« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE EFFICIENCY TECHNICAL
NOTES: MARCH 2005
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Scottish Executive Spending
Proposals 2005-2008
1 were published in September 2004. Integral to those
proposals is the commitment to manage public sector
resources more effectively, which will contribute to a
growing economy, and to modernise and improve Scotland's
public services. In these spending proposals, target 1 for
the Finance and Public Services portfolio is to make
government in Scotland more efficient and release 500
million of recurring cash-releasing efficiency savings for
investment in frontline services by March 2008. A technical
note for this Spending Review target was published in
December 2004
2 and this sets out the criteria for a cash-releasing
efficiency.
1.2 In November 2004, a plan
3 to attack waste, bureaucracy and duplication was
published. The Efficient Government Plan builds upon much
work which has already been done over the past five years
and sets increased financial targets for the three years to
2007-08. These include securing 745 million of annually
recurring cash-releasing savings by 2007-08 and the
ambition of achieving up to 900 million.
| 2005-06
Already identified | 2006-07
Already identified | 2007-08
Already identified | For the year 2007-08
Additional savings yet to be
specified |
Cash releasing savings | 405m | 582m | 745m | 155m |
Time releasing savings | n/a | n/a | 300m | 300m |
Ensuring we deliver
1.3 The Efficient Government Plan articulated how these
efficiency savings would be achieved, how they would be
monitored and how they would be reported. We have agreed
with Audit Scotland that they will provide more formal
comments on the published Technical Notes by end April and
that these comments should be in the public domain.
.Developments from November 2004 to March 2005 include:
- Establishing a reference group with representation
from local government, the NHS and other public bodies
to act as a channel for information and to strengthen
dialogue between different sectors;
- Establishing an Efficient Government Delivery Team
within the Scottish Executive;
- Holding a series of workshops across Scotland with
senior managers in the public sector on the topic of
collaborative Efficient Government projects;
- Piloting the technical note for identified
cash-releasing efficiency projects;
- Drafting of technical notes for the 48
cash-releasing efficiency projects that have been
identified; and
- Working with Audit Scotland to introduce
independent scrutiny into the process.
Cash Releasing Technical Notes
1.4 In line with Annex B of the Efficient Government
Plan, this document provides the technical notes for the
cash-releasing efficiency projects that were identified in
the plan and which form the basis of the 405 million of
recurring cash-releasing efficiency savings in 2005-06, 582
million in 2006-07 and 745 million in 2007-08.
1.5 These technical notes are intended to document:
- a description of the project;
- the nature of the efficiencies to be realised and
the cash to be released;
- whether the financial impact has been included in
the 2004 Spending Review;
- the names of those accountable for the saving and
those who manage the project;
- the actions to be undertaken and the dependencies
that have to be factored in;
- the impact on staffing levels, both increases and
decreases; and
- clarification on how the efficiency will be
measured, monitored and reported.
1.6 It should be noted that the technical note is a
working document. Many efficiency projects are at different
stages of development and some projects have more detailed
technical notes than others. The technical notes will be
updated periodically to reflect the latest technical
information on the projects.
Efficiency savings
1.7 The figures for savings and for changes in staffing
shown in the technical note are inclusive of prior year
savings, i.e. the saving shown for any year is the change
since 2004-05. The overall baseline for the savings (Year
0) has been set as the 2004-05 budget. In terms of context,
the savings of 405m/582m/745m in 2005-06, 2006-07 and
2007-08 respectively are to be achieved against a
background of increasing investment in the public sector.
The Total Managed Expenditure for the same period
(including estimated inflation) is 25,480m/27,117m/28,923m.
Monitoring for the purposes of the Plan will be limited to
individual efficiency projects. Total spend (for each and
every public sector body), for which there is likely to be
other factors contributing to variances, will be subject to
normal ongoing monitoring.
Next Stages
1.8 In the next quarter, the Scottish Executive
will:
- review delivery planning to monitor and report on
progress; and
- produce technical notes for the identified
time-releasing savings (300m) and the additional
cash-releasing and time-releasing savings (i.e. the
155m and 300m respectively).
Template for the cash releasing technical note
with description of what each section
contains.
1. Portfolio/Number/Name:Name of project and identifier |
2. Programme/Activity: Please
include a short description The purpose of this section is to
provide a description of the activity that
will lead to the delivery of the efficiency
savings. |
3. Planned Savings | | 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 |
Cash | This section contains the figures that
formed the basis of the original figures
included in the Efficient Government Plan.
In some instances, a project may deliver
time-releasing savings as well as
cash-releasing savings. |
Time Releasing |
4. Accountable Officer for
delivery | The Departmental Accountable
Officer. |
5. Project Manager | The Branch Head or above with policy
responsibility for delivery of
efficiency. |
6. EGDG account manager | The member of the Efficient Government
Delivery Group overseeing the delivery of
the saving. |
7. Quality Impact | Describe any impact on the quality
of service delivery. Be specific and
explain if the expectation is positive,
negative or neutral. This section should describe whether or
not the efficiency project will have any
impact on the quality of the service
provided. |
8. Dependencies | Explain if your savings are
dependant on legislation or other
structural changes being achieved. In some cases, the delivery of an
efficiency saving may be outwith direct
control of the project manager. This
section should illustrate where the
delivery of a saving is dependant on
certain factors. |
9. Description of efficiency and
actions to be taken | 9.1 How will the saving be made? Be
specific about number/size of contracts,
staff, posts dates etc. This section provides more details on
how the actual efficiency savings will be
made as opposed to the activity that will
deliver it. |
9.2 What action is critically
needed to secure delivery of this saving?
Be specific, and name the key action
managers if they are outwith your immediate
management chain (e.g. in an
NDPB.) This section outlines some of the key
actions that are necessary in order for the
saving to be delivered. It is not a
comprehensive list of milestones or a
critical path. |
10. Impact on Staffing to achieve the efficiency
gain | If there are to be any changes in
staff numbers (at activity level) to
achieve the efficiency gain, please
indicate how many full time equivalents and
how far you expect savings to be achieved
by natural wastage (show additions as + and
reductions as -). |
| 2005- 06 | 2006- 07 | 2007- 08 |
+ | This section provides details on the
impact of an efficiency project on the
number of posts for that particular
activity. |
- |
Net |
Explanation |
11. Benefits | In general, the benefits of the
Scottish Executive Efficiency Plan are the
enhanced outputs from the resources
Ministers have been able to allocate in
SR04. But if there is a direct connection
between this efficiency saving and the
enhancement of a particular service please
describe it here. This section explains that most of the
efficiency savings have been allocated as
part of the Spending Review. In most
instances, it is not possible to provide a
direct link between an efficiency savings
and a subsequent increase in resources
elsewhere in the Spending Review proposals.
However, where it is possible to indicate
where the efficiency saving was allocated,
this information should be provided
here. |
12. Gross/Net Cash Savings | 12.1 Please set out the gross
recurring saving and any offsetting
recurring expenditure. This section sets out the latest
estimate of the gross recurring saving. It
also asks for offsetting recurring
expenditure so that it is possible to work
out the net recurring saving. In some instances, one-off costs or
capital expenditure may be provided
although this should not be deducted from
the savings. Similarly one-off receipts or
savings are excluded from the savings. |
12.2 Against what budget does this
expenditure and saving fall? The budget against which the
expenditure and saving falls should be
included here. This will vary in level of
detail depending on the information
available. |
12.3 Has this saving been built
into your budget? This questions asks whether the saving
has been built in to the budget. In this
instance, the "budget" is the allocation
they have been given from central
government as part of the budget process.
In some instances, the saving has been
deducted at source and allocated elsewhere
as part of the Spending Review/Budget
process - see section 11. In other
instances the saving has not been deducted
at source, and the saving is available to
be directed to services as that
organisation sees fit. |
12.4 If so, what is the maximum
allowable expenditure against the budget
data, in each year, for that saving to be
delivered? Where a saving has been built in to the
budget, this section asks for the budget to
be provided so it is possible to assess
whether or not they have managed to live
within their budget and, therefore,
delivered the efficiency saving. |
12.5 If not, how do you propose to
invest the additional cash back into public
services? Where an efficiency saving has not been
built in to the budget, this section asks
for an explanation on how that saving will
be invested back into public services. |
12.6 What plans do you have to
exceed the required saving? Explain by how
much in each year. This section asks if any plans have
been made to exceed the planned saving
provided in section 3. In most cases, any
variance between section three and the
latest revised estimate is provided in this
section. |
13. Time - release savings | 13.1 Please explain any
time-releasing savings indicated at
question 3. Where a time-releasing saving has also
been identified in section 3, along with
the cash-releasing saving, this section
asks for the details to be provided. |
13.2 Please describe the method you
plan to use to calculate the cash
equivalent of those time release
savings. This section asks for the methodology
used to calculate the cash equivalent of
the time saved. |
14. Measurement and
Monitoring | 14.1 How are you proposing to
measure the expected efficiency benefits
(e.g. in terms of costs, level of output or
quality of service)? This section asks how the efficiency
benefits will be measured. |
14.2 What monitoring &
reporting procedures will be put in place
to measure the efficiency savings (How
often will progress towards the target be
monitored? Who will have lead
responsibility for reporting progress and
what procedures will be in place?) This section asks how the measured
efficiency savings in section 14.1 will be
monitored and who this will be reported
to. |
14.3 Monitoring Data: Sources,
validation and risks - What data will be used to
measure progress? Is all the required
information quantifiable and readily
available? If not what action will be
taken to rectify this?
- What measures will be in place
to validate the accuracy of the data?
Who will take responsibility for
this?
- Are there any issues or risks
relating to how you plan to use the
data? (e.g. accuracy, difficulties in
collection)
This section asks about the data being
used to measure progress and whether or not
it is quantifiable, readily available and
accurate. |
« Previous | Contents | Next »