1. Portfolio/Number/Name:T/C1 - Rail Franchise -
Procurement |
2. Programme/Activity: Please
include a short description During the re-franchising process,
bidders were asked to come up with
innovative ideas for service delivery and
quality improvement in the ScotRail
Franchise. First ScotRail's response was a
detailed proposal for at least 40m of
capital investment secured over the life of
the new rail franchise. These investments
are cost neutral to the Executive. The
franchisee is at risk on cost overruns for
most commitments. The capital investment is
focussed on benefits for passengers. In
addition, the franchise has committed to
improvements which will mean substantial
revenue expenditure on the same basis which
will see some train refurbishment. This
passenger - and staff - focussed
expenditure is forecast to be of circa 18m
in value over the life of the franchise.
However, unlike the capital investment the
revenue commitments are output rather than
expenditure based. |
3. Planned Savings | | 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 |
Cash (m) | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Time Releasing (m) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4. Accountable Officer for
delivery | Eddie Frizzell |
5. Project Manager | Jonathan Moore |
6. EGDG account manager | Iain Dewar |
7. Quality Impact | Describe any impact on the quality
of service delivery. Be specific and
explain if the expectation is positive,
negative or neutral. Over the life of the franchise, and in
particular years 2004-08, this level of
investment should mean that passengers will
see a significant improvement in the
quality and cleanliness of facilities on
trains and at stations. Work to improve
reliability of trains should feed through
to better punctuality. The additional
numbers of staff to be employed in
satisfaction of these obligations will
contribute to perceptions of security on
services and at stations. |
8. Dependencies | Explain if your savings are
dependant on legislation or other
structural changes. Savings are not dependent on
legislation or structural changes - this
saving is generated through the franchise
agreement. |
9. Description of efficiency and
actions to be taken | 9.1 How will the saving be made? Be
specific about number/size of contracts,
staff, posts dates etc. The franchise will create the specified
assets, deliver its specified services or
create and maintain the necessary new posts
to support their commitments. The number and location of physical
assets will be finalised as detailed
proposals are worked up and agreed. |
9.2 What action is critically
needed to secure delivery of this saving?
Be specific, and name the key action
managers if they are outwith your immediate
management chain (e.g. in an
NDPB.) The Franchise Management Unit in the
Scottish Executive will need to oversee the
franchisees delivery of these assets,
services and new posts. The primary
responsibility does, however, rest with the
franchisee to deliver. |
10. Impact on Staffing to achieve the efficiency
gain | If there are to be any changes in
staff numbers (at activity level) to
achieve the efficiency gain, please
indicate how many full time equivalents and
how far you expect savings to be achieved
by natural wastage (show additions as + and
reductions as -). |
| 2005- 06 | 2006- 07 | 2007- 08 |
+ | 110 | 110 | 110 |
- | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Net | 110 | 110 | 110 |
Explanation | The franchisee has contracted to create
and maintain a number of new posts, most
significantly: 4 additional managerial posts 20 repair/handymen 5 service quality auditors 87 additional ticket collectors |
11. Benefits | In general, the benefits of the
Scottish Executive Efficiency Plan are the
enhanced outputs from the resources
Ministers have been able to allocate in
SR04. But if there is a direct connection
between this efficiency saving and the
enhancement of a particular service please
describe it here. N/A |
12. Gross/Net Cash Savings | 12.1 Please set out the gross
recurring saving and any offsetting
recurring expenditure. The gross recurring saving will be in
the order of 5 million a year. The sole recurring expenditure
associated with this saving is the
additional cost of a Franchise Performance
Manager for so long as this post is
maintained. |
12.2 Against what budget does this
expenditure and saving fall? The saving falls against the Transport
Group: Rail Services in Scotland: Rail
Franchise budget by virtue of the fact that
this private sector investment means these
improvements do not need to be funded
through the public purse. The additional
expenditure will fall against First
Scotrail's budget. |
12.3 Has this saving been built
into your budget? Yes. All of the saving is built into
the subsidy line for the franchise and,
thus, into the rail franchise budget. |
12.4 If so, what is the maximum
allowable expenditure against the budget
data, in each year, for that saving to be
delivered? In order for this efficiency to be
delivered, the additional expenditure will
be: | Capital | Revenue | Total | 2005-06 | 7.706 | 2.3 | 10.006 | 2006-07 | 5.534 | 2.3 | 7.834 | 2007-08 | 4.517 | 2.4 | 6.917 | Total | 17.757 | 7.0 | 24.757 |
The Scottish Executive's budget for the
Rail Franchise is: 2005-6 256.360m
2006-7 263.900m
2007-8 269.500m |
12.5 If not, how do you propose to
invest the additional cash back into public
services? N/A |
12.6 What plans do you have to
exceed the required saving? Explain by how
much in each year. The original estimate of the efficiency
savings was 40 million over the life of the
franchise (8 years), which lead to the
estimate of a recurring saving of 5 million
a year. However, the capital investment is
likely to vary from year to year with
savings of 7.706m in 2005-06, 5.534m in
2006-07 and 4.517m in 2007-08. Over the
course of the financial year, these are
subject to a deviance of + or - 20% carried
forward. The revenue expenditure, which was
not included in the original estimate and
is worth around 18 million over the life of
the franchise, is likely to lead to
efficiency gains of the order of 2.3m in
2005-06, 2.3m in 2006-07 and 2.4m in
2007-08. The generation and collection of the
forecast additional revenue generated is a
matter for the franchisee. Where, however,
in any year the additional revenue
contributes to push the franchisee above
the revenue share threshold, the saving
will be exceeded and any additional savings
will be used to reduce the necessary
franchise subsidy from the Executive. |
13. Time - release savings | 13.1 Please explain any
time-releasing savings indicated at
question 3. N/A |
13.2 Please describe the method you
plan to use to calculate the cash
equivalent of those time release
savings. N/A |
14. Measurement and
Monitoring | 14.1 How are you proposing to
measure the expected efficiency benefits
(e.g. in terms of costs, level of output or
quality of service)? The rolling series of franchise
management meetings, reports and audits
will allow the Executive to measure the
delivery of the committed assets, services
and posts. Invoices will be required of the
franchisee to monitor expenditure where
relevant. Quality will be monitored through
the quality regimes included in the
franchise and general compliance will be
subject to audit. |
14.2 What monitoring &
reporting procedures will be put in place
to measure the efficiency savings (How
often will progress towards the target be
monitored? Who will have lead
responsibility for reporting progress and
what procedures will be in place?) Progress will be monitored against the
annual forecast budgets in the franchise
and also by the meeting and report cycle
referred to. The Rail Franchise Management
Unit (RFMU) will have lead responsibility
for reporting progress. |
14.3 Monitoring Data: Sources,
validation and risks - What data will be used to measure
progress? Is all the required information
quantifiable and readily available? If not
what action will be taken to rectify
this?
The reports generated by the franchisee
will be used to measure progress as will be
findings of service quality inspections in
the field. The necessary information is, or
can be made, readily available.
- What measures will be in place
to validate the accuracy of the data?
Who will take responsibility for
this?
Information generated by the
franchisee will be validated by RFMU,
information generated by the service
quality inspectors will be validated by
RFMU.
- Are there any issues or risks
relating to how you plan to use the
data? (e.g. accuracy, difficulties in
collection)
We do not foresee any issues or
risks relating to how we plan to use
the data.
|