On this page:

SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE EFFICIENCY TECHNICAL NOTES: MARCH 2005: page 6

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE EFFICIENCY TECHNICAL NOTES: MARCH 2005

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:A/C5 - Savings from non-staff costs/better staff deployment

2. Programme/Activity: Please include a short description

Savings in the administration budget of the Scottish Executive through a reduction in non-staff costs expenditure and better staff deployment.

3. Planned Savings

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Cash (m)

0.4

1

2

Time Releasing (m)

0

0

0

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

John Elvidge

5. Project Manager

Nicola Fisher

6. EGDG account manager

Iain Dewar

7. Quality Impact

Describe any impact on the quality of service delivery. Be specific and explain if the expectation is positive, negative or neutral.

The quality impact of the savings on the work of the Executive are not yet known.

8. Dependencies

Explain if your savings are dependant on legislation or other structural changes.

Savings are dependent on consideration departments are now giving to the scope for efficiency savings in staff and non-staff costs.

9. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

9.1 How will the saving be made? Be specific about number/size of contracts, staff, posts dates etc.

The detail of how the savings will be made will not be known until Departmental efficiency illustrations have been considered.

9.2 What action is critically needed to secure delivery of this saving? Be specific, and name the key action managers if they are outwith your immediate management chain (e.g. in an NDPB.)

Each of the following departments have been asked to complete an efficiency savings illustration for the period up to 2007-08 by 31 March 2005:

  • Development
  • Education
  • Environment and Rural Affairs
  • Enterprise, Transport and Lifelong Learning
  • Finance and Central Services
  • Health
  • Justice
  • Legal and Parliamentary Services
  • Office of the Permanent Secretary

It is unlikely that savings can be confined entirely to overheads and non-staff costs and so illustrations will seek to achieve the best fit between work priorities and the deployment of staff. This will identify priorities across the spending review period and outline how staff can be best deployed to meet these. Illustrations are to cover both cash and time releasing savings.

These illustrations will be considered by Management Group with a view to efficiencies at departmental level being agreed by 29 April 2005.

Following agreement on the level of the efficiencies, a delivery plan will be drawn up by 31 May 2005 setting out the milestones towards delivery targets.

10. Impact on Staffing to achieve the efficiency gain

If there are to be any changes in staff numbers (at activity level) to achieve the efficiency gain, please indicate how many full time equivalents and how far you expect savings to be achieved by natural wastage (show additions as + and reductions as -).

2005- 06

2006- 07

2007- 08

+

-

Net

Explanation

The Executive has some 4,500 staff (4,491 at November 2004). In general there may need to be fewer posts in the Executive as a whole in the future, after what has been a period of very substantial growth. The over 200 temporary agency staff employed by the Executive affords some flexibility. The specific impact on staffing will be assessed as part of departmental illustrations.

11. Benefits

In general, the benefits of the Scottish Executive Efficiency Plan are the enhanced outputs from the resources Ministers have been able to allocate in SR04. But if there is a direct connection between this efficiency saving and the enhancement of a particular service please describe it here.

N/A

12. Gross/Net Cash Savings

12.1 Please set out the gross recurring saving and any offsetting recurring expenditure.

The gross recurring saving will be 2m a year by 2007-08 with no offsetting recurring expenditure.

12.2 Against what budget does this expenditure and saving fall?

The expenditure and savings fall to the administration budget.

12.3 Has this saving been built into your budget?

Yes.

12.4 If so, what is the maximum allowable expenditure against the budget data, in each year, for that saving to be delivered?

The Scottish Executive's administration operating budget for the years 2005-06 to 2007-08 is 235,285,000.

12.5 If not, how do you propose to invest the additional cash back into public services?

N/A

12.6 What plans do you have to exceed the required saving? Explain by how much in each year.

None

13. Time - release savings

13.1 Please explain any time-releasing savings indicated at question 3.

See answer 9.2

13.2 Please describe the method you plan to use to calculate the cash equivalent of those time release savings.

This will depend on the nature of the savings, but most likely the average staff costs of the grades of staff time released.

14. Measurement and Monitoring

14.1 How are you proposing to measure the expected efficiency benefits (e.g. in terms of costs, level of output or quality of service)?

The efficiency benefits will be measured by the success with which Departments live within reduced departmental allocations for administration whilst continuing to provide an effective service to Ministers.

14.2 What monitoring & reporting procedures will be put in place to measure the efficiency savings (How often will progress towards the target be monitored? Who will have lead responsibility for reporting progress and what procedures will be in place?)

Milestones towards the delivery of savings will form part of the delivery plan to be drawn up. Progress will be monitored on a monthly basis and reported to Management Group as part of the process of monitoring the Administration budget. Lead responsibility will fall to the Finance Administration team.

14.3 Monitoring Data: Sources, validation and risks

  • What data will be used to measure progress? Is all the required information quantifiable and readily available? If not what action will be taken to rectify this?

    Provisional departmental outturn data, provided every month, will be used to measure progress.
  • What measures will be in place to validate the accuracy of the data? Who will take responsibility for this?

    Final outturn data will form part of the Scottish Executive accounts and will be internally and externally audited to ensure their accuracy.
  • Are there any issues or risks relating to how you plan to use the data? (e.g. accuracy, difficulties in collection)

    No.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Thursday, March 31, 2005