On this page:

Have a Heart Paisley Phase 2 Plan

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

8. Success Criteria

This plan for the second phase of HaHP seeks to address the four Success Criteria identified in the Scottish Executive Health Department's Phase 2 commissioning letter of 13 April 2004 as follows:

i. Financial sustainability and ii. Senior level leadership

The commissioning letter indicates a requirement for Phase 2 of HaHP to be funded by a specified mix of local and Executive funding. The partners remain committed to HaHP as a national health demonstration project guiding future action locally and beyond. It is not, however, possible for the partners to commit to make up for the tapering off of Executive funding during HaHP Phase 2, as might be represented thus:

funding diagram 1

Instead, our intentions can be represented thus:

funding diagram 2

This means that specifically identified funding for HaHP will be dependent on SEHD funding, but as this tapers off, the influence of HaHP will be expected to increase progressively through:

  • local and national dissemination activities
  • the legacy of changes achieved that will be sustainable without funding from the HaHP partners
  • informing national policy, and future action locally and beyond.

This approach not only reflects the reality of financial and other challenges and responsibilities facing HaHP partners, but will also aid mainstreaming of HaHP lessons in areas that have not had the benefit of the special funding that has enabled HaHP to be set up and developed.

HaHP partners are committed to ensuring that approaches which have been seen to be effective and value for money will influence local practice and service implementation through the Joint Health Improvement Planning mechanism (see Annex 6). The outcomes of Phase 2 of HaHP will help inform decision-making in NHS Argyll and Clyde in relation to chronic disease management, new models of care and the Cardiac Services MCN. If the model proves successful in increasing numbers, using Local Authority facilities in the medium term, this will also help inform future Council decision-making and community planning processes.

NHS Argyll and Clyde is currently rolling out the CDR through the MCN. Should the targeted primary prevention intervention prove successful, this will be considered for roll out again within the MCN.

iii. Applicability for the rest of Scotland

The selection of the interventions within Phase 2 has been made within the context of an evidence based approach. The new evidence that will be generated through the implementation of those interventions will be captured through the evaluation framework that is being developed with the support of NHS Health Scotland (see Annex 4 and 5). That new learning will highlight what does and does not work, and what may be transferable and will be disseminated nationally and internationally in conjunction with the Heart Health Learning Network (see Annex 8).

iv. Tackling health inequalities

Have a Heart Paisley's activity is underpinned by the need to address the health inequalities gap in Paisley (see page 4) and the Phase 2 interventions will, where appropriate, focus upon people living in DEPCAT areas 6 and 7 who fall within the target population for Phase 2. The use of the CDR as a public health tool, the targeted health coaching, the local community development and unmet need activity, the consideration of deprivation in calculating a risk score for CHD and the promotion of positive mental health will combine to help HaHP tackle the socio-economic, gender and disability inequalities in the target population.

Defining success

The need to track HaHP's progress towards the achievement of success, as defined by these four criteria, will guide the development of the evaluation priorities with NHS Health Scotland along with the intended outcomes listed within the plan (see pages 6 and 7).

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Thursday, June 9, 2005