On this page:

SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE EFFICIENCY TECHNICAL NOTES: MARCH 2005: page 19

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE EFFICIENCY TECHNICAL NOTES: MARCH 2005

8. FINANCE AND PUBLIC SERVICE REFORM

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:FPSR-C/C1 - Standards Commission

2. Programme/Activity: Please include a short description

Implement improved ICT and case-management system to make tracking of investigations and hearings in ethical standards cases more efficient.

3. Planned Savings

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Cash (m)

0.016

0.016

0.016

Time Releasing (m)

0

0

0

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Andrew Goudie, Head of FCSD

5. Project Manager

Morris Fraser

6. EGDG account manager

Carolyn Girvan

7. Quality Impact

Describe any impact on the quality of service delivery. Be specific and explain if the expectation is positive, negative or neutral.

Positive impact expected - more efficient availability of information.

8. Dependencies

Explain if your savings are dependant on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

Dependent on acquisition of suitable case management system

9. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

9.1 How will the saving be made? Be specific about number/size of contracts, staff, posts dates etc.

Introduction of case management system will reduce time and effort required to track casework. Saving will be equivalent of half a Higher Executive Officer equivalent per year.

9.2 What action is critically needed to secure delivery of this saving? Be specific, and name the key action managers if they are outwith your immediate management chain (e.g. in an NDPB.)

Standards Commission will have to acquire suitable case management system.

10. Impact on Staffing to achieve the efficiency gain

If there are to be any changes in staff numbers (at activity level) to achieve the efficiency gain, please indicate how many full time equivalents and how far you expect savings to be achieved by natural wastage (show additions as + and reductions as -).

2005- 06

2006- 07

2007- 08

+

-

Net

Explanation

N/A

11. Benefits

In general, the benefits of the Scottish Executive Efficiency Plan are the enhanced outputs from the resources Ministers have been able to allocate in SR04. But if there is a direct connection between this efficiency saving and the enhancement of a particular service please describe it here.

N/A

12. Gross/Net Cash Savings

12.1 Please set out the gross recurring saving and any offsetting recurring expenditure.

16,000

12.2 Against what budget does this expenditure and saving fall?

Standards Commission Grant In Aid

12.3 Has this saving been built into your budget?

Yes

12.4 If so, what is the maximum allowable expenditure against the budget data, in each year, for that saving to be delivered?

Budget figures are 390,000 in 2005-06 and 380,000 in 2006-08

12.5 If not, how do you propose to invest the additional cash back into public services?

N/A

12.6 What plans do you have to exceed the required saving? Explain by how much in each year.

None

13. Time - release savings

13.1 Please explain any time-releasing savings indicated at question 3.

N/A

13.2 Please describe the method you plan to use to calculate the cash equivalent of those time release savings.

N/A

14. Measurement and Monitoring

14.1 How are you proposing to measure the expected efficiency benefits (e.g. in terms of costs, level of output or quality of service)?

Efficiency benefits to be measured in terms of time saved

14.2 What monitoring & reporting procedures will be put in place to measure the efficiency savings (How often will progress towards the target be monitored? Who will have lead responsibility for reporting progress and what procedures will be in place?)

Standards Commission will monitor time savings on the new system, and report monthly to Ministers.

14.3 Monitoring Data: Sources, validation and risks

  • What data will be used to measure progress? Is all the required information quantifiable and readily available? If not what action will be taken to rectify this?

  • What measures will be in place to validate the accuracy of the data? Who will take responsibility for this?

  • Are there any issues or risks relating to how you plan to use the data? (e.g. accuracy, difficulties in collection)

    Monitoring via reports from Standards Commission. Rely entirely on accurate compiling of time savings to be carried out by Standards Commission.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Thursday, March 31, 2005