« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
2 Introduction
The estimates for the number of lightweight plastic
carrier bags issued in the
UK vary from 8 billion [Defra 2003] to
10 billion [
WRAP 2005]. From these, a range of
690-860 million has been estimated for use in Scotland
based on population statistics. The calculations and
assumptions behind this range are given in Section 4.3. The
estimated cost of these bags to
UK retailers also varies. Some sources
suggest the cost to
UK retailers is around £1 billion per
year [
BBC,
WRAP 2004b], whereas the Carrier Bag
Consortium (
CBC) suggests that, based on the unit
price of bags, the cost is closer to £64-80 million.
2.1 The Different Types of Carrier
Bags
Most outlets currently provide free lightweight bags
3 made from conventional polyethene (polyethylene)
plastic or bags made from degradable plastic (some outlets
do make a charge
4). Most major supermarket retailers also offer
heavyweight reusable bags known as 'bags for life', for
which they charge a small sum. Some shops also provide
paper bags free of charge. The main types of carrier bags
are described below; Table 2.1 summarises their key
features.
Disposable High-Density Polyethene (
HDPE) Bags
These plastic bags offer a thin, lightweight, high
strength, waterproof and reliable means of transporting
shopping. Research and development by the industry has
reduced the average weight of such a bag by 60% compared
with 20 years ago, while retaining the same strength and
durability. Such bags are currently found in supermarkets
and other food retail outlets.
Disposable Low-Density Polyethene (
LDPE) Bags
These bags are currently given away free by many
UK retailers (
e.g. clothing shops). Like their
HDPE counterparts, they are made from a
by-product of oil refining.
Reusable Low-Density Polyethene (
LDPE) Bags,
These are heavier gauge plastic carrier bags, often
called 'bags for life'. Retailers charge for these
(typically around 10p). The intention is that the customer
uses them repeatedly and then returns them to the store for
recycling when they are worn out, receiving a free
replacement. Such bags are offered in many
UK supermarkets.
Paper Bags
The paper bags issued by shops range from very simple
ones for small items (
e.g. from newsagents and greengrocers) to
larger ones (
e.g. issued by fashion and shoe retailers).
Some paper bags have plastic handles or plastic coatings.
Under the terms of the Irish definition of plastic carrier
bags (
i.e. a bag with a plastic content), it is
assumed that paper bags with a plastic content would be
subject to the levy.
It is a misconception that paper bags are
environmentally friendly because they are biodegradable.
The increased volume of waste and the impact of their
manufacture and transportation all need to be taken into
account.
Polypropylene Bags
Polypropylene
5 has many uses for producing rigid and flexible
containers, as well as furniture, and is also derived from
oil resources. Non-woven polypropylene bags are available
at shops such as Marks and Spencers in the
UK, where they retail at more than £1.
They are strong and durable and, like 'bags for life', are
intended to be used many times.
Woven polypropylene bags are available at J Sainsbury in
the
UK as well as in the Republic of Ireland
at Tesco and Dunnes stores. Woven bags are produced by
stretching the polypropylene in production to form
"fibres", the result is a stronger bag.
Degradable Bags
Bags that can be broken down by chemical or
biological processes are described as degradable.
Intuitively, degradable bags are expected to be
environmentally friendly and a number of retailers are
actively pursuing this option. Thus, there is often some
surprise when reports suggest that degradable bags are not
such an 'environmentally friendly' option. Waste management
protocols emphasise the need to prevent, reduce, reuse,
recycle and then recover energy. Encouraging disposal via
degradation runs counter to this approach.
It can also be difficult to agree whether a particular
type of bag is degradable or not. This could become
significant if biodegradable bags were to be exempt from
the levy.
Types of degradable bags
There are two main kinds of degradable bags
6.
- Biodegradable bags are made from
natural starch sources such as maize and synthetic
polyesters that degrade through the enzymatic action of
micro-organisms (bacteria, fungi and algae),
essentially rotting down like vegetable matter.
However, starch-based biodegradable carrier bags are
not available in significant numbers in the
UK. They would only be covered by a
potential levy on plastic carrier bags if they
contained some plastic (some do for bag-strengthening
reasons).
- Bioerodable bags are made from
synthetic plastics (oil-based) with trace degradation
initiators (
HDPE with an approximately 3%
content of heavy metals such as manganese and iron
7) and, as such, would be covered by a plastic bags
levy. They bioerode primarily by oxidation and erosion
of the plastic through the action of light and heat
until very small particles of plastic remain (these
often degrade biologically). It is reported that, in an
anaerobic environment, the degradation process is
halted for some types of bioerodable bags [
RMIT, Symphony Plastic
Technologies].
Concerns Regarding Bioerodable Bags
- Recycling. Conventional polyethene
plastic bags (
HDPE and
LDPE) can be recycled into new
products such as other bags and solid items such as
'plastic' wood (known as plaswood). It will be
difficult to keep the different kinds of bag apart (
HDPE and
LDPE bags for recycling and
bioerodable bags for composting), especially if both
are available in the same community. Inevitably,
bioerodable bags will get into this plastic bag waste
stream and thus contaminate the recyclate. If the
resulting recycled item contains a certain percentage
derived from bioerodable bags, it will have inherently
lower functional properties (
i.e. it will start to degrade when in
contact with water, ultraviolet light,
etc.). This could have serious
implications if the recycled plastic is used for pipes
for water, gas supply or as fencing posts or seats [
RMIT]. Some types of bioerodable
bags
8 are reported not to damage the overall value of
the reclaimed material as the degradant initiator is
destroyed during reprocessing.
- Shelf-life and storage. Bioerodable
bags may start to decompose early if exposed to high
temperatures, light or moisture. This compromises their
carrying ability, though vacuum packaging is reported
to prevent this [Symphony Plastic Technologies].
- A solution to littering problems. This
claim is felt to send the wrong message to the
consumer,
i.e. it is acceptable to discard these
bags because they will eventually rot down. The
argument is that consumers should be informed of the
need to reuse bags to reduce litter and resource
consumption [
RMIT]. In addition, the Marine
Conservation Society (
MCS) reports that any littered
bioerodable bags based on
HDPE will still cause problems to
wildlife as they will break down into smaller pieces
that can be ingested [
MCS 2005]. This is questioned by
Symphony Plastic Technologies, which suggests that
degradation to carbon dioxide, water and humus is
likely and that, should an animal ingest these smaller
pieces, the degradation process will actually continue
in its gut.
- Provision of appropriate conditions for planned
benign degradation. Bioerodable bags are
designed to decompose through the action of sunlight,
water, stress and, ultimately, the enzymatic action of
microbes in an aerobic environment. Where degradable
bags are simply disposed of alongside other 'household
waste' and then landfilled (like most household waste
in Scotland [
SEPA]), then the necessary
conditions to allow degradation may well be absent and
thus the environmental 'benefits' lost.
Certification and Labelling
Manufacturers of degradable polymers have signed a
voluntary agreement with the European Commission to use
environmentally friendly polymers in packaging that
"will effectively guarantee a biodegradability standard
for products such as plastic bags, cups and plant pots,
enabling them to be turned into compost and soil
improvers." The agreement includes a certification and
labelling scheme to help consumers and manufacturers
identify products made from degradable polymers [
EU Commission].
Key Features of Carrier Bags
Table 2.1 summarises some of the key features of the
various types of carrier bags available, including their
costs and relative sizes compared with conventional
lightweight plastic carrier bags.
Table 2.1 Key features of carrier bags
Bag type | Features | Average cost to the retailer per
thousand bags
* | Average weight per thousand bags
(kg)
* | Relative bag storage volume
** | Recyclability |
|---|
Lightweight plastic carrier | Light, strong, durable, effective when
wet | £7.47 | 8.4 | 1 | Yes - but not all stores have facilities |
'Bag for life' | Light, strong, durable, effective when
wet | £60.88 | 47.4 | 4 | Yes - system of replacement actively
encouraged |
Fully degradable plastic bag | Light, strong, durable, effective when
wet | £6 to £8 | 6.5 | 1 | Degradable under the right conditions.
Problematic if contaminate conventional plastic
recycling. |
Paper, without handles § | Convenient | £50 | 51 | 8 | Yes - kerbside collections available |
Paper, with handles § | More appealing to customers
e.g. for shoes and clothes | £220 | 124 | 10 | Yes - kerbside collections available but can
be more problematic due to mixed materials |
Non-woven polypropylene | Durable, strong, effective when wet | £333.33 | 138.7 | 20 | Not at present |
Woven polypropylene | Durable, strong, effective when wet | £433.33 | 226 | 20 | Not at present |
* Data provided by
CBC and Symphony Plastic Technologies
plc. Based on average price of an average bag.
**The relative volume of bags (to a conventional
lightweight bag) is important for transportation and
storage units required compared with plastic carrier bags.
§ The average weight of all paper bags available is
99g (arithmetic mean of 51, 81 and 166g). The values of 51g
and 99g are used in the
LCA in Section 4 for various analysis
sensitivities.
2.2 Summary of the Irish Experience
A key motivator for the introduction of a levy on
plastic bags in Scotland is the experience from the
Republic of Ireland, where a levy known as the PlasTax was
introduced in 2002. We consulted the Department of
Environment, Heritage and Local Government in the Republic
of Ireland for its views on the introduction and operation
of the PlasTax. The Department said:
- The PlasTax was primarily an anti-litter measure
with the secondary aims of increasing public awareness
and changing behaviour. Introduction of the levy
coincided with introduction of Ireland's Waste
Strategy.
- No documented evidence is available showing a
reduction in visible litter in the Republic of Ireland
because of the levy. The Department has commented that
"littering of plastic carrier bags is no longer a
problem".
- Approximately €1 million are raised each month from
the levy.
- The decrease in bag usage was initially 90% and is
now 95%.
- The main cost to retailers was updating their
software so that till receipts would itemise the sale
of plastic carrier bags.
- Theft was reported to increase at the outset but,
when the Department investigated these claims, they
were unable to substantiate them.
- Some increased control measures were introduced to
stop trolleys being taken away from stores.
- Although use of paper bags has increased, it is not
felt that their exclusion from PlasTax has been to the
detriment of the scheme. Paper bags are reported as
being used mainly by fashion and shoe shops. The
grocery sector has switched largely to reusable
bags.
- The advertising campaign, which was high profile
and intensive, was considered a successful element in
smoothing introduction of the levy.
- There are approximately 30,000 accountable persons
registered in the Republic of Ireland. An accountable
person is responsible for submitting the required
information to the Revenue Commissioners.
- Compliance levels are reported to be very good.
There is a facility for 'estimating levy liability' if
retailers fail to submit returns or if the return is
considered too low.
- There have not been any prosecutions. Any retailer
not complying with the law has been visited, their
non-compliance verified and a warning issued.
- Funds have been used to support waste recycling
infrastructure, ongoing running costs and the
introduction of dedicated staff to enforce waste
legislation (with a particular focus on illegal waste
dumping).
- An independent review of the scheme will be
undertaken during 2005, three years after its
introduction.
- A voluntary code was considered but the advice
received suggested that this would be less
effective.
« Previous | Contents | Next »