On this page:

Advice for All: Publicly Funded Legal Assistance in Scotland ? The Way Forward - a Consultation

« Previous | Contents |

Listen

Footnotes

1 Report www.scotland.gov.uk/stratreviewlegalaid ; Summary www.scotland.gov.uk/stratreviewlegalaidsumm ; Background Information- www.scotland.gov.uk/stratreviewlegalaidbackground
2 This working definition is based on the term 'justiciable event' used by Prof. Hazel Genn and Prof. Alan Paterson in their 'Paths to Justice Scotland' research. (Genn H. and Paterson A. (2001) Paths to Justice Scotland - What people in Scotland do and think about going to law, Hart Publishing) Genn and Paterson defined 'justiciable event' as 'a matter experienced by a (person) which raised legal issues, whether or not it was recognised by the (person) as being 'legal' and whether or not any action taken by the (person) to deal with the event involved the use of any part of the civil justice system'.
3 Advice and Assistance makes it possible to obtain initial legal advice from a solicitor, or where appropriate, from counsel, on any matter of Scots law. Advice and Assistance is therefore available on a wide range of civil matters including matrimonial issues, debt, employment and injury, as well as for criminal matters. The discussion and proposals in this section of the consultation paper relate only to Advice and Assistance on civil matters. Advice and Assistance does not cover a solicitor representing his or her client in court or at a tribunal.
Assistance By Way of Representation is a form of advice and assistance, which allows a solicitor or counsel to represent a client in specified civil (and criminal) proceedings in certain courts and tribunals.
Civil legal aid is, broadly speaking, a form of legal aid which provides for representation by a solicitor or counsel in civil proceedings before a court specified in the Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986.
4 Homelessness and housing advice: Section 2(1) of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2001 places a requirement on local authorities in Scotland to secure that advice and information about homelessness, the prevention of homelessness and any relevant services are available free of charge in their areas.
The Scottish Executive has issued guidance which requires councils to take a corporate approach to this duty and to the planning of advice on homelessness and housing, setting out three roles for local authorities: provider of advice, funder of advice services, and strategic planner of advice provision. Local authorities evidence their compliance with this duty in their homelessness strategies and local housing strategies, and are monitored through the Communities Scotland single regulatory framework. Guidance has also been issued to local authorities on strategic planning of housing information and advice provision. The Scottish National Standards for Housing Information and Advice, published by HomePoint, are the standards which councils must apply in the discharge of their statutory duty. An external audit process of housing information and advice services has been established to provide the evidence route to compliance with the section 2(1) duty for local authorities.
Money advice: Following the introduction of the Debt Arrangement and Attachment (Scotland) Act 2002 a Debt Arrangement Scheme ( DAS) has been introduced. A key feature of the Scheme is the role of approved money advisers in guiding debtors through the process. In co-operation with the advice sector the Scottish Executive has set up a process to recognise the appropriate skills and competencies of advisers that are required for approval. At the same time the Executive has invested significantly to ensure additional money advice provision.
A key issue of this increased money advice provision is maintaining the quality of services given to clients. With this in mind the Executive is now developing a quality system for money advice, based on the Scottish National Standards for Housing Information and Advice.
5 Pleasance P. et al. (2004) Causes of Action: Civil law and Social Justice, London, the Stationery Office
6 See: Genn H. and Paterson A. (2001) Paths to Justice Scotland - What people in Scotland do and think about going to law, Hart Publishing;
Justice 1 Committee (2001), Report on Legal Aid Inquiry, Scottish Parliament.
Scottish Executive (2001), Review of Legal Information and Advice Provision
Scottish Executive (2003), Legal Information and Advice Provision in Scotland: A Review of Evidence
Scottish Executive (2004), Strategic review of the delivery of legal aid, advice and information
7 Pleasance P. et al. (2004) Causes of action: Civil law and Social Justice, London, the Stationery Office
8 'Match funding' describes the situation where different funders provide a share of the funding required to provide a particular PFLA service, and have agreed with each other (and the service provider) to do so.
9 This is consistent with earlier recommendations from the Justice 1 Committee in its report on Legal Aid Inquiry (2001) and from the Community Legal Service Working Group in its 'Review of Legal Information and Advice Provision in Scotland' ( ROLIAPS Report) of November 2001.

10 A person who is legally aided may have to pay for their case in full out of the property they have recovered or preserved as a result of the action (this is often referred to as 'clawback'). This arrangement is similar to charging arrangements for privately paying clients whereby a solicitor can obtain a charging order to secure his fees and outlays from property recovered or preserved.
11 The Scottish Compact can be accessed on www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/social/sccm-00.asp , and the Good Practice Guidance on www.scotland.gov.uk/library2/doc16/cgpg-01.asp
12 The consultation paper, which sets out the proposals in detail, can be can be viewed online at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations . The consultation period closed on 28 January 2005.
13 Outlays are costs incurred in connection with a case, excluding solicitors' fees, for example medical reports or housing surveys.
14 Such concerns have been raised in particular by the Justice 1 Committee in its Report on Legal Aid Inquiry, Scottish Parliament (2001) and in the Report of the Strategic Review of the Delivery of legal aid, advice and information, Scottish Executive (2004)
15 In 1993 changes to financial eligibility for civil legal aid came into effect which reduced the lower income limit (below which applicants do not have to pay a contribution) to the income support level.
16 Further information is available in the research published by the Scottish Legal Aid Board in 2001: Legal Aid in a changing world: Research into the reduction in civil legal aid applications in Scotland between 1992 and 2001.
17 A disregarded benefit is income that will not be taken into consideration in calculating disposable income when assessing financial eligibility.
18 Scottish Legal Aid Board, Report on Effect of Extension of Periods For Payment of Civil Legal Aid Contributions, Submitted to Justice1 Committee, July 2003.
19 For civil Advice and Assistance this proposal has already been consulted on in the context of the first stage of reform proposals.
20 As set out in Section 18 of the Legal Aid (Scotland) Act, 1986.
21 Generally, in cases where both parties are paying privately, the loser will pay the opponent's expenses. However, a successful privately paying client in a cases where the opponent is legally aided may be left to meet some or all of their own costs.
22 For example an advice worker may represent a client before a social security appeal or in an incapacity benefit appeal. Such an advice worker may be an employee of a local authority, or an advice agency.
23 This is reflected in Article 6(3)(c) of the European Convention on Human Rights, which provides that: "everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights…to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing, or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require".
24 Commission of the European Communities (2004) Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union.
25 Set out by the Deputy Minister for Justice at the Joint Legal Aid Conference at Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, October 2004.
26 Section 33A of the Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986. No Regulations have as yet been made under this section.
27 Section 23(1) and section 24(1)(a) of the Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986 set that the court and the Board respectively have to be satisfied 'after consideration of the financial circumstance of the accused person, that the expenses of the case cannot be met without undue hardship to him or his dependants' before solemn or summary legal aid can be granted. This is referred to in this consultation as the 'undue hardship test'.
28 For summary cases and for appeals, where the applicant did not receive criminal legal aid for the proceedings at first instance.
29 For solemn and section 23(1)(b) cases. (Section 23(1)(b) of the Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986 provides that in circumstances where a person has not been previously sentenced to imprisonment or detention and the court is considering such a sentence, it is the court that grants legal aid).
30 Section 33.3 Act of Adjournal (Criminal Procedure Rules) 1996
31 Regulation 15 of the Criminal Legal Aid (Scotland) Regulations 1996
32 The most recent available performance figures (Oct04 - Dec04) indicate that SLAB decides 72% of applications in 2 days, 95% of applications in 4 days and 100% of applications in 8 days.
33 The key proposal from the SLAB Review of summary criminal legal assistance is that there should be a single integrated system for publicly funded legal assistance in summary cases which provides advice, assistance and representation. Further proposals are that there should be consistent feeing arrangements providing appropriate remuneration for work of a similar nature; and that the interest of justice test in assessing eligibility should be retained, but that within it the reference to the existence of a 'non-frivolous defence' should be replaced by a more robust requirement for there to be a 'meaningful defence'.

« Previous | Contents |

Page updated: Thursday, June 16, 2005