« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
CHAPTER FIVE: EVALUATIONS OF
DEVOLUTION
Chapter aims
This chapter addresses three questions:
- Who do people think has most influence over how
Scotland is run: the Scottish Executive or the
UK Government?
- Which of these institutions
should have most say over how Scotland is
run?
- Has devolution strengthened Scotland's voice in the
UK and who is most likely to believe
this is the case?
Introduction
5.1 This report considers two aspects of people's
evaluations of devolution. Firstly, it explores people's
views about the impact of devolution on the wider process
of governing Scotland; for example has it given Scottish
institutions greater influence and does Scotland now have a
stronger voice? Secondly, it examines what people believe
the new system of government has meant for public services
and policy delivery. This chapter addresses the first of
these issues and chapter six looks at the second.
5.2 The issue of how much influence different
institutions exert over how Scotland is run is covered by
two questions that have now been asked on five occasions
since the
Scottish Social Attitudes survey began in 1999.
The first asks:
Which of the following do you think
has most influence over the way
Scotland is run?
The Scottish Parliament
The
UK government at Westminster
Local councils in Scotland
The European Union
As with some of the other questions looked at in this
report the question wording has had to be adapted over the
years. This question has changed in two ways. In 1999 the
wording reflected the fact that the parliament had yet to
open and instead asked "When the new parliament starts
work, which of the following
will have most influence…". In 2004
Scottish Parliament was replaced with Scottish Executive so
that it would match the
UK Government option
10.
5.3 This question is always followed up by a second
which asks (using the same answer options):
And which do you think
ought to have most influence over the
way Scotland is run?
5.4 In addition to looking at the relative powers of the
Scottish Executive and
UK Government the survey also asked
about the relative power of Scotland within the
UK. The following question was asked in
1997, 1999 and 2000 with the intention of tapping this
dimension:
Will a Scottish Parliament give Scotland ...
...a stronger voice in the United Kingdom,
a weaker voice in the United Kingdom,
or, will it make no difference?
It was then replaced in 2001 (and asked annually since)
by a slightly different format of wording which asked
people to evaluate performance in this respect:
Do you think that having a Scottish Parliament is
giving Scotland...
...a stronger voice in the United Kingdom,
a weaker voice in the United Kingdom,
or, is it making no difference?
Power and influence
5.5 Figure 5.1 shows the proportions of people over time
who have said that the Scottish Executive
does have most influence over how Scotland is run
alongside the proportions who said that it
should have most say. The different wording used
in 1999, as discussed in the introduction, in part accounts
for the higher proportion choosing the Scottish Parliament
in the first year than did so in later years when the
question asked about actuality.
5.6 The most striking pattern evident in this chart is
the fact that in every year the proportion who think the
Executive should have most say exceeds, by a fairly large
margin, those who think this is actually the case. By 2003
the proportion who said the Executive should have most say
had declined from three-quarters to two-thirds, and this
remained the case in 2004, but despite this drop the gap
between people's aspirations and their perceptions of
reality is still quite large. It should also be noted that
over the same period there was a small but steady increase
in the proportion who believe that it does indeed have most
influence, from 13% in 2000 to 19% in 2004.
Figure 5.1 Perceptions of the Scottish
Executive's role in how Scotland is run,
1999-2004

5.7 Although the question gave people a range of four
possible institutions to choose from, the only other body
which has attracted significant attention over time is the
UK Government. Figure 5.2 follows the
same principle as Figure 5.1 but this time looks at views
towards the
UK Government's role.
5.8 Once again the first point to note is the large gap
between what people say should be the case and what they
think is actually happening. Even at its highest point (20%
in 2003) no more than a small minority take the view that
the
UK Government should have most
influence, and even this reading appears so far to be a one
off reading. By 2004, it had dropped down to its lowest
ever level (12%). As before, 1999 stands out as quite
distinct with just four in ten (39%) people during the
period immediately after the first Scottish Parliament
elections saying that the
UK Government had most influence over
how Scotland is run. By 2000, however, this jumped to
two-thirds, remaining at this level until 2004 when there
was a significant drop, to 48%.
Figure 5.2 Perceptions of the
UK Government's role in how Scotland
is run, 1999-2004

5.9 The fact that the proportion who said the
UK Government has most influence dropped
to just below half in 2004 cannot be accounted for by the
small increase in the proportion saying that the Scottish
Executive has (as shown in Figure 5.1). In fact what
happened is rather more curious. For the first time since
the survey began the proportion saying that local councils
have most influence hit double figures - 20% - up from 7%
in 2003. Quite why this might have happened is unclear.
Scotland's voice
5.10 Prior to 1997 Scottish voting trends were quite
different to those in England. Since 1959 Scotland has
returned a majority of Labour
MPs at each election
11, so by 1992 (when the Conservatives had won four
elections in a row) Scotland had been governed by a party
which had only won a minority of seats for an unprecedented
period of time. This situation increased concerns about
Scotland's influence within the
UK and as a result the
Scottish Social Attitudes survey has asked a
question every year about whether devolution is
strengthening Scotland's voice within the
UK. As with other questions the wording
of this question in the early years asked about aspirations
whereas from 2001 onwards people were asked to evaluate
devolution's performance.
5.11 Figure 5.3 looks at people's views in the years
immediately before and after the establishment of
devolution. In 1997 and 1999 large majorities of seven in
ten (70%) thought that Scotland would have a stronger voice
within the
UK as a result of devolution, though
this dropped to half by the time devolution had been place
for a year.
Figure 5.3 Will having a Scottish Parliament
give Scotland a stronger voice in the
UK? 1997, 1999 and 2000

5.12 Figure 5.4 looks at people's evaluations of the
impact of devolution on Scotland's voice within the
UK. In 2001 and 2003 the proportion who
thought Scotland has a stronger voice outweighed those who
said devolution had made no difference in this respect. In
2002 and 2004 the reverse is the case, which echoes a trend
present in a number of the analyses in this report (of
views differing in alternate years).
Figure 5.4 Do you think having a Scottish
Parliament is giving Scotland a stronger voice in the
UK? 2001-2004

5.13 Table 5.1 looks at the relationship between whether
people think devolution has or has not strengthened
Scotland's voice in the
UK and trust in government, party
identification, and awareness of the Executive's
activities. Figure 5.4 indicated that in 2004 more people
thought that devolution was making no difference than said
it was giving Scotland a stronger voice. People with high
levels of trust, however, are more likely to believe that
it is having a positive impact (50%) in this respect than
not (42%). While there are very strong associations between
both party identification and awareness levels and this
measure, none of the other groups are more positive than
negative overall.
Table 5.1 Perceptions of the impact of
devolution on Scotland's voice in the
UK, by trust in government, party
identification, age, and awareness of the Scottish
Executive's activities
% who say having a Scottish
Parliament is giving Scotland… | A stronger voice in the
UK | A weaker voice in the
UK | Making no difference | Sample size |
|---|
All | 35 | 7 | 55 | 1637 |
|---|
Trust in Scottish
Executive |
|---|
Just about always / most of the time | 50 | 6 | 42 | 827 |
|---|
Some of the time / never | 18 | 9 | 71 | 774 |
|---|
Party identification |
|---|
Conservative | 22 | 14 | 62 | 232 |
|---|
Labour | 41 | 7 | 51 | 555 |
|---|
Liberal Democrat | 36 | 7 | 54 | 179 |
|---|
SNP | 34 | 3 | 63 | 211 |
|---|
None | 32 | 5 | 58 | 231 |
|---|
Awareness of Scottish Executive's
activities over past year |
|---|
A great deal / quite a lot | 41 | 9 | 50 | 687 |
|---|
Not very much / nothing at all | 26 | 7 | 63 | 950 |
|---|
Key points from this chapter
- Since 1999 clear majorities of between
three-quarters and two-thirds have said each year that
the Scottish Executive should have the most influence
over how Scotland is run.
- However, no more than one in five has ever said
that the Scottish Executive does in fact have most
influence.
- Between 2000 and 2003 around two-thirds identified
the
UK Government as the body having
most influence, though in 2004 this fell to just under
half. It is not possible to conclude from a single
year's results what caused this change between 2003 and
2004.
- The high aspirations recorded in 1997 and 1999 that
devolution would give Scotland a stronger voice in the
UK do not appear to have been
met.
- From 2001 onwards the proportion who believe
Scotland now has a stronger voice in the
UK has fluctuated between a half
(52%) and a third (35%) while the proportion who
believe devolution has made no difference on this front
has moved between four in ten (40%) and over half
(55%).
« Previous | Contents | Next »