On this page:

IMPROVING ROAD SAFETY EDUCATION FOR CHILDREN WITH ADDITIONAL SUPPORT NEEDS

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

CHAPTER THREE Travel Patterns

3.1 Travel Patterns of Children with Learning Difficulties

The travel patterns of children with mild to moderate learning difficulties could be expected to differ from other children's travel patterns for a number of reasons. For example, travel to school patterns could vary considerably due to many children travelling to specialist schools or schools with Additional Support Need units. This can have a significant impact on the method of travel. However, little research has been undertaken in this field and part of this study has been to address this gap through analysis of the travel patterns of children with mild to moderate learning difficulties.

In discussion with parents, children and other stakeholders, such as national charities and support groups, the travel patterns of children with mild to moderate learning difficulties were explored. Due to linkages between learning difficulties and other additional support needs, many of the children involved in this research had either a 'multiple diagnosis' of learning difficulties coupled with other needs; or parents and children were not able to put a label on the precise learning difficulty or Additional Support Needs experienced. This led to some variation in the travel patterns exhibited by children involved in this study, which cannot clearly be correlated to the type of Additional Support Needs of the child.

Despite this variation, all of the parents participating in this study indicated that their children had different travel patterns due to their additional needs, with most stating that their travel was significantly limited.

3.1.1 Travel to and from school

The first area where travel patterns can differ is in relation to travel to school. While many children with Additional Support Needs do attend mainstream schools, and this is being increasingly promoted, a significant number of children continue to attend either mainstream schools with particular additional support provision, or special education schools. This generally means that these children are not attending their local school, but are travelling a greater distance to attend schools with particular provision.

This has clear implications on the way in which children travel to school. The education authority has a responsibility to provide transport to school for those pupils who live further than the 'statutory walking distance' from the school 12. This is defined as being less than two miles for those under the age of eight, and less than three miles for those between eight and sixteen. With children placed in special education schools, or those with "additional support " resources, it is more likely that they will have to travel further to school, and therefore qualify for transport provided by the local authority (generally bus or taxi). These children, therefore, are less likely to have the opportunity to walk to school and develop road safety skills in this way.

For those children with Additional Support Needs attending mainstream schools, local authority transportation may also be provided. The Education (Scotland) Act 1980 gives local authorities discretion when deciding the level of transportation to provide, and to whom this should be provided. However, when making a decision about whether it is necessary to provide transport, local authorities should take into account issues such as pupil age, pupil safety and whether pupils have Additional Support Needs. This means that a number of pupils with Additional Support Needs attending mainstream schools will also receive local authority transport to school, depending on the local authority in which they live or attend school.

Many parents and children consulted, indicated that they were provided with local authority transport to and from school - either taxi or bus. Parents expressed some concerns that travelling by taxi or bus meant that children missed out on "learning by walking", and this was echoed by national organisations, such as Enable, who suggested that "children miss out on basic learning, awareness, opportunities for teaching and the social context".

Even where local authority transportation is not provided, travel to school patterns differed. For those not provided with local authority transport, travel by car was most common. Walking was seen as very dangerous for children with additional needs - "in terms of health and fitness it is better for them to walk to school, but in terms of safety this can be impossible" (parent). Car travel was seen as reducing these risks, and also making transport more predictable and routine (an important issue for many of the children).

Some parents had begun encouraging independent walking to school. Two parents consulted allowed their children to cycle - "it is important to give them a sense of independence and responsibility". However, parents did remain concerned - " if he walks I follow him down the road to check he gets there okay".

3.1.2 Evening and weekend travel

Outwith travel to and from school, parents and children indicated that travel was very restricted with very little independent travel in the evenings or at weekends. There were two factors leading to these restricted patterns. Firstly, all of the parents believed that their children faced additional road safety risks due to their needs, and therefore restricted travel to reduce risks. Secondly, children often had difficulty integrating in social activities or coping with everyday tasks, and parents often avoided visiting friends and family, going to social clubs, or going shopping with their children. Parents indicated that they "tailor the environment" and stop doing activities which are too risky or create extra stress for both parent and child.

Many parents believed that these restrictions were made subconsciously - "you don't realise its different… its only when you speak to other people you realise you restrict where you go". However, a small number of parents indicated that while they preferred to restrict the travel patterns of their child, this was not always possible. This was particularly true for those with other children - "if you have other children you need to be out and about".

3.2 Summary

  • Travel of children with mild to moderate learning difficulties is often limited to going to and from school, with little travel for social reasons
  • When travelling to school, many children received local authority transport in the form of taxi or bus
  • For those who did not receive this assistance, car was the favoured method of travel due to perceived increased safety and predictability
  • Travel is restricted by parents due to perceived higher risks of road accident and concerns about the stress of travelling (for both parent and child)
  • Travel is also often restricted due to lack of acceptance of children with Additional Support Needs at social events, or inability of the child to cope with these events
  • There was concern that, due to these restricted travel patterns, many children were missing out on learning the basics of road safety education
  • Road safety awareness was seen as a key skill which could significantly increase the independence of children with Additional Support Needs, both as children and in their adult life

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Tuesday, July 19, 2005