Estimated costs for each of the accepted actions and for
those where alternatives are suggested will be left open
subject to a thorough costing exercise which is now
underway. Timescales for carrying out actions will follow
once these have been subjected to further scrutiny and when
resource has been agreed.
Ref. | Source | Recommendation(s) | Response/ responsibility |
|---|
1 | Report;
Steering &
Working
Groups
(S &
WG) | That statistics be retained, and
consideration be given to setting targets, at a
sectoral level, in relation to: New learners
(including register of unmet demand); learner
achievement (against
SCQF); learner progression
to employment; funding sources and how they are
applied. That these be used to address unmet
demand. | See section 4 of the main report This should help establish the real picture
of unmet demand. |
|---|
2 | Report;
S &
WG | That the statutory position on duty to
provide and funding eligibility needs to be
clarified in all sectors. | This will be clarified, where necessary. |
|---|
3 | S &
WG | SQAESOL qualifications should
be mapped against other
ESOL qualifications,
including
UCLES. | Accepted in principal, subject to
funding. SQAESOL units continue to be
benchmarked to the Common European Framework
and to other widely used
ESOL qualifications. As a
result of initial benchmarking,
SQA are revising the
specifications, evidence requirements, and
assessment materials for the
ESOLNQ framework. |
|---|
4 | Report;
S &
WG | Better marketing of
SQAESOL units | SQA are currently developing
a marketing strategy for the new units. |
|---|
5 | Report;
S &
WG | An initial pre-
CELTA qualification be
developed for unqualified staff and volunteers
to qualify them to assist
ESOL teachers and provide
one-to-one support to
ESOL learners. | Agreed To be developed by the short-life
ESOL professional
development group using existing models. |
|---|
6 | S &
WG | A post-
CELTA/
TESOL qualification be
developed to upgrade the skills of those
qualified
ESOL teachers working in
further education and
CLD | Agreed To be developed by the short-life
ESOL professional
development group using existing models. |
|---|
7 | S &
WG | That guidance and support for
ESOL learners be improved
and better advertised | Agreed See proposals in sections 4 and 6 in the
main body of the report |
|---|
8 | Report;
S &
WG | That progression routes for
ESOL learners be improved
into employment and further study | Agreed See proposals in the main body of the
report. Some of this will be dependent on the
work of the
ESOL curriculum group and
their recommendations for vocational content in
ESOL provision. |
|---|
9 | Report | The Scottish Executive should set up a
working party to develop principles for a
national curriculum for
ESOL | Agreed An
ESOL curriculum group will
be set with role and remit as set out in
section 5 of the main body of the report. |
|---|
10 | Report | Teaching and learning materials with a
Scottish "accent" should be developed for
Beginner and
ESOL Literacy classes | Agreed This matter should be considered by the
ESOL curriculum group. |
|---|
11 | S &
WG | That course materials, staff development
seminars or other appropriate dissemination
methods, and adequate
ESOL provision for
naturalisation applicants, are developed as a
means of ensuring compliance with the
UK Government's citizenship
requirements | Agreed These developments are being taken forward
by a partnership led by
SQA, and are being overseen
by the Scottish Sub-Group of the
UK Advisory Board on
Naturalisation and Integration (
ABNI). |
|---|
12. | Report;
S &
WG | The Scottish Executive should appoint a
national
ESOL co-ordinator to liaise
with
FE,
CLD and voluntary providers,
the Home Office and other agencies such as the
Scottish Refugee Council. The coordinator
should have access to funds which could be
disbursed to provide tuition on the case of
sudden increases in demand. | See alternative set out in section 4. Given
the proposed mechanisms for better
collaboration and coordination, we feel that
there is no need to change existing channels
for funding. |
|---|
13 | Report | Providers should consider ways of
encouraging learners to move on rather than
stay in the same class | This merits further consideration, in the
ESOL curriculum group |
|---|
14 | Report | The
HNESOL Unit should be marketed
as an equal alternative to Communications for
ESOL students, and
ESOL recognised as part of
integrated core skills provision in
HN frameworks | SQA are currently
considering this in light of piloting. |
|---|
15 | S &
WG | That a balance of accredited and
non-accredited provision should be kept as part
of the variety of routes to learning. This
could also be linked to the introduction of a
'standard' individual learning plan | We agree this balance be maintained but feel
that it merits further discussion in the
ESOL curriculum group. |
|---|
16 | S &
WG | We recommend that providers of
ESOL review barriers to
learning and seek to minimise them | This needs further consideration and, if
necessary,
SE will fund some small
scale studies into barriers to learning. |
|---|
17 | Report;
S &
WG | SQANQ and
HNESOL, mapped into
SCQF, products need to be
expanded. More time and resources need to be
directed to this, and more used in
CLD. | Accepted in part, subject to funding. There
will also need to be some discussion of the
wider
ESOL curriculum within the
ESOL curriculum group. Proposals will be put to the
SQA's Qualifications
Committee in April. |
|---|
18 | Report | FE colleges should institute
specific induction sessions for new
ESOL staff | This merits further consideration by the
short-life
ESOL professional
development group. However, the group will
first need to examine common practice on
inductions for new staff in all sectors
providing
ESOL. |
|---|
19 | S &
WG | As a means of facilitating the 'literacy
proofing' of courses,
HMIE and
SFEFC consider issuing good
practice guidance. | This will be addressed by through the 'Good
Practice in
ESOL Framework' to be
disseminated soon. |
|---|
20 | Report;
S &
WG | A common quality and inspection system
should be devised for all adult
ESOL provision.
HMIE should discuss joint
arrangements for quality assurance of
ESOL in Scotland with the
British Council.
SFEFC, Learning Connections
and the Scottish Executive may wish to explore
the idea of a joint aspect report for
ESOL. | There are robust and rigorous
HMIE quality systems for
FE,
CLD and
ALN. These existing
HMIE systems should be used
to support good practice and will also be aided
by the publication of the 'Good Practice in
ESOL' support document. |
|---|
21 | S &
WG | Identify current appropriate training grants
available and market these in relevant
industries | To be referred to
SEn,
HIE and Job Centre + (
JC+) |
|---|
22 | Report | The Scottish Executive should consider ways
of providing
ESOL outside the classroom
but within safe and stimulating
environments | To be referred to providers and the proposed
National
ESOL Panel and regional
fora |
|---|
23 | S &
WG | VisitScotland should carry out an analysis
of
ESOL as an element of
Scottish tourism. Marketing of Scottish
ESOL provision to overseas
(full cost) should be a priority | To be referred to VisitScotland and
Education
UK Scotland |
|---|
24 | Report | Colleges should consider spending some of
the income from full fee-paying international
students to improve classroom accommodation for
all
ESOL students | To be referred to the Association of
Scottish Colleges (
ASC) |
|---|
25 | Report | Priority for intensive tuition (more than 21
hours a week) should be given to
ESOL beginners and literacy
learners | To be referred to the
ESOL curriculum group and
providers |
|---|
26 | Report | Employers and professional bodies should
consider holding in-service training sessions
and
CPD during working hours,
rather than always at weekends | To be referred to the
ASC,
CoSLA,
SFEU and the professional
associations |
|---|
27 | Report | Institutions should establish more full-time
and fractional posts for
ESOL, in order to improve
working conditions for teachers and ensure that
students benefit from the continuity of
teaching, guidance and support that a stable
workforce | To be referred to the
ASC and
CoSLA |
|---|
28 | Report | The
SQA needs to review entry
requirements for
HN courses, so that they
match more closely the language requirements
for native speakers | To be referred to
SQA and providers. The
English language learning needs of the settled
ethnic minority communities also merits further
investigation and could be considered as a
discrete piece of research. |
|---|
29 | S &
WG | Research should be undertaken in Scotland to
identify levels of English required by
employers for particular job-types | To be referred to
SEn,
HIE,
JC+ . This has also been
referred to officials within the Scottish
Executive with policy responsibility for the
Employability Action Plans. The
ESOL curriculum group should
take account of any work on employability in
its deliberations |
|---|
30 | S &
WG | JCB+ should make information
and training on types of
ESOL provision available for
their staff | To be referred to
JC + |
|---|
31 | S &
WG | Disaggregated Home Office statistics on
applications for citizenship, on dispersal
numbers and work permits (by country of origin)
from and for Scotland should be produced | To be referred to Home Office and
CoSLA. This has also been
referred to officials within the Scottish
Executive's Equality Unit. |
|---|
32 | Report | The proposed merged
FE and
HE Fnding Council should
consider an alteration in the rules for
international students to enable refugees and
asylum seekers, and other categories to pay
home fees for full-time
FE and
HE courses | Asylum seekers are prevented from accessing
full-time
FE and
HE courses by their Home
Office residency status. The Scottish Executive
waived residency regulations for asylum seekers
and refugees wishing to access part-time
FE and
HN level courses. Under the
Further and Higher Education (Scotland) Act
1992,
FE colleges and
HE institutions are
autonomous bodies. Therefore,
FE colleges' Boards of
Management have responsibility for curriculum
provision and resource disbursement within
their institutions. Similarly, Ministers and
the Scottish Funding Councils do not have the
power to direct
HEIs on the provision of
courses within their institutions. However,
Universities Scotland have been consulting with
New Roots Scotland over this issue. The
regional
ESOL fora's collaboration
with the regional access fora should also aid
progression. |
|---|
33 | Report | The Scottish Executive should provide an
emergency fund which could be disbursed to
centres to cope with sudden rises in demand | With improved coordination and
collaboration, there should be no need to
change existing mechanisms for disbursing
funds. |
|---|
34 | Report | 'There should be an agreed national
criterion, based on length of residence for
eligibility for free community education
classes.' | We reject this. Classes in
CLD partnerships are
provided on the basis of need rather than
requiring residence for eligibility |
|---|
35 | S &
WG | There should be consultation between sectors
to clarify the definition of an Adult
ESOL Literacies Learner | We reject this. The Scottish Executive
already has a definition for an adult
literacies learner (see the main body of the
consultation document) which we will continue
to use. |
|---|