Intended Outcome | Outcome Measure (% figures will be
agreed with
NHS Health Scotland in
May 2005) | Process Measure |
|---|
A1 A Central Data Repository (
CDR) that enables
implementation of a targeted primary prevention
system through primary care. | | % of people aged 45-60 in Paisley with risk
data populated within
CDR, broken down by
deprivation status. % of missing data for each variable. User satisfaction. |
A2 A primary prevention
intervention for Paisley residents aged 45-60
years that effectively reduces the targeted
population's risk of cardiovascular
disease. | % of population who meet the standard for
CV risk score at exit from
intervention. % of population who experience a reduction
in their
CV risk score between entry
to and exit from intervention. % of population who meet the standard for
CV risk factors at exit from
intervention: - Blood pressure status
- Total serum cholesterol
- Smoking status
- Physical activity (compliance with
recommendation for active living or regular
exercise)
- Weight
- BMI
- Waist circumference
- Alcohol intake
- Psychological wellbeing
% of population who experience positive
change in
CV risk factor between entry
to and exit from intervention: - Measures as defined above for standards
and including cigarettes per day
% of population eligible to be on certain
medication receiving appropriate
pharmacological therapy at exit from
intervention (may be measured within Unmet Need
pilot): - % eligible on antiplatelet
- % eligible on betablocker
- % eligible on
ACE inhibitor
- % eligible on statin
% of population are started on appropriate
medication between entry to and exit from
intervention: - Medications as defined above (may be
measured within Unmet Need pilot).
| % of eligible population who gain access to
intervention, broken down by gender,
disability, age, diagnosis, setting and
deprivation status: - % of those at high risk who are invited
to health coaching service
- % attended health coaching service
- % referred to
HaHP and non-
HaHP funded
micro-interventions
- % attended micro-interventions
- % adhered to micro-interventions
- % referred/prescribed to maintenance
services/activities
Number and % of people attending community
development activities from Depcat 6 &
7. Number, range and adequacy of available
services. Number of appropriate services with an
agreed Service Level Agreement. % of priority gaps filled, as identified by
mapping exercise. % split of investment in new services by
HaHP/partners. Satisfaction with Health Behaviour Change
Network amongst Health Coaches. Satisfaction with available services amongst
Health Coaches and users. |
Intended Outcome | Outcome Measure | Process Measure |
|---|
B1 A
CDR that enables
implementation of a targeted secondary
prevention system through primary care. | | % of people in Paisley who are identified by
CDR as having
CHD compared with
LHCC records, broken down by
deprivation status. % of missing data for each variable. User satisfaction. |
B2 Improvement of the
cardiovascular health of Paisley residents who
already have identified coronary heart disease
and who are currently maintained in primary
care. | % of population who meet the standard for
CV risk factors at exit from
intervention: - Blood pressure status (<140/90mmHg,
130/80mmHg in diabetics)
- Total serum cholesterol
(<5mmol/L)
- Smoking status (non/ex smoker)
- Physical activity (compliance with
recommendation for
active living or
regular exercise)
- Weight
- BMI (18.5-24.9)
- Waist circumference
- Alcohol intake (²21 men, ²14
women)
- Psychological wellbeing (
HADS anxiety and
depression scores <11, absence of
self-reported stress, mean wellbeing score
for population)
- Shuttle walking test performance:
number of shuttles, peak heart rate, rating
of perceived exertion
% of population who experience positive
change in each
CV risk factor between entry
to and exit from intervention: - Measures as defined above for standards
and including cigarettes smoked per
day
% of population eligible to be on certain
medication receiving appropriate
pharmacological therapy at exit from
intervention: - % eligible on antiplatelet
- % eligible on betablocker
- % eligible on
ACE inhibitor
- % eligible on statin
% of population who are started on the
appropriate medication between entry to and
exit from intervention: - Medications as defined above
| % of eligible population who gain access to
intervention, broken down by gender,
disability, age, diagnosis and deprivation
status: - % referred to health coaching
service
- % attended health coaching service
- % referred to non-exercise based
services
- % referred for exercise tolerance
testing
- % undertaking exercise screening
- % referred to phase III or IV physical
activity opportunities
- % attended phase III or IV
- % adhered to phase III or IV
- % referred/prescribed to maintenance
physical activity
Number, range and adequacy of exercise-based
CR services across multiple
settings: hospital, community, home, local
authority. Including number of additional
venues available for exercise, and volume of
exercise sessions on offer out with the
hospital. Number of instructors qualified to deliver
phase IV
CR exercise. Number of non-hospital locations at which
the
CR menu can be accessed. Number of non-hospital locations where any
part of the menu is delivered, broken down by
setting (community,
LA). Satisfaction with available services amongst
health professionals and users. |
Intended Outcome | Outcome Measure | Process Measure |
|---|
B3 Delivery of effective phase
III cardiac rehabilitation (comprising
structured exercise and risk factor
modification) in a community setting for
appropriate patients. At the same time a safe
and effective cardiac rehabilitation service is
designed for the highest risk patients (
i.e. the most ill
CHD patients) who are
referred to the cardiac rehabilitation
programme at the Royal Alexandra Hospital,
Paisley. | % of population who meet the standard for
CV risk factors at exit from
intervention: - Blood pressure status (<140/90mmHg,
130/80mmHg in diabetics)
- Total serum cholesterol
(<5mmol/L)
- Smoking status (non/ex smoker)
- Physical activity (compliance with
recommendation for
active living or
regular exercise)
- Weight
- BMI (18.5-24.9)
- Waist circumference
- Alcohol intake (²21 men, ²14
women)
- Psychological wellbeing (
HADS anxiety and
depression scores <11, absence of
self-reported stress, mean wellbeing score
for population)
- Shuttle walking test performance:
number of shuttles, peak heart rate, rating
of perceived exertion
% of population who experience positive
change in each
CV risk factor between entry
to and exit from intervention: - Measures as defined above for standards
and including cigarettes smoked per
day
% of population eligible to be on certain
medication receiving appropriate
pharmacological therapy at exit from
intervention: - % eligible on antiplatelet
- % eligible on betablocker
- % eligible on
ACE inhibitor
- % eligible on statin
% of population who are started on the
appropriate medication between entry to and
exit from intervention: - Medications as defined above
Comparison of death and hospital readmission
rates amongst different user groups
(attenders/non-attenders/adherers/non-adherers
etc). | % of eligible population who gain access to
intervention, broken down by gender, age,
diagnosis and deprivation status: - % referred to
CR
- % referred to part of menu
- % referred to phase III
- % uptake of phase III
- % adherence to phase III
- % referred/prescribed to phase IV
Output and satisfaction measures as for
B2. |
Intended Outcome | Outcome Measure | Process Measure |
|---|
C1 Maximum participation of
target population in the A and B interventions
using a social marketing approach and
innovative community planning workforce
development. | % of 45-60 year olds who are aware of their
risk level of
CHD. | % of eligible population who gain access to
intervention, broken down by gender, age,
diagnosis and deprivation status: - % of those at high risk who are invited
to health coaching service
- % attended health coaching service
- % referred to
HaHP and non-
HaHP funded
micro-interventions
- % attended micro-interventions
- % adhered to micro-interventions
- % referred/prescribed to maintenance
services/activities
Number and % of people attending community
development activities from Depcat 6 &
7. % of priority gaps filled, as identified by
mapping exercise. Satisfaction with available services amongst
Health Coaches and users. Number of individuals who attend capacity
building activities. Number of targeted group events undertaken
e.g. per quarter / year. Number of training events offered to partner
organisations. % of budget going on capacity building
activities % sample of target group who are aware of
the services available. Number of media items in public domain Column inches printed and prominence. |
Intended Outcome | Outcome Measure | Process Measure |
|---|
C2 Wider policy and practice
is influenced by the dissemination of
learning/lessons from
HaHP. | | HaHP is involved in the
Community Health Partnership and is involved in
the Joint Health Improvement Plan of the Health
and Social Care, Community Planning
Partnership. Number of key lessons adopted into policies
and services of partner agencies. Number of key lessons adopted into national
policy. Number of publications (of all kinds)/
presentations disseminated. HHLNHaHP subsection website
hits. |
Funding for the development and implementation of the
Phase 2 evaluation plans has been included in budget
projections. Additional evaluation work may be commissioned
outwith
HaHP during Phase 2. The following are
possible additional areas of enquiry, some of which may
require additional funding:
A meeting with key local and national stakeholders is
planned to discuss the feasibility of taking some of these
issues forward.