| Description | Report of Consultation Responses |
|---|
| ISBN | n/a |
|---|
| Official Print Publication Date | |
|---|
| Website Publication Date | June 30, 2005 |
|---|
Listen
ISBN
0 7559 1158 X (Web only publication)
This document is also available in
pdf format (116k)
Introduction
On 10 March 2005 the Scottish Executive invited comments
on draft regulations made under powers contained in The
Smoking, Health and Social Care (Scotland) Bill 2005 and
the Regulatory Impact Assessment (
RIA) of this legislation. Comments were
invited from relevant business representative
organisations, individual businesses, health and other
organisations and interested parties (list attached). To
enable a wider audience to participate, the consultation
material was also placed on the Scottish Executive's web
site
www.scotland.gov.uk/smokingregulations.
All responses were requested by Thursday 26 May 2005.
Background
The issue of smoking in public places was subject to
extensive public consultation from June to September 2004.
Following consideration of the findings of the consultation
and other evidence gathered on the health effects of
passive smoking and the health and economic impact of
regulation on smoking in public places, Ministers
introduced the Smoking, Health and Social Care (Scotland)
Bill in December 2004.
The Bill contained measures to prohibit smoking in
certain wholly enclosed public places, and indicates that
detailed provisions, including exemptions will be
prescribed through regulations. The First Minister stated
that the scope of the ban was intended to be comprehensive,
although it was recognised that there would be a need for
some very specific exemptions for places where people
reside or where there are clearly established humanitarian
or practical considerations.
Summary of Responses and Conclusions
The consultation materials posed questions about
specific matters. However, this approach did not preclude
consultees from commenting on any aspects of the draft
regulations or the
RIA.
We are extremely grateful to all who took the time to
respond to the consultation paper. A total of 126 responses
were received by the deadline set. Table 1 below sets out
the category of respondents. A number of responses dealt
specifically with the 10 questions posed in the
consultation paper, the others passing general comments on
the proposed legislation or the material contained in the
RIA. All of the responses were
considered individually and this report is a summary of the
main issues raised.
Please note that the graphs contained within this report
display a significant number of no comments. While some
respondents actually offered no comments to the
consultation exercise, the majority offered specific
comments on one or two of the questions raised and these
are reflected in the appropriate graphs.
Table 1: Category of Respondents
THE SMOKING, HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE
(SCOTLAND) ACT 2005 CONSULTATION
RESPONSES | |
|---|
Business | 26 |
|---|
Business - transport | 3 |
|---|
Charity Organisation | 7 |
|---|
Government body | 5 |
|---|
Health Promotion Unit | 5 |
|---|
Interest Groups | 4 |
|---|
Justice | 3 |
|---|
Local Authorities | 20 |
|---|
MSP | 1 |
|---|
NHS bodies | 16 |
|---|
Non- departmental public
body | 1 |
|---|
Other | 15 |
|---|
Private club | 1 |
|---|
Professional Organisation
(Health) | 12 |
|---|
Sports | 2 |
|---|
Unions | 1 |
|---|
Voluntary | 4 |
|---|
Total | 126 |
|---|
Next Steps
Ministers and officials have given careful consideration
to all responses received as part of the consultation
exercise. The regulations will be finalised, taking into
account the responses received. If the Smoking, Health and
Social Care (Scotland) Act 2005 (Prohibition of Smoking in
Certain Premises) Regulations 2005 is approved by
MSPs, the regulations will be laid
before Parliament for approval following the summer recess,
in September 2005.
The introduction of the new law is planned for Spring
2006.
A copy of the updated regulations will be sent to all
those who responded to the consultation.
Draft Regulations and responses to questions
posed
Regulation 1: Citation, interpretation and
commencement
Regulation 1 provides the definitions of words and
phrases used in the regulations and the commencement
date of the regulations.
Q.1. Consultees were asked if the
definitions of words and phrases ensured clarity of
what premises were covered or exempted from the
regulations. If not, how might they be
improved?

Although, in general, respondents were content with the
definitions used in the draft regulations there were a
number of responses which provided a range of suggested
changes or sought further clarification. The main issues
raised were:
- Clarification was sought on the definitions of club
premises, designated hotel rooms, educational
institutions (e.g. student accommodation), government
establishments (e.g. armed forces), residential
premises, (e.g. hostels), sports stadia, railway and
bus stations, open top tour busses and bars.
- To avoid confusion it was suggested that vehicles
should be separately defined.
- Clarification was sought on the definition of
wholly enclosed to ensure that there was no
ambiguity.
Regulation 2: Display of no smoking
notices
This regulation makes further provision in relation
to the display of no-smoking notices, in addition to
the requirements already stipulated under section 3(1)
of the Bill. The regulation sets out the minimum size
of a no-smoking notice (230 mm x 160 mm) and specifies
that it should include an international "no smoking"
symbol of at least 85 mm. in diameter. The sign must
also specify the person to whom complaints should be
addressed and be displayed so that it is protected from
tampering, damage, removal or concealment.
Q2. Views were invited on this
approach.

A range of suggestions were made regarding the issue of
signage. Mixed views were received from respondents, some
favouring the approach contained in the draft regulations
while others felt that the regulations were too
prescriptive, excessive or unnecessary. The main issues
raised concerned the size, shape, placement and the
information to be contained within the signage.
Regulation 3: "No-smoking premises"
Paragraph (1) of regulation gives effect to
Schedule 1, which sets out the premises or classes of
premise which are to be no-smoking premises, whilst
paragraph (2) gives effect to Schedule 2, which sets
out the premises or parts of premises or classes of
premises or parts of premises which are excluded from
the definition of no-smoking premises. The "no-smoking
premises" listed at Schedule 1 and the exemptions
listed at Schedule 2 are discussed in more detail
below.
Paragraph 3 of regulation 3 defines and elaborates on
the terms 'premises', 'wholly enclosed' and 'has access' as
they are used in the Bill.
We are continuing to examine whether the given
definition of "wholly enclosed" delivers the policy
intention, which is to designate as no-smoking premises all
those premises listed in Schedule 1 to the regulations,
provided that they are either wholly enclosed or, where
they are not wholly enclosed, the extent to which they are
not wholly enclosed is significant.
Q3. Comments were invited on the existing
formula and on how it might be improved.

The majority of the respondents felt the need for a
clearer definition of the term "wholly enclosed" and
whether the premises could be permanent or temporary, based
on the definition as drafted.
Regulation 4: Fixed penalty time limits,
amounts and payments
Regulation 4 provides further detail on fixed
penalties. The regulations provide that an enforcement
officer can only serve a fixed penalty notice up to 7
days after the event. It sets out the amounts of fixed
penalty associated with the various types of offence.
The fixed penalties are: £200 for permitting others to
smoke in no-smoking premises; £50 for smoking in
no-smoking premises; £200 for not conspicuously
displaying warning notices in no-smoking premises.
Where an offender pays the fixed penalty within 15 days,
discounted amounts are charged. The discounted amounts are:
£150; £30 and £150 respectively.
Q4. Views were invited on the level of
fixed penalties and time limits for
payment

Although the majority of those who responded were
generally satisfied with the level and time limit for fixed
penalties, a number of responses suggested that fixed
penalties should be increased or a sliding scale introduced
for repeat offenders. There were, however, some views
suggesting that fixed penalties were excessive. The ability
to enforce fixed penalties in rural locations within the
time limits set was questioned by some respondents.
Regulation 5: Application by councils of fixed
penalties and account keeping
This regulation requires councils to keep accounts
of their income and expenditure in respect of the
administration and enforcement of Fixed Penalty
Notices. Any deficit will be made good by the council
and any surplus used to improve the "amenity" of the
council area. Councils will be required to send an
annual statement of the accounts they have kept to
Ministers along with an explanation.
Q5. Views were invited on the general
approach outlined here.

The majority of responses which offered comment favoured
the approach set out in the regulations. Caution was
expressed to ensure that an over zealous enforcement
approach by Environmental Health Officers should not be
adopted in an attempt to defray costs.
Schedules to the Regulations
Schedule 1sets out the definitive list of those premises that
will be no-smoking premises for the purposes of the Act.
This is required by Section 4(2) of the Bill which provides
that Ministers will make regulations prescribing premises,
or classes of premises, as "no-smoking" premises. Section
4(4) of the Bill limits the kinds of premises that can be
prescribed as being no-smoking premises by making it a
condition that they must be wholly enclosed and also fall
within one of 4 stipulated categories.
Schedule 2 lists the premises or parts
of premises or classes of premises or parts of premises
which will be exempted from the no-smoking regime.
There are a number of issues in relation to
Schedule 1 and 2 on which views were sought:
Schedule 1: No-smoking premises
Under Section 4(4) of the Bill, the kind of
premises which can be defined as no-smoking are those
which are wholly enclosed and -
(a) to which the public or a section of the public has
access;
(b) which are being used wholly or mainly as a place of
work by persons who are employees;
(c) which are being used by and for the purposes of a
club or other unincorporated association; or
(d) which are being used wholly or mainly for the
provision of education or of health or care services.
It is therefore intended that the list of premises
included in Schedule 1 to the regulations be definitive.
Ministers will have the power to add to the list of
no-smoking premises by way of amendment of the regulations
if it proves to be deficient in any way.
Q.6 Views were sought on whether there were any
premises which fall into the definition of
no-smoking premises at section 4(4) of the Bill
[(a)-(d) above], but which had been omitted from
the list in Schedule 1.

In response to the specific question asked a number of
additional premises were identified by respondents. These
included: detention centres, prisons, armed service
establishments, public telephone kiosks, bus stop shelters,
doorways, stadia, railway stations and bus stations.
Schedule 2: Exemptions
Adult care homes
Ministers recognise that there are a number of
issues which make it desirable to exempt adult care
homes from the scope of the legislation, not least that
these are effectively the homes of their
residents.
However, Ministers also recognise that safety and other
considerations mean that in many such establishments
smoking is not permitted in residents' own rooms, the
places which most closely equate to their private place of
residence. For this reason, particular consideration must
be given to the impact of second hand smoke on non-smoking
residents and on staff. In order to address this, we will
investigate the best way of ensuring that care homes
implement smoking policies which provide smoke-free social
areas for non-smoking staff; and the targeting of cessation
services and funds on those groups where it would have the
greatest benefit.
Q.7 Views were invited on:
- the general merits of this
approach;
- the development of smoking policies
for residential care homes; and
- the targeting of cessation services
on these groups.

Respondents were mainly in favour of the approach to
exempt adult care homes. However, respondents identified a
clear need to take account of the rights of non-smoking
residents and a duty of care to staff working in these
establishments. Respondents indicated that they supported
the view that the Scottish Executive should look at the
best ways of ensuring care homes implement smoking policies
backed up by the education of smoking residents
Psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric
units
The position of patients in psychiatric hospitals
and units, whether they are there voluntarily or on the
basis of a compulsory order, is different to general
members of the public. They do not have a private room
and may have limited access to the outdoors. For those
reasons, among others, we would for now intend to
exempt these locations. We will explore with those
involved in the care and treatment of people with
mental illness as well as advocacy groups and patients
themselves whether arrangements might be developed to
allow the legislation to extend to some or all
psychiatric hospitals and units in due course.
Ministers recognise that the physical health profile of
those with mental illness in Scotland is poor and smoking
rates are traditionally high. Ministers are committed to
reducing the healthinequalities experienced by this group of patients and
plan to implement a programme of targeted cessation across
the sector in support of this aim.
Q.8 Views were invited on:
- the general merits of this
approach; and
- the targeting of cessation services
at this group.

In the main respondents were in favour of the approach
and recognised the need for the exemption of these
premises. However, respondents identified the requirement
to ensure the protection of staff and no-smoking patients
by minimising the impact of smoke within these premises. It
was acknowledged that patients should be given the
necessary support to help them to give up smoking.
Hotel, guest house and B & B
bedrooms
The regulations have been drafted to include hotels,
guest houses and B & Bs within the scope of the law,
but to allow proprietors the ability, if required, to
designate bedrooms in which smoking may be
permitted.
Q.9 Views were invited on the merits of this
approach.

Respondents were generally in favour of the approach,
suggesting that proprietors should have the discretion to
designate some of their bedrooms in which smoking could be
permitted. A number of respondents recommended that there
might be some merit in setting a maximum number of smoking
rooms within the premises to prevent all or mainly all
being allocated as smoking rooms. Concern was expressed
over staff servicing such rooms regarding their exposure to
second-hand smoke.
Omissions from Schedule 2
Q.10 Were there any premises which, taking into
account humanitarian, practical or other
considerations, which were omitted from the
exemptions list in Schedule 2?

While the majority of respondents were content with the
list, a number of individual respondents requested that
certain premises should be added. These included day care
centres for the homeless, day care centres for the elderly,
users of mental health drop in centres, theatre productions
and on shore gas installations.
Regulatory Impact Assessment (
RIA)
The consultation documentation contained a Regulatory
Impact Assessment (
RIA) which assessed the costs, benefits
and the likely impact of the proposed legislation on
business based on the best evidence available. Three
options had been considered in the development of policy
and these were set out in the
RIA documentation. The three options
were:- option one - voluntary approach, option two - smoke
free legislation, option three - legislation, but with the
exemption of the hospitality sector.
Only seven respondents choose to make specific comments
on the
RIA with the majority fully supporting
the Scottish Executive's conclusion that option 2 was the
best option to deliver improvements in public health. One
respondent suggested that the information set out in the
documentation was highly speculative. Another respondent
raised issues of enforcement, sanctions and level of proof
required by environmental enforcement officers. The
respondent also suggested that a fourth option should also
have been considered i.e. the creation of smoke free
premises with the option to provide separate accommodation
for those who wish to smoke.
THE SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
TOBACCO CONTROL DIVISION
JUNE 2005
DRAFT: SMOKING, HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE (SCOTLAND) ACT
2005 (PROHIBITION OF SMOKING IN CERTAIN PREMISES)
REGULATIONS 2005 CONSULTATION LIST
Business (General)
CBI Scotland
Federation of Small Businesses
McLarens Wholesale
Scottish Retail Consortium
Scottish Business in the Community
Scottish Chamber of Commerce
Scottish Grocers' Federation
National Federation of Retail Newsagents
Business (Leisure, Gaming and Hospitality)
Association of British Bookmakers
Bar, Entertainment and Dance Association
BAT (British American Tobacco)
Bell Filter Solutions Ltd
Bingo Association
British Casino Association
British Greyhound Racing Board
British Horseracing Board
British Hospitality Association
Carlton Clubs Plc
Cowells Arrow Bingo
Gala Leisure Ltd
National Association of Bookmakers Ltd
National Greyhound Racing Club Ltd
Rank Group Gaming Division
Scottish Beer and Pub Association
Scottish Football Association
Scottish Independent Bookmakers Association
Scottish Licensed Trade Association
Scottish Premier League
Scottish Rugby Union
Sportscotland
Scottish Tourism Forum
Stanley Leisure Plc
Tobacco Manufacturers' Association
Visit Scotland
William Hill Plc
Business (Transport)
Airport Operators Association
BAA Scottish Airports
British Ports Association
Caledonian MacBrayne Ltd
Confederation of Passenger Transport
Dundee Airport
Edinburgh Private Hire Association
First ScotRail
Glasgow Prestwick International Airport
GNER
Highlands and Islands Airport Ltd
Northlink Orkney and Shetland Ferries Ltd
Orkney Ferries
P&O Irish Sea
Railway Policy and Projects Branch
Scottish Taxi Federation
Seacat
Stena Line Ltd
Strathclyde Passenger Transport
The Chamber of Shipping
The Greater Glasgow Private Hire Association
UK Major Ports Group
Virgin Trains
Western Ferries (Clyde Ltd)
Children and Young People
Barnardos
Children First
Children in Scotland
Save the Children Scotland
Scottish Youth Parliament
Youthlink Scotland
Disability
Capability Scotland
Disability Rights Commission
Enable
Inclusion Scotland
Scottish Association for Mental Health
Scottish Disability Equality Forum Scotland
Mental Health Foundation
Mental Welfare Commission
National Schizophrenia Fellowship (Scotland)
Enterprise
Highlands and Islands Enterprise
Scottish Enterprise
Equality and Ethnic Groups
Commission for Racial Equality
Equality Opportunities Commission
Strategic Group on Women
Justice
Faculty of Advocates
Scottish Police Federation
Sheriff's Association
The Association of Scottish Police Superintendents
The Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland
The Law Society of Scotland
Local Authorities
COSLA
Chief Executives, Local Authorities
City of Glasgow Licensing Board
Edinburgh Licensing Board
VOCAL (Voice of Chief Officer of
Cultural, Community and Leisure Service)
NHS Scotland/ Other Health
Asthma
UK
British Dental Association (Scottish Branch)
British Heart Foundation
British Lung Foundation
British Medical Association (Scottish Branch)
Cancer Research
UK
Care Commission
Chest, Heart and Stroke Scotland
Chief Executives,
NHS Boards
Chief Executives, Special Boards
Diabetes
UK, Scotland
Directors of Public Health
General Managers, State Hospitals
Health Promotion Managers
MacMillan Cancer Relief
Marie Curie Cancer Relief
RCGP
Royal College of Nursing
Royal College of Physicians
Royal College of Surgeons
Royal Society of Edinburgh
The State Hospitals Board for Scotland
UK Departments of Health
Older People
Age Concern
Alzheimer Scotland
Help the Aged
Scottish Care
Parliament
Clerk of Committees
MEPs
Prisons
APEX Scotland
HM Inspectorate of Prisons
SACRO
Scottish Prison Officers Association
Scottish Prison Service
Private Clubs
British Legion
Coal Industry Social Welfare Organisation
CIU (Scottish Rep)
CIU - Working Men's Club and Institute
Union Ltd
CORCA - Committee of Registered Clubs
Association
Grand Lodge of Scotland
Grand Orange Lodge of Scotland
National Union of Students
Scottish Bowling
Scottish Golf Union
Sustainable Development
Friends of the Earth Scotland
Keep Scotland Beautiful
Unions
STUC (for all Unions)
Voluntary
Aberlour
ASH Scotland
Association of Chief Officers of Voluntary
Organisations
Community Service Volunteers
Oxfam in Scotland
Salvation Army
Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations
Scottish Human Rights Centre
The Poverty Alliance
The Roy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation
Voluntary Action Fund
Volunteer Development Scotland
Who Cares Scotland
Women's Royal Voluntary Service
Other
Association of Scottish Community Councils
CAB (Citizens Advice Bureau)
Centre for Tobacco Control Research
Copyright Libraries
FOREST
Highland Users Group
Ministerial Working Group on Tobacco Control
National Smoke-free Areas Implementation Group
Royal Environmental Health Institute of Scotland
Scotland's Health at Work
Scottish Civic Forum
Scottish Consumer Council
Scottish Tobacco Control Alliance
Society of Chief Officers of Environmental Health in
Scotland
Society of Chief Officers of Trading Standards in
Scotland