« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
Annex A: Section 3 of the Homelessness etc
(Scotland) Act 2003
3 Statement on abolition of priority need
test
(1) The Scottish Ministers must, by 31st December
2005, prepare and publish a statement setting out the
measures which they and local authorities have taken, are
taking and intend to take for the purpose of ensuring that
local authorities can reasonably be expected to perform the
duties under sections 31 and 32 of the 1987 Act as modified
by section 2(1) of this Act.
(2) The statement must specify-
(a) a target date (which must be no later
than 31st December 2012) for the achievement of that
purpose, and
(b) interim objectives towards the
achievement of that purpose.
(3) Those interim objectives may include proposals
to specify, under section 25(2)(a) of the 1987 Act, further
descriptions of persons as having a priority need for
accommodation.
(4) The Scottish Ministers-
(a) must keep the statement under
review,
(b) may from time to time modify the
statement, and
(c) must publish any modified
statement.
(5) In preparing or modifying the statement, the
Scottish Ministers must have regard to the homelessness
strategies and local housing strategies prepared by local
authorities under sections 1 and 89 respectively of the
Housing (Scotland) Act 2001 (asp 10) ("the 2001 Act").
(6) Before preparing or modifying the statement the
Scottish Ministers must consult-
(a) such associations representing local
authorities, and
(b) such other persons,
as they think fit.
Annex B: Households assessed as
non-priority in 03/04 (as percentage of all assessments
in that age range)
Local Authority | 18-20 year olds | 21-25 year olds | 56-60 year olds |
|---|
Scotland | 35% (1707) | 37% (2433) | 19% (194) |
|---|
Aberdeen | 28% (47) | 25% (63) | 17% (5) |
|---|
Aberdeenshire | 37% (41) | 51% (54) | 20% (7) |
|---|
Angus | 27% (24) | 25& (26) | 24% (7) |
|---|
Argyll & Bute | 41% ((42) | 51% (48) | 26% (6) |
|---|
Clackmannan | 22% ((16) | 23% (21) | 0% (0) |
|---|
Dumfries & Galloway | 27% (54) | 31% (68) | 20% (8) |
|---|
Dundee | 15% (13) | 12% (13) | 11% (2) |
|---|
East Ayrshire | 54% (59) | 73% (104) | 11% (2) |
|---|
East Dunbartonshire | 43% (23) | 39% (27) | 18% (3) |
|---|
East Lothian | 36% (27) | 62% (46) | 33% (7) |
|---|
East Renfrewshire | 6% (2) | 29% (10) | 0% (0) |
|---|
Edinburgh | 42% (228) | 47% (387) | 22% (24) |
|---|
Eilean Siar | 40% (8) | 43% (10) | 14% (1) |
|---|
Falkirk | 45% (37) | 57% (52) | 10% (3) |
|---|
Fife | 57% (239 | 57% (226) | 18% (11) |
|---|
Glasgow | 19% (172) | 20% (373 | 16% (32) |
|---|
Highland | 53% (90) | 65% (148) | 37% (21) |
|---|
Inverclyde | 44% (21) | 45% (34) | 0% (0) |
|---|
Midlothian | 43% (20) | 78% (42) | 29% (2) |
|---|
Moray | 63% (40) | 68% (52) | 0% (0) |
|---|
North Ayrshire | 30% (63) | 34% (73) | 0% (0) |
|---|
North Lanarkshire | 39% (109) | 47% (133) | 20% (12) |
|---|
Orkney | 7% (1) | 29% (2) | 0% (0) |
|---|
Perth & Kinross | 40% (40) | 38% (48) | 29% (8) |
|---|
Renfrewshire | 1% (1) | 2% (4) | 29% (7) |
|---|
Scottish Borders | 44% (31) | 35% (26) | 18% (5) |
|---|
South Ayrshire | 46% (42) | 46% (57) | 6% (1) |
|---|
South Lanarkshire | 42% (104) | 47% (111) | 22% (10) |
|---|
Stirling | 35% (31) | 41% (46) | 20% (4) |
|---|
West Dunbartonshire | 10% (13) | 29% (32) | 6% (2) |
|---|
West Lothian | 46% (64) | 61% (92) | 20% (3) |
|---|
Annex C: The Scottish Executive
Consultation Process
Consultation is an essential and important aspect of
Scottish Executive working methods. Given the wide-ranging
areas of work of the Scottish Executive, there are many
varied types of consultation. However, in general, Scottish
Executive consultation exercises aim to provide
opportunities for all those who wish to express their
opinions on a proposed area of work to do so in ways which
will inform and enhance that work.
The Scottish Executive encourages consultation that is
thorough, effective and appropriate to the issue under
consideration and the nature of the target audience.
Consultation exercises take account of a wide range of
factors, and no two exercises are likely to be the
same.
Typically Scottish Executive consultations involve a
written paper inviting answers to specific questions or
more general views about the material presented. Written
papers are distributed to organisations and individuals
with an interest in the issue, and they are also placed on
the Scottish Executive web site enabling a wider audience
to access the paper and submit their responses
32. Consultation exercises may also involve seeking
views in a number of different ways, such as through public
meetings, focus groups or questionnaire exercises. Copies
of all the written responses received to a consultation
exercise (except those where the individual or organisation
requested confidentiality) are placed in the Scottish
Executive library at Saughton House, Edinburgh (K Spur,
Saughton House, Broomhouse Drive, Edinburgh, EH11 3XD,
telephone 0131 244 4565).
All Scottish Executive consultation papers and related
publications (eg analysis of response reports) can be
accessed at:
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations.
The views and suggestions detailed in consultation
responses are analysed and used as part of the decision
making process, along with a range of other available
information and evidence. Depending on the nature of the
consultation exercise the responses received may:
- Indicate the need for policy development or
review
- Inform the development of a particular policy
- Help decisions to be made between alternative
policy proposals
- Be used to finalise legislation before it is
implemented.
Final decisions on the issues under consideration will
also take account of a range of other factors, including
other available information and research evidence.
While details of particular circumstances
described in a response to a consultation exercise may
usefully inform the policy process, consultation
exercises cannot address individual concerns and
comments, which should be directed to the relevant
public body.
Annex D: Distribution listThis paper has been distributed to the following groups
of organisations/individuals:
Aberdeen Cyrenians
Clerk of the Scottish Parliament Communities
Committee
Commission for Racial Equality
CoSLA
Disability Rights Commission
Dundee Cyrenians
Edinburgh Cyrenians
Equal Opportunities Commission
Glasgow Homelessness Network
Glasgow Simon Community
Homelessness Monitoring Group
Homelessness Monitoring Group 2012 Subgroup
Homes for Scotland
Landlord Organisations
Local Authority Chief Executives
Local Authority Directors of Finance
Local Authority Directors of Housing
Local Authority Directors of Social Work
Local Authority Leaders
Local Authority Homelessness Strategy Co-ordinators
(Scottish) Members of the European Parliament
National Rent Deposit Forum
NHS Scottish Chairs
NHS Scottish Chief Executives
Rock Trust
SACRO
Scottish Association of Citizen's Advice
Scottish Council for Single Homeless
Scottish Churches Housing Action
Scottish Federation of Housing Associations
Scottish Foyer Network
Scottish Parliament Information Centre
Scottish Social Networks Forum
Shelter Scotland
Women's Aid
Annex E: Summary of consultation
questions and response form
Section 3 - Evidence base
Views are sought on the issues covered by this section
of the paper; in particular:
1. What other sources of information should be
considered in assessing capacity to meet need?
2. What are the main gaps in the evidence base in
relation to assessing the capacity to meet need?
3. Would it be useful to re-run the pro-forma exercise
at a later date and if so when? If not then what process
would be helpful to inform local authority planning for
2012?
Section 4 - Coverage of the Ministerial
Statement
Views are sought on the issues covered by this section
of the paper; in particular:
4. Are there other policy areas which are
relevant to the 2012 target which should be considered?
What are the priorities?
5. Are there specific actions which would contribute to
the 2012 target which the statement should contain? In
particular are additional actions required to ensure
homelessness is prevented, and sustainable solutions
achieved for homeless people and local communities?
6. What are the barriers to diverse housing outcomes for
homeless people and how can these be overcome?
7. Could existing funding streams be used more
effectively to prevent and tackle homelessness? How could
this be done?
Section 5 - Monitoring and interim
objectives
Views are sought on the issues covered by this section
of the paper; in particular:
8. How should capacity be measured and is it
possible to set relevant benchmarks?
9. Should local authorities be required to report
against a broader set of targets?
10. Would it be useful to resubmit homelessness
strategies following the publication of the statement?
11. Should the statement contain an interim objective in
relation to the abolition of the priority need test or is
this precluded by the current position?
12. If an interim objective on the abolition of the
priority need test is incorporated, how should it be
framed?
13. What other interim objectives should be set?
Annex F: Respondent information
form
« Previous | Contents | Next »