« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
CHAPTER SEVEN: POLICY PRIORITIES
Chapter aims
This chapter addresses three key questions:
- What do people think the Scottish Executive should
be trying to achieve?
- To what extent is there consensus around people's
priorities?
- How do the priorities chosen for the Executive
compare with similar questions asked in other surveys
in Scotland and Britain-wide?
Introduction
7.1 The two previous chapters looked at people's
evaluations of the performance of devolution, both as a
process and as a means of delivering public services.
Another interesting issue is whether the policy priorities
pursued by Scotland's devolved government mirror those of
the public. The nature of political competition generally
means that parties who win elections tend to do so in part
as a result of matching their manifesto commitments to
public concerns. It is also true, however, that public
concerns are in turn moulded by long-established and
high-profile government activities.
7.2 This chapter looks first at people's stated
priorities for the Scottish Executive as a whole, then
looks at how these vary across the population. The question
about priorities asked:
Here is a list of things the Scottish Executive
could try and achieve. Which do you think should be its
highest priority, that is the most important thing it
should try and do?
Improve standards of education
Improve housing
Help the economy to grow faster
Improve people's health
Cut crime
Improve the environment
Improve public transport
7.3 These results are also compared with the results
from the 2003 survey, when people were asked which issue
had mattered most to them when voting in the election to
the Scottish Parliament. Finally the results will be
compared to a question in the
British Social Attitudes survey which asks people
which area of government spending they would like to see
increased.
Priorities for the Scottish Executive
7.4 Respondents were presented with a list of seven
possible things the Scottish Executive could aim to achieve
and asked them to say what their first priority would be.
Table 7.1 presents people's responses and reveals that the
most commonly chosen item was "improve people's health"
(27%), followed by "cut crime" (22%) and "improve standards
of education (17%). The least commonly chosen option was
"improve public transport" picked by just one in a hundred.
As the proportion choosing this was so low the more
detailed analysis presented in Table 7.2 combines the two
least commonly chosen options (the environment and
transport).
Table 7.1 What should be the Scottish
Executive's highest priority?
What should be the Scottish
Executive's highest priority? | % |
|---|
Improve people's health | 27 |
|---|
Cut crime | 22 |
|---|
Improve standards of education | 17 |
|---|
Help the economy to grow faster | 16 |
|---|
Improve housing | 12 |
|---|
Improve the environment | 4 |
|---|
Improve public transport | 1 |
|---|
Sample size: 1637 | |
|---|
Note to table
The table is presented in order of the most common
responses given. The order which was presented to
respondents is shown in the introduction to this
chapter.
Is there a consensus around priorities for the
Scottish Executive?
7.5 Table 7.2 looks at the extent to which priorities
are common across different social groups. The first thing
to note is that the choices people made were fairly varied
and this is underlined by the fact that even the most
commonly mentioned item, health, was picked by only around
one in four (27%). Health was the top priority for almost
all groups, however, there are some notable exceptions
highlighted in the discussion below..
7.6 When considering the Scottish Executive's
priorities, men and women have broadly similar views. With
the exception of the economy, where men are slightly more
likely to choose this than women, no other differences are
statistically significant. Age, on the other hand, makes
quite a difference to people's views. There is little
variation when it comes to health, public transport or the
environment, but for the four remaining areas quite clear
patterns emerge. Older people are more likely to prioritise
cutting crime and help for the economy than are younger
people, for example those aged over 65 are five times as
likely to choose the economy as those aged 18-24. In
contrast, younger people are more likely to choose
improving education and housing than are their older
counterparts.
7.7 Such patterns undoubtedly reflect people's differing
concerns over the life-cycle; in many instances housing and
education are critical issues for young people whereas
concerns about crime and the economy probably loom larger
for older people many of whom will have pensions and
investments whose performance will depend in part on the
strength of the economy. Another example of this pattern is
in relationship to economic hardship. People who said they
were having difficulty coping on their income were twice as
likely to choose housing compared to people who said they
were living comfortably.
7.8 People's highest educational qualification is also
important, but not in as many ways as age. The two areas
where education appears to make an impact are crime and,
perhaps unsurprisingly, education standards. People with no
qualifications are twice as likely as those with degrees to
prioritise cutting crime, and are half as likely to choose
improving education standards.
7.9 What kind of community people live in makes a
difference to their views about cutting crime, education,
the economy and, to a limited extent, transport and the
environment, though the relationships did not follow any
clear patterns. For example, people in small remote towns
and in remote rural areas are the least likely to
prioritise cutting crime or education compared with all the
other groups (though note that for education the views of
those in 'other urban' areas were very similar to those in
the remote locations). In contrast, people in large urban
areas and in small accessible towns are the least likely to
prioritise the economy. Those most likely to prioritise the
environment or public transport are to be found in small
accessible towns, where 7% pick this option. In contrast,
3% in 'other urban' areas choose this.
7.10 By far the largest variation found is, however, in
relation to health. People in small remote towns are twice
as likely to name this as their top priority than those in
small accessible towns (39% and 20% respectively). As noted
above, people in remote areas are also the least likely to
say that cutting crime or improving education should be the
Executive's top priority.
Table 7.2 Priorities for the Scottish
Executive, by sex, age, education, self-rated hardship,
and urban / rural residence
% who say the Executive's highest
priority should be… | Improve Health | Cut crime | Education | Economy | Housing | Transport / environ-ment | Sample size |
|---|
All | 27 | 22 | 17 | 16 | 12 | 5 | 1637 |
|---|
Sex |
|---|
Men | 26 | 22 | 16 | 18 | 10 | 6 | 687 |
|---|
Women | 28 | 22 | 17 | 14 | 13 | 4 | 950 |
|---|
Age |
|---|
18-24 | 26 | 21 | 24 | 4 | 17 | 6 | 125 |
|---|
65+ | 25 | 30 | 11 | 21 | 8 | 5 | 408 |
|---|
Education |
|---|
Degree /
HE | 29 | 15 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 6 | 456 |
|---|
None | 25 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 13 | 4 | 463 |
|---|
Self-rated hardship |
|---|
Living very comfortably | 34 | 20 | 13 | 16 | 11 | 4 | 138 |
|---|
Finding it difficult / very difficult | 26 | 19 | 17 | 14 | 19 | 5 | 226 |
|---|
Urban / rural residence |
|---|
The four cities | 29 | 21 | 19 | 13 | 12 | 5 | 557 |
|---|
Other urban | 26 | 26 | 13 | 18 | 13 | 3 | 432 |
|---|
Small accessible towns | 20 | 25 | 23 | 12 | 11 | 7 | 160 |
|---|
Small remote towns | 39 | 12 | 12 | 19 | 12 | 6 | 110 |
|---|
Accessible rural | 27 | 18 | 17 | 21 | 9 | 5 | 224 |
|---|
Remote rural | 30 | 13 | 10 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 154 |
|---|
Note to table
The policy areas are presented in order of the priority
people gave them, not by the order in questionnaire. The
two least commonly chosen options (public transport and the
environment) have been combined.
7.11 These results are similar to findings in previous
years. For instance, when asked what issue had mattered
most to them when deciding how to vote in the 2003 Holyrood
election the 2003
Scottish Social Attitudes survey found that the
same issues occupied the top four places, though in a
different order, health, education, the economy and law and
order then transport. Additionally the
British Social Attitudes survey has asked people
to nominate their first and second priorities for extra
government spending since the survey began in 1983 and
health has been the public's number one priority for extra
spending every year (Bromley and Hewson, 2005).
Key points from this chapter
- The areas most commonly chosen as priorities for
the Scottish Executive to try and achieve were: improve
people's health (27%), cut crime (22%), and improve
standards of education (17%).
- Improving health was the top priority for most, but
people living in remote rural areas stood out as the
most likely to choose this (39%), they were also much
less likely to prioritise cutting crime or improving
education standards.
- 21% of people aged over 65 chose the economy
compared to just 4% of 18-24 year olds.
- People having difficulty coping on their income
were twice as likely to choose housing as people living
very comfortably (19% compared to 11%).
- 28% of people with no qualifications chose cutting
crime compared with 15% of people with degrees.
- When asked what was important when deciding how to
vote in 2003 voters prioritised health, education, the
economy and law and order - a fairly similar pattern to
that found in relation to priorities for the Scottish
Executive.
- Looking at Britain-wide trends, health has
consistently been chosen as the number one priority for
extra government spending followed by education for
over twenty years now.
« Previous | Contents | Next »