On this page:

AN EVALUATION OF ORGANIC FARMING SYSTEM RESEARCH NEEDS FOR SCOTLAND: A Final Report to: Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

4 Consumers of organic products

4.1 In this chapter we explore the consumers' perspectives on organic food and drink, albeit utilising proxies for their views. It was beyond the scope and resources of this study to undertake new primary research directly with consumers. We utilise prior survey work, we examine feedback from a consumers' organisation and also we explore the views of retailers, a farmers market and others in the supply chain on purchasing patterns and motivations of their customers, the consumers.

4.2 The NFO System Three study of public perceptions of food and farming in Scotland for SEERAD (op. cit.) identified a number of issues that are relevant to the organics sector and the marketing of its products.

4.3 On farming methods, it was found that:

  • for most survey respondents, farming methods are not given great consideration
  • the public is more concerned with quality of output and how best quality produce can be purchased for the lowest possible price
  • the biggest concern associated with increased mechanisation of farming is the impact on local employment, not on the products produced
  • there is an acknowledgement of greater emphasis on standardised products in terms of shape and general appearance
  • consumers do seek the most perfectly shaped/coloured vegetables etc. and therefore feed the industry's drive towards "perfect" appearance.

4.4 It is only existing purchasers of organic products that are conscious of and informed about production issues. Although organics have an emotional appeal amongst consumers generally, price is a significant barrier to purchasing. Many respondents believe the pricing levels of organic foods are a "marketing ploy" by retailers to create and exploit a niche product. In any event, many consider there is a lack of tangible benefits that are worth paying premium prices - consumers expect a significant improvement in taste which is not always evident to them. Some believe that it is Government's role to help organic producers reduce their prices and make the products more accessible to the general public.

4.5 The survey found pride among consumers in the perceived standards of farming and quality of farm products in Scotland.

4.6 On the influences on consumers' decisions at the point of purchase, the NFO Systems Three survey revealed the following key factors:

  • value for money
  • freshness/sell-by date
  • product appearance
  • quality
  • country of origin - especially for meat from Scotland
  • brand name - for processed foods
  • farming method (free-range, organic) - but views on importance vary at personal levels
  • food safety and animal welfare - but often taken for granted.

4.7 The survey found that consumers rely on government and retailers to control quality standards: there is poor understanding of the significance of quality assurance logos. Although the report concluded that there may be some value in schemes that promote "Scottishness", in general consumers are concerned with sourcing reasonable quality food at reasonable prices: they are not concerned for the most part with associated moral issues.

4.8 The Food Standards Agency ( FSA) identifies a number of reasons behind consumers' decisions to purchase organic products - taste, safety, nutrition, better for the environment and/or better for animal welfare, or simply because "its more natural". However, the FSA's view on the basis of current evidence, is that organic food is not significantly different in terms of food safety and nutrition from food produced conventionally. The Consumers' Association in its Which? magazine (May 2003) concluded that there is "no consensus" in reports linking organic food to health benefit.

4.9 The Soil Association's recently commissioned research to identify "organic purchasing triggers" amongst UK consumers has produced interesting results with significance for marketing organic products 7&8. We have selected a number of key findings and recommendations in Table 4.1 from the 75 separate findings highlighted in the full report on purchasing triggers, specifically on marketing to consumers. A fuller analysis of all the detailed findings and proposed actions made in this publication is beyond the scope of this chapter but we would recommend a closer analysis of their significance for Scottish producers in both domestic and wider UK markets.

Table 4.1: Summary of selected findings of the Soil Association's research into organic purchasing triggers

Promotion: The Soil Association wishes to step up promotion of the benefits of organic food.
The report proposes a coordinated generic PR and advertising campaign for organic food.

Spend per consumer: Average weight of purchase ( AWP = annual spending per organic consumer) is up 10.2% from £29.44 to £32.44
AWP increase is driven more by amount spent per shopping trip (up 7.8%) than frequency of shopping trips (up 2.3%)
Increasing AWP for individual products is recommended through bulk packs and 'three for twos'

Meat purchasing: Meat purchase is at the end of the 'cycle of adoption' for buying organic - few people buy organic meat as a first purchase, and most do so after all the other categories. There has been a big improvement in organic meat availability in the past year

Drinks purchasing: The report advises a focus on product marketing for beer/wine/spirits on taste and environmental benefits. Alcoholic drinks cannot deliver on health.

Broadening promotions: The report proposes the publication of directories and guides covering e.g. B&Bs, demo farms, certified restaurants, tourist destinations, farm shops in order to encourage organic shopping outside the supermarket.

Innovative promotions with multiples: As together Waitrose, Tesco and Sainsbury's are responsible for 70% of organic sales, the report advises that these three multiples are the priority for marketing co-promotions and consumer education, including poster campaigns advertising benefits outside branches that have the best organic offerings and the biggest share of organic consumer spend (e.g. car park and trolley park advertising). Multiples could be persuaded to discount space or share in cost.

Promoting to baby-food buyers: 22.3% of baby food buyers have never bought any other organic category.
SA considers that baby food and fruit/vegetable buyers are the entry markets to target with messages about key benefits - taste and health followed by animal welfare, environment - to encourage buying into additional categories
Report recommendations include: targeting baby food purchasers with offers/promotions on fresh produce; target fresh produce purchasers with offers/promotions on grocery/dairy lines; develop product lines for children when they move on from organic baby food; highlight the poor nutritional quality of school meals, capitalising both on parental interest in this area and on government policy support for organic procurement

Potential for growth: Heavy buyers of organic products are 23% of all buyers, but even the most committed buyers are committing only 13.4% of their food and drink spending to organic food
This is viewed positively as it shows room for growth among the core consumers who are driving the market

Consumers' entry points: Fruit and vegetables are found to be the key entry points, accounting for over half the organic spend of light and medium organics purchasers. All the other categories have more people saying they bought them fourth or later than saying they bought them first or second.
The report advises promoting other organic categories and their benefits to buyers of organic fruit/veg

Loyalty schemes: When it comes to general motivations for choosing a supermarket, heavy and medium organic consumers both place using a loyalty card and having a fresh fish counter high on their lists.
Independent retailers and direct sellers should consider their own loyalty schemes

Other attractors: For light consumers, childcare facilities, low prices and extras like clothing/lottery tickets/cheap petrol are important

Promotional messages: Apart from positive statements about organic food, the statements that have higher-than-average resonance with heavy organics consumers are ' I regard myself as a connoisseur of food and wine' (17.5%), ' I always choose foods for health reasons' (29.5%), ' I read the ingredients on packs before buying' (54.3%) and ' I prefer to take holidays off the beaten track' (39%)
The high proportion of organic consumers who read the ingredients shows the worth of providing basic information about organic benefits on packaging where there is space.
The report recommends that a food club/distinct food-focused membership might be a good way to build awareness and organic loyalty among foodies and develop a new income stream.
Health publications are proposed as a priority for Soil Association PR work, as health is the prime motivation for organic purchase apart from taste. These publications are a good way of pre-selecting the health-conscious consumer.
It is proposed to increase information on packs and improve consistency of messages; consideration is advised on developing a informative website whose address is used on packaging

Promotional techniques: Medium buyers are often willing to pay more for organic food (36.9%) but their motivations to do so (animal welfare, environment etc.) are comparatively weak. Their higher-than-average 'agree' statements show them to be impulsive (spending more than should on credit cards/liking snack foods/buying just because they see on shelf) and to be more likely than most consumers to eat out regularly (29.1%).
The Soil Association regards it to be important to target medium consumers with information about the health, environmental and animal welfare benefits of organic food.
It is recommended that the aim is probably best served by targeted publications and PR by the Soil Association as part of a generic campaign; produce guide(s) to certified organic eateries where consumers can eat out organically; a website called e.g. whyorganic.com that could cover all the main benefits for all the main food categories in a very consumer-friendly way, with web address on packaging ; images from live webcams at an organic farm

Price sensitivity: Among light buyers, price consciousness is very acute and health consciousness less important

Organic vs free-range: Although survey evidence suggests eggs are the most frequently purchased organic product (12% of all shoppers almost always buy, 8% mostly and 14% occasionally), this finding is regarded as unsafe. Claimed purchasing of organic eggs is not matched by sales, which suggests people think they are buying organic when in fact they are buying free range. This is regarded as a priority area for publicising what is distinctive about the organic product and how it can be identified.

"Accidental" consumers: Over three quarters of shoppers never buy organic groceries, fruit juice or meat. 52% claim never to have bought organic food
Only 48% of organic consumers are conscious consumers - buying partly because it is organic and being aware of this. When this is compared with the 78% of households actually buying organic according to Superpanel, it could be argued that only six out of ten organic consumers are 'real' organic consumers, the rest are 'accidentals'.

Cross-category promotions: Category purchasing patterns suggest four relatively discrete types of purchase which do not necessarily overlap: namely fruit/veg; eggs; meat; grocery/dairy. This is used to show the importance of cross-promoting categories to consumers of other categories
Use of marketing promotions to encourage consumers to cross between the groups is recommended - e.g. recipe books featuring lots of eggs and dairy as an incentive for a marketing promotion for a grocery brand, special price for eggs and bacon together etc.

Environment: 59% agree that organic food is more environmentally friendly while 49% believe organic foods are healthier
These statistics are taken to show an important difference between 'selfish' motivations, which people are more likely to act on, and more altruistic ones. The proportion of shoppers buying organic food (48%) closely matches the proportion who believe it's better for them (49%) but not all of the 59% who believe organic food is more environmentally friendly are actually buying it.

Beliefs: 50% believe organic food is better for animal welfare, 43% believe it is safer, 39% believe it is of better quality and 34% believe it tastes better

Validating claims: Taste, health and quality are the biggest drivers of heavy purchasers of organic products.
The report recommends that it is important to research health benefits that can be the subject of scientifically backed claims; producers and processors should work to ensure that organic foods continue to deliver on quality and taste.

Justifying price premiums: 51% of non-buyers cite cost as a reason for not buying - the top-ranking reason. The only other reasons given that reach double figures in percentage terms are 'I don't think these products taste better' (15%) and 'I need more information to justify cost' (14%)
These statistics are used in the report to indicate that one in seven non-buyers ' needs more information to justify the cost' and suggests there are potentially new consumers out there to bring into the market through awareness raising. This contradicts the point often made that market penetration has reached as far as it is likely to go.

Value of media coverage: Media coverage is the way most people first find out about organic food - either television (25%) or print (also 25%). Advertising comes next (20%), followed by in-store promotions (18%) and 'from a family member' (14%).

Country of origin: Over 40% of buyers in all categories do not know if the food they are buying comes from the UK or not
This is taken by the report's authors to suggest there is a real market advantage to be had by clearly labelling country of origin for UK products and positive commercial motivation for supermarkets to move towards their UK sourcing targets
The Soil Association has developed a range of labels based on flags for licensees to use as national/regional identifiers but the take-up has been poor so far.

UK branding: There is a strong preference for UK organic products. Around one in six do not care where their organic food comes from but three-quarters prefer it to be from the UK.

Local branding: Motivation towards local products (52% more likely to buy) is not as strong as motivation towards UK products (60% more likely to buy), except in Wales, Scotland and the East Midlands where it is stronger and the North and South West where it is about the same
The report finds it to be more of a turn-on than a turn-off for consumers outside the South West and Wales if organic products are identified as Welsh or Cornish, but there is not the clear marketing advantage to be gained that origin labelling provides for sales within the country or region of origin itself. Once a product gets beyond its boundary of origin, the fact that is from the UK is more motivating/significant than its precise geographical origin.
The report advises clearly identifying products as British. If this conflicts with successfully marketing them within their location of origin (e.g. a British label should be avoided in Scotland and Wales) then consideration should be given to using additional stick-on labels or separate packaging to emphasise "Britishness" in wider marketing.

Premium pricing: Certain categories command more acceptance of a premium than others. Two thirds or more of organic consumers are prepared to pay more for organic eggs, fruit and veg, beef and pork/chicken. Fewer are prepared to do so for dairy (62%), lamb (61%), grocery (60%) and soft drinks (56%).

Multiple retailers' views of their customers' motivations

4.10 A major dilemma for multiple retailers engaged in organics is that they cannot confirm the two most important factors for the consumer:

  • taste
  • food safety.

Figure 4.1: Organic buying factors - summary of consumers' main reasons to buy

Figure 4.1: Organic buying factors - summary of consumers' main reasons to buy

4.11 One multiple initially tried an organic section in its supermarkets but this became a 'ghetto' - some consumers would not even go there. This raises the issue of segmenting the different consumer groups, including consumers that are:

  • dedicated
  • willing to try - attracted by own label organics but perceive the dedicated organics group as 'health food people' that are 'not me!'
  • not willing to try.

4.12 The multiple identifies "foodies" as well as the committed, "keen" organics consumers as by far the largest groups buying organic products from its stores. Most are middle aged parents and couples, young parents and retired couples. It expects growth to come from increasing cross-category penetration. Also, we understand that promoting the brand experience of ' be good to yourself' by one retailer has encouraged customers to think of the benefits of what they purchase. There are lessons here for 'organic' branding.

4.13 For one multiple consulted, 5% of the population are "committed buyers", purchasing organic food more than 30 times in a year and accounting for >50% of sales. The AC Nielsen Homescan Survey conducted in 2003 into the reasons why people never buy organic products, found the following:

  • too expensive - 63% of respondents in a survey of c.2,800 households in the UK
  • too much hype (12%)
  • health benefits not apparent (12%)
  • other reason (7%)
  • limited range (3%)
  • poor availability (3%).

4.14 It appears however that some other multiples accord less importance to researching customer motivations for buying organics. For example, one consultee from a multiple considered that there are " as many motivations as there are consumers". His firm aims only to ensure that the option of buying organic products is available and tries to stock the shelves in line with evident demand. An anecdote shared with us was that in many stores "organic pasta and organic mince sells well, but organic lasagne does not". Less than 10% of this company's customers are responsible for 80% of its organic sales.

4.15 Our consultations with multiples, indicates that promoting organic is " difficult". One consultee made the point that " thirteen certifiers take different views" on the key benefits and to some extent on the standards that can be promoted. It is hard to develop a consistent message acceptable to all and still attractive to the consumer. There are always caveats - e.g. it cannot be claimed that all organic produce are free of antibiotics or pesticides - as some are allowed by some certifiers in certain circumstances. So any promotional material towards consumers could not claim complete absence.

4.16 Our contact with multiples indicates that customers will not accept organic produce if it is of inferior quality compared to equivalent conventional produce, in particular with respect to appearance. Therefore, the organic producer of fruit and veg. for example has to meet conventional growers' standards of quality. In terms of rearing/growing know-how and skills, the organic producer needs to be able at least to match if not exceed the conventional. Also, customers will not accept easily the limitations of seasonality - they have come to expect their favourite fruit and veg. to be available when they want to buy them.

Consumers using farmers' markets

4.17 The perspectives of customers buying from farmers' markets arguably taps into purchasing motivations of a group of consumers more aware and interested than most of the production issues. Despite becoming accredited in 2003 by the Soil Association, organic products are not a major part of the food and drink sold through the Edinburgh Farmers' Market. Of 46 suppliers registered with the Market, only 7 are organic (and there are thought to be more organic suppliers at the Edinburgh market than at others in Scotland):

  • poultry (1)
  • beef/lamb (1)
  • veg (2)
  • beer (1)
  • wine (1)
  • meat products (1).

4.18 The key characteristics of products attractive to the Farmers' Market customers appear to be quality and traceability. If these are in place then in the view of this market, "organic" is less necessary.

4.19 We understand that there may be resistance from existing traders to more organic traders entering some farmers markets in Scotland

Other perspectives

4.20 From the perspective of a leading independent retailer in Scotland, health and food safety, including a healthy option for children to avoid allergic reactions, are the key motivations for customers.

4.21 From the perspective of a consumer organisation in Scotland, the key concerns with the organics sector include:

  • the importance of ensuring the integrity of labelling and the claims made for food and drink products
  • including concerns about "logo overload"
  • the requirement for an evidence base with respect to the health benefits of particular kinds of food products - reducing/removing the confusing messages reaching consumers
  • the need to establish an evidence base on the health effects of pesticides and to determine what pesticides are used in organic products
  • concerns with the re-establishment of well-founded trust across all sectors of the food and drink industry
  • the environmental issues around organic products as a "food miles offender"
  • a major focus on access to healthy food and healthy diets for all consumers in Scotland - but neither specifically focused on organic products
  • concerns about promotion of benefits of what some argue are "junk organic" products.

Emerging issues and research needs

4.22 From the range of views on the consumer perspective on organic products, we identify the following key issues and research needs:

  • further research is required to develop, justify and consistently promote the unique selling proposition of organic products to consumers in alliance with the major retail outlets. Further co-operation between certifiers would be advantageous in developing consistent messages for those consumers using the higher volume retail outlets
  • the significance of branding as "Scottish" appears to vary between categories and in different markets. Further research on how to optimise branding/labelling on the basis of location of origin is required. It appears as if a one-size-fits-all approach is not necessarily best
  • the feasibility of resolving uncertainties with respect to food safety and health benefits needs to be considered further and alternative marketing messages developed if this cannot be achieved
  • the interesting evidence from the Soil Association's work on purchasing triggers should be analysed and "translated" for the Scottish context. Consideration should be given as to how this and other available market intelligence is disseminated to and made actionable by the supply chain actors in Scotland - we suggest that know-how and motivation may be more important that simply availability of information
  • further research is required to discover why the organics penetration of Farmers' Markets in Scotland appears to be relatively low
  • innovative methods of reducing production and logistics costs, not incurring other environmental dis-benefits, will be required by the organics sector if price resistance among some consumer groups is to be addressed.

Recommendations

  • the feasibility of resolving uncertainties with respect to food safety and health benefits needs to be considered further and alternative marketing messages developed if this cannot be achieved.
  • the interesting evidence from the Soil Association's work on purchasing triggers should be analysed and "translated" for the Scottish context. Consideration should be given as to how this and other available market intelligence is disseminated to and made actionable by the supply chain actors in Scotland - we suggest that know-how and motivation may be more important that simply availability of information.
  • the significance of branding as "Scottish" appears to vary between categories and in different markets. Further research on how to optimise branding/labelling on the basis of location of origin is required. It appears as if a one-size-fits-all approach is not necessarily best.
  • further research is required to develop, justify and consistently promote the unique selling proposition of organic products to consumers in alliance with the major retail outlets. Champions of organic products should (continue) to engage with the multiples to develop acceptable but effective promotional messages in the interests both of organic producers/processors and the retailers. Further co-operation between certifiers would be advantageous in developing consistent messages for those consumers using the higher volume retail outlets.
  • as organic products do not appear to have penetrated in a major way the farmers' markets in Scotland, there is merit in exploring more fully the reasons behind this and the opportunities that may still exist within this niche. For purchasers at these markets, arguably "sophisticated" consumers, quality, traceability and direct contact with the producers appear to offer a sufficiently attractive "offer" without an "organic" status for the products on sale.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Friday, May 13, 2005