« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
MINISTERIAL FOREWORD
As Justice Minister, I
want to deliver a safer, stronger Scotland through a more
efficient and effective justice system. A justice system that
stands up to the scourge of antisocial behaviour. A justice
system that tackles the ongoing threat from drugs. A justice
system that protects the public, punishes criminals, but offers
a second chance to those who need one.
Reducing violent crime - and tackling the "booze and blades"
culture that endangers decent communities - remains at the
forefront of our drive to improve public
safety. Knife crime is an ugly, vicious and unacceptable
scar on our society, and one which we are determined to
confront. But there are no quick fixes for this problem. There
are no simple, one-off solutions to violence and its many
causes.
That is why we are tackling this in a number of ways. This
paper proposes new restrictions on the sale of knives. This
adds to the existing law and the changes proposed in
'Supporting Police, Protecting Communities' - which will double
the maximum sentences for carrying a knife in public and raise
the minimum age for purchase of a knife from 16 to 18.
Of course, criminal laws are just one way of addressing this
problem - and will never provide us with the whole solution.
That is why 'Supporting Police, Protecting Communities' already
proposes that we extend the police's powers of arrest for knife
crime offences and why we are working with the police and other
agencies, to explore the root causes of this behaviour; to
identify preventative measures which can reduce the likelihood
of violence; and to develop early interventions, which can help
to break cycles of violence and brutality.
By reviewing and updating our laws on knife crime, we can
help the police make communities safer by sending a clear
message that such misconduct cannot, and will not be tolerated.
A clear message that those who persist in flouting the law, and
endangering others, can expect to pay a hefty price in our
criminal courts.
I welcome your views on these proposals for tightening up
our laws on the sale of knives and swords. I am confident that
by working with others, we can tackle this problem, so that
together, we can drive down knife crime, keep it down, and
break its grip on Scotland once and for all.
CATHY JAMIESON
MSP
Minister for Justice
SECTION ONEBackground
Knives and swords: The problem?
1. Every year in Scotland, far too many people are badly
injured and killed by knives. In 2004, Scotland had the 4
th highest incidence of death by violence in the
European Union. Year upon year, murder statistics show that
knives and other sharp items continue to be the most common
method of killing in this country, consistently accounting for
around half of all murders each year
.
Knife crime statistics for Scotland
Year | Total number of murders | Number of murders with knives |
|---|
2003 | 108 | 55 |
|---|
2002 | 128 | 68 |
|---|
2001 | 110 | 49 |
|---|
2000 | 105 | 43 |
|---|
1999 | 119 | 66 |
|---|
1998 | 97 | 42 |
|---|
2. These continuing high levels of knife crime represent an
ugly and destructive aspect of our society and are totally
unacceptable. The statistics reflect a far too common view
amongst some, that carrying and using knives is a way of
displaying strength and gaining respect. And increasingly, the
police are reporting the carrying and concealment of fixed
blades, lock knives, and other bladed weapons, mainly by young
men, particularly in Glasgow and the west of Scotland.
Number of convictions for handling an offensive
weapon
Police Force Area | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 |
|---|
Central | 53 | 50 | 54 | 70 | 62 | 85 |
|---|
Dumfries & Galloway | 37 | 47 | 35 | 32 | 44 | 50 |
|---|
Fife | 33 | 43 | 41 | 74 | 55 | 58 |
|---|
Grampian | 97 | 74 | 63 | 118 | 102 | 111 |
|---|
Lothian & Borders | 271 | 211 | 204 | 278 | 325 | 254 |
|---|
Northern | 43 | 34 | 31 | 46 | 46 | 53 |
|---|
Strathclyde | 1,397 | 1,499 | 1,680 | 1,939 | 1,821 | 2,048 |
|---|
Tayside | 131 | 122 | 130 | 138 | 134 | 140 |
|---|
Age of offenders detected for Murder, Attempted
murder and serious assault for Strathclyde where a
knife was used during the 1000 days prior to 13 April
2004

3. Knives can be lethal weapons and to carry them for
'protection' or as a status symbol is not something which we
can tolerate. A knife is not defensive, it is an offensive and
indeed a lethal weapon. And carrying a knife can often be the
first step towards becoming a criminal; the first step towards
taking a life; the first step towards tearing apart the very
fabric of our communities.
4. There are already strict laws concerning the carrying of
knives in public. What we now need to consider are ways to
restrict knives getting into the hands of the wrong people in
the first place.
5. Similarly, while many might think that swords are part of
a by-gone age, their threat remains very real in Scotland
today. Advice from the police suggests that the concealability,
portability and availability of samurai swords in particular,
make them the weapon of choice for growing numbers of young men
with criminal intentions. That view is supported by the
increasing number of well reported court cases involving
samurai and ornamental swords.
6. Swords can be lethal weapons. They are designed for
combat and as such, there are strong arguments that they should
be subject to specific measures of control. This consultation
paper sets out a range of possible options to achieve this.
Existing Law: What's already being done to reduce
knife crime?
7. There are already a number of laws in place to restrict
the sale and use of knives in Scotland. An attack with a weapon
has always been considered a particularly serious assault under
Scots law. Over the past 50 years, our laws have been
continually strengthened and updated, to provide a range of
powers and a range of penalties - including fines and
imprisonment - for tackling and preventing knife crime (see
Annex A).
Existing criminal offence | Maximum penalty |
|---|
Manufacturing, selling, hiring or lending a
flick-knife or gravity knife | - 6 months in prison and/or a £2500 fine
|
Manufacturing, importing, selling, hiring,
lending or giving a range of offensive weapons,
including sword stick, push daggers, death stars
and butterfly knives | - 6 months in prison and/or a £5000 fine
|
Selling a knife to someone under the age of
16* | - 6 months in prison and/or a £5000 fine
|
Marketing a knife in a way which suggests it is
suitable for combat | - 2 years in prison and/or a fine
|
Carrying a knife or similar, bladed item, in a
public place | - 2* years in prison and/or a fine
|
Carrying an offensive weapon in a public
place | - 4 years in prison and/or a fine
|
*
NB It is proposed to increase the maximum
penalty for possession of a knife in a public place to 4 years
and increase the minimum purchase age for a non-domestic knife
from 16 to 18 - see paras 13 & 16 below
Overall strategy
8. Of course, criminal sanctions alone will never be enough
to eradicate knife crime totally. In addition to tightening up
the laws relating to violent crime, the Scottish Executive is
also taking forward work on the enforcement of those laws. We
are working on this in partnership with Strathclyde Police, who
have identified violent crime - and particularly knife crime -
as a priority.
9. A specialist unit has been established in Strathclyde, to
work with partner agencies in education, health and social
work, so that a joined-up approach to reducing violent crime in
Glasgow and the west of Scotland can be developed.
10. The unit is also undertaking a programme of research
which aims to:
- establish why young men carry knives;
- explore triggers such as alcohol, drugs, peer pressure,
gangs and territorialism;
- identify the number of violent crimes going unreported
to the police; and
- examine the link between crime and deprivation.
11. We will use the findings of this research to develop
further the Executive's approach to violence. Of course, the
problem of knife crime is not unique to Strathclyde. Successful
new approaches to enforcement on knife crime can usefully be
shared with other forces after being piloted in
Strathclyde.
Next Steps: What plans are in place to tighten up
the law?
12. Tightening up the law is therefore one part of the
overall strategy. Despite the laws already in place to ensure
that the carrying, sale and use of knives can be dealt with
robustly it is a matter of concern that crimes involving knives
continue at their current level. That is why the Scottish
Executive has been reviewing knife crime law and its
enforcement - to consider what more can be done, in particular,
to limit the availability of these potentially dangerous
weapons by placing restrictions on their sale.
A Partnership for a better Scotland: Partnership
Agreement:
"We will continue to work for a Safer Scotland, reducing
crime, particularly violent and drugs related crime, and
reducing re-offending."
"We will work to make communities safer, and people feel
safer. . . [and] we will review the law and enforcement on
knife crimes".
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/government/pfbs-00.asp
13. That review identified a number of actions which could
be taken, to strengthen the laws on selling and carrying
knives. In November 2004, the First Minister announced the
following five point plan:
- Doubling the penalty for possession of a knife in a
public place, from 2 years to 4 years;
- Increasing the use of stop and search powers by the
police, and enhancing police powers of arrest, so that
arrests could be made on the suspicion that someone was
carrying a knife or an offensive weapon;
- Increasing the minimum age at which a knife can be sold
to someone from 16 to 18;
- Creating a licensing scheme for the sale of
non-domestic knives; and
- Banning the sale of swords.
'Supporting Police: Protecting
Communities'
We are already taking action on the first three points of
the First Minister's five point plan. Proposals for new
legislation to put those measures in place were announced in
February as part of the consultation on the Police Bill.
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations/justice/sppcpl-00.asp
Further action
14. This consultation paper therefore focuses on the last
two points and looks at what more can be done to prevent these
potentially dangerous weapons getting into the wrong hands in
the first place.
Definitions: what kind of knives are we talking
about?
15. While we could seek to restrict access to
all knives - no matter what their intended purpose - the
vast majority of people use knives in the home responsibly and
safely every day. The efforts and costs involved in restricting
access to all of these knives would be disproportionate to any
benefits that might be gained. We do not, therefore, propose to
place further restrictions on the sale of knives with a
legitimate domestic use.
16. We therefore intend that knives which are designed for
domestic purposes, such the preparation and consumption of food
or
DIY tasks, should not be covered by the
proposed increase in the minimum age at which a knife can be
sold to someone or any further restrictions on sale we
introduce.
17. Instead, we believe that proposals to restrict the sale
of knives should focus on those knives which do not have a
clear and unambiguous domestic purpose. In particular we want
to catch so-called combat knives and others more suitable for
slashing, stabbing and fighting than for any domestic
purpose.
18. Our proposed definition of a "non-domestic" knife
is:
" a knife which has a blade or sharp point, and which
is not designed only for domestic use, or only for use in
the processing, preparation or consumption of food."

19. That definition would extend to dual- or multi-function
knives, where any one of those functions related to a
non-domestic purpose. For example a 'hunting' knife might be
used for 'food preparation' but, since it is also designed for
non-domestic use, it would be subject to the restrictions
proposed in this paper.
20. Existing legislation in this area refers to "knives and
other articles with blades or points". The distinguishing
feature of those items that we wish to control is not that they
are commonly called "knives" but that they are bladed or
pointed, and therefore have the potential to harm others.
References in this consultation paper to "knives" are therefore
used as a shorthand for any similarly bladed or pointed article
or implement.
21. In addition, the definition of non-domestic knives
proposed above would include swords (as could existing
statutory definitions of knives). The measures this paper
proposes for restricting the sale of such knives could
therefore also apply to swords.
22. A working definition of a sword - and one which was used
in legislation of the Parliament of Victoria, Australia, (which
banned swords in 2004), is:
"'Sword' being a thrusting, striking or cutting weapon
with a long blade having 1 or 2 edges and a hilt or
handle"
Consultation: What are the options?
23. This consultation paper discusses a range of actions we
might take to restrict access to knives and swords.
24. The various options outlined in Section 2 of this paper,
will require different levels of resources; offer different
degrees of control; and produce different levels of impact.
Some can be implemented relatively quickly, others will require
more detailed work, and primary legislation. In exploring these
options, it will be important to assess the balance between the
necessary input, in terms of time and resources, and the
expected benefits, in terms of reducing knife crime.
SECTION 2
Restricting sale of knives and swords:
Options
License the sale of non-domestic knives
A key step toward restricting the availability of
non-domestic knives is to regulate their sale. Scottish
Ministers could require any retailer wishing to sell
non-domestic knives to hold a licence, authorising them to do
so. Retailers would apply to the relevant local authority for a
licence - and could be required to meet certain conditions
before their application was approved. It would then be a
criminal offence for a person to sell a non-domestic knife
without a licence. It would also be a criminal offence for a
licence-holder to break any of the conditions of his or her
licence.
25. We do not propose to create a mandatory licensing scheme
for the sale of all knives. Instead, we propose to introduce a
scheme for the sale of non-domestic knives. This is intended to
target those knives that have no clear domestic purpose and
place a spotlight on any retailers who sell knives
irresponsibly.
26. Any conditions attached to licences would require to be
reasonable, and proportionate to the problem being tackled. As
a number of murders are committed with knives every year in
Scotland, however, it is clear that this is a serious problem,
and one which justifies more onerous conditions. These might
include:
- requiring retailers to keep records of those to whom
they sell non-domestic knifes;
- requiring retailers to obtain photographic evidence of
the purchaser's identification;
- regulating the display of knives on the licensed
premises
e.g. blacked out windows; locked cases;
- requiring a "cooling off" period between any initial
approach to purchase, and the finalising of a sale;
- requiring retailers to obtain a statement from (
e.g.) a Justice of the Peace, Member or
Parliament or professional person, confirming purchaser's
ID ;
- Requiring retailers to record transactions on
CCTV;
- Requiring retailers to record a description of the type
of knife sold; or
- ID numbers or other means to identify
their merchandise with a shop "marker"
27. Clearly, a licensing scheme using these sorts of
conditions would not prevent anyone from acquiring a
non-domestic knife for legitimate purposes, like fishing,
hunting, some trades or farming and other rural businesses.
Such purchases would remain entirely legal.
28. The conditions outlined above, however, would serve both
to deter those with no such legitimate purposes from attempting
to buy a knife; and to compel unscrupulous retailers either to
sell non-domestic knives more responsibly, or to cease trading
in these knives altogether.
29. Although a licensing scheme will necessarily place some
additional demands on legitimate purchasers and retailers, we
believe that this is a small price to pay for preventing
non-domestic knives from getting into the wrong hands, and the
resulting reduction in knife crime that would achieve.
Logistics: how could this be done?
30. Section 44 of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982
provides Scottish Ministers with the power to establish
licensing schemes for activities which are not otherwise
covered by the Act.
31. We would use the power under section 44 of the Civic
Government Act to create a mandatory licensing scheme for i)
dealers in new, non-domestic knives and ii) dealers in
second-hand, non-domestic knives, where the dealing in such
knives is
incidental to the dealer's primary business. Local
authorities would act as licensing authorities under this
scheme.
32. There is an expectation that the costs to local
authorities of operating any such licensing scheme should be
recovered through charges made for licences. There would
therefore be an initial or annual cost associated with the
holding of a licence to sell non-domestic knives.
33. It would not be possible under section 44 for the
mandatory scheme to cover any second-hand dealers dealing
primarily in second-hand knives, but if any such dealers exist
then they could be covered by a scheme imposed by the local
authority.
Consultation questions:
Q1 Should a licence be needed to sell non-domestic
knives?
Q2 What should be covered by a definition of a
non-domestic knife?
Q3A Are the suggested conditions of license
reasonable?
Q3B Should there be any additional conditions of
licence?
Q4 What would be the costs for businesses of
licensing
the sale of knives?
Ban the purchase of non-domestic knives, other than
from a licensed seller
The regulations licensing the sale of knives could be
accompanied by the creation of an offence of
purchasing a non-domestic knife from an unlicensed
retailer. This would mean that it would be illegal to purchase
a non-domestic knife from an unlicensed retailer.
34. Making it a criminal offence to buy a non-domestic knife
from an unlicensed seller would reinforce the licensing scheme
by placing criminal sanctions directly on purchasers.
Logistics: How could this be done?
35. Making it a criminal offence to purchase a non-domestic
knife from someone other than a licensed dealer would require
primary legislation. This would suggest a phased approach, with
a licensing scheme being introduced in the first instance.
Consultation question:
Q5 Should it be a criminal offence to purchase a
(non-domestic) knife from an unlicensed seller?
Include swords in licensing scheme for the sale of
knives
The simplest and most straightforward means of regulating
the sale of swords would be to extend the licensing scheme for
the sale of non-domestic knives, to include swords. This would
make it an offence for an unlicensed retailer to sell a sword,
or for a licence-holder to break any of the conditions of
licence.
Such a scheme could be strengthened by introducing primary
legislation that prohibits retailers selling swords to anyone
other than those who could prove they were members of approved
organisations (such as martial arts associations, highland
dance groups, fencing clubs or re-enactment societies)
Licensing of retailers
36. As with a licensing scheme for the sale of non-domestic
knives, this option would require retailers to meet a number of
conditions if they wished to sell knives and swords.
37. As conditions of licence would be likely to include the
need for retailers to record the names and addresses (as
verified with personal
ID) of purchasers, such a scheme should act
as a strong deterrent to those wishing to buy swords for
illegal ends.
38. Conditions preventing retailers from displaying swords
might also help to stigmatise their purchase - and monitoring
retailers to ensure they were trading responsibly in swords,
should discourage those who might otherwise have been less
scrupulous about selling such merchandise to those without any
apparent legitimate reason for purchasing.
Approved organisations
39. It would be possible to introduce legislation that could
require retailers to sell swords only to those who could prove
they were members of, for example, approved sporting, cultural
or dramatic organisations. The legislation would have to make
provision for the way in which such organisations are to be
approved, for example by local authorities and/or the
police.
40. The intention behind this approach is that it will place
some responsibility on those organisations that want to use
swords; to show both that they have a legitimate reason for so
doing and that they exercise suitable controls over the use to
which such swords were put.
41. The practical enforcement of a licensing scheme with
this additional condition would involve a number of different
groups:
- Organisations: In order to be approved,
organisations would need to accept some responsibility for
their members.
- Local authorities: In their role as the
licensing bodies, local authorities would have to approve
organisations upon application.
- Police: The police would be responsible
for enforcing the new law and advising on local authority
licensing decisions.
- Retailers: Retailers would be responsible
for ensuring that purchasers were current members of one of
the approved organisations.
Logistics: How could this be done?
42. As before, a licensing scheme could be established under
section 44 of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982. This
could cover the same breadth of retailers, and apply the same
range of conditions as outlined for the licensing scheme for
(non-domestic) knives.
43. To require retailers to sell swords only to members of
approved organisations would require primary legislation. It
may be that a phased approach is preferable, whereby a
licensing scheme for the sale of non-domestic knives is
established initially, and consideration is given to
introducing primary legislation in the longer-term.
Consultation questions:
Q6 Should shops require a license to sell
swords?
Q7 Should the sale of swords by shops be restricted
to require them to sell only to members of approved
organisations?
Ban the sale of swords
The sale of all swords - or of certain types of swords -
could be banned. There could be exemptions from such a general
ban for particular interest groups which had legitimate reasons
for requiring swords.
44. It would be relatively straightforward to ban the sale
of all swords. We are aware, however, that many groups in
Scotland have legitimate reasons for owning, manufacturing,
selling and using swords.
45. Since the First Minister's announcement in November, we
have received representations from a wide variety of interest
groups, outlining their particular case for purchasing and
using swords. In response to those groups, we have made clear
that this consultation would consider the need to build
exceptions into any legislation strengthening the law on the
sale of swords.
46. The Scottish Executive has no wish unnecessarily to
restrict or adversely impact on cultural, sporting or dramatic
activities. We value the many traditions and pursuits that
contribute towards our country's heritage and diversity. We
recognise, too, the significant contribution many such
activities make to the tourist industry.
47. Groups representing the following activities have been
in contact with the Scottish Executive, to discuss their use of
swords:
- Re-enactment - re-enactment societies do
much to bring significant aspects of Scotland's history to
life, by re-enacting battles, with quality reproduction
weapons.
- Martial arts - swords are used in many
martial arts, which revolve around strict codes of
discipline and control.
- Sword manufacture - swordsmiths in
Scotland manufacture swords, in some cases to extremely
high specifications, involving traditional techniques and
attracting international interest and renown.
- Historical and sport fencing - fencing
swords are used in organised events across the
UK and internationally.
- Scottish Highland dancing - the
traditional Scottish sword dance, when authentically
performed, inevitably involves swords.
- Film and theatre - swords are frequently
used as props in period dramas.
- Religion - the sword is of particular
religious symbolism to Sikhs.
- Collecting - the preservation of the past
by many individual collectors in this country is often to
the benefit of our museums and national heritage
bodies.
48. Where possible, we would like to exempt these groups
from legislation restricting the sale of swords, so that those
undertaking legitimate cultural, sporting or dramatic
activities involving swords will not be liable to
prosecution.
Logistics: How could this be done?
49. Section 141 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 provides
Scottish Ministers with the power to add types of weapons to
the list of weapons outlawed in the Criminal Justice Act 1988
(Offensive Weapons) Order 1988 (the Offensive Weapons Order).
It would therefore be possible to add all swords to the
Offensive Weapons Order, thereby banning their manufacture,
sale, hire or loan.
50. There are already three statutory defences to a charge
under made under section 141 of the Criminal Justice Act
1988:
- It is a defence for a person charged to prove that his
conduct was only for the purposes of functions carried out
on behalf of the Crown or a visiting force;
- It is a defence for a person charged to provide that
his conduct was only for the purposes of making the
specified weapon available to a museum or gallery.
- It is a defence for a person acting on behalf of a
museum or gallery who is charged with hiring or lending a
specified weapon to prove that he had reasonable grounds
for believing that the person to whom he lent or hired it
would use it only for cultural, artistic or educational
grounds.
51. That legislation also exempts antique weapons (defined
as those which were manufactured more than 100 years before the
date of any alleged offence).
52. It is clear, however, that the defences and exemptions
currently available under the 1988 Act would not cover the full
range of interest groups with a legitimate case for continuing
to deal in, and use swords, as outlined above.
53. Extending beyond those existing statutory defences, to
establish additional defences/exemptions for groups we believe
have legitimate grounds for buying and selling swords, would be
outwith the scope of an Offensive Weapons Order and would
require primary legislation.
54. A ban on the sale of swords, with the creation of a
number of exceptions to that ban, would require substantial
primary legislation. As such, it would take considerably more
time to develop.
Consultation Questions
Q8 Should the sale of swords be banned?
Q9 If so, should there be any groups who are
exempted from that ban (
i.e. should there be any reasons/uses for
which it remains legitimate to sell swords)?
Ban the sale of samurai swords
Scottish Ministers could make it illegal to sell
specifically samurai swords in Scotland. Again, this would make
it a criminal offence to sell, rather than to buy or own, such
a sword.
55. When there is evidence of the carrying and use of
swords, the vast majority are samurai swords. By banning the
sale of samurai swords, rather than all swords, we would be
focusing down on those swords which appear to be the greatest
problem in parts of Scotland. In order to do this, we would
need to define a samurai sword as distinct from the general
definition of swords proposed in Section 1.
56. On the other hand, samurai swords are legitimately used
by many martial arts exponents who exercise the highest degree
of discipline and control. In addition, the swords involved in
crime are likely to be only cheap replicas of genuine samurai
swords.
57. If therefore, steps were taken to ban the sale of
samurai swords, it might be appropriate to build in exceptions
to the ban, so that those with specific reasons, could continue
to purchase them. If possible, it might also be desirable to
differentiate between authentic swords, and replicas.
58. The Japanese katana is the sword most commonly referred
to as a samurai sword. A katana can be defined as:
"A specific type of curved, single-edged sword
traditionally used by the Japanese Samurai as a cutting
weapon against lightly-armoured opponents, kept in a
sheath, and forged with the highly specialized tamagahane
steel"
59. However, we would also want to cover replicas of any
such swords together with swords of a similar design, albeit
made from inferior materials.
Logistics: How could this be done?
60. As with banning the sale of all swords, specifically
samurai swords could be added to the Offensive Weapons Order,
provided that a suitable definition could be agreed. The
provision of exemptions from that ban would, however, require
primary legislation.
Consultation questions:
Q10 Should the sale of only samurai swords be
banned?
Q11 If so, should any groups of people be exempt
from that ban (
i.e. should there be any reasons/uses for
which it remains legitimate to sell samurai
swords)?
Q12 How should a samurai sword be defined?
License the purchasers of swords
A system similar to existing firearms legislation could be
introduced which would require anyone wishing to buy a sword to
obtain a personal, individual licence. This would make it a
criminal offence for an unlicensed person to purchase a sword
in Scotland.
61. This approach would effectively place swords on a par
with firearms, as weapons which could be bought by an
identified and controlled number of people, who have proven
they have a legitimate reason for such a purchase. Conditions
of licence might include:
- Evidence that the applicant had no criminal record
- Corroborated statement of the reason for owning a
sword
- Submission of up-to-date contact details to the
licensing authority
- The payment of an administrative charge
62. Correspondence from some groups who use swords has
indicated that at least some would be willing to accept an
individual licensing process, in recognition of the potential
dangers of swords in the wrong hands. Licensing of this sort
would enable these groups to continue to practise their
particular, sword-based activities legally.
63. Unless specific exemptions were included in such a
system, however, it could impact adversely on the tourist
industry, effectively by banning (unlicensed) visitors to our
country from purchasing, often highly valuable, swords as
souvenirs. We may wish to consider the feasibility of
exempting those wishing to purchase swords for export from
Scotland - as verified by the necessary documentation.
64. A system of individual licences for sword ownership is
likely to be expensive to establish and operate. If
implemented, it would be likely that an initial or annual fee
would be payable by licence holders.
Logistics: How could this be done?
65. This would involve extensive primary legislation and, if
thought to have merit, would require further consultation on
the detail.
Consultation question:
Q13 Is there a case for individual licenses for the
purchase of swords
Summary of options
Option | Logistics |
|---|
License the sale of non-domestic knives | A licensing system could be introduced in the
relatively short-term, under the Civic Government
Act 1982. |
Ban the purchase of non-domestic knives other
than from a licensed seller | This would require primary legislation. |
License the sale of swords (with or without
additional "organisational membership"
condition) | In order to require retailers to sell swords
only to members of approved organisations, we would
need primary legislation. |
Ban the sale of swords (with or without
exemptions) | Swords could be added to the Offensive Weapons
Order, thereby banning their sale, manufacture,
hire or loan. Exempting particular interest groups
with legitimate reasons for using swords would,
however, require primary legislation. |
Ban the sale of samurai swords (with or without
exemptions) | If a suitable definition could be identified,
samurai swords could be added to the Offensive
Weapons Order, thereby banning their sale,
manufacture, hire or loan. Again, exempting those
with legitimate cases would require primary
legislation. |
License the individual purchase of swords (with
or without exemptions) | This would require primary legislation. |
66. Regulating the sale of non-domestic knives and swords
through a licensing scheme might be enough to discourage people
from buying these weapons for the wrong reasons - and indeed to
ensure that retailers themselves were responsible in their
trading.
67. If, however, an evaluation of any licensing scheme
showed that swords were continuing to get into the wrong hands,
we might wish to consider some of the more far-reaching
solutions, such as banning the sale of certain types of sword
or licensing purchasers.
Consultation Arrangements and Access
to Responses
68. We are inviting written responses to this consultation
paper by 30 September 2005. We would be grateful if you could
clearly indicate in your response which questions or parts of
the consultation paper you are responding to as this will aid
our analysis of the responses received. Please remember to
complete and return the Respondee Information Form attached at
Annex C along with your response.
Please send your response to:
knifecrimeconsultation@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
or
Knife Crime Consultation
Criminal Law
Scottish Executive Justice Department
Area 1W
St Andrew's House
Edinburgh
EH1 3DG69. This consultation, and all other
SE consultation exercises, can be viewed
online at
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations
You can telephone Freephone 0800 77 1234 to find out where
your nearest public internet access point is.
70. We will make all responses available to the public in
the Scottish Executive Library unless confidentiality is
requested. All responses not marked confidential will be
checked for any potentially defamatory material before being
logged in the library or placed on the website.
« Previous | Contents | Next »