| Description | This study identified and assessed the information on victims and witnesses collected by statutory and voluntary agencies involved in the Scottish justice system. Recommendations were made on how to improve information systems to facilitate tracking victims and witnesses through the justice system, allowing agencies to monitor their services and evaluate service developments |
|---|
| ISBN | 0755926412 |
|---|
| Official Print Publication Date | |
|---|
| Website Publication Date | July 29, 2005 |
|---|
Listen
ISBN
0 7559 0 7559 2641 2
This document is also available in
pdf format (117k)
Reid Howie Associates was commissioned by the Scottish
Executive to undertake a review of information held by
statutory and voluntary agencies about victims and
witnesses.
Main Findings
- There are a range of issues with the way in which
information about victims and witnesses is gathered,
stored and shared which make it difficult to assess the
extent to which the available support framework is
meeting their needs.
- An initial review of published material suggested
that there is inconsistent delineation of victims from
witnesses; fragmented information about victims, and
unclear procedures for tracking victims through the
justice system.
- It was identified that although there is a
nationally agreed definition of a "victim", it is clear
that this is not in consistent use, and that
definitions evolve over time meaning that different
agencies are likely to use different definitions.
- There is no currently agreed set of data standards,
meaning that, for example, some agencies count
"clients", some count "contacts", and some count each
contact as a fresh "client".
- There are clear inconsistencies even within
services, and there is nothing approaching a core
dataset in common use.
- Many agencies do not have written policies for data
collection, storage and destruction, and many are not
registered with the Information Commissioner.
- Some services do not undertake monitoring and
evaluation of their service, and do not assess or
publish the data they gather relating to victims and
witnesses.
- Recommendations are made relating to the adoption
of common data standards and a set of shared
definitions; the provision of standardised reports on
an agreed basis, the publication of a leaflet for
victims and witnesses which details how and why
information is being gathered, and what it will be used
for.
- Recommendations are also made in relation to
tracking, and it was suggested that the Scottish
Executive considers commissioning a piece of research
to investigate help seeking by victims of crime, and
investigate their experiences of support.
Aims and Methodology
The aims of the research were:
Aim I: | To obtain an accurate and definitive picture
of the information already collected on victims
and witnesses. |
Aim II: | In the context of victims and witnesses,
define the strengths and weaknesses of this
information in terms of what is collected, how
it is collected and how it is held by each
organisation, along with the practical
requirements for extracting information
relevant to the needs of the Scottish
Executive. |
Aim III: | Develop recommendations on how systems can
be improved in order to best facilitate keeping
track of victims and witnesses in the justice
system allowing agencies to monitor their
services, and evaluate developments intended to
assist these individuals. |
The work was undertaken in four main parts:
- Available reports were assessed to identify policy
and practical issues which underpin both the
relationship between victims and witnesses and justice
and support agencies, and the information collected by
these agencies.
- A survey was undertaken of more than 50
organisations from the statutory and voluntary sectors
focusing on policy and practical issues in relation to
gathering, storing and sharing information.
- Discussions were held with 7 agencies or groups
which focused on current issues and ways forward.
- A short workshop was held with public sector
representatives to discuss emerging findings and to
assess potential solutions.
Findings
The research identified a wide range of initiatives
being undertaken by agencies across Scotland in response to
the Scottish Strategy for Victims. Work has been undertaken
to both develop existing and new services, develop sources
of information and improve the sharing of information.
Among the most visible changes have been the development
and rolling out of the Witness Service (by Victim Support
Scotland) and Victim Information and Advice (by the Crown
Office and Procurator Fiscal Service), as well as changes
which have meant that Victim Support receives information
from police forces about victims of crime.
Despite this progress, assessment of published reports
and the minutes of the Victim Steering Group (a
multi-agency group established to take forward the Victim
Strategy) suggested that there are clear issues with the
ways in which information about victims and witnesses is
currently gathered, stored and used. These issues
include:
- Inconsistent delineation of victims from
witnesses.
- Fragmented information about victims.
- Unclear procedures for tracking victims through the
justice system.
The effect of this is that it is both difficult to
enumerate the numbers of victims and witnesses coming into
contact with support agencies, and to evaluate the extent
to which, overall, their needs are being met.
These initial findings were supported by the primary
research undertaken. There are a wide range of agencies
which provide support to victims and witnesses, including
agencies in the public and voluntary sectors. It is clear
that some agencies have a "dual" purpose, for example the
police, who both investigate crime and provide support to
victims. It is also clear that new agencies, and new
services are being developed.
Victims and witnesses can seek help at a wide range of
points, including in the immediate aftermath of a crime
being committed, in preparing for, or attending court, or
in the period after a trial. Similar issues also impact on
the victims of youth crime.
Victims and witnesses can also contact multiple
agencies, and may contact each agency more than once,
perhaps over an extended period. It is also clear that
there are many victims and witnesses who do not report
crimes, but who seek support, and a further group who
neither report crimes, nor seek support. The support
framework available to victims and witnesses is, therefore,
complex, and the range of possible experiences wide. In
part, due to the limitations of the information gathering
and reporting framework, it is very difficult to assess the
extent to which the framework is meeting the needs of
victims who require support.
The survey identified that there are a range of issues
both with the policy framework within which information is
gathered, and with its collection, storage and use. These
include:
- Although there is a nationally agreed definition of
a "victim", it is clear that this is not in consistent
use.
- It is clear that definitions evolve over time, for
example to include the concept of vulnerable witnesses,
but one consequence of this is that different agencies,
at different points in the adoption process, would use
different definitions.
- There is no currently agreed set of data standards,
meaning that, for example, some agencies count
"clients", some count "contacts", and some count each
separate contact as a fresh "client".
- There are clear inconsistencies even within
services.
- There is nothing approaching a core dataset in
common use.
- Many agencies do not have written policies for data
collection, storage and destruction, and many are not
registered with the Information Commissioner.
- Some services do not undertake monitoring and
evaluation of their service, and do not assess or
publish the data they gather relating to victims and
witnesses.
- The primary consequence of these findings is to
underscore the difficulties faced by the Victim
Steering Group and the Scottish Executive in assessing
the extent to which the measures set out in the
national strategy are effective.
Recommendations
The report makes a number of recommendations,
specifically that:
- Agreement is reached among as many partners as
possible to the principle of common data standards. It
is suggested that could include two main strands: a
minimum data set and a set of shared definitions.
- Agreement is reached among as many partners as
possible to gather data using common definitions.
- In relation to those services not currently
undertaking any monitoring, it is suggested that the
Scottish Executive agrees a format of structured
returns and commissions a brief note on some research
techniques which could be deployed.
- As many agencies as possible agree to provide
standardised reports to the Scottish Executive and
Victim Steering Group on an agreed basis (which could
be quarterly or annually).
- It is suggested that the Scottish Executive
publishes an annual return about this information,
perhaps supported within the same publication by crime
survey information about victims, information about the
use of, for example, special measures in court and the
number and nature of victim impact statements
made.
- The Scottish Executive could support the delivery
of information to victims and witnesses which details
how and why information is being gathered, and what it
will be used for.
- In relation to tracking, it is suggested that the
Scottish Executive considers commissioning a piece of
research to investigate help seeking by victims of
crime, and investigate their experiences of
support
- As part of the implementation of the revised
Scottish Crime and Victimisation Survey, the Scottish
Executive could consider a brief follow up survey of
victims who are identified as neither reporting crimes
nor seeking help.
- As part of its consideration of any emerging
legislation which impacts on victims and witnesses in
any way, the Victims and Witnesses Unit should work
with colleagues in the Scottish Executive to ensure
that a guidance note on information requirements
relating to victims and witnesses be available to be
published prior to the implementation of any
legislation.
- Two suggestions are made in relation to data
protection, that it would be helpful if more
organisations were registered with the Information
Commissioner, and that the general issue of data
protection is one which may benefit from either a
guidance note or a workshop focussing specifically on
the handing and sharing of sensitive data relating to
victims and witnesses.
If you wish further copies of this Research Findings or
have any enquiries about social research, please contact us
at:
Scottish Executive Social Research
4th Floor West Rear
St Andrew's House
Regent Road
EDINBURGH
EH1 3DGTel: 0131 244 7560
Fax: 0131 244 5393
Email:
socialresearch@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
Website:
www.scotland.gov.uk/socialresearch
The report, "Information on Victims and Witnesses in the
Scottish Justice System", which is summarised in this
research findings is available on the Social Research
website at
www.scotland.gov.uk/socialresearch
This document (and other Research Findings and Reports)
and information about social research in the Scottish
Executive may be viewed on the Internet at:
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/socialresearch
The site carries up-to-date information about social and
policy research commissioned and published on behalf of the
Scottish Executive. Subjects covered include transport,
housing, social inclusion, rural affairs, children and
young people, education, social work, community care, local
government, civil justice, crime and criminal justice,
regeneration, planning and women's issues. The site also
allows access to information about the Scottish Household
Survey.