« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
Introduction
1.1 In 1988, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child
Health (
RCPCH) established a multi-disciplinary
working group to review routine health checks for young
children. Its report, first published in 1989, was entitled
Health for All Children. In later years, the remit
of the review was extended beyond routine checks to detect
abnormalities or disease, to include activity designed to
prevent illness and efforts by health professionals to
promote good health. The report of the most recent
RCPCH review of child health screening
and surveillance programmes in the
UK was published in February 2003 as the
fourth edition of
Health for All Children1, and is commonly referred to as
Hall 4.
1.2 In February 2003, the Child Health Support Group,
with the Scottish Executive Health Department, organised a
national consensus conference to inform professionals and
managers in
NHSScotland and partner organisations
about
Hall 4 and to provide an opportunity to consider
whether and how to implement its recommendations in
Scotland. Stakeholders welcomed the proposals in
Hall 4, and asked the Scottish Executive to
provide national guidance on how best to apply the
recommended core programme of child health surveillance,
screening and health promotion in Scotland, and how to
identify and target support for vulnerable children and
families. The Child Health Support Group established a
multi-disciplinary reference group, chaired by Dr Zoƫ
Dunhill
MBE, to assist preparation of this
guidance
2.
1.3 Draft guidance was published in December 2003 for a
three-month consultation. Children 1st were commissioned to
undertake some focus group consultation with parents on
behalf of the Scottish Executive, and submitted a report of
their findings for consideration with other consultation
responses. Reid Howie Associates undertook an analysis of
the 153 consultation responses received, and have prepared
an overview report, published concurrently with this
guidance
3.
1.4 The majority of respondents welcomed implementation
of
Hall 4 in Scotland, and the draft guidance. Many
respondents provided helpful comments and suggestions to
strengthen the draft guidance, and wherever possible, these
have been taken on board in finalising this guidance. In
particular, an action template is now included as an
appendix, to assist
NHS Boards and their partners in
developing implementation plans.
1.5 Many of the concerns raised in the consultation
related to the original
Hall 4 recommendations. The
RCPCHHall 4 working group considered the best available
evidence in arriving at their conclusions and
recommendations, and this guidance does not, therefore,
revisit these.
Aims of the guidance
1.6 This guidance has been prepared to support
consistent implementation across Scotland of the
recommendations made by the
RCPCH in the fourth edition of
Health for All Children (
Hall 4). In doing so, it sets
Hall 4 in the context of other Scottish policies
to promote effective and integrated provision of universal
and targeted services for children and families, and
describes the activity needed for implementation at
national and local levels. It is not, and cannot be, a
comprehensive guide to child health.
1.7 First and foremost, the rights and responsibilities
to provide for their children's health and welfare rest
with parents; this is enshrined in the Children (Scotland)
Act 1995. But a range of services provided by the
NHS, local authorities and voluntary and
independent organisations, in health centres, nurseries,
pre-schools and schools, family centres and community-based
support services have a vital role in helping parents to
ensure their child's healthy development and maximise their
potential.
1.8 This guidance describes activities and initiatives
already in place in Scotland; describes activities that are
happening but not consistently around Scotland or to a
sufficient level to meet the requirements of
Hall 4; and makes recommendations, based on
Hall 4, for changes to current practice. This
guidance does not make an explicit distinction between
these three aspects. Rather, it should be read as a
holistic guide to child health surveillance and screening
in Scotland, proposing that all aspects should be in place
for effective child health promotion, screening and
surveillance. This guidance also describes some initiatives
that are currently in a developmental or pilot phase and
will provide additional learning over the next few years to
inform effective child health promotion and
surveillance.
1.9 Throughout this guidance, the term "parent" includes
all those with parental responsibility, including
carers.
Who is the guidance for?
1.10 This guidance reflects the evidence-based framework
set out in
Hall 4, for intervention to assess, monitor and
support children's health and development throughout
childhood and adolescence, based on staged intervention and
underpinned by strong health promotion activities. All
those involved in planning, managing and delivering
services for children and families have a role in ensuring
its success.
1.11 The framework set out in
Hall 4 is firmly rooted in the need for an
integrated approach to the delivery of services and support
for children and families. This guidance is therefore for
the range of professionals who work with children and
families, including social workers, family support workers,
community learning development workers, and practitioners
in state and independent sector schools and early years
settings, as well as staff in
NHSScotland who plan, commission and
provide care and treatment for children.
1.12 The Scottish Executive proposes to work with
NHS Health Scotland to develop a leaflet
for parents, setting out the core programme of screening,
surveillance and health promotion and explaining the
service that they will receive.
NHS Boards will be responsible for
disseminating this to parents, and advising how the
programme is being rolled out in their area.
What does
Hall 4 say?
1.13 The fourth
RCPCH review examined the evidence for
existing child health surveillance and screening activity,
including the purpose, content and timing of interventions.
It takes account of the impact of social, economic and
environmental factors on children's health. The
recommendations in
Hall 4 also reflect the advice of the National
Screening Committee (
NSC), which considers all screening
programmes on a national level.
Child health surveillance - used to
describe routine child health checks and monitoring.
Child health screening - the use of formal
tests or examination procedures on a population basis to
identify those who are apparently well, but who may have a
disease or defect, so that they can be referred for a
definitive diagnostic test.
Health promotion - used to describe
planned and informed interventions that are designed to
improve physical or mental health or prevent disease,
disability and premature death. Health in this sense is a
positive holistic state.
1.14 The recommendations in
Hall 4 reflect a move away from a wholly medical
model of screening for disorders, towards greater emphasis
on health promotion, primary prevention and targeting
effort on active intervention for children and families at
risk. The philosophy and recommendations set out in
Hall 4 aim to:
- Establish an evidence-based core universal child
health programme of screening, surveillance and health
promotion, that effectively supports children's health
and development.
- Ensure that parents are supported and empowered to
keep their children healthy and safe.
- Ensure that the needs of vulnerable children and
families are identified and met.
- Promote the development of seamless support through
integrated models of service delivery to make best use
of available skills and resources across agency
boundaries.
- Promote a holistic model of family care, in which
adult services recognise the impact of adult physical
or mental ill health on children in the family.
- Promote the need to monitor population health
through systematic and effective data recording.
- Highlight the need for efficient information
sharing.
1.15 The guidance recognises that it is also important
to empower and support children and adolescents themselves
to take responsibility for their own health needs.
1.16 The
RCPCH review found little or no evidence
for the effectiveness of some of the health checks
currently carried out by health professionals on children's
health or wellbeing. Consequently,
Hall 4 recommends that certain checks be
discontinued and that a reduced core programme of child
health surveillance, with some enhanced screening activity,
be offered to all children based on interventions proven to
be effective in supporting children's health and
development.
Hall 4 also recommends that this should
incorporate enhanced health promotion work to inform and
educate parents about their children's development and
needs, so that they can seek the right advice and help when
they need it. These proposals recognise the regular contact
that children and families have with other professionals
in, for example, pre-school or family centres, and
highlight a need to draw more effectively on these, by
providing increased support and ensuring that there are
clear routes for liaison, consultation and referral to
health professionals when there are concerns about a
child.
1.17
Hall 4 recommends more effective targeting of
support for those children and families who are most in
need, whether by virtue of disability, disadvantage or
other stresses. For the first time, the report includes
recommendations for children's care from birth to
adolescence.
1.18
Hall 4 also stresses that screening and
surveillance activity is of no value unless supported by
high quality and accessible diagnostic, treatment and care
services, planned and developed with service user
involvement.
1.19 The Executive Summary from the fourth edition of
Health for All Children is included in this
guidance as
Annex 2.
Key principles
1.20 The
NHS provides a universal service to all
families with young children. Current policy recognises the
need to target that service more effectively in order to
ensure that those families with greatest need receive the
greatest level of support. This is reflected in the
recommendations made in
Hall 4.
1.21 Scottish data
4 show that take up of health promotion advice and child
health screening and surveillance contacts is much higher
amongst parents from more affluent areas and circumstances,
with children in need more likely to remain disadvantaged
in health status and access to health care. When formal
child health checks are made at 6-8 weeks, almost one in 10
children in deprivation
5 categories 6 and 7 do not attend clinic appointments.
By the time checks are made at 22-24 months, almost one in
four children in deprivation categories 6 and 7 do not
attend for clinic appointments, and this rises further to
almost two in five children by the routine checks that
currently take place at 39-42 months.
1.22
Hall 4 is based on the principle of universal
access to
NHS services, but recommends that the
way in which those services are delivered must be tied much
more closely to identified need. In other words, universal
access to
NHS services does not necessarily have
to mean uniform provision of those services.
1.23 There will always be a need to ensure universal
provision of a health promotion and surveillance programme
for all children and young people to enable families to
take well informed decisions about their child's physical
and mental health and development; to identify children
with particular health or developmental problems; and to
recognise and respond when a child may be in need. This
guidance sets out a core programme of contacts that every
parent can expect, wherever they live in Scotland. However,
beyond this, contacts must be determined on the basis of
each family's circumstances and needs, which will be
different. Some parents need only information and ready
access to professional advice when their child is injured
or unwell or when they are worried about their child's
development or welfare. Other parents may need considerable
support, guidance and help at specific times, or over a
continuous period, perhaps because of their child's serious
ill health or disability, or because of their own personal
circumstances. This approach is represented in the diagram
below.

1.24
Nursing for Health6 advocated the development of Family Health Plans as an
instrument to help families to think, with their health
visitor, about their health and wellbeing.
For families where a particular need had been
identified, the plan would provide a means to record those
needs, to set clear goals to address them, and actions that
both professionals and the family would take in order to do
so.
NHS Health Scotland commissioned
research on the potential development of Family Health
Plans, followed by a consensus conference in September
2003. The Family Health Plan concept will be given further
consideration within the context of the Integrated
Assessment Framework (
see
Policy Context section).
1.25 In line with the recommendations made in
Hall 4, this guidance promotes:
- A shift away from child health surveillance
activity that concentrates on prevention and detection
of specific developmental problems and disorders, to a
more holistic approach which supports parents to ensure
that they have the information, skills and resources
they need to maximise their child's potential.
- A refocused universal core programme of routine
child health contacts that all families can expect,
wherever they live in Scotland, with additional support
and contacts for some families or communities on the
basis of assessed need.
- Enhanced neonatal and pre-school screening within
the universal core programme to achieve optimum
detection and treatment for specific conditions.
- Improved team working so that parent support,
health promotion and child assessment activities
already being undertaken by a range of children's
services - in, for example, family centres, nurseries
and schools - support the early identification and
referral of children with additional needs for
support.
- Development of community involvement and
development approaches to public health promotion for
child health, with priority for action in areas of
disadvantage, in conjunction with Community Health
Partnerships.
1.26 Allocation of
NHS resources, such as input from health
visitors and school nurses, should reflect the greater
concentration of need.
1.27
Hall 4 indicates that population-based child
health screening and surveillance is only one way in which
children's health problems are detected. Evidence has shown
that parents notice and seek help for most significant
health problems in the first instance, especially if they
receive timely, appropriate and accessible information.
Other family members, playgroup staff, childcare workers,
nursery nurses, teachers and
GPs may also detect problems in the
course of their general contact with a child.
1.28 Individual children and families will require
routine and targeted support from a range of professionals
and agencies. Effective health promotion can also be
universal and targeted and health promotion measures will
require both a population focus, with information in a
range of media provided to the public or sections of the
public at large, and more focused and tailored information,
targeted at vulnerable individuals and communities.
1.29 Central to the delivery of any new child health
programme are integrated processes for assessment and
planning services to meet the needs of families with
identified needs. In order to ensure that a reduced
universal core programme of contacts is augmented by
targeted approaches to meeting the needs of families, the
following will be needed:
- Reliable, effective and consistent assessment tools
and approaches.
- Universal and tailored packages of information to
underpin the programme.
- An effective needs assessment and planning
process.
- An efficient information system that supports
professional activity.
- Appropriate and efficient sharing of information
between professionals about children with particular
needs.
1.30 These issues are explored in more detail in this
guidance.
Achieving change
1.31 Implementation of this guidance, along with the
NHS modernisation programme already
underway, provides an opportunity for coherent planning to
shape the future of child health services. Effective
implementation of the recommendations made in
Hall 4 and in this supporting guidance will
require:
- Genuine joint working between services and
agencies.
- Effective information exchange and transfer
protocols and systems.
- Effective cross-referral mechanisms.
- Multi-agency staff training and development.
- Clear referral protocols and pathways which are
familiar and accessible to non-health
professionals.
1.32 Planning for implementation, including decisions
about prioritisation, should therefore be considered on an
inter-agency basis, and within the integrated children's
services planning context.
NHS Boards should agree with local
authority planning partners an organisational development
plan for implementation of this guidance over a three year
period, aiming for full implementation by 2008.
1.33 Workforce planning and development will obviously
be a key element in planning for implementation of
Hall 4. This will require local planning partners
to identify the contribution of staff across agencies and
services to health improvement and support for children and
families, and action to ensure that mechanisms are in place
to support these contributions. The opportunity to develop
the individual roles of primary care, health promotion,
nursery, childcare and school staff will be key to
implementing
Hall 4. To support this,
NHS Boards should consider:
- Allocation of a named health visitor or school
nurse for every pre-school establishment.
- More and regular health visitor or school nurse
time in pre-school setting and family centres, to
ensure effective liaison, support and training for
non-health professionals.
1.34 Pre-qualifying training may also need to take this
into account and the Scottish Executive will consider this
issue with training providers.
NHS Education for Scotland is currently
reviewing the child health workforce in the context of a
range of national policy developments, with a view to
developing an associated educational framework.
1.35 Scottish Ministers have established a Cabinet
Delivery Group on Children and Young People to drive
forward work across the Scottish Executive to secure an
integrated approach to the delivery of services focussed on
children. The Delivery Group, which includes the First
Minister and Ministers with responsibilities for health,
education, justice, communities and finance, has identified
workforce development issues as one of its five priorities
for action. A National Review of the Early Years and
Childcare Workforce is currently underway, examining roles
and responsibilities, qualifications and training,
recruitment and retention, career pathways and workforce
planning. The Review is expected to be complete by the
Summer of 2005, and will provide the longer-term direction
for qualifications and training for early years and
childcare staff.
1.36 To support local planning, an action template is
attached at
Annex 1, summarising the key
areas of activity that
NHS Boards are expected to take forward
with their local partners.
Resources
1.37 The reduction in the number of universal routine
contacts and developmental checks by health visitors and
school nurses is expected to release some capacity to
provide additional or intensive support for those children
and families most in need.
1.38 The best way of delivering against a common set of
outcomes, shared across all agencies, may be to pool or
align resources with partners to deliver key inputs. For
example, local authorities and
NHS Boards might consider pooling
resources to expand child and family support services.
Accountability and monitoring
1.39 This guidance is intended to be used to support
local planning through integrated children's services
planning arrangements. The Scottish Executive will be
monitoring integrated children's services plans for each
area, and these, together with annual updates, will inform
the accountability process for
NHS Boards. The Scottish Executive is
working to rationalise existing quality improvement and
accountability arrangements across services for children
and young people. This will include new arrangements for an
integrated system of inspection of services for
children.
1.40 The Integrated Children's Services Planning
Guidance lists the current performance indicators that the
Scottish Executive and
NHSScotland use to monitor progress in
improving the health of children and young people. Revised
and more focused national indicators will be published in
2005, as part of a quality improvement framework for
services for children, young people and their families.
1.41 Responsibility for ensuring delivery of the
universal core child health programme and of targeted
support will continue to rest with the Chief Executive of
the
NHS Board, and for those aspects of the
programme commissioned or delivered by local authority
staff, with the Chief Executive of the local authority. In
most cases, responsibility for delivery is likely to lie
with Community Health Partnerships.
1.42 In terms of monitoring trends more generally, the
Scottish Executive has commissioned
Growing Up in Scotland, a longitudinal social
survey to monitor the impact of Scottish Executive early
years policies on longer term outcomes for children and
young people. The survey will track a number of
representative cohorts of children from birth until the age
of 5. The first cross-sectional times series data are
expected to be available for 2-3 year olds in 2007, 3-4
year olds in 2008 and 4-5 year olds in 2009. This will be
published by the Scottish Executive.
« Previous | Contents | Next »