« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
06:
Sustainable Development
The introduction of a new
framework and hierarchy for planning, along with measures
to improve efficiency and support better inclusion, are not
an end in themselves. They are, instead, a means to
securing better outcomes from the planning process. The
proposals in the White Paper increase the opportunities for
planning to fulfil its potential and to play its role in
delivering sustainable development. For development to be
sustainable it must be the right development, in the right
place, of the right quality and at the right time.
We are committed to a plan led system. We want plans to
be drawn up in an inclusive and transparent manner. We
expect these plans to provide clarity and certainty about
the way communities will change and evolve in the longer
term.
Development planning provides both a framework and a
process by which the interaction of economic, social and
environmental considerations as they affect people and
places can be identified and evaluated. In preparing
strategic development plans and local development plans,
issues should be considered as they relate to and connect
with each other and not in isolation. At the same time the
long term consequences, as well as the short term effects,
of development and change can be addressed.
The introduction of Strategic Environmental Assessment (
SEA) marks not just a significant
improvement in the way that the environmental consequences
of decision making are addressed, but also introduces
enhanced levels of openness and accountability in policy
making. We will therefore integrate
SEA into the process for drawing up the
National Planning Framework.
Although it has been normal practice for planning
authorities to consider the likely environmental
consequences when preparing a development plan, the
introduction of
SEA has now formalised this.
SEA introduces an explicit, systematic
method of taking account of environmental considerations
and it also places public participation at the heart of
that process. Key stages include: the preparation of an
environmental report; carrying out full public
consultations; taking account of the environmental report
and consultation responses in the decision making process;
and finally, a requirement to make information available on
the decisions made, helping stakeholders to understand
better how these decisions were reached.
Development plans must make provision for development.
Scotland's future depends on it. We need jobs, houses,
services and utilities to enable the people of Scotland to
fulfil their hopes and aspirations as individuals, families
and communities. But that does not mean development at any
cost or in any place or to any standard. There are
consequences from badly located, ill considered and poorly
designed development. The growth areas of today cannot
become the regeneration priorities of the future.
We expect plans to make provision for developments that
are required to meet our wider international and
EU obligations, notably in waste
management and water quality. We recognise concerns of some
communities about developments that have significant
environmental impacts not just individually but also
cumulatively. Our emerging policies on opencast coal, waste
and minerals will seek to ensure that any community is not
subject to a disproportionate burden of negative
environmental impacts. These national planning policies
need to be reflected in development plans and in decisions
on planning applications and appeals. We expect planning
permission to be refused if unacceptable impacts cannot be
mitigated.
Since 1988 certain types of planning applications which
are likely to have significant effects on Scotland's
environment have been subject to the formal requirements of
Environmental Impact Assessment (
EIA) legislation.
EIA provides a means of drawing
together, in a systematic way, an assessment of a project's
likely significant environmental impacts. Once again,
public consultation is an explicit requirement and key
stage in that process.
The current Regulations are due to be further
strengthened to take account of expanded provisions on
public participation which have been introduced at European
level. These changes, which are themselves currently the
subject of a full public consultation, will introduce new
procedures designed to enhance further the rights of local
people and to make it easier to participate fully in the
decision making process.
We have also indicated that where an
EIA is involved, the developer should
engage with the local community prior to submitting a
planning application. If the planning authority is not
satisfied with the level of engagement or believes that the
developer has not done sufficient to take account of local
concerns, they may refuse to register the application. We
are also proposing to pilot the use of Good Neighbour
Agreements. This will allow communities an active role not
just in planning for new development but in ensuring that
it is carried out to agreed planning and environmental
standards.
We have attached a high priority to improving design
quality in Scotland. Publications such as
Designing Places,
SPP1: The Planning System,
SPP20: Role of Architecture and Design
Scotland, together with a series of Planning Advice
Notes, set out our aspirations for higher standards of
development. We have also emphasised the importance of
raising design awareness and improving skills within the
planning profession and will continue to support a range of
measures and incentives to achieve this.
Location, in particular ready access to jobs and key
services, is the starting point, but development should be
designed in a way that is well integrated with the existing
urban form, has well planned and well connected public
spaces that bring people together and which provides
opportunities for physical activity and recreation. Our aim
goes beyond discouraging poorly located or badly designed
proposals. Instead we want to encourage development that
will enhance the quality of places and provide
neighbourhoods for living, working and recreation which
will increase community well-being. The objective is not
just to create places that look good but which function
well and add to the quality of life for all.
Interaction between planning and
environmental regulation: In 2003, the
Executive commissioned Environmental Resources
Management to carry out research on the
interaction between planning and environmental
consenting regimes, including assessing whether
the regimes interact in a way that supports
public involvement and environmental justice.
The research report was published in October
2004. The research found that there have been
substantial improvements in the operation of
the interface between planning and
environmental regulation since guidance was
first published in 1994. But, it concluded that
there are still weaknesses which lead to
inappropriate standards of environmental
protection, delays in resolution of consents,
unnecessary burdens on participants, public
uncertainty and lack of confidence in the
planning system. This research report contained
28 main recommendations and a number of
detailed recommendations on how they should be
given effect. The Executive intends to adopt
all the recommendations in the report.
Consideration will also be given to improving
the interaction between the planning process
and other statutory procedures for flood
prevention schemes. |
« Previous | Contents | Next »