On this page:

HEATH DEPARTMENT: HEALTH FOR ALL CHILDREN: DRAFT GUIDANCE ON IMPLEMENTATION IN SCOTLAND - ANALYSIS OF CONSULTATION RESPONSES

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES

382. Although it is impossible to adequately summarise the wide range of views expressed in a consultation such as this, a number of key points for consideration are set out below.

  • There was a broad welcome for the Draft Guidance.
  • There was support for the key principles, although most respondents expressed a range of concerns about their practical implementation.
  • A main area of concern related to the implications of the proposals to target support towards vulnerable families. While this was welcomed by most, respondents expressed concerns about the reduced frequency of contact with some families, and whether this may have a detrimental effect on both children's health and the likelihood that problems would be identified.
  • While most respondents welcomed the view that responsibility for children's health issues should rest with parents or carers, there was concern expressed about whether there were adequate safeguards proposed in the Draft Guidance to deal with situations where parents or carers did not engage with health professionals.
  • There were concerns expressed relating to a number of proposals in the Draft Guidance that issues facing children would fail to be identified, either due to the reduced frequency of contact, or the perceived reliance on parents to raise issues.
  • An area of concern for some respondents was whether the proposals may have a negative impact on child protection, and particularly the detection of abuse.
  • It was suggested that the proposals would require more funding, and that funding would have to be re-allocated towards areas perceived to be high need or high cost. The need for funding for partner agencies to allow the proposals to be carried through was also noted. Concern was also expressed that the focus on priority families and the reduction in other routine contacts would not deliver the resource savings assumed in the Draft Guidance.
  • The need for pre-investment in IT was noted by a wide range of respondents.
  • The need for joint working among agencies was highlighted, together with the need for joint planning in relation to the implementation of Hall 4.
  • The need for workforce development, and particularly for staff training was highlighted, with the need for training for non- NHS staff (whose role in relation to health issues is proposed to increase) being suggested by a wide range of respondents.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Friday, April 8, 2005