On this page:

PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARDS YOUNG PEOPLE AND YOUTH CRIME IN SCOTLAND - FINDINGS FROM THE 2004 SCOTTISH SOCIAL ATTITUDES SURVEY

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION

Concern about young people and youth crime is nothing new - as a number of academic commentators have noted (see, for example, Pearson, 1983, and Muncie, 2004), it has been a recurrent theme in Britain for at least the past hundred years - but the intensity of recent political and media debate around such issues remains striking. Implicit in these debates are assumptions about public attitudes towards 'young people today' - after all, when politicians refer to 'yob culture' or the erosion of 'respect', they do so in the belief that they are articulating the views of the majority. And yet surprisingly little is actually known (rather than assumed) about public attitudes in this area. While it is possible to find a wealth of survey evidence about attitudes towards crime in general (largely generated by the British and Scottish Crime Surveys), research that focuses specifically on views of young people and youth crime is largely absent.

As part of the 2004 Scottish Social Attitudes survey, the Scottish Executive funded a module aimed at exploring adult views of 'young people', with particular reference to youth crime. More specifically, the module addressed the following questions:

  • How much contact is there between young people and other sections of the population?
  • Do problems associated with young people and youth crime figure prominently in adults' accounts of the main problems facing their communities?
  • What are the main themes in the way that young people are viewed by adults?
  • What are the main features of adult perceptions of and anxieties about youth crime and disorder, and to what extent are such views grounded in experience?

What do we mean by young people?

Although the term 'young people' is commonplace and is intuitively understood, there is no obvious definition of the age groups it includes. For this module, we chose to focus on those between the ages of 11 and 24, which early piloting work suggested was consistent with most public understandings of the term. For some of the questions, though, we addressed 11 to 15 year-olds and 16-24 year-olds separately. The reason for this distinction is that the issues relating to 11 to 15 year-olds (hanging around the streets, truancy, vandalism, etc.) are very different from those affecting the older age group (more serious drug and alcohol use, late-night disorder and violence, more serious offending). Moreover, the circumstances of the two groups tend to be rather different - the former typically still living at home and attending school; the latter entering the job market or higher/further education and often having left the family home.

As a side note, it is worth noting that, although this age group as a whole looms large in popular imagination, it actually accounted for just 18% of Scotland's population in 2003 - down from 23% in 1985. In simple numerical terms, young people are actually increasingly overshadowed by older people - those aged 60 and over currently account for around 20% of Scotland's population. By 2020, those aged 11-16 are likely to account for no more than around 15% of the population; and those aged 60 + for nearer 30% ( GRO, 2005). Thinking forwards 10 or 20 years, this may well have implications for inter-generational contact and conflict; for overall views of young people; and for the construction of the problem of youth crime.

Structure of the report

The report has the following broad structure. The remainder of this introductory chapter provides some background information about the SSA and the reporting conventions used in the analysis. Chapter 2 examines briefly the nature and extent of contact between young people and different sections of the adult population. In subsequent sections, this analysis is drawn upon in order to explore the hypothesis that negative views of young people are associated with low levels of direct personal contact. Chapter 3 looks at the extent to which issues relating to young people feature in adults' accounts of the main problems facing their communities - in other words, at whether the current media and political focus on young people and youth crime is mirrored in public attitudes. Chapter 4 looks at general adult perceptions of younger people, and in particular at the extent to which such views can be characterised as positive or negative. Chapter 5 focuses specifically on the issue of youth crime and disorder and explores public perceptions of, anxieties about and experience of such behaviour. Finally, Chapter 6 summarises the main themes emerging from the research and discusses their implications for how we understand the 'problem of youth crime'.

Each chapter starts by stating the key questions addressed within it. This is followed by an introduction which provides a brief overview of the topic matter and presents the survey questions on which the analysis is based. A set of key points highlighting the main findings can be found at the end of each chapter.

The Scottish Social Attitudes survey series

The Scottish Social Attitudes ( SSA) survey was launched by the Scottish Centre for Social Research1 (part of the National Centre for Social Research) in 1999, following the advent of devolution. Based on annual rounds of interviews with 1,600 people drawn using random probability sampling its aims are to facilitate the study of public opinion and inform the development of public policy in Scotland. In this it has similar objectives to the British Social Attitudes ( BSA) survey, which was launched by the National Centre for Social Research in 1983. While BSA interviews people in Scotland, these are usually too few in any one year to permit separate analysis of public opinion in Scotland (see Park, et al, 2003 for more details of the BSA survey).

SSA is conducted annually and has a modular structure. In any one year it will typically contain four or five modules, each containing 40 questions. Funding for its first two years came from the Economic and Social Research Council while from 2001 onwards different bodies have funded each year's individual modules. These bodies have included the Economic and Social Research Council, the Scottish Executive and various charitable and grant awarding bodies such as the Nuffield and Leverhulme Foundations.

Reporting conventions

Data analysis and presentation

Two types of analysis are presented in the report. The tables and figures present the findings from simple bivariate analyses between two variables. To keep the presentation simple, for some variables (chiefly age, education and social class) the tables only show the results for a selection of categories. For example, the views of 18-24 year olds and those over 65 are shown but the intervening age groups have been omitted. Full versions of the tables are available from the Scottish Centre for Social Research on request.

In many instances the decision as to what to present in each table was taken after multivariate modelling using logistic regression had been carried out. This kind of modelling looks at the strength of the association between one variable and a number of factors that might be related to it while controlling for the association that all of the other indicators have with the variable of interest. The results therefore make it possible to establish the relative strength of the patterns of association between variables, for example whether someone's age or their education level is most closely associated with their views on an issue. It also makes it possible to eliminate factors which are not significant once other variables have been controlled for.

Appendices

Annex 1 provides the technical details of the surveys on which the report is based and has further descriptions of the analysis techniques used. Details of some of the classification variables used in the analysis, such as social class and urban/rural residence, are also included here. Annex 2 contains the questions from the 2004 survey, and the responses people gave, that are covered within this report. Annex 3 presents the results of the multivariate analyses included in the report.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Thursday, July 14, 2005