On this page:

SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE EFFICIENCY TECHNICAL NOTES: MARCH 2005: page 3

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE EFFICIENCY TECHNICAL NOTES: MARCH 2005

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:A/C2 - Better Procurement

2. Programme/Activity: Please include a short description

The Scottish Executive plans to make savings through improving procurement practices. There are 4 components to the procurement savings. These are:

  • Savings from Purchase to Pay administrative process cost reductions
  • Reduced exposure to licence fees
  • Price savings through eprocurement including
  • eAuctions/electronic reverse auctions, eTendering

3. Planned Savings

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Cash (m)

0.6

3

3

Time Releasing (m)

0

0

0

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

John Elvidge

5. Project Manager

Tom Wilson

6. EGDG account manager

Iain Dewar

7. Quality Impact

Describe any impact on the quality of service delivery. Be specific and explain if the expectation is that the impact will be positive, negative or neutral.

These efficiency measures are based on improving the quality of the procurement service to the Scottish Executive. The continued roll out of EASEbuy and other elements of the eProcurement Scotl@nd service in parallel with Purchase to Pay process improvements will improve the overall service by progressively eliminating manual processing and replacing it with electronic handling of simplified processes. A significant additional business benefit which is not classifiable as cash or time releasing will be on-time payment of invoices.

8. Dependencies

Explain if your savings are dependant on legislation or other structural changes.

The Purchase to Pay element of the improvements is dependant on a successful bid to the Efficient Government Fund and also on observance of corporate and financial disciplines.

9. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

9.1 How will the saving be made? Be specific about number/size of contracts, staff, posts dates etc.

The savings will be made in a number of ways. The savings from the Purchase to Pay may come from the administrative costs associated from manual processing. eAuctions secure cash savings through the bidding process with cost reductions being secured through the lowest bid. Price savings through eProcurement occurs through achieving sustainable cost reductions in goods and services through making the procurement process more efficient.

9.2 What action is critically needed to secure delivery of this saving? Be specific, and name the key action managers if they are outwith your immediate management chain (e.g. in an NDPB.)

Many of the actions required to deliver these efficiencies have already been carried out. eAuctions are already delivering savings and will continue to do so and EASEbuy (eProcurement) is now mandatory across the office.

If the Scottish Procurement Directorate is successful in its bid to the Efficient Government Fund for the Purchase to Pay project, the project will need to be fully implemented, and users will have to be successfully using the new system by eighteen months from the award of funding in order to deliver optimum savings, although quick wins will be available within that period.

10. Impact on Staffing to achieve the efficiency gain

If there are to be any changes in staff numbers (at activity level) to achieve the efficiency gain, please indicate how many full time equivalents and how far you expect savings to be achieved by natural wastage (show additions as + and reductions as -).

2005- 06

2006- 07

2007- 08

+

-

Net

Explanation

The Purchase to Pay project may result in a reduction in the number of posts necessary to process invoices but as yet the actual impact is unquantified.

11. Benefits

In general, the benefits of the Scottish Executive Efficiency Plan are the enhanced outputs from the resources Ministers have been able to allocate in SR04. But if there is a direct connection between this efficiency saving and the enhancement of a particular service please describe it here.

N/A

12. Gross/Net Cash Savings

12.1 Please set out the gross recurring saving and any offsetting recurring expenditure.

The net recurring savings from better procurement are 3m a year by 2007-08.

The Purchase to Pay project may actually result in some time releasing savings rather than cash releasing savings. This will depend on future decisions to be made by local managers.

12.2 Against what budget does this expenditure and saving fall?

Goods and services are procured on behalf of all parts of the Scottish Executive but requisitioned locally. Therefore, the impact will be across multiple cost centres within the overall administration budget.

12.3 Has this saving been built into budgets?

Yes

12.4 If so, what is the maximum allowable expenditure against the published budget data, in each year, for that saving to be delivered?

The Scottish Executive's administration operating budget for the years 2005-06 to 2007-08 is 235,285,000.

12.5 If not, how do you propose to invest the additional cash back into public services?

N/A

12.6 What plans do you have to exceed the required saving? Explain by how much in each year.

It may be possible to exceed the required saving but this will depend on the success of eAuctions and eProcurement. This will be reflected in future reports.

13. Time - release savings

13.1 Please explain any time-releasing savings indicated at question 3.

N/A but see caveat to 12.1

13.2 Please describe the method you plan to use to calculate the cash equivalent of those time release savings.

N/A

14. Measurement and Monitoring

14.1 How are you proposing to measure the expected efficiency benefits (e.g. in terms of costs, level of output or quality of service)?

The efficiency benefits will be measured by looking at the costs associated with processing transactions, particularly invoices; and the cost of goods and services before the use of eAuction (or as a result of discounts achieved when negotiating contracts where eProcurement is the specified transactional method) multiplied by actual demand. The time taken to process an invoice will also be monitored to ensure that there is no reduction in the quality of service.

14.2 What monitoring & reporting procedures will be put in place to measure the efficiency savings (How often will progress towards the target be monitored? Who will have lead responsibility for reporting progress and what procedures will be in place?)

Expenditure on procurement services and on goods and services procured will be monitored through the monthly returns on the Executive's financial management system. This will be reviewed quarterly to ensure that the Executive is on course to meet these targets. Progress is reported to the Procurement Management Board and will be forwarded at regular intervals to EG.

14.3 Monitoring Data: Sources, validation and risks

  • What data will be used to measure progress? Is all the required information quantifiable and readily available? If not what action will be taken to rectify this?

    Financial data will be used to measure progress and this information is quantifiable and readily available through the financial management systems.
  • What measures will be in place to validate the accuracy of the data? Who will take responsibility for this?

    Scottish Executive accounts are audited internally and externally and this ensures the accuracy of the Executive's financial data.
  • Are there any issues or risks relating to how you plan to use the data? (e.g. accuracy, difficulties in collection)

    None, assuming that the financial data within SEAS is accurate which itself assumes that corporate financial and process disciplines are observed by staff.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Thursday, March 31, 2005