for example,
because of refusal to answer a question), the
SHS contractors imputed the missing
amounts, using information that was obtained from other
households that appeared similar.
3.9
SHS urban / rural classification:
the urban / rural classification shown in some tables was
developed for use in analysing the results of the
SHS. It is based on settlement size, and
(for the less-populated areas) the estimated time that
would be taken to drive to a settlement with a population
of 10,000 or more. Each postcode in Scotland was classed as
either "urban" or "non-urban", then clumps of adjacent
"urban" postcodes, which together contained more than a
certain total number of addresses, were grouped together to
form "settlements". Six categories were then defined:
Large urban areas - settlements with populations
of 125,000 or more. These are around - but not the same as
- Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh and Glasgow. This category
may (a) include areas outwith the boundaries of these four
cities, in cases where a settlement extends into a
neighbouring local authority, and (b) exclude some
"non-urban" areas within the boundaries of these four
cities.
Other urban areas - other settlements of
population 10,000 or more.
"Accessible" small towns - settlements of between
3,000 and 9,999 people, which are within 30 minutes drive
of a settlement of 10,000+ people.
"Remote" small towns - settlements of between
3,000 and 9,999 people, which are
not within 30 minutes drive of a settlement of
10,000+ people.
"Accessible" rural areas - settlements of less
than 3,000 people, which are within 30 minutes drive of a
settlement of 10,000+ people.
"Remote" rural areas - settlements of less than
3,000 people, which are
not within 30 minutes drive of a settlement of
10,000+ people.
3.10
Full driving licence and
frequency of driving: the
SHS asks whether the person currently
holds "a full driving licence (car or motorcycle)". For
those who are said to hold a licence, the
SHS asks how often the person drives
nowadays. The interviewer records whichever of the
categories shown in the table is the most appropriate, in
the light of the answer. Prior to April 2003, these
questions were asked of the head of the household, or his
or her spouse/partner, about each adult member of the
household. Since April 2003, these questions have been
asked of a randomly-selected adult member of the household
about themselves. Hence, results for previous years may not
be entirely comparable with results for 2003 onwards.
3.11
Frequency of walking: the
SHS asks on how many of the last seven
days the person made a trip of more than quarter of a mile
by foot. The interviewer asks about walking for the purpose
of going somewhere, such as work, shopping or to visit
friends. The interviewer then asks about walking just for
the pleasure of walking or to keep fit or to walk the
dog.
3.12
Frequency of cycling: the
SHS asks on how many of the last seven
days the person made a trip of more than quarter of a mile
by bicycle. The interviewer asks about cycling for the
purpose of going somewhere, such as work, shopping or to
visit friends. The interviewer then asks about cycling just
for the pleasure or to keep fit.
3.13
Socio-economic classification: the social class
categories used in the
SHS match those used in all official
statistics and surveys. The National Statistics
Socio-economic Classification (
NS-
SEC) has been designed to group
together, as far as possible, people with similar levels of
occupational skills. The version of the classification used
for this analysis has eight categories, although the final
one is not used in the "travel to work" table, as it refers
only to those who have never worked or are long-term
unemployed. The seven classes used are:
- Higher managerial and professional occupations -
persons who employ others in enterprises of 25 or
more persons, and who delegate some part of their
managerial and entrepreneurial functions onto salaried
staff (L1); positions in which there is a 'service
relationship' with the employer, and involving general
planning and supervision of operations on behalf of the
employer (L2); and positions, whether occupied by
employers, the self-employed, or employees, covering
all types of higher professional work (L3);
- Lower managerial and professional occupations -
positions, whether occupied by employers, the
self-employed, or employees, covering lower
professional and higher technical occupations (L4);
positions in which there is an attenuated form of the
'service relationship' and where those employed in
these positions generally plan and supervise operations
on behalf of the employer under the direction of senior
managers (L5); positions (other than managerial) having
an attenuated form of 'service relationship' which
cover intermediate occupations included in L7. These
positions involve formal and immediate supervision of
others engaged in such occupations (L6);
- Intermediate occupations -
positions not involving general planning or
supervisory powers, in clerical, sales, service and
intermediate technical occupations. Positions in this
group are 'mixed' in terms of employment regulations,
i.e. are intermediate with respect to the
service relationship and the labour contract
(L7);
- Small employers and own account workers -
persons (other than higher or lower professionals)
who employ others (and thus assume some degree of
control over them) and carry out all or most of the
entrepreneurial and managerial functions of the
enterprise, but employ fewer than 25 employees (L8);
self-employed positions in which the persons involved
are engaged in any (non-professional) trade, personal
service, semi-routine, routine or other occupation, but
have no employees other than family workers
(L9);
- Lower supervisory and technical occupations -
positions having a modified form of 'labour
contract', which cover occupations included in groups
L11, L12 and L13, and involve formal and immediate
supervision of others engaged in such occupations
(L10); positions in which employees are engaged in
lower technical and related occupations and thereby
have a modified form of the 'labour contract'
(L11);
- Semi-routine occupations -
positions in which employees are engaged in
semi-routine occupations which have a slightly modified
labour contract (L12);
- Routine occupations -
positions where employees are engaged in routine
occupations which have a basic labour contract
(L13).
Scottish residents' visits abroad - statistics from
the International Passenger Survey
3.14 The International Passenger Survey is designed to
be representative of all people travelling in and out of
the
UK in terms of: the usage of air, sea
and tunnel;
UK residents going abroad and foreign
residents coming to the
UK; different types of traveller (eg
holiday, business, etc); and travel to and from different
parts of the world. However it is not designed to produce
results which are representative for different regions of
residence within the
UK. While the survey's procedures should
not lead to any major bias in the estimates for Scottish
residents, the "luck of the draw" inherent in the sampling
process may result in their being over-represented in the
survey in some years, and under-represented in other
years.
3.15
Visits abroad: The figures include all tourists
who make trips which last no more than a year, those
travelling to Eire have been included in the
IPS since 1999.
3.16
Miscellaneous and other purposes: includes visits
for study, to attend sporting events, for shopping, health,
religious or other purposes, and multi-purpose visits for
which no one purpose predominates.
3.17
Area visited: in cases where two or more countries
are visited, a person is counted on the basis of the one
country in which he or she stayed for the longest time.
"Inter-zonal" trips made on an average weekday -
estimates from the Transport Model for Scotland (
TMfS)
3.18 These are the estimated annual average numbers of
trips made per weekday between or within the areas shown,
using the specified modes of transport (for example, they
do
not include trips made by foot, by bicycle, or by
motorcycle). The figures represent the estimated total
flows over the whole 24 hours of an average weekday. A
return journey, from A to B and back again, on the same
day, would be counted as two trips: one from A to B and one
from B to A.
3.19 The figures are estimates of the numbers of
"inter-zonal" trips -
i.e. trips which cross the boundary of at
least one of the zones used in the Transport Model for
Scotland (
TMfS). The zones used in the model are
constructed by amalgamating Population Census output areas.
The model's zones vary in size from area to area, depending
on factors such as the size and density of the population
and the nature of the transport network that the model must
represent. As a result, there is no simple definition of a
zone. Some Council areas have many zones (
e.g. there are 180 in Edinburgh, and 239 in
Glasgow); others have only a few (
e.g. there are 10 in East Lothian and 11
Midlothian and 21 in West Lothian). It follows that a trip
of a particular length will be more likely to be counted as
an "inter-zonal" trip if it is in (say) Edinburgh than if
it is in (say) East Lothian.
3.20
'Person trips' relate to the number of people
travelling by the specified modes of transport, and
'vehicle trips' to the numbers of vehicles going
between the specified areas. Thus, for example, if a car
containing two people goes from A to B, it is counted as
two person trips and one vehicle trip.
3.21 The areas identified in the table are "sectors"
within the
TMfS. These correspond broadly (but not
necessarily exactly) to the areas of the similarly-named
former Regions and/or current Councils. Some of these
sectors do not contain many
TMfS zones - for example, the "Borders"
sector contains 11 zones, and the "Perth & Kinross"
sector contains 23 zones. All else being equal, the larger
the zones are within a sector, the smaller the proportion
of the trips within the sector that will be treated as
"inter-zonal" trips - and, hence, the smaller the
proportion that will be represented within the model.
3.22 "Elsewhere in Scotland" refers to those parts of
Scotland which are outwith the
TMfS model area: broadly, Arran, Argyll
& Bute, Highland, Moray, Orkney, Shetland and the
Western Isles. The model does not hold information
regarding trips which are wholly outwith its model area,
such as a trip between Inverness and Dingwall, which would
be wholly within the "elsewhere in Scotland" area.
3.23 The estimated average number of trips originating
in an area usually differs from the estimated number with a
destination in that area - for example, compare the
estimates of 1,132,000 person trips with a destination in
Edinburgh & Lothians and 1,140,000 trips originating in
Edinburgh & Lothians. This is because the estimation
process (which is described in
section 4) is mainly based upon survey
data covering the 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. period, and cannot take
full account of trips which involve returning later in the
evening. Therefore, the
TMfS-based estimates indicate broadly
the levels of flows within Scotland, but do not provide
precise measures.
3.24 The model's estimates of the number of cross-border
trips by bus and train may not be particularly reliable,
because of the way that they are produced - see section
4.
4.
Sources4.1
Travel (within
GB) by Scottish residents (
Tables 12.1 to 12.9, and
12.19)4.1.1 Information about travel (within Great Britain) by
Scottish residents is obtained from the National Travel
Survey (
NTS). This collects "travel diary"
details from a sample of households across Great Britain.
Travel for all private purposes is included. Trips in the
course of work are included if they fulfil the requirement
that the main reason for the journey is for the traveller
to reach the destination. However, travel in the course of
work to convey passengers or to deliver goods is excluded,
such as travel in the course of their work by bus drivers,
lorry drivers and postmen. Trips off the public highway,
such as country walks, are excluded.
4.1.2 Prior to 2002, the
NTS was not designed to provide reliable
estimates for Scotland for single years: the sample
included only a few hundred Scottish households each year.
Therefore, the samples for a number of years had to be
combined in order to produce Scottish results, and even
they could be subject to considerable sampling variability.
In 2002, the
NTS's sample size was increased greatly,
enabling the production of results for individual calendar
years with effect from 2002. However, the sample size was
less in 2002 than in the previous three years taken
together, and therefore the results for 2002 alone could be
subject to greater sampling variability than those for
1999/2001 taken together. The tables therefore give results
for the two-year period 2002/2003, as they should be more
reliable, being based on a larger sample.
Section 3.6 provides some information
about sampling variability.
4.2
Frequencies of driving, walking and cycling; and usual
main methods of travel to school and travel to work (
Tables 12.10 to 12.12 and
12.16 to 12.18)4.2.1 Information on these and some other
transport-related topics is collected by the Scottish
Household Survey, which started in February 1999. The
SHS collects information on a wide range
of topics, to allow exploration of the relationships
between different sets of variables. Interviewing takes
place throughout the year.
4.2.2 The
SHS is a survey of private households.
For the purposes of the survey, a household is defined as
one person or a group of people living in accommodation as
their only or main residence and
either sharing at least one meal a day
or sharing the living accommodation. A student's
term-time address is taken as his/her "main residence", in
order that he/she is counted where he/she lives for most of
the year. The sample was drawn from the Small User file of
the Postcode Address File (
PAF) which does not include (eg) many
nurses' homes, student halls of residence, hostels for the
homeless, other communal establishments, mobile homes, and
sites for travelling people. Therefore, the
SHS cannot produce figures completely
representative of people living in Scotland: its target
population includes only a proportion of the student
population, for example. People living in bed and breakfast
accommodation may be included,
if it is listed in the Small User file of the
PAF and if it is their sole or main
residence. Prisons, hospitals and military bases are
excluded.
4.2.3 Each year,
SHS interviews are conducted with a
randomly-chosen sample of (on average) over 15,000
households across Scotland. Within each Council area, the
sample is stratified using a geo-demographic indicator in
order that it will be representative across that Council's
area. A higher sampling fraction is used in the areas of
the Councils with the smallest populations, in order that
(in each two-year period) there is a minimum of 550
household interviews per Council. The results are then
reweighted so that they will be representative of Scotland
as a whole.
4.2.4 The
SHS interview is conducted in two parts.
The first part is with the highest income householder, or
his/her spouse/partner (if any), who answers questions
about the household and its members. This part of the
interview provides the information about the ages and sexes
of household members, and about the annual net household
income. Prior to April 2003, it included questions about
the type of driving licence (if any) held by each adult
member of the household, and about the frequency of driving
of those who hold a full driving licence. It also provides
the information about the usual main method of travel to
school for one randomly-chosen schoolchild member of the
household (if there is one). Because the information is
collected for at most one schoolchild per household, in the
analysis proportionately greater weight is given to cases
where there are greater numbers of schoolchildren in the
household.
4.2.5 The second part of the
SHS aims to obtain results which are
representative of Scottish adults by interviewing a
randomly-chosen adult (aged 16+) member of the household
(who may happen to be the person who answered the questions
in the first part of the interview - for example, this is
always the case for single pensioner households). The
second part of the survey has fewer respondents because
some of the randomly-chosen adults cannot be interviewed,
perhaps because they choose not to take part in the survey
or perhaps because the interviewer cannot contact them.
This part of the interview provides the information about
the type of driving licence (if any) held by the randomly
selected adult (since April 2003), about the frequency of
driving of those who hold a full driving licence (since
April 2003), about the frequency of walking and the
frequency of cycling and, in cases where the person is
employed, about the place of work and the usual means of
travel to work. Questions are also asked about journeys
made on the previous day (the "Travel Diary"). These
include the start and end times of each stage of the
journey, the mode of transport used, the purpose of the
journey, and experiences of congestion. Because at most one
adult is interviewed per household, in the analysis
proportionately greater weight is given to cases where
there are greater numbers of adults in the household. For
the "Travel Diary" questions, further weighting is given
according to the day of the week and the economic status of
the adult.
4.2.6 Although the
SHS's sample is chosen at random, the
people who take part in the survey will not necessarily be
a representative cross-section of the people of Scotland.
For example, purely by chance, the sample could include
disproportionate numbers of certain types of people, in
which case the survey's results would be affected. In
general, the smaller the sample from which an estimate is
produced, the greater the likelihood that the estimate
could be misleading. As an example,
Table 12.17 shows that the
percentages of people aged 16-19 who usually travelled to
work in various ways were calculated from data for only 121
commuters of that age in the
SHS in 2004. It was estimated that 2% of
them travelled to work by train - but if, purely by chance,
the sample had contained just two more 16-19 year olds who
travelled to work by train, the estimate would have been 4%
rather than 2%. Results produced from a small sample could
therefore be greatly affected by sampling variability. The
larger the sample, the less likely it is that the results
will be affected greatly by sampling variability. The
Transport Statistics publications of
SHS results and the
SHS Annual Reports (
see sections 5.3 and
5.4) provide examples of the "95%
confidence limits" for estimates of a range of percentages
calculated from sub-samples of a range of sizes.
4.2.7 The above information relates only to sampling
variability. The survey's results could also be affected by
non-contact / non-response bias: the characteristics of the
(roughly) one-third of households who should have been in
the survey but who could not be contacted, or who refused
to take part, could differ markedly from those of the
people who were interviewed. If that is the case, the
SHS's results will not be representative
of the whole population. Without knowing the true values
(for the population as a whole) of some quantities, one
cannot be sure about the extent of any such biases in the
SHS. However, comparison of
SHS results with information from other
sources suggests that they are broadly representative of
the overall Scottish population, and therefore that any
non-contact or non-response biases are not large overall.
Of course, such biases could be more significant for
certain sub-groups of the population. In addition, because
it is a survey of private households, the
SHS does not cover some sections of the
population - for example, it does not collect information
about many students in halls of residence. The
SHS technical reports (
see section 5.4) provide more information
on these matters.
4.3
Travel to work (
Tables 12.13 to 12.17)
4.3.1 The information about the usual means of travel to
work and the time taken to travel to the usual place of
work shown in
tables 12.13 and
12.14 is obtained from the
Labour Force Survey using questions which have been
included in those survey interviews which have been
conducted in the Autumn each year since 1992. The tables
include the self-employed, those on Government training
schemes and unpaid family workers as well as employees, but
exclude those working at home, and those whose workplace or
mode of transport to work was not known. The
LFS is a household survey covering
60,000 households each quarter in
GB, and about 6,000 households per
quarter in Scotland.
4.3.2
Table 12.15 provides some
Census of Population information about travel to work.
There have been some changes in the categories used - for
example, the 1966 Census had a category described as "none"
which was included in the 1971 Census under its "On foot
and none" category; the 1971 Census had a category
described as "Public Transport" which was separate from the
categories for "Train" and "Bus"; and the 1966 and 1971
Census "travel to work" figures did not identify separately
those who were working at home, so they are included in the
figures for those years. However, the effect of such
differences on the statistics will be small compared to the
scale of the changes in the shares of the main modes of
travel.
4.3.3 Information about travel to work is also collected
by the
SHS (
see section 4.2 above), which is the
source for
tables 12.16 and
12.17.
4.4
Scottish residents' visits abroad (
Tables 12.20 to 12.22)
4.4.1 This information is collected by the International
Passenger Survey (
IPS), from a sample of passengers
returning to the
UK by the principal air, sea and tunnel
routes (excluding some routes which are too small in volume
or which are too expensive to be covered). Travellers
passing through passport control during the day are
randomly selected for interview (interviewing is suspended
at night). A weighting procedure takes account of the
non-sampled routes and time periods. For example, the
figures for certain airports are "uplifted" to take account
of the passenger numbers at the other
UK airports which are not covered by the
survey. Edinburgh and Glasgow are the only Scottish
airports at which interviewing takes place, so it is not
possible to produce estimates for other Scottish airports
but the figures for both Edinburgh and Glasgow are uplifted
to take account of the non sampled airports.
4.4.2 The figures in the tables are based on interviews
with Scottish residents who returned to the
UK. This is the Office for National
Statistics' standard practice for producing such estimates,
as it can then also analyse other information that is
collected in the interviews (such as the amount that people
say that they spent while on holiday).
4.4.3 The survey covers both adults and children, and is
voluntary - for example, the response rate was 80% in 2003,
and the results reported in these tables for that year are
based upon interviews with about 2,000 Scottish
residents.
4.4.4 The
IPS data used in the tables are adjusted
to take account of the fact that not all people respond to
questions regarding area of residence. This means that
tables produced by area of residence will not always
exactly match other published data regarding trips abroad
by
UK residents.
4.5
Trips made on an average weekday (
Table 12.23 and
12.24)
4.5.1 These figures were provided using the Transport
Model for Scotland (
TMfS). This covers the areas from the
Borders, through Perth and Dundee, stretching North East to
Aberdeen and the surrounding area, in which lives roughly
95% of the population of Scotland.
4.5.2 The area covered by the model is divided into
1,133 zones. The model uses planning data for each zone (
e.g. population, number of households, car
ownership, employment, number of employed residents) to
calculate the number of trips that would be expected to be
generated. It also uses information collected by traffic
counts, roadside interviews and surveys of passengers on
public transport. Some of the information was collected
specifically for the model (the programme of surveys to
collect data for
TMfS started in 2002, which is its base
year).
TMfS also uses information from other
sources, such as 'donor' models (such as the Strathclyde
Integrated Transport Model), the 2001 Census of Population
and the Scottish Household Survey (which has been conducted
continuously since February 1999). Data collected in other
years were "factored" to represent the base year. The
quality and coverage of the data that are held within the
TMfS vary between different areas and
different parts of the transport network. This is the
result of the historical interest in the movement of people
and goods between various points on the transport network,
and the resultant availability of data. However, the base
information used for the
TMfS is more robust and comprehensive
than that used for the former Central Scotland Transport
Model.
4.5.3 The pattern of travel movements is held in a
series of trip matrices covering the morning peak period,
the evening peak period and the intervening off-peak
period. Taken together, these matrices can be combined to
provide a matrix reflecting trip movements during the
period 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on a typical weekday. Daily,
monthly and annual averages can then be derived by
grossing-up these figures using time series data sources.
The resulting expected flows around the transport network
are then "calibrated" and "validated" for each modelled
time period using information about the actual numbers of
trips that were made on particular routes.
4.5.4 Applying the calibration and validation process to
the "expected numbers of generated trips" calculated by the
model produces estimates of the numbers of trips which are
consistent with the observed traffic counts and the results
of surveys and interviews. The estimated numbers of trips
for the areas shown in the table were then produced by
aggregating the estimated numbers of trips for the relevant
zones.
4.5.5 The model's estimates of the numbers of people
travelling by bus and train across the border with England
are less reliable because it uses its standard set of
"public transport" factors to "gross up" the cross-border
passenger numbers obtained (
e.g.) from surveys and passenger counts which
were carried out at certain times on certain days. Because
local bus services account for the vast majority of public
transport in Scotland, the model's standard public
transport "grossing-up" factors mainly reflect the pattern
of local bus passenger usage - so applying these factors to
the data for cross-border bus and train traffic may not
take pro5)per account of the different patterns of such
traffic.
4.6
Passenger journeys made under concessionary fare
schemes (
Table 12.25)
4.6.1 The figures for the Strathclyde Concessionary
Travel scheme were supplied by Strathclyde Passenger
Transport (
SPT); the figures for the other schemes
were collected from local authorities using the Local
Financial Returns form
LFR5.
4.6.2 Local authorities were asked to provide numbers of
passenger journeys on the same basis as the expenditure on
concessionary fares that they report in the
LFR5. This relates to concessionary
fares for elderly people, for people with visual or other
disabilities, and for children (but excluding any element
of school transport costs). In cases where authorities
participate in a joint scheme (other than the Strathclyde
one) for some modes of transport, they were asked to
provide the estimated numbers of journeys for those modes
which correspond to their shares of the joint scheme's
total numbers of journeys for those modes. It is
appreciated that such estimates may not be precise.
4.6.3
SPT was able to provide passenger
numbers from its records for the Strathclyde Concessionary
Travel scheme for several years; figures for the passenger
numbers for other schemes are only available for 2000-01
onwards because that was the first year for which that
information was requested from local authorities using the
LFR forms.
5.
Further Information
5.1 The Scottish Executive statistical bulletin
"Travel by Scottish residents: some National Travel
Survey results for 2002/2003 and earlier years"
provides a range of National Travel Survey statistics for
Scotland, and some information about the survey. More
details of this publication are given under "Scottish
Executive Transport Statistics publications". The National
Travel Survey is also described in the Department for
Transport publications "
Focus on Personal Travel" and
"National Travel Survey" bulletins, and in the "
National Travel Survey Technical Report".
5.2 Enquiries regarding National Travel Survey
statistics should be directed to Christopher Mottau of the
Department for Transport (tel: 020 7944 3097), whilst those
relating to the Labour Force Survey should be directed to
Catherine O'Shea subnational.stats@dft.gsi.gov.uk (tel. 020
7944 4926).
5.3 There are a number of
publications on the Scottish Household Survey. The main
transport-related results are given in three series of
bulletins:
- "Household Transport…: some
SHS results";
- "
SHS Travel Diary results…";
and
- "Transport across Scotland: some
SHS results for parts of
Scotland".
More details of these publications appear under
"Scottish Executive Transport Statistics Publications".
5.4 There are also a number of
SHS publications. The main one is
"Scotland's People", a detailed Annual Report,
which provides many tables of results on a wide range of
the topics covered by the survey. These are accompanied by
"technical" reports which contain information about the
survey's procedures (such as the sample design and the
method of reweighting) and an edited version of the
questionnaire. In addition, between 1999 and 2002, a series
of
SHS bulletins, provided a selection of
SHS results, including some on
transport-related topics, together with a brief description
of the survey. All the
SHS publications are available from the
Stationery Office bookshop.
5.5 Enquiries regarding the Scottish Household Survey
should be directed to the
SHS Project Manager: Emma McCallum of
the Scottish Executive Central Research Unit (tel: 0131 244
8420).
5.6 The annual report on the International Passenger
Survey is called "
Travel Trends", and is published by the Stationery
Office. Enquiries regarding the International Passenger
Survey should be directed to Josh Lovegrove of the Office
for National Statistics (tel: 020 7533 5765).
5.7 Further information or guidance on the detailed
application of the Transport Model for Scotland can be
obtained from Diarmid Lindsay, the Scottish Executive
Transport Division 1 (tel: 0131 244 7260) or Kevin Lumsden,
MVA (tel: 0131 220 6966).
5.8 Further information about the numbers of passenger
journeys made under concessionary fare schemes can be
obtained from John Valentine of the Scottish Executive
Local Government Finance Statistics branch (tel: 0131 244
7033) and, in the case of the Strathclyde Concessionary
Travel Scheme, from Anne Gibson, Strathclyde Passenger
Transport (tel: 0141 333 3253).
5.9 Further information about the number of telephone
calls and Web site hits for Traveline Scotland can be
obtained from David Keenan, the Scottish Executive
Transport Division 2 (tel: 0131 244 7960).


« Previous | Contents | Next »