« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
Section 4. Compulsory Treatment Order (
CTO) - Section 63
Only a
MHO can apply for a
CTO, once he or she has received two
mental health reports. The application would include a
proposed care plan and must occur within 14 days of the
date of the second of the two medical examinations which
gave rise to the mental health report. Doctors should
consult the
MHO prior to any decision to initiate
the
CTO application.
Criteria for issuing a compulsory treatment
order
- The patient must have a mental disorder.
- Medical treatment is available and would be likely
to prevent the mental disorder worsening, or alleviate
its effects.
- Significant risk to health, safety and the welfare
of the patient, or to the safety of others, exists if
medical treatment is not provided.
- The patient's ability to make decisions about his
or her treatment is significantly impaired by mental
disorder.
- The treatment cannot be provided informally.
The responsible medical officer will provide in the
mental health report:
- Confirmation that these criteria have been met,
giving reasons to justify each decision.
- A description of the patient's symptoms and
consequent effects of the mental disorder.
- The 'measures' that should be authorised under the
order.
- The date of the medical examination.
'Measures' authorised through
CTOs
'Measures' that could be authorised by the Tribunal
following the suggestion of the
MHO or mental health report through
CTOs include:
- Detention in a specific hospital
- Requirement to attend at a specified time and place
to receive treatment
- Requirement to reside at a specific address
- Requirement to allow home visits by the responsible
medical officer,
MHO, community psychiatric nurse and
appropriate others
- Requirement to inform/obtain approval from of the
responsible medical officer to a proposed change of
address.
Imposition of community-based 'measures' would only be
recommended if they provide a safe alternative to
hospitalisation, and voluntary community care had
previously failed. The principle of 'least restrictive
alternative' of care should remain paramount.
Mental health reports to support a
CTO application
Mental health reports for
CTOs require that two medical
examinations are carried out. Criteria apply to these
examinations, which are:
- They must be completed by either two
AMPs, or by one
AMP and the patient's
GP.
- The two medical examinations may occur
simultaneously or separately, but no more than five
days apart.
- The medical examination should include the
assessments noted for an
EDC (page 19).
- Consideration of the patient's past psychiatric
history and probable success of long-term treatment
should be included; advice on these issues should be
sought from the
MHO and other relevant parties.
- Patients should be able to have their named person
and/or an independent advocate with them at the medical
examination.
- The two mental health reports should agree on the
category of mental disorder.
- The same 'measures' should be specified in the two
reports.
- Any doctor who provides a mental health report
should be able to attend a Tribunal hearing.
An
AMP must also state whether the patient
should receive written notice of any
CTO application, and whether the patient
is capable of arranging representation at a Tribunal. These
points should be discussed with the
MHO.
CTOs in operation - Section
64
The Tribunal will either:
- Refuse the application, or
- Authorise an interim
CTO.
Granting the application
If the
CTO is granted, the stated compulsory
'measures' last initially for six months. The Tribunal may
(unusually) specify different or additional compulsory
'measures'.
The Tribunal can also specify 'recorded matters' (Box
2). These are particular types of treatment or services
viewed as being essential.
Box 2. Recorded matters The Tribunal records aspects of care from
the patient's care plan that are considered to
be essential, and notes them as recorded
matters. For instance, a sixteen year-old
person's need to be cared for in a child and
adolescent service may be noted as a recorded
matter; if an
NHS Board is unable to
provide this service to the patient, the
Tribunal can refer the issue to the Mental
Welfare Commission. The responsible medical officer has a duty
to notify ('make a reference to') the Tribunal
when a recorded matter is not provided. This
must contain the name and address of the
patient and named person, as well as the reason
for the reference. The patient, named person,
MHO, Mental Welfare
Commission, and any guardian/attorney must also
be notified of the reference to the
Tribunal. |
Once the Tribunal has made the
CTO, any removal to hospital under the
order must occur within seven days.
The responsible medical officer must prepare a care
plan. The care plan will reflect the 'proposed care plan'
(proposed by the
MHO for the Tribunal) and will contain
details of:
- Any other services or treatment to be given.
Interim
CTO
An interim
CTO is authorised by the Tribunal when
it is felt additional information is required before it can
determine the application. The interim order lasts for up
to 28 days.
Best practice dictates that a care plan be developed and
implemented during an interim
CTO. The responsible medical officer can
revoke the interim order if detention criteria are no
longer met under its duration, but must give written
reasons to the patient, named person,
MHO, Tribunal, Mental Welfare
Commission, and any guardian/attorney.
No more than two interim
CTOs with a total of 56 consecutive days
can be authorised.
Reviewing the
CTO
The criteria applied during review are the same as those
applied during application. The presumption applied is that
the criteria are no longer being met - the responsible
medical officer must therefore be able to demonstrate that
the criteria are still being met to justify
continuation.
Mandatory review must occur during the last two months
of the order, bearing in mind that an initial order lasts
for six months. Extensions last another six months, and
thereafter for 12 months.
Mandatory review for a
CTO occurs two months prior to expiry of
the order and must consist of:
- Medical examination of the patient, including a
determination of whether criteria for compulsion are
met.
- Consultation with the
MHO, relevant service providers, and
other appropriate individuals.
Best practice suggests that a mandatory review should
involve a case conference. Further (less formal) reviews
are mandatory 'from time to time'.
Following review, the responsible medical officer
may:
1 Revoke the
CTO (Section 82). If the responsible
medical officer revokes the order using Section 82, written
notification giving reasons for revocation must be sent to
several parties (Box 3).
Box 3. Notification list for
revocation or variation of a compulsory
treatment order - The patient
- Named person
- MHO
- Tribunal
- Mental Welfare Commission
- Any guardian or welfare attorney
|
2 Apply to the Tribunal to vary the
compulsory measures or recorded matters
(Section 95) in the order. This is done after review
and consultation with the
MHO and other relevant service providers
lead the responsible medical officer to believe that a
variation in the
CTO terms is required. The intention to
vary the order must be communicated to several parties (Box
3). The Section 95 application will contain: the name and
address of the patient and named person; the details of the
modification to the compulsory measures and/or recorded
matters being sought; and whether or not the
MHO is in agreement with the
application. The most recent draft of the patient's care
plan and mental health report should accompany the
application.
The care plan should state:
- Which compulsory measures have been granted
- Which recorded matters have been specified
- When the next mandatory review of the order is
due.
3 Extend the order, with (Section 92)
variation in the compulsory measures and/or recorded
matters. When the responsible medical officer wishes to
extend the
CTO but vary its terms he or she must
notify the
MHO beforehand, usually at least two
weeks prior to expiry. The other parties who need to be
notified about a Section 92 application are shown in Box
3.
The Section 92 application to the Tribunal must take
account of the
MHO's and any other relevant service
providers' views. It must state: the name and address of
the patient and named person; what modifications of
compulsory measures or recorded matters are being sought,
with accompanying reasoning; and whether or not the
MHO consents to the application. The
responsible medical officer should also provide the most
recent draft of the patient's care plan alongside the
Section 92 application, and the
MHO will also provide a report.
4 Extend the order without (Section 86)
variation in the compulsory measures and/or recorded
matters. The responsible medical officer must notify the
MHO if he or she wishes to extend the
order under Section 86 without a variation in terms,
usually two weeks before expiry. The responsible medical
officer's record of determination to extend the
CTO must contain: the reasons for the
extension; a note of what type of mental disorder exists;
and whether or not the
MHO agrees to the extension. This record
goes to the parties shown in Box 3. The responsible medical
officer is allowed to withhold the record from the patient
only if significant harm to the patient or others would
ensue. If the record is withheld, the reasons must be
noted.
The Tribunal does not need to review the responsible
medical officer's Section 86 determination unless:
- There is disagreement between the
RMO and the
MHO on the need for extension.
- The
MHO has failed to inform the
responsible medical officer of whether or not he or she
agrees to the extension or with the original
order.
- No Tribunal hearing has been held on the
CTO for two years.
Rights of Appeal
The patient or named person can appeal to the Tribunal
for revocation of a Section 86 (extending order) or, at
least three months after the imposition of a
CTO, Section 92 or 95.
Non-compliance with a
CTO
Non-compliance is a serious issue. The responsible
medical officer has the authority to have a non-compliant
patient taken into custody and conveyed to hospital on the
grounds that:
- Efforts to contact the patient have failed.
- It is urgent and likely to prevent a significant
deterioration in the patient's mental health.
The relevant sections of the 2003 Act involved are:
- Section 112 (non-compliance with 'attendance
requirement')
- Section 113 (detention for 72 hours in
hospital)
- Section 114 (non-compliance with a
CTO)
- Section 115 (non-compliance with an interim
CTO).
Sections 112 and 113
Where the only lack of compliance is with the
'attendance requirement' of the
CTO, the responsible medical officer can
invoke Section 112, after
MHO consent has been obtained.
Section 112 allows the patient to be conveyed to the
place of treatment, or hospital, and be detained there for
up to six hours to allow administration of medical
treatment under Part 16 of the 2003 Act.
Section 112 should be used in preference to Section 113,
where appropriate, consistent with the principle of least
restrictive alternative. Once the patient is in hospital,
detention of 72 hours under Section 113 is allowed. Once
the initial 72 hours has expired, further detention can be
authorised through invoking Section 114 or 115.
Sections 114 and 115
After the initial 72 hours has expired following
actioning of Section 113, further detention of 28 days can
be authorised through the responsible medical officer
completing a Section 114 for a
CTO, and a Section 115 for an interim
CTO.
Section 114 is granted and signed by the responsible
medical officer. It must state his or her reasons for
believing that a significant deterioration in the patient's
mental health is likely if he or she is not further
detained in hospital.
Detention under Section 114 would start at the point
when the certificate was granted, and would last a further
28 days if the following criteria apply:
- The patient is currently under Section 113 (that
is, within the 72 hours specified).
- The patient has been examined by the responsible
medical officer or another
AMP.
- The responsible medical officer is considering
whether the specified compulsory measures need to be
varied, such as making a Section 95 application to the
Tribunal.
- The patient's
MHO consents.
- The responsible medical officer has consulted the
patient's named person, where practicable.
The criteria for Section 115 (non-compliance with an
interim order) are as above.
Once Sections 113, 114 and 115 are in place, the
specified compulsory measures of the
CTO are suspended, except for those
relating to the administration of medical treatment.
Comparisons of the conditions and effects of
CTOs between the 1984 and 2003 Acts are
shown in Tables 6 and 7.
Table 6. Compulsory treatment order/Section 18
- order conditions
2003 Act Part 7 (Section
57-129) | 1984 Act (Section 18-23 and Section
27-34) |
MHO application, which
specifies compulsory measures sought, medical
treatment proposed, other | MHO application which states
need for detention in hospital for
treatment |
Two mental health (medical) reports, one
MHO report and a proposed
care plan (
PCP) | Two medical reports,
MHO application One
AMP (Section 20) and one
GP or, if exceptional, two
AMPs |
Two
AMPs or one
AMP and one
GP or one
AMP and one
GP |
|
Both medical reports must specify at least
one of the same types of mental disorder | Specify same mental disorder |
Treatment likely to prevent mental disorder
worsening or alleviate symptoms or effects | Treatment likely to alleviate or prevent
deterioration in condition |
Significant risk to health, safety or
welfare of patient or safety of any other
person, decision-making ability re medical
treatment is significantly impaired and order
is necessary | Necessary for health or safety of patient or
for protection of other persons that he should
receive medical treatment in hospital |
Mental health reports must specify
compulsory treatment measures | No measures specified |
Dispense with notice to patient if notice is
likely to cause significant harm to patient or
other person | Dispense with service on patient if likely
to prejudice health or treatment |
No more than five days between mental health
reports | No more than five days between medical
reports |
No conflict of interest in relation to
medical examination | No pecuniary interest or relationship with
patient |
Separate medical examinations unless consent
from patient (if capable) or named
person/guardian/welfare attorney (if
incapable) | Separate medical examinations unless
consent |
Notification by
MHO to patient, named person
and Mental Welfare Commission | MHO informs nearest relative
unless impracticable |
MHO informs patient of right
to advocate and helps patient access these
services | |
MHO prepares report and
PCP | |
Application to Tribunal within 14 days of
second mental health report for detention in
hospital or treatment in community | Application to Sheriff within 14 days of
MHO interview and seven days
of of later medical report. For detention in
hospital |
Tribunal hearing. Right to attend for
patient, named person, Guardian or Attorney,
MHO, doctors, primary carer,
curator
ad litem, anyone else with an interest
in the application | Sheriff Court hearing. Right to attend for
patient, nearest relative, patient's
representative, mental health officer |
Tribunal can make order sought in whole or
in part and can specify measures other than
those set out in the application | Sheriff can grant or refuse application |
Emergency and short-term detention extension
certificate extends detention for three working
days (from date of issue for emergency
detention and from end of 28 days for
short-term detention) | Section 26 extended for up to five working
days |
Detention under short-term and/or extension
certificate extended by five working days once
application for
CTO made | Sheriff court hearing within five working
days (Section 21.) Section 26 extended until
application determined |
Tribunal decision before end of five
working-day extension period. | |
Removal to hospital or specified place of
residence within seven days of
CTO | Removal to hospital within seven days |
Table 7. Compulsory treatment order/Section 18
- order effects
2003 Act | 1984 Act |
|---|
The
CTO lasts initially for six
months | Lasts initially for six months |
Tribunal can make interim order for up to 28
days. The total length of the interim order may
not exceed 56 continuous days | No interim orders, but Section 26 extended
until final determination |
No interim order without opportunity for
patient to be heard | |
- Measures authorised by interim order or
full order could include:
- giving of medical treatment
- requirement to attend at specified
places to receive medical treatment and/or
community care services or other treatment,
care or services
- requirement to reside at a specified
address
- requirement to allow access to mental
health officer, responsible medical
officer, etc
- approval of or inform mental health
officer for change of address
| Order authorises detention in hospital but
leave of absence with or without conditions
possible later for specified maximum periods of
time |
Responsible medical officer duty to review
interim and final compulsory treatment order,
within two months of end of order. Duty to
consult
MHO and others | Responsible medical officer duty to review
within two months of end of Section 18. Duty to
consult those involved with treatment |
Mental Welfare Commission power to evoke
CTO | Mental Welfare Commission power to discharge
detailed patients |
Responsible medical officer duty to make
care plan (Section 76) | |
Responsible medical officer power to extend
by six months and then by 12 months. Consent of
mental health officer must be sought | Responsible medical officer power to extend
by six months and then 12 months |
Appeal to Tribunal against extension | Appeal to Sheriff against renewal |
Failure of a community-based patient to
attend for treatment gives responsible medical
officer or authorised representative power to
take patient to hospital or specified place and
keep him or her there for up to six hours to
give treatment or to determine whether capable
of consenting to treatment | Absence without leave or failure to comply
with conditions of leave of absence gives
mental health officer hospital staff, constable
and persons authorised by managers of hospital
power to take patient back to hospital |
Failure to comply generally with
CTO in community gives
responsible medical officer or authorised
person power to take patient to hospital for up
to 72 hours for examination and for further 28
days if considering variation or application to
Tribunal.
MHO consent needed. Patient
can apply to Tribunal to revoke | |
Consideration of a Compulsory Treatment Order
Application - Flowchart

« Previous | Contents | Next »