« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
PAN 44: Fitting New Housing Development
into the Landscape
DESIGN A - LANDSCAPE CAPACITY
i Landscape capacity is a measure of the degree of
acceptable modification that the landscape can absorb. It
embraces:
- the capacity or sensitivity of the landscape;
and
- the potential of new elements to strengthen
positive attributes (such as an attractive wetland
area) and ameliorate the impact of elements which
detract from the overall integrity of the landscape
(for example, derelict buildings and degraded
land).
ii Landscape capacity can be established by recording
and integrating the natural features of the landscape such
as the incidence and scale of valleys, woodland and so on.
Essentially, capacity is a function of topography, ie
landform and groundcover vegetation. The interplay of these
can combine to create a landscape of high capacity, eg
undulating with tree cover or low capacity, eg open,
expansive and bare.
iii The character of the landscape is
used to interpret its capacity to absorb development and
can be described using a standard vocabulary and associated
plans, sketches and photographs. This approach is adopted
in the former Countryside Commission for Scotland
guidelines on landscape assessment which provides a useful
reference.
iv Generally speaking, undulating and
complex topography will create opportunities to absorb new
development as will wooded or afforested areas. This will
not be the case with flat lowland landscapes or open and
expansive upland landscapes.
v The principles of landscape analysis can be applied to
the landscape around a settlement in order to come to a
view about the capacity of a landscape to absorb further
development. Equally, this process could be used to
establish planting guidelines to assist in ameliorating the
impact of existing developed areas.
vi A variety of layouts are tested against the analysis
criteria. The better arrangements are worked up further
until an optimum proposal for the site emerges. On this
hypothetical site the comfortable landscape capacity for
housing development is achieved by developing two zones as
shown on the adjacent plan.

|
Level ground minimises the capacity of
the landscape to absorb development.
Variable topography and mature vegetation
affords an increased capacity, offering
landform screening thereby maximising the
visual capacity of the landscape. |

| 
|
Buildings arranged parallel or
perpendicular to the contours appear to
complement the topography. Those arranged
in a more random fashion present an awkward
appearance. | Buildings seen against the sky can
create greater visual impact. This can
appear visually intrusive or can be used to
good effect for important public buildings.
Buildings seen against a solid backdrop are
more easily integrated with the
landscape |
(1) A larger area on the gently sloping
land to the east is developable as a direct
extension of the inner part of the original
settlement. (2) A. smaller ribbon area to the south
extending the lochside development
immediately below the hill. | 
|
DESIGN B - URBAN STUDIES: STRUCTURE
& HIERARCHYi Part A of this manual stressed the
importance of structure in the urban form which is
critically related to hierarchy of buildings. Hierarchy
here means the size and setting of buildings in relation to
their public importance, the relative significance of
streets and spaces within neighbourhoods. Structure refers
to a planned framework within which a hierarchy of
buildings and places can be understood.
ii Today most suburban developments suffer from the
absence of both structure and hierarchy. In many recent
developments, current practice has attempted to redress
this issue. However, it is not solely a design matter and
whereas it is well understood which design parameters need
to be addressed, this issue is critically related to scale
and density.

| 
| 
|
Typical developer's layout of
monotonous regularity with no focal points,
structure or hierarchy of space | Layout more typical of much public
sector housing - irregular, uneconomic and
lacking identity | Urban layout showing a distinct
structure and hierarchy of streets and
spaces |

| 
|
Structure and hierarchy of
buildings | Structure and hierarchy of spaces |
DESIGN C - URBAN STUDIES: SCALE AND
DENSITYi Scale and density vary with
development objectives, for example, the nature of' a
development could be individual villas which is likely to
lead to low density. On the other hand the objective could
be to create flats and sheltered housing which is likely to
lead to a high density. The key to successful development
is to minimise uniform densities. It is important to avoid
mono-use, mono-scale and mono-density, which leads to lack
of identity and lack of legibility.
ii This is the central reason for the
creation of modern developments which have no sense of
place. Successful neighbourhoods have focal points of
community activity within them, such as shops, village
hall, parish church, library etc. Larger new developments
must not only incorporate other uses at the outset but also
allow space for neighbourhood activities to evolve once the
community becomes established.
iii Use, scale and density can vary throughout a
development and it is the blend of these factors which is
important in order to achieve the objectives of structure
and hierarchy. Generally, developments should be more dense
at the centre and less dense at the edge. This helps to
create a focus and a traditional physical structure that is
readily "understood".
iii If the principles of structure and
hierarchy are balanced with scale and density, then it is
quite possible to create a balanced community of old and
young people through a mix of unit size and a mix of
tenure.
iv A balanced mix and tenure will also generate a range
of patterns of activity from different community groups
which leads to varied patterns of activity across the day.
This maximises opportunities for social interaction and
promotes passive supervision of the housing area. The
desirability of achieving such objectives is well
documented and forms the subject of much current urban
design research.
Low buildings - village scale | Tall buildings - city scale |

| 
|

| 
| 
|
Large scale buildings -suitable for
buildings of public significance, for
example. | Domestic buildings - typical scale for
a single family residence. | Traditionally the pattern of density in
towns has had a concentration of central
development with a thinning towards the
peripheral areas. |
DESIGN D - URBAN STUDIES: HEIGHT
AND MASSING
Height and massing flows from structure and hierarchy.
In part it is borne out of the mix of housing, size and
tenure which is proposed. For example height is directly
related to the type of property. Flats tend to be higher -
frequently 4 storeys - and they can also be grouped to
create urban squares. On the other hand, detached villas
with a much lower density would not normally exceed 2 or
2.5 storeys. Today massing is often dictated by road
layout.
Impact of massing on elevations | Impact of massing on site layout |

| 
|
« Previous | Contents | Next »