« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
LEARNER PERCEPTIONS OF INFORMATION,
ADVICE AND GUIDANCE: A REVIEW OF RESEARCH
SECTION FOUR: THE IMPACTS OF INFORMATION,
ADVICE AND GUIDANCE ON LEARNERS AND POTENTIAL LEARNERS
4.1 The general impact of IAG
This section gives an overview of what
research can tell us about the impact that access to IAG,
or the lack of appropriate IAG, has on learners.
Research highlights the impact that
relevant and targeted IAG can have. For example, some of
the main outcomes of mtl's (2003) survey were as
follows.
- 80% of respondents felt that they had benefited
from the service they had received. The most highly
valued benefits were help in identifying and using
information; and being made aware of suitable
learning opportunities. Other benefits that were
considered definitely or probably important include
making adults more likely to start an education or
training course (63% of all respondents).
- Of those that had moved into learning following
receipt of information and advice (36% of all
respondents), 76% believed that the service had
been crucial or important in them making the
decision or transition into learning. Of those that
had gone into work-related learning, 80% felt that
information and advice was crucial or
important.
- As 30% of respondents had since gone on to
start or achieve an NVQ, the authors suggest that
advice and information services could have an
impact on sub level 2 achievement in particular,
and could be important in increasing level 2-4
achievement.
However we also have shown in Section 2,
lack of knowledge of educational opportunities is often
cited by researchers as a major barrier to adult
participation in learning. This is reflected in the NALS
2002 study where it is reported that 27% of non-learner
respondents cited lack of knowledge about local learning
opportunities as a barrier to learning (Fitzgerald
et al, 2002). Munn and MacDonald have highlighted
class differences apparent in knowledge of educational
opportunities, with almost a quarter of social class D not
knowing what is available in local area (Munn and
MacDonald, 1988). In addition it has been shown through
focus group research that younger people might be put off
learning if they receive bad advice and information about
learning opportunities (KMPG, 2003).
4.2 Participants in learning
Young people
Research undertaken by HMIE (2002)
illustrates the impact that a lack of good IAG can have on
young people studying at college. They did not always get
the information and advice they needed after they left
school, and they did not always get the same support at
college as they had at school. This could contribute to
drop out from courses. Similarly other studies have shown
that for young people, being placed on inappropriate
courses through lack of good transitional guidance, or lack
of good guidance at college, can lead to higher rates of
drop out (Sadler, 2002; Martinez, 2001).
Research has also shown the positive impact
that good IAG can have on the learning pathways of young
people. Joyce
et al (2003) undertook research on young people's
view on the Connexions service in England. Education,
employment and training issues had been discussed with
Personal Advisers. They felt they had received a large
amount of information and personal support from them. They
felt that decisions and choices had been influenced through
increased awareness; they had been enabled to take on a new
activity or course of action. Morris
et al (2002) carried out research on learner
support arrangements for 16-19 year olds in England. They
found that young people generally thought positively of the
support they received, when the support was planned,
integrated and targeted.
In respect of young people in transition,
research has been conducted on their views of careers,
education and guidance (CEG). In the study by SWA (2000)
603 students were tracked for two years after leaving
compulsory education in England. Most of those doing A
levels or work-based learning, such as employer or
government-supported training, felt that CEG had not
adequately prepared them for what they were doing now. Most
respondents who had finished A levels felt that CEG had not
helped with their decision about what to do next.
Other research on the impact of CEG has
shown that for some young people, formal CEG has less of an
impact than parents and family networks (Payne, 2003).
However CEG may have more influence in selecting a course
once the decision has been taken to continue in education;
and with those choosing vocational courses rather than A
levels. Young people tend to find careers advisers more
helpful than careers teachers. In this respect there are
difference between ethnic groups, with minority ethnic
groups seeming to find CEG less helpful than non minority
ethnic groups.
Further education
Overall, in relation to the FE sector the
findings from research highlights both the importance of
IAG, and its potential for improvement (Martinez 2001;
Sadler, 2000). The review of research undertaken by
Martinez, which included research which focused on both
young people and adults at FE colleges, shows that lack of
appropriate IAG can lead to drop out. Martinez (2001)
overviews research which has explored the perceptions of
IAG of students who have withdrawn from college. This shows
that these students differ from students who have completed
in the following ways.
- They have received poor or inadequate advice
and guidance.
- Students who apply late or who join courses
after their commencement are more likely to
experience problems in relation to IAG issues.
- There can be indiscriminate recruitment to
courses by colleges.
- There can be a lack of understanding of demands
of course.
The research undertaken in Scotland by the
Scottish Funding Councils (2003), which has been quoted
above, highlighted the importance of IAG for FE students in
particular. This relates to receiving adequate help,
learning support and guidance with their studies from
teaching staff, and to financial issues. It was more
important amongst: part-time (49%) rather than full-time
(39%); those in their first year (42%) rather than those in
later years (37%); those with long-standing illness or a
disability (46%) rather than those without (39%). Students
in the first year are more likely to think that advice on
financial and personal issues (16%) is important than those
in later years (10%).
Higher education
The large scale UK-wide study undertaken by
Connor
et al (2001) has shown that there is a lack of
knowledge among those from lower social classes of likely
costs of going to HE, and the likely financial outcomes of
HE study later on. A number of concerns other than finance
are listed: being able to cope with level and amount of
work; gaining entry qualification; the application process;
and for some personal matters such as childcare. This shows
the impact that a lack of IAG has on the groups who would
be targets of the social inclusion agenda. The indication
would seem to be from this that these are areas in which
information and advice might benefit those from lower
social class groups.
As with research in the FE sector, IAG is
shown to have an impact on drop out in the HE sector.
Christie
et al (unpublished) undertook a study on reasons
for withdrawal from university with students enrolled in
2001-02 in two universities in Scotland. This report
highlights that only a third had sought advice from staff
in the university before withdrawing, including lecturers,
tutors or advisors. The authors suggest that universities
may need to better publicise their advice services, or
improve their perceived accessibility to students thinking
of leaving the university. They suggest that more help may
be needed early on in the university career to help
students make better choices of programmes. This supports
the work of Ozga and Sukhnandan (1998) who link
non-completion of HE courses with being inadequately
prepared for university life, including in terms of a lack
of information and unrealistic expectations.
Learners with disabilities
Hall and Tinklin's research (1998) in
Scotland on the experiences of disabled students in HE in
Scotland highlighted that information about support for
students with disabilities and institution's general
approach towards disability impacted onto students' choice
of institution. However it was also shown that some
students were not aware that they were entitled to
additional support from the institution and therefore
special needs provision was not a factor in their
choice.
Minority ethnic young people
Ball
et al's (2002) study of minority ethnic students
in London, investigated HE choice. It has shown that some
young people from minority ethnic communities lack
information about the different kinds of HE, the different
statuses of HE, and lack of understanding of what HE study
will be like. They rarely visit institutions in the
decision making process.
Funding
As we have highlighted in Section 2,
Callander's (1999) large scale study of students in FE
showed that half of the students studied were unaware of
particular sources of financial support and that it was
students from social classes D and E, that is those in the
greatest need, that had the least information. Overall the
findings from this study showed that such a lack of
information impacted onto the take up of opportunities for
students from lower social classes, and that potentially
take up could increase if information on these sources was
more widely disseminated within the student body and among
potential students.
4.3 Those who generally do not participate in
learning
As is shown in Section 2, lack of knowledge
of learning opportunities is a major barrier to
participation in learning for traditional non-participant
groups. For example
Clayton and McGill (2000) comment that
those most likely to need vocational guidance are those
least likely to receive it; and where it is available those
who need it most are least likely to use it. Work by
McGiveny has shown that the language used in publicity can
be a problem, either because course titles are not
specific, or acronyms or jargon are used. Mention of
assessment can also be off putting (McGivney, 1999c). The
impact of this is that men will not attend classes. In
relation to the impact of language, Hawthorn
et al (2002) found that the word 'guidance' did
not mean much to a range of disadvantaged groups. NICEC
(1998a) found that many adults do not find the word
'career' relevant or meaningful so will not find places
offering careers advice attractive. They equally found that
many do not understand the term 'guidance'. Similarly
Clayton and McGill (2000) found that vocational guidance
needs to be publicised in a language and style that its
target audience will understand without being patronising.
Posters used should have pictures, use community languages
and give information on other services available such as a
free crèche. Overall it is concluded that the way
information about courses in FE is communicated to
non-traditional learners is a critical factor in persuading
such learners to participate. Getting the language,
presentation and style right is crucial (Gallacher
et al, 2000; Merrill, 1999).
Research undertaken in Scotland which
explored the role of FE in helping non-traditional learners
take their first steps back into learning, showed the
impact that initial contact, and the way a potential
student is received, can be a deciding factor as to whether
or not someone who is not confident actually makes it
through the door, and participates in a course. Evidence in
this study shows that the community centres were better at
this than the more anonymous main colleges (Gallacher
et al, 2000).
In relation to facilitating progression
between learning opportunities, McGivney (1999a) found that
IAG services with good referral procedures within and
between organisations, encouragement from staff, and
knowledge of the learning opportunities available can all
facilitate progression from informal learning to formal
learning. She emphasises the role of 'key' people who
inform, advise and encourage informal learners. Often these
are not professional guidance workers, but people from
'non-educational organisations and networks'. Examples are
health workers or playgroup workers. In this respect the
timing of information to facilitate progression needs
careful thought. McGivney (1999a) comments on the
importance of providing information on further learning
opportunitiesto those who have participated in informal
learning, while they are likely to be enthusiastic about
continuing to learn.
Other work undertaken by McGivney (1999b)
states that studies have shown there to be little advice
available to women wishing to return to work, with no
obvious routes for them to follow. The same study found
that IAG on educational opportunities provided by project
workers contacting community groups, and visiting them at
their request, was found to be an effective way of
encouraging women into learning.
Older learners
DfES (2003a) refers to the finding of
research by MORI that the over 45s are a group for whom
access to IAG is the most difficult and who express most
dissatisfaction with IAG received. Carlton and Soulsby
(1999) state that a lack of appropriate and accessible
advice or guidance is a barrier to learning for this group.
DfES (2003b) reports that for this group, services which
are integrated, comprehensive, and which are personalised,
have been found helpful. IAG services need to be targeted,
according to participants.
People with disabilities
DfES (2003,a) also comments on the
difficulties that people with disabilities in accessing
IAG, and their dissatisfaction with the IAG received.
McGivney (1999a), with reference to people recovering from
a mental illness, comments on the need to only encourage
progression in learning when individuals are perceived to
be ready for this; and not to refer them too soon as this
can either scare people, or put them at risk of failure.
Developing learning options that are familiar or
non-threatening has been found to help people develop
further learning interests.
Disaffected young people
Research undertaken in a Scottish context
which explored the role of the FE sector in relation to
lifelong learning and social inclusion showed that that
many young people living in areas of deprivation, hold the
views that college is 'not for the likes of them'.
(Gallacher
et al, 2000). This had been a major barrier in
them attending college. They also commented that that none
of their 'pals' went to college, and they would not want to
go somewhere where they did not know anyone. Conversely the
presence of "mates" who were already there, or going with
them, acted as a strong incentive to attend (Gallacher
et al, 2000). This shows the impact of a lack of
information about the potential role of college. Again lack
of information is shown to be a barrier for young
job-seekers at a local development company in Glasgow. It
was reported that they did not feel that they had been
helped to find employment or education before, despite
having been registered with the Employment Service (Clayton
and McGill (2000).
NICEC (1998b) in a briefing on career
guidance for disengaged young people comment that young
people react positively to personalised 'client-centred
concern and caring' and willingness to go beyond doing the
minimum in mentors, and where they perceive this they are
helped to move away from a sense of disengagement. If they
do not perceive these qualities in a career mentor, they
will not be helped in this way. Feedback from young people
suggests that local initiatives which actively involve
them- such as group work, residential experience, youth
awards, work experience, taster sessions with learning
providers or 'gateway' courses in FE - can be effective in
overcoming disengagement. The researchers also comment that
many such young people will not be able to act on career
guidance before other personal difficulties are overcome,
and they have achieved a level of personal security.
Minority ethnic young people
McGivney (1999c) comments that many
minority ethnic young men do not have the information and
support structures for them to access opportunities and
financial help. As such, they may be unwilling to take part
in training if they have had a bad experience of training
before or are concerned that they will face racial
discrimination.
« Previous | Contents | Next »