« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
CHAPTER TWO RESEARCH METHODS AND DATA
SOURCES
2.1 The scoping study utilises a combination of
quantitative and qualitative research methods defined over
two main stages. The first stage has involved analysis of
secondary data, quantitative analysis of baseline data and
a programme of qualitative face-to-face interviews with
MEB owners. The second stage involved
informed consultation with community leaders and key
informants as stakeholders in minority ethnic enterprises
in Scotland. This research design is illustrated in Figure
2.1.
Figure 2.1: Research design

Secondary data
2.2 The main source of secondary data on the importance
of minority ethnic groups is the 2001 Census. Data from the
2001 Census is available from the General Register Office
for Scotland (
GROS, 2004) and can be obtained at
different levels of disaggregation from their website (
www.scrol.gov.uk)
and from the publication of a series of
CD-
ROMs with Census data tables (
GROS, 2004). The research team requested
data from
GROS on self-employment by gender and
ethnicity for council areas for Scotland and data on
National Statistics Standard Economic Classification or
NS-
SEC. The number of small employers and
own account workers is used as a proxy for the number of
enterprises, and this data has also been compiled by the
research team at council level areas from the 2001 Census
data. However, the breakdown by ethnicity is not as
disaggregated to the same extent by ethnicity as is
self-employment, so a combination of both self-employment
data and data on the number of small employers has been
collected. The use of self-employment and small employers
is, as indicated, a proxy for the numbers of minority
ethnic enterprises in Scotland. Obviously, this is a
limitation of the study, but the numbers of self-employed
have been used as indicators of the level of enterprise
activity where data is not otherwise available, for
example, with the number of female-owned enterprises (
SBS, 2004).
2.3 Self-employment and the number of small employers
for Scotland are shown in Tables 2.1 and 2.2. The
distribution of minority ethnic enterprise, as represented
by self-employment data, has been used as a guide for the
distribution of interviews by ethnicity and by area.
Table 2.1: Distribution of minority ethnic
self-employment in Scotland
Area/City | Numbers of minority ethnic
self-employed | Average self-employment rate by
minority ethnic group | Proportion of all minority
self-employed in Scotland |
|---|
Glasgow | 1874 | 18.1% | 25.1% |
|---|
Edinburgh | 1162 | 11.9% | 15.6% |
|---|
Dundee | 325 | 17.0% | 4.4% |
|---|
Aberdeen | 251 | 9.68% | 3.4% |
|---|
Other Lowland Scotland | 3375 | 23.2% | 45.2% |
|---|
Highlands and Islands | 312 | 20.9% | 4.2% |
|---|
South of Scotland | 167 | 26.3% | 2.2% |
|---|
All Scotland | 7466 | 19.1% | 100.1%* |
|---|
*Total does not add to 100 due to rounding
Source:
http://www.scrol.gov.uk/scrol/analyser
see also
CD Rom Series. Census Analysis - General
Register Office for Scotland, Edinburgh
Table 2.2: Distribution of minority ethnic
small employers and own-account workers in
Scotland
| Area/City | Numbers of minority ethnic small
employers and own account workers | Average per cent rate by
minority ethnic group | Proportion of all minority small
employers and own account workers in Scotland |
|---|
Glasgow | 2052 | 19.8% | 26.6% |
|---|
Edinburgh | 1146 | 11.7% | 14.9% |
|---|
Dundee | 337 | 17.6% | 4.4% |
|---|
Aberdeen | 230 | 8.9% | 3.0% |
|---|
Other Lowland Scotland | 3448 | 14.8% | 44.7% |
|---|
Highlands and Islands | 315 | 12.3% | 4.1% |
|---|
South of Scotland | 187 | 18.8% | 2.4% |
|---|
All Scotland | 7715 | 14.8% | 100.1%* |
|---|
* Total does not add to 100 due to rounding
Source:
http://www.scrol.gov.uk/scrol/analyser
see also
CD Rom Series. Census Analysis - General
Register Office for Scotland, Edinburghsee also
CD Rom Series. Census Analysis - General
Register Office for Scotland, Edinburgh
Notes on data
- All self-employment is included in summary tables,
this includes part time and full time self-employment
where the definition of part time is for those working
up to 30 hours per week.
- Economically active definitions include all those
active in the workforce aged 16 to 74.
- Therefore self-employed includes those up to 74.
This may tend to under-estimate the proportion of
minority ethnic enterprises in Scotland, although not
the overall numbers, due to the younger age structure
of minority ethnic groups. This is due to the
demographic nature of the minority ethnic population,
which has a younger age profile (for an analysis of
minority ethnic demographic profiles see
ONS, 2003).
- NS-
SEC is National Statistics -
Socio-Economic Classifications. This provides an
economic position, based upon an occupation. Class 4
are small employers and own-account workers. These are
defined as employers in small organisations and will
include sub-contractors.
Baseline data
2.4 The baseline dataset is held on 81
MEBs, located in Scotland. This is part
of a larger dataset held of 855
MEBs in the
UK for six minority ethnic groups. The
dataset was constructed from a two-stage set of telephone
interviews conducted with
MEB owners during 2000 and 2001.
Therefore the dataset is contemporaneous with the 2001
Census.
2.5 The dataset contains profile data on the enterprise
(
e.g.; sector, employment size, age, turnover,
profitability) and the entrepreneurs (
e.g.; age, gender, generational status,
education level, motivation for start-up) as well as access
to finance and business support both at start-up and during
the 12 months prior to the interviews. The database was
specially constructed to include both traditional and
emergent sectors of
MEB activities. Data for a white control
group is also held, matched against the
MEB dataset in terms of sectoral mix and
size. Thus, this data consists of a matched stratified
sample.
2.6 A total of 81 of the 855
MEBs surveyed in 2001 as part of the
British Bankers' Association (
BBA) study are located in Glasgow and
Edinburgh, split between the minority ethnic groups (
i.e.; 30 Pakistani, 25 Chinese, 20 Indian, 4
Bangladeshi and 2 African), together with 33 of the 219 in
the white control group.
2.7 Whilst the 2001 survey sample was national in scope,
it was not designed with the intention of enabling separate
analysis by region or devolved administration. Hence, the
Scottish element in the sample is not representative of
MEBs in Scotland. In practice, it is
mainly comprised of Pakistani, Indian and Chinese-owned
businesses, with very few Bangladeshi, African and
Caribbean-owned firms. It is not designed to be necessarily
representative of the proportionate importance of
MEBs by minority ethnic group in
Scotland, although this is examined in Chapter 3, in the
secondary data analysis. This must be taken into account
when interpreting the results of the analysis presented in
this report particularly since, in the national study,
Africans and Caribbeans appeared to be disadvantaged
compared with both their white and other minority ethnic
counterparts.
2.8 A further point to note in making comparisons
between England and Scotland is, of course, that there are
different public support infrastructures in the two
nations. In addition, the survey was conducted before the
establishment of the current Business Gateway support
infrastructure, which was not established under its present
name until 2003.
2.9 Despite these limitations, the 2001
BBA survey database has been used to
inform the current project in two main respects:
- To provide insight into the characteristics and
experiences of
MEBs in Scotland (particularly those
that are Pakistani, Indian or Chinese-owned), paying
particular attention to any distinctive features,
compared with those of their counterparts in the
UK.
- By using the results from the national study as a
whole may have implications for
MEB groups in Scotland, which are
under-represented in the Scottish sample, particularly
Africans and Caribbeans.
Face to face interviews
2.10 The research team have completed 41 face-to-face
interviews. There were some delays in completing the
programme, but this is a common feature of research with
MEB owners who are reluctant to
co-operate or engage with researchers, even if careful
explanation of the study's importance to their community
has been undertaken beforehand. The research team are
grateful for initial contact lists supplied by Glasgow City
Council, Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce and Fife Council
Development Services. The research team has been able to
supplement this list through their own contacts. From these
separate sources, a 'target' database was constructed
guided by two criteria. First, by the broad distribution of
MEBs geographically. This is shown in
Chapter 5 (see Table 5.3). Second, by a requirement to
include both emergent as well as traditional sectors. This
was important to ensure that the results from the
interviews were not dominated by issues reported from
MEB owners located in traditional
sectors. Thus, for example, one list of contacts was used
sparingly as it was dominated by traditional retail and
catering sectors. The initial target database resulted in
only a 25 per cent agreement rate to requests for interview
from an introductory letter explaining the purpose and
importance of the study. Therefore, the need arose for the
research team to increase the interview sample from its own
contacts.
2.11 The interview sample, which the research team
constructed, should be regarded as a purposeful but crafted
sample. It includes representation from five minority
ethnic groups, an attempt has been made at geographic
distribution and it includes a small number from the rural
Highlands and Islands. It is representative of both
emergent and traditional sectors of
MEB owners. A summary of the main
features of the interview sample is shown in Chapter 5 (see
Table 5.1). It should be noted that because of the
purposeful nature of the sample it has not been possible to
locate many of the interviews, as initially desired, in the
Central Belt. To obtain the sample it has been necessary to
undertake more of the interviews in Glasgow and Edinburgh,
although the research team has included representation from
Central Belt locations.
2.12 The research instrument used for this phase of the
study was a semi-structured interview guide. The research
team has taken account of comments from the Research
Advisory Group (
RAG) in the interview questions and in
conducting the interviews. The nature of the research meant
that the interviews had to be conducted in a sensitive and
flexible manner. The diversity of
MEB owners is a known feature from
previous research and was highlighted as a characteristic
in the Ram
et al (2002)
UK study. Thus the interviews were
conducted with appropriate flexibility to accommodate the
diversity. All the researchers employed on the project have
previous experience of conducting qualitative research with
MEB owners. In some cases, interviews
have been conducted in the respondents' first language and
subsequently translated. The research team was also able to
call on an experienced researcher with the minority ethnic
communities who also had multi-lingual skills and had
familiarity with different cultures. The research team was
able, therefore, to gain the trust of respondents and gain
their respect, an important issue in determining the
validity of the qualitative research.
2.13 For this phase of the study the research team have
not included any interviews with white business owners. The
purpose of this phase was to obtain greater depth of
information on issues facing
MEB owners, in line with purposeful
interview samples.
Dealing with ethnicity and cultural
perceptions
2.14 The research team have used the respondents' own
perception of their ethnicity using the 2001 Census
questionnaire form definitions
1 with the respondent. The researchers have avoided
imposing any pre-conceived or stylised views of
respondents. The researchers admit that some of the
questions may have had an institutional bias (that is
reflecting existing academic literature and research on
business issues), but the flexibility and grounded approach
of the researchers allowed the respondent freedom to
provide their perspective on issues such as social,
financial and human capital. The semi-structured interview
questionnaire used as an interview guide by the researchers
is provided in Annex 5.
« Previous | Contents | Next »