| Description | Proposals to set targets for recycled content in public sector procurement. |
|---|
| ISBN | 0-7559-4752- |
|---|
| Official Print Publication Date | |
|---|
| Website Publication Date | July 27, 2005 |
|---|
Listen
July 2005
Paper 2005/15
ISBN
0 7559 4752 5
This document is also available in
pdf format (352k)
Introduction
1. The National Waste Plan 2003 established the
direction of Scotland's waste management policies up to
2020. The focus of the plan is to divert waste away from
landfill and to increase recycling. The Plan outlined the
importance of developing markets for recycled products and
the need to stimulate demand through procurement.
2. The Partnership Agreement commitment, which can be
found at
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/government/pfbs-00.asp
., contains a commitment to:
'use the public purchasing rules to enhance the status
of recycled goods and those capable of reuse
'
3. The proposals outlined in this paper could make a
significant contribution to our goal of sustainable
development. The outcomes from this consultation will be
built into the Scottish sustainable development strategy
the Executive is currently developing
4. Various mainstream products, notably in paper and
construction applications, are available with a range of
recycled content at no extra cost and equal quality. Many
public bodies will already be achieving significant levels
of recycled content in their procurement, whether or not
through conscious effort. Many of these products are
already used as standard practice.
5. The purpose of this consultation paper is to outline
what public bodies can do to specify recycled content when
letting contracts and to seek views as to whether targets
should be set on public bodies in relation to specifying
recyclate. At this stage, the Executive has not taken a
view on whether or not targets on recyclate should be set.
However, the Executive does consider that, when letting
contracts, public bodies should consider the scope for
specifying recyclate, as part of their work on sustainable
development and procurement and resource efficiency.
6. The proposed targets would apply to the Scottish
Executive, its agencies, local authorities, Registered
Social Landlords, non-departmental public bodies including
the Enterprise Networks, and the
NHS. The proposed targets could also
apply when public bodies provide financial resources to
other bodies which then carry out a procurement exercise
(eg when the Executive supports a body which then puts a
service out to tender).
7. It would be helpful if Chief Executives of public
bodies could ensure that procurement officers see and
comment on this paper.
Question number 1. Do consultees consider that
this paper is aimed at the appropriate public bodies?
Do consultees consider targets should apply when public
bodies provide financial resources to other bodies
which then put a service out to tender?
8. In making these proposals, the Scottish Executive
considers:
- Recyclate can often be specified without extra cost
and at equal quality. When specifying recyclate, public
bodies will, in line with usual good practice, need to
take account of full life-time costs of the
products.
- Specifying recyclate in contracts is in line with
the
EU Procurement rules, so long as
recyclate is specified at the beginning of the tender
exercise (see
www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Government/SPD/17839/13744
) . Consultees may wish to be aware of the European
Commission's handbook on environmental public
procurement, which can be found at:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/gpp/pdf/gpphandbook.pdf
- The targets proposed are in line with good practice
already being achieved by a number of public
authorities.
What Materials Would Targets Apply To?
9. The Waste and Resources Action Programme (
WRAP) (
www.wrap.org.uk ) and
Remade Scotland (
www.remade.org.uk )
are supported by the Executive to develop markets for
recycled products. Reflecting the outcome of research
undertaken by these bodies, the Executive proposes that
targets would apply initially to paper and construction
applications, where a range of mainstream products are
already available.
10. Paper includes:
- Direct purchasing of office and copier paper.
- Procurement of reprographic and printing services -
for copying, printed publications and business
processes such as invoicing.
- Specification of relevant products in catering and
hygiene services (
e.g. tissue paper).
11. Construction includes construction and major
refurbishment of public buildings such as offices, schools,
hospitals, social housing, roads etc.
12. Appendices 1 and 2 set out the potential to increase
the use of recycled content in relation to paper and
construction.
Question number 2: Do consultees agree that
targets should be set? What other steps could be used
as an alternative to targets or in conjunction with
targets (eg use of planning conditions) to help meet
the Partnership Agreement commitment to 'use the public
purchasing rules to enhance the status of recycled
goods and those capable of reuse'?
Question number 3: What other applications,
other than paper and construction, might be included
within the scope of the targets?
Proposed Targets
13. The Executive proposes the following targets:
- By the start of 2006/07, at least 90% (by value) of
all centrally co-ordinated public procurement contracts
relating to construction projects and paper should each
have minimum levels of recycled content in the tender
specifications for goods, works and services. These
should be:
- In construction applications, at
least 10% of the value of materials used on a project
should derive from recycled content
1.
- In printing and writing paper
applications, products should contain at least 50%
recycled content
2.
- In tissue paper applications,
products should contain 100% recycled content.
14. There are several reasons for proposing targets at a
modest 10% in construction projects:
- A target such as 10% accommodates a range of
construction types.
- If a particular product should become unavailable
as a result of difficulties in the supply chain,
contractors could source another product which would
not necessarily need to have the same level of recycled
content.
- Designers and contractors will not feel they have
to design specifically with recycled goods in mind but
instead can look for opportunities for product
substitution where appropriate.
15. For tissue paper, a wide range of products in the
away-from-home market already contain 100% recycled
content. For copying and printing papers, a threshold of
50% recycled content can be met by a range of products that
are able to compete on price, quality and availability with
virgin papers.
16. While there will be potential within specific
projects and services for greater use of products with
recycled content, the Scottish Executive believes that
setting conservative targets will allow maximum flexibility
for both contractor and supplier and allow the market for
goods with recycled content to develop further. The
Executive would propose to review these targets after two
years with a view to increasing the requirements.
Question number 4: What benchmark levels of
minimum recycled content are appropriate?
Question number 5: Should targets be reviewed
with a view to being increased after a set amount of
time? If so after how long should targets be
reviewed?
Question number 6: Should the targets only
apply to contracts above a certain value? If so what
should this threshold be? Should different targets be
set for different kinds of construction work?
Monitoring of Targets
17. The Executive proposes that public sector bodies
include data on their performance against these targets in
existing annual reports. The Minister for Environment and
Rural Development wrote to the majority of Scottish
Executive Agencies and Non-Departmental Public Bodies (
NDPBs) on 26 November 2004, requesting
them to develop and implement environmental management
policies by the end of 2005 (the
NHS, local authorities, the police and
fire service were not included in this initiative as they
are covered by other requirements).
18. The Minster indicated that
NDPBs should report on performance
within existing annual reports or as a freestanding
document. It is proposed that for bodies covered by the
Minster's letter, this reporting mechanism is also used for
reporting against targets proposed in this paper. Those
bodies not covered by the Minister's letter should add a
section outlining achievements to existing annual reports
(or produce a freestanding document if this would be
easier). Information on performance on targets should be
included within 2006/07 annual reports onwards. For local
authorities, this information could be included within
Public Performance Reports.
Question number 7: Is including a section
within existing annual reports an appropriate way of
reporting progress?
19. Where a public body has met or exceeded the targets,
the Executive would intend, with
WRAP and
REMADE, to highlight and disseminate
best practice, by way of publishing material on a website.
Where a public body has not met the targets, or has failed
to provide adequate information, the Scottish Executive
will ask
WRAP and
REMADE to work with the public bodies
concerned, to see what can be done to improve performance.
If and when targets are put in place, the Scottish
Executive will ask
WRAP and
REMADE to produce a statistical analysis
of what the public bodies have done in relation to meeting
the targets. This statistical analysis would be made
publicly available on a website.
20. To aid identification and monitoring of the level of
recyclates,
WRAP has commissioned and trialled
software toolkits for assessing recycled content at project
level in new build and commercial refurbishment. (See
Appendix 1 for more detail of the method of
calculation.).
21. For a number of major procurement projects, it is
now common for a "Gateway Review" process to take place.
Under this process, compliance with sustainability issues
is taken into account. Specifying recyclate within
procurement contracts is one way of demonstrating
sustainable development.
Question number 8: Do consultees agree that
asking
WRAP and
REMADE to monitor what public bodies
have done in relation to meeting the targets is an
appropriate way to proceed? If not, what would be the
best way to monitor the targets?
Question number 9: If public bodies continue to
be unable to meet targets what further action should be
taken? Is any training required?
Question number 10: What incentives should be
offered for good performance?
Key Issues: Procurement Rules, Costs, Quality
and Advice
22. It is likely that many bodies are already achieving
the 10% construction target for recycled content, even if
unintentionally, and some have already committed to buying
recycled paper. However, setting targets for recycled
content will raise a number of questions, as discussed
below.
Rules on public procurement
23. The European Commission handbook on environmental
public procurement states:
"As a contracting authority, you have the right to
insist that the product you are purchasing be made from a
specified material, provided they respect the Treaty
principles of non-discrimination, and the free movement of
goods and services
. You can also indicate the range of
materials you would prefer, or alternatively specify that
none of the materials or chemical substances should be
detrimental to the environment. A common approach for the
green procurement of cleaning products, for example, is for
the contracting authority to give an indicative list of
hazardous substances harmful to the environment or public
health (on the basis of an objective risk assessment) that
it does not wish to be present in the product
. The right to specify materials or the contents of
a product also includes the right to demand a minimum
percentage of recycled or reused content where
possible." (Section 3.4.1)
24. Local authorities may wish to consider whether any
changes are required to their standing orders, in relation
to the letting of contracts, to ensure that they cover
sustainability issues, including specifying recyclate.
25. The Scottish Procurement Directorate guidance on
Environmental Issues in Purchasing (
www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Government/SPD/17839/13744
), in Section 4 on Contract Specification, states:
"This is a key stage at which to consider environmental
issues………Contracting authorities are free to specify in
terms of performance or functional requirements, which can
include environmental aspects."
26. European guidance appears to give the right to
specify a percentage of recyclate, but this is subject to
the principles of free movement of goods and services,
which would include the Construction Products Directive (
CPD). The Directive is designed to
ensure that construction products meeting key technical,
standards can be traded freely across the European Union.
The Scottish Executive would wish to make certain that any
targets on specifying recyclate do not cut across the
requirements of the
CPD.
Product costs
27. In construction, a range of mainstream products
(bricks, blocks, boards, concrete products, etc.) are
already available which offer above-average recycled
content at no extra cost or risk - in compliance with
quality standards. For example, market research
commissioned by
WRAP has identified Quick Win options
covering 50-60% of the materials value of a typical
secondary school or house.
28. Case study evidence demonstrates the potential to
increase the recycled content used in buildings at no extra
cost or with a cost saving. Though housing construction
methods can differ between Scotland and England (64% of new
housing in Scotland is timber frame compared with 8% in
England), Taylor Woodrow estimate they could increase
recycled content from 16% to 30% of the materials value of
a standard design of house at cost parity, and to 20% with
a cost saving (see Appendix 1).
29. In paper-based applications, historically a price
premium has been charged for 100% recycled content papers.
However, some organisations, including both the Scottish
Executive and the Scottish Parliament, have demonstrated
that price parity is achievable by using buying power
effectively (see Appendix 2). Other organisations have
achieved cost neutrality by selecting a hybrid paper - for
example,
BT and Barclays Bank have recently
introduced copier paper with 70-80% recycled content at no
extra cost. Some
UK Government departments have achieved
a saving relative to equivalent virgin papers for printed
publications by agreeing a framework agreement for the
supply of recycled papers, rather than purchasing paper for
individual print jobs.
Product availability and quality
30. As indicated above, there are a range of mainstream
products - including some market leading brands - that are
available in the market with above-average recycled
content. These conform to the normal quality standards.
31. Meeting the proposed targets therefore does
not require the selection of novel products from
limited sources (which would increase risk and might breach
EU Procurement Rules). For more
information on product options, visit
www.wrap.org.uk/procurement
.
Procurement advice
32. In order to implement a recycled content
requirement, a supplier has to be able to demonstrate the
performance of their products and clients must verify
compliance of the product. Inevitably, the pressure on the
client is such that monitoring and verification of
performance must be carried out at minimal cost and effort
while ensuring a robust approach. In addition, a client
will need to know how to state the requirement in
procurement documentation.
33. For paper, advice on procurement practice is
available from
www.wrap.org.uk/procurement
. Paper merchants will know the composition and performance
parameters of the papers they supply, so verification of
recycled content will be straightforward.
34. For construction,
WRAP has developed standard template
wording that procurement professionals can use in tender
specifications. This is also available from
www.wrap.org.uk/procurement
This output has been tested in schools building work and
Glasgow City Council has already included a 20% requirement
as a criterion in a design competition for a café in George
Square.
Question number 11: Are there any other
critical issues in relation to issues such as
procurement rules, costs and availability of products
that need to be addressed?
Conclusion
35. We would welcome written responses to this
consultation paper by 18 November 2005. Please also
complete and return the Respondent Information Form
attached to cover letter with your response.
Please email your response to
RecycledContent@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
Or send it by post or fax to
Kirstie Macfarlane
Scottish Executive
Environment and Rural Affairs Department
SEPA Sponsorship and Waste Division
Area 1-J (North)
Victoria Quay
Edinburgh
EH6 6QQFax: 0131 244 0245
Access to responses
36. This consultation, and all other
SE consultation exercises, can be viewed
at
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations
. Electronic comments would be preferred but all responses,
whether electronic or written, will be carefully
considered. The electronic questionnaire can be accessed
and downloaded at the following website address
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations
. You can telephone Freephone 0800 77 1234 to find out
where your nearest public internet access point is.
37. We will make all responses available to the public
in the Scottish Executive Library by 23 December 2005,
unless confidentiality is requested. All responses not
marked confidential will be checked for any potentially
defamatory material before being placed in the library.
Appendix 1: Evidence for the potential to
increase the use of recycled content in
construction
1. The proposed benchmark of 10% recycled content as a
proportion of the value of materials used in a construction
project has been recommended previously by the
UK Government's Sustainable Buildings
Task Group (2004). The same method of evaluation by value
is already used in the
USA.
2. The evaluation simply requires data on materials
costs and quantities (which contractors will already be
monitoring), plus data on the recycled content % by mass
for component products. The latter is a simple addition to
a product data sheet where not already stated, and
contractors can alternatively use published default values
for standard practice - requiring product-specific details
only for those limited product types where they want to
claim credit for above-average content. (Case studies show
that, on a typical project, most of the gains in recycled
content above standard practice come from selecting
alternative brands for just 5-10 product types, which vary
according to the project.)
3. The following Table provides a simple illustration of
the method of calculation
3:
Component | Quantity | Unit price (excluding
labour) | Total price | Recycled content by mass | % recycled content by
value |
|---|
Bricks | 2,000 | £250 per 1000 | £500 | 15% | £75 |
|---|
Dense blocks | 50m2 | £8 per m2 | £400 | 50% | £200 |
|---|
Plasterboard | 50m2 | £2 per m2 | £100 | 80% | £80 |
|---|
Insulation | 20m2 | £10 per m2 | £200 | 80% | £160 |
|---|
TOTAL: | | | £1,200 | | £515
(£515 out of £1200 = 43%
overall) |
|---|
4. It is key that the % requirement is expressed on this
outcome basis for the project overall,
i.e. remaining neutral in terms of which
materials are used to meet the requirement. This gives
contractors the flexibility to adopt the most economic
solution for each situation and location.
Assessment of economics and technical
potential
5. Many common products (such as bricks, blocks,
chipboard and plasterboard) already include some recycled
content, and a range of mainstream brands offer
above-average recycled content with no penalty in terms of
cost, performance or availability (
i.e. Quick Wins).
Example 1: Case study analysis by Costain and
Taylor Woodrow
6. While construction techniques can differ, the
following Table lists the results of detailed product-level
analysis, led by contractors Costain and house-builders
Taylor Woodrow, on eight actual construction projects,
based on real-life costs and quantities. The data
demonstrate that there is substantial potential to increase
the use of recycled content, and even to reduce materials
costs in the process.
Table 1: Potential to use recycled content in
construction (as a % of project materials
value)
Case study | Actual practice | Higher recycled content
readily achieved
at no extra cost | Potential recycled content
at no extra cost |
|---|
Terraced house | 16% | 19.5%
(6% cost saving) | 27.5%
(5% cost saving) |
|---|
Detached house | 16.5% | 20%
(8% cost saving) | 30%
(1% cost saving) |
|---|
Flat | 16.5% | 20%
(6% cost saving) | 30%
(0% cost saving) |
|---|
Primary care centre | 17.5% | 21.5%
(0.4% cost saving) | 27%
(1% cost saving) |
|---|
Commercial office building | 22% | 26%
(0.2% cost saving) | 30%
(0.9% cost saving) |
|---|
Commercial redevelopment | 23% | 24.5%
(0.1% cost saving) | 26%
(0.2% cost saving) |
|---|
Bridge | 22.5% | 32%
(3% cost saving) | 48.5% if aggregates had been available
locally
(7% cost saving) |
|---|
Motorway junction | 15.5% | 18%
(1% cost saving) | 29% if aggregates had been available locally
(3% cost saving) |
|---|
Example 2: Secondary school buildings
7. At standard practice, two Exemplar Designs for
secondary schools (commissioned by the Department for
Education and Skills in Whitehall) would contain at least
16-17% recycled content by value. Davis Langdon estimated
that substitution of competitively-priced products with
higher recycled content would increase overall recycled
content to 18 or 21%, and give a major (up to ten-fold)
increase in the use of recovered materials, equivalent to
diverting an additional 3,000-4,000 tonnes per school from
landfill. The City Academy in Brent achieved 13% recycled
content, and could have achieved 16% with a similar
environmental benefit. In Scotland, a primary school in
Glasgow achieved 22% recycled content.
8. This work also showed that the majority of the
potential to increase recycled content comes from simple
substitution of one product or brand for another. More
radical and complex changes in design specifications, which
are likely to require greater effort and present greater
risk, are not essential.
Example 3: Barracks accommodation
9. The barracks being constructed in Defence Estates'
modernisation programme for Single Living Accommodation
already contain 18-19% recycled content by value. Scott
Wilson identified ways of increasing this figure to 23-24%,
using alternative products at comparable cost. Over the
remainder of the programme, such product substitution would
use ~67,000 tonnes of recovered material that might
otherwise have gone to landfill.
10. These results illustrate that setting a requirement
for recycled content would provide an effective incentive
to increase the sustainability of buildings without
diminishing the quality of the building or increasing
costs. A 10% benchmark looks conservative, and therefore is
likely to be viable across a range of construction
situations - while still providing the signal to get the
construction supply chain aware of, and interested in
increasing, the recycled content of various product
groups.
11.
WRAP has further projects underway,
working with major construction clients and contractors to
assess the case for setting requirements in real-life
situations. Applications include hospitals, primary
schools, housing new build and refurbishment, and
commercial refurbishment and fit-out. This includes a major
project with Communities Scotland (
www.communitiesscotland.gov.uk
) and three Scottish housing associations.
Appendix 2: Evidence for the potential to
increase the use of recycled content in paper
applications
The following case studies illustrate how public sector
organisations can procure paper with high recycled content
at no extra cost, by setting this requirement upfront when
specifying their needs to potential suppliers.
Case study: Scottish Executive; 'Greening the
Government: Everyone can contribute'
In this policy statement, the Scottish Executive has
committed to managing resources in a sustainable way,
including in relation to paper:
"To ensure that all Executive staff purchase
recycled copying paper containing 100% recycled content
with a minimum of 75% post-consumer waste."
The Executive's electronic purchasing system makes these
papers the default option. By ensuring demand in this way,
the Executive's procurement team has been able to secure
price parity through bulk purchasing.
Case study: Scottish Parliament procurement of
publications services
The Scottish Parliament's Procurement Office has set up
several contracts for printing and publishing. The tender
specification made clear the Parliament's environmental
objectives:
"
the contractor has to use best endeavours ……where
possible to maximise the use of recycled content"
"the contractor is required to provide paper comprising
genuine post-consumer waste or virgin pulp from sustainably
managed forests, produced using a chlorine-free
process".
Nevertheless, the specification still allowed each
prospective tenderer to propose the papers most suitable to
meet the specification.
The main print contract was awarded to Astron Document
Services. After being selected, and in response to client
policy, Astron successfully tested an 80gsm paper
containing 100% post-consumer waste. This paper has now
been adopted as their standard recycled paper for digital
printing, not just for the Scottish Parliament contract,
but throughout Astron's operations when recycled paper is
specified. The original paper proposed by Astron contained
100% elemental chlorine-free pulp with no recycled fibre.
The alternative paper was introduced at no additional cost
per printed page.
The Design & Print service providers, by comparison,
use both recycled and sustainable virgin papers. The
quotation for each individual print job will include an
option for recycled content, identifying the cost and
performance implications, so that the client can choose.
The contract management process also requires a quarterly
environmental report from each supplier, recording the use
of different papers and advising on the availability of new
papers.
In awarding contracts, the Procurement Office focused on
the overall service level and price per printed page. The
price of the paper itself was not a significant parameter,
particularly for Design & Print where labour costs
dominate. Therefore trading cost against recycled content
was not a factor in contract award - the success lay in
making the corporate objective explicit in the contract
specification from the outset.
Appendix 3: List of Consultation
Questions
Question number 1. Do consultees consider that this
paper is aimed at the appropriate public bodies? Do
consultees consider targets should apply when public bodies
provide financial resources to other bodies which then put
a service out to tender?
Question number 2: Do consultees agree that targets
should be set? What other steps could be used as an
alternative to targets or in conjunction with targets (eg
use of planning conditions) to help meet the Partnership
Agreement commitment to 'use the public purchasing rules to
enhance the status of recycled goods and those capable of
reuse'?
Question number 3: What other applications, other than
paper and construction, might be included within the scope
of the targets?
Question number 4: What benchmark levels of minimum
recycled content are appropriate?
Question number 5: Should targets be reviewed with a
view to being increased after a set amount of time? If so
after how long should targets be reviewed?
Question number 6: Should the targets only apply to
contracts above a certain value? If so what should this
threshold be? Should different targets be set for different
kinds of construction work?
Question number 7: Is including a section within
existing annual reports an appropriate way of reporting
progress?
Question number 8: Do consultees agree that asking
WRAP and
REMADE to monitor what public bodies
have done in relation to meeting the targets is an
appropriate way to proceed? If not, what would be the best
way to monitor the targets?
Question number 9: If public bodies continue to be
unable to meet targets what further action should be taken?
Is any training required?
Question number 10: What incentives should be offered
for good performance?
Question number 11: Are there any other critical issues
in relation to issues such as procurement rules, costs and
availability of products that need to be addressed?
Appendix 4: List of Consultees
Local Authorities
Aberdeen City Council
Aberdeenshire Council
Angus Council
Argyll & Bute Council
City of Edinburgh Council
Clackmannanshire Council
Comhairle nan Eilean Siar
Dumfries and Galloway Council
Dundee City Council
East Ayrshire Council
East Dunbartonshire Council
East Lothian Council
East Renfrewshire Council
Falkirk Council
Glasgow City Council
Highland Council
Inverclyde Council
Midlothian Council
Moray Council
North Ayrshire Council
North Lanarkshire Council
Orkney Islands Council
Perth and Kinross Council
Renfrewshire Council
Scottish Borders Council
Shetland Islands Council
South Ayrshire Council
South Lanarkshire Council
Stirling Council
West Dunbartonshire Council
West Lothian Council
Public Bodies
Accounts Commission for Scotland
Architecture and Design Scotland
Bord Gaidhlig na h-Alba (the Gaelic Development
Agency)
Building Standards Advisory Committee
Cairngorms National Park Authority
Caledonian MacBrayne Ltd
Children's Panel
Crofter's Commission
Deer Commission Scotland
General Teaching Council for Scotland
Highlands and Islands Airports
Highlands and Islands Enterprise
Learning and Teaching Scotland
Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park
Authority
Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland
National Galleries of Scotland
National Library of Scotland
National Museum of Scotland
National Waiting Times Centre Board
NHS 24
NHS Scotland
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical
Monuments of Scotland
Scottish Children's Reporter Administration
Scottish Commission for the Regulation of Care (Care
Commission)
Scottish Enterprise
Scottish Environment Protection Agency
Scottish Further Education Funding Council
Scottish Higher Education Funding Council
Scottish Homes (Residuary Body)
Scottish Law Commission
Scottish Legal Aid Board
Scottish National Heritage
Scottish Qualifications Authority
Scottish Screen
Scottish Social Services Council
Scottish University for Industry
Scottish Water
Sport Scotland
State Hospitals Board for Scotland
Visit Scotland
Executive Agencies
Accountant in Bankruptcy
Communities Scotland
Fisheries Research Service
Historic Scotland
HM Inspectorate of Education
National Archives of Scotland
Registers of Scotland
Office of Scottish Charity Register (
OSCR)
Scottish Agricultural Science Agency
Scottish Building Standards Agency
Scottish Court Services
Scottish Fisheries Protection Agency
Scottish Prison Service
Scottish Public Pensions Agency
Social Work Inspection Agency
Student Awards Agency for Scotland
NHS Boards
NHS Argyll & Clyde
NHS Ayrshire & Arran
NHS Borders
NHS Dumfries & Galloway
NHS Fife
NHS Forth Valley
NHS Grampian
NHS Greater Glasgow
NHS Highland
NHS Lanarkshire
NHS Lothian
NHS Orkney
NHS Shetland
NHS Tayside
NHS Western Isles
Political Parties
Conservative Party
Green Party
Labour Party
Liberal Democrats
Scottish National Party
Scottish Socialist Party
Scottish Senior Citizens Unity Party
Dennis Canavan
MSP
Margo MacDonald
MSP
Campbell Martin
MSP
Jean Turner
MSP
Interested Parties
Association of Chief Housing Officers
Chambers of Commerce
Chartered Institute of Housing
Chartered Institution of Wastes Management
Confederation of British Industry
Constructing Excellence in Scotland
Construction Confederation
COSLA
Confederation of Paper Industries
Community Recycling Network Scotland
Friends of the Earth
Federation of Small Businesses
Homes for Scotland
National Association of Paper Merchants
Registered Social Landlords
Remade Scotland
Scottish Building
Scottish Environmental Services Association
Scottish Federation of Housing Associations
Sustainable Scotland Network
Sustainable Construction Forum
The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors in
Scotland
The Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland
Waste and Resources Action Programme
World Wildlife Fund
Appendix 5
THE SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE CONSULTATION
PROCESS
Consultation is an essential and important aspect of
Scottish Executive working methods. Given the wide-ranging
areas of work of the Scottish Executive, there are many
varied types of consultation. However, in general, Scottish
Executive consultation exercises aim to provide
opportunities for all those who wish to express their
opinions on a proposed area of work to do so in ways which
will inform and enhance that work.
The Scottish Executive encourages consultation that is
thorough, effective and appropriate to the issue under
consideration and the nature of the target audience.
Consultation exercises take account of a wide range of
factors, and no two exercises are likely to be the
same.
Typically Scottish Executive consultations involve a
written paper inviting answers to specific questions or
more general views about the material presented. Written
papers are distributed to organisations and individuals
with an interest in the issue, and they are also placed on
the Scottish Executive web site enabling a wider audience
to access the paper and submit their responses
4. Consultation exercises may also involve seeking
views in a number of different ways, such as through public
meetings, focus groups or questionnaire exercises. Copies
of all the written responses received to a consultation
exercise (except those where the individual or organisation
requested confidentiality) are placed in the Scottish
Executive library at Saughton House, Edinburgh (K Spur,
Saughton House, Broomhouse Drive, Edinburgh, EH11 3XD,
telephone 0131 244 4565).
All Scottish Executive consultation papers and related
publications (eg, analysis of response reports) can be
accessed at:
Scottish Executive consultations (
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations
)
The views and suggestions detailed in consultation
responses are analysed and used as part of the decision
making process, along with a range of other available
information and evidence. Depending on the nature of the
consultation exercise the responses received may:
- indicate the need for policy development or
review
- inform the development of a particular policy
- help decisions to be made between alternative
policy proposals
- be used to finalise legislation before it is
implemented
Final decisions on the issues under consideration will
also take account of a range of other factors, including
other available information and research evidence.
While details of particular circumstances described in a
response to a consultation exercise may usefully inform the
policy process, consultation exercises cannot address
individual concerns and comments, which should be directed
to the relevant public body.
Footnotes
1 See Appendix 1 for a description of how to calculate
recycled content as a % of materials value.
2 Recycled content is defined in BS EN ISO 14021:2001 on
Environmental Labels and Declarations. The National
Association of Paper Merchants (
http://www.napm.org.uk
) has a definition of "genuine waste" that includes waste
paper from convertors, printers, households and offices,
but excludes mill broke
i.e. waste re-used within the mill.
3 This illustration is based on actual mainstream brands
with above-average recycled content. Alternative brands
currently available on the market at the same price but
with less recycled content would achieve just 5%, instead
of 43%, as the overall outcome.
4
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations