« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
LEARNER PERCEPTIONS OF INFORMATION,
ADVICE AND GUIDANCE: A REVIEW OF RESEARCH
SECTION THREE: SOURCES OF INFORMATION,
ADVICE AND GUIDANCE.
This section explores the range of sources
of information, advice and guidance used by learners and
potential learners, and the different ways in which these
information sources are used by different groups. In this
section funding issues have not been distinguished from
other IAG issues since there is not a significant
literature which focuses on this as a distinct issue.
However much of the literature on how learners and
potential learners, and particularly those from
non-traditional groups, access IAG is also of relevance
with regard to the particular issue of funding.
3.1 All learners and potential
learners
There is evidence of a very wide range of
sources of advice which are used by learners and potential
learners. The ways in which these are used varies with
respect to factors such as educational experience and
qualifications, age and social characteristics.
Informal networks
An important source of information, advice
and guidance that appears to be used by all adult groups to
a greater or lesser extent is word-of-mouth through
informal networks. Reviewing the Scottish data from the
2002 NIACE survey on adult participation in learning,
Slowey (2003) comments that word-of-mouth was by the far
the most common means of accessing information on
learning.
Important people in the informal network
can include:
- Family, who emerge as a very important source
of advice, particularly for those with family
experience of involvement in post compulsory
education. (Aldridge and Tuckett, 2002; Allen,
2003; Bond and Merrill, 1999; Bowman
et al, 2000; Christie
et al, unpublished; Connor
et al, 1999; Connor
et al, 2001; CRLL, 2002; David
et al, 2003;; Fitzgerald
et al, 2002; Gallacher
et al, 2000; HMIE, 2002; McKeeking
et al, 2002; McGivney, 1999a; McGivney,
1999c; Merrill, 1999; mtl, 2003;NICEC, 1998a;
Payne, 2003; Sargant, 2000; Scottish Executive,
2001; Semple
et al, 2002; Slowey, 2003).
- Friends (Aldridge and Tuckett, 2000; Bond and
Merrill, 1999; Bowman
et al, 2000; Connor
et al, 1999; Connor
et al, 2001; CRLL, 2002; Fitzgerald
et al, 2002; Gallacher
et al, 2000; Kidd and Wardman, 1999;
McGivney, 1999a; McKeeking
et al, 2002; Merrill, 1999; mtl, 2003;
Sargant, 2000; Scottish Executive, 2001; Semple
et al, 2002; Slowey, 2003).
- People in the local area (McGivney,
1999a).
- Peers (Foskett, Maringe and Lumby, 2003;
Gallacher
et al, 2000; KMPG, 2003; NICEC,
1998a).
- School teachers (Connor
et al, 1999; Kidd and Wardman, 1999;
Semple
et al, 2002).
- Family friends, neighbours or family members'
colleagues (Semple
et al, 2002).
Informal networks can be particularly
valued because they provide information and advice based on
other people's direct experience of learning (Gallacher
et al, 2000; Payne, 2003; Semple
et al, 2002). Semple
et al (2002) also comment that the directive
nature of advice from those in their informal network can
be preferred by Scottish young people who are confused
about their post-16 options.
The influence of friends and family may be
indirect, such as friends influencing the development of a
general attitude towards learning amongst those making
choices at 16 (Payne, 2003); or family influencing views on
education or careers options (Payne, 2003; Semple
et al, 2002). Foskett, Maringe and Lumby (2003)
found some evidence that young men are more influenced by
peer pressure in post-16 choice than young women. David
et al (2003) found that young women are more
willing to involve their parents, especially mothers, in
decision making about higher education than young men, who
were more likely to find parental involvement intrusive or
irrelevant. They also found that fathers often tried to
control the choice process.
However, informal networks can vary in
terms of the range and the appropriateness of information,
advice and guidance they can provide (Christie
et al, unpublished; Kidd and Wardman, 1999; HMIE,
2002; Semple
et al, 2002). For example, Kidd and Wardman (1999)
in their study of those who switch courses post-16, state
that those who switched course more than once tended to
cite the influence of parents and friends significantly
more often than those who only switched course once. It
should also be noted that while these informal networks
provide information which inform choices about
participation, they can also provide information, advice or
guidance which discourage participation in learning
(Gallacher
et al, 2000; McGivney, 2000a; Payne, 2003).
Workplace
A second common source of IAG on learning
reported in the literature is the workplace. The workplace
can include employers, training officers or work colleagues
(Aldridge and Tuckett, 2002; 2
et al, 2003; Hawthorn
et al, 2002; mtl, 2003; Progressive Partnership,
2003; Sargant, 2000; Scottish Executive, 2001; Semple
et al, 2002; Slowey, 2003).
This is also important for those who belong
to groups who have historically participated less in adult
learning. Hawthorn
et al (2002) found that employers play an
important part in provision of IAG for learning amongst
disadvantaged groups. It has been found that groups of men
generally excluded from education and training accessed
information on learning mainly from their employer, though
women are likely to cite a much wider range of sources
(McGivney, 1999c)
Other sources
A range of other sources are mentioned with
some frequency in the literature in relation to a range of
groups, although the evidence suggests that they are used
much less for IAG on learning than informal and workplace
sources. They include:
Job centres and job clubs (Allen, 2003; McGivney,
1999c; McKeeking
et al, 2002; mtl, 2003; Progressive Partnership,
2003; Sargant, 2000; Scottish Executive, 2001; Slowey,
2003; Stone
et al, 2000). Issues relating to these are raised
below in relation to non-traditional groups.
Careers services (Allen, 2003; Connor
et al, 1999; CRLL, 2002; Foskett, Dyke and
Maringe, 2003; Joyce
et al, 2003; Lloyd, 2002; Payne, 2003; Sargant,
2000; Stone
et al, 2000; SWA, 2000). These are used more often
by young people as they make their post-16 decisions than
by other groups.
Educational institutions (Christie
et al, unpublished; CRLL, 2002; Fitzgerald
et al, 2002; Kidd and Wardman, 1999; mtl, 2003;
Payne, 2003; Progressive Partnership, 2003; Sargant, 2000;
Scottish Executive, 2001; Slowey, 2003). Amongst adults in
general, FE colleges were more likely to be a significant
source of information than HE institutions. School can be
an important source of information, advice and guidance for
young people. In the Scottish data of the 2002 NIACE
survey, 8% name school as a source of information, compared
to 9% for FE colleges and 3% for HE institutions (Slowey,
2003).
Learndirect and other telephone helplines
(Fitzgerald
et al, 2002; McGivney, 1999c; mtl, 2003; NICEC,
1998a; Progressive Partnership, 2003; Sargant, 2000;
Scottish Executive, 2001; Slowey, 2003). According to the
Scottish University for Industry (2003), in 2002-03: 25,613
individuals were assisted online; there were 2,229,880
consumer website hits; there were 101,201 consumer helpline
enquiries; 63,614 business website hits; and 2,243 business
helpline enquiries. However, in reviewing the Scottish data
from the NIACE survey on adult participation in learning,
Slowey (2003) comments that only 1% of respondents
mentioned Learndirect as a source of information on
learning. While research by the Scottish Executive (2001)
which included learners on adult literacy and numeracy
courses, on other courses, and non-learners, states that
several learners mentioned Learndirect as a source of
information, in the Progressive Partnership (2003) study,
also in Scotland, Learndirect was only named as a potential
source of information on learning after a fair amount of
prompting.
Publicity material is mentioned as a source of
information in a number of studies (Connor
et al, 1999; Fitzgerald
et al, 2002; McGivney, 2000a; McGivney, 1999c;
Sargant, 2000; Scottish Executive, 2001; Slowey, 2003).
However the value of this varies for different social
groups, and this will be discussed below.
The media are recognised, as a source of
information. There is again evidence of variations in the
use of the media, with local community papers of particular
importance for those involved in community based learning
(Fitzgerald
et al, 2002; Gallacher
et al, 2000; McGivney, 1999b; mtl, 2003; Sargant,
2000; Scottish Executive, 2001; Semple
et al, 2002; Slowey, 2003). The 2002 NIACE survey
on adult participation in learning showed that newspapers
and magazines were given as sources of information by 13%
of respondents in Scotland compared to 7% in the UK as a
whole (Slowey, 2003). In research in England, mtl (2003)
found that advertising is a dominant source of information
for those in work.
Libraries are also a source of information, but
their use and impact will be explored further below
(Progressive Partnership, 2003; Sargant, 2000; Scottish
Executive, 2001; Slowey, 2003).
The internet, overall does not seem to be a
significant source of information on learning (mtl, 2003;
Progressive Partnership, 2003; Sargant, 2000; Slowey,
2003). One of the few findings in relation to the use of
the internet for this purpose is provided by Connor
et al (1999) on research on applicants to HE, who
found that mature and younger applicants were equally
likely to have used the internet to find information.
Visits/open days are also an important source of
information and advice, particularly for those who are
already involved in learning (Connor
et al, 1999; CRLL, 2002; McGivney, 1999a;
McGivney, 2000b; McKeeking
et al, 2002).
3.2 Participants in learning
Informal networks
The importance of informal networks for all
learners has been noted above. With regard to participants
these have been noted as being of particular importance for
younger learners. Semple
et al (2002) undertook research on the informal
networks of Scottish young people that are drawn on for
IAG. The informal network of career support included
extended family, friends and those with weaker ties to the
family such as family friends, neighbours and family
members' colleagues. The influence of friends in the
development of a general attitude towards education is also
noted in Payne's (2003) review of research on choice at the
end of compulsory schooling. They, and siblings, can
provide information seen as more meaningful on specific
options than from formal sources. Connor
et al (1999) noted that people who could be
referred to as 'advisers' including friends and family as
well as professional careers advisers, were very important
for many. Informal advisers were generally more important
to young people than mature applicants.
Educational institutions
Schools are an important source of
information for many young people making post-16 decisions
(Callander, 1999; Connor
et al, 1999; CRLL, 2002; Kidd and Wardman, 1999).
The ethos or culture of school may also have an influence
on decisions taken by young adults on post-16 options
(Foskett, Dyke and Maringe, 2003). Payne (2003) found that
individual teachers can be helpful, but are not a
significant source of advice. The advice of teachers is
usually to stay in full time education. Work-based training
is more likely to be encouraged by parents who have
followed this route than by schools. While Payne believes
that the fact that school is influential on post-16 choices
is accepted, the nature of this influence is not clearly
known.
Payne (2003) also found that for those at
the end of compulsory schooling, choices about which to
college to attend can be influenced by college marketing.
Kidd and Wardman (1999) state that their findings from a
study on those who switch course post-16 suggest the need
for post-compulsory institutions to provide 'realistic
course previews' for potential students.
However, HMIE (2002) refer to evidence that
young people did not always get the information and advice
they needed after they leave school; they did not always
get the same support at college as they had at school, and
this could lead them to drop out; some young people and
their parents were not aware of the opportunities available
at college.
Prospectuses also emerge as an important
source of advice for those entering HE. In Connor's UK-wide
study on applicants to HE 40.4% stated that prospectuses
were the most helpful source of information (Connor
et al, 1999). However, there was some criticism of
their lack of detail on courses as they were seen as
promotional documents.
Visits to colleges and universities are
also important sources of information and advice. Connor
et al (1999) found that 26.1% of applicants to HE
found a visit to the institution to be the most helpful
source of information. However, visits to institutions were
experiences that seemed to vary widely and not all were
positive. In a study by CRLL (2002) on students in a
post-92 Scottish university, it was reported that 53.1% had
visited the university before applying. Of these 1231
students, 84.5% described the visit as 'important' or 'very
important' in influencing their decision about the
programme to apply for. Of all respondents, 15.3% of those
who visited did not think it important in helping their
decision. Mature applicants to HE were more likely to have
attended a visit by a university representative and were
more likely to have found such visits useful (Connor
et al, 1999). Pupils in a study in England on
post-16 decisions commented that they would like more trips
to FE providers (Foskett, Dyke and Maringe, 2003).
With regard to IAG for disabled students,
there seems to be some variation in both availability and
quality. Hall and Tinklin's (1998) small scale research on
the experiences of disabled students in HE in Scotland,
reports that some students found that only a few of the
institutions were willing to provide information on support
available to students with disabilities, but respondents
commented that it was helpful to meet with advisers from
the institutions. Some support and guidance before entering
HE had been received by several of the students, while
other students had not received any.
There is also some limited information on
the extent to which students have access to advice or
guidance when they are considering withdrawal from their
course. Christie
et al (unpublished) undertook a study on reasons
for withdrawal from university with students enrolled in
2001-02 in two universities in Scotland - one post-92 and
one pre-92. Only a third had sought advice from staff in
the university before withdrawing, including lecturers,
tutors or advisors. The authors suggest that universities
may need to better publicise their advice services, or
improve their perceived accessibility to students thinking
of leaving the university.
Institutions also emerge as an important
source of advice on funding. For those in FE, the most
common source of information on funding issues were the
Student Services at the college they were attending at the
time of the interview. Nearly two thirds of the students
who had obtained information got it from this source, but
only two out of five of them acquired this information
before starting college (Callander, 1999).
Careers guidance
Young adults making post-16 choices often
get advice and guidance from professional careers advisers
(Callender, 1999; Connor
et al, 1999; CRLL, 2002; Foskett, Dyke and
Maringe, 2003; SWA, 2000). This is more often the case for
young adults than for older students (Callander, 1999).
Young applicants to HE were more likely than mature
applicants to have attended a careers fair (Connor
et al, 1999).
Formal advisers can be important to young
people, as Joyce
et al (2003) showed in research on young people's
views on the Connexions service in England. Education,
employment and training issues had been discussed with
Personal Advisers (PA), and the young people felt they had
received a large amount of information and personal support
from them. Views on personal advisers were mostly positive,
with some negative comments on communication skills and the
language they used. Most respondents liked this kind of
help. However, some older young people felt that they would
have liked to be able to do more for themselves than have
the PA do everything for them. Foskett, Maringe and Dyke
(2003) comment that Connexions can be particularly
important for those at a school without a sixth form.
Connor
et al (1999) found that those at the end of
compulsory schooling who had decided not to go on to HE or
who were undecided, were more likely to name schools
careers/guidance teachers as a key influence than those who
had decided to go on to HE. This latter group were more
likely to have named school subject teachers as a key
influence. Those who switched course post-16 did not feel
that their decision-making had been helped by individual
guidance from a careers adviser. Those who only switched
once generally reported feeling better prepared for their
choice by being taught careers topics in class or talked
with a careers teacher than those who had switched more
than once (Kidd and Wardman, 1999). Some young people
criticised careers advisers because they did not challenge
the young person's stated aims; and because they cannot
tell them what the experience of doing the different
options will be like (Kidd and Wardman, 1999).
For some young people, the formal careers
network can be unhelpful because it is non-directive, and
unlike informal advisers, does not provide information on
real life knowledge and experience of different learning
options (Semple
et al, 2002). Payne (2003) found that formal
careers guidance can be less influential for young people
than families. However, formal careers guidance can have an
influence in selecting a course once the decision has been
taken to continue in education; and with those choosing
vocational courses rather than A levels. Young people tend
to find careers advisers more helpful than careers
teachers. Minority ethnic groups seem to find formal
careers guidance less helpful then non minority ethnic
groups (Payne, 2003).
However it should also be noted that
informal advisers were generally found to be more important
to young people than mature applicants to HE (Connor
et al, 1999).
Media
Semple
et al (2002) found in research on the informal
networks of Scottish young people that are drawn on for
IAG, that television and the media generally can be more
influential for younger rather than older age groups.
Workplace
The importance of the workplace as a source
of IAG for those in employment has already been commented
on (Aldridge and Tuckett, 2002; Fitzgerald
et al, 2002; Hawthorn
et al, 2002; mtl, 2003; Progressive Partnership,
2003; Sargant, 2000; Scottish Executive, 2001; Semple
et al, 2002; Slowey, 2003). NALS 2002 showed that
47% of those who had taken part in some taught learning had
received IAG from their employer (Fitzgerald
et al, 2002).
However, with regard to graduate
employment, in a study in Leeds graduates expressed concern
that the potential of many graduates was being wasted
because of a lack of guidance available after graduates
leaver higher education and enter the labour market (NICEC,
2000).
3.3 Those who do not traditionally participate
in learning
Location
Shops, supermarkets, pubs and doctor's
surgeries are locations that have been used to some effect
to make information on learning available (Gallacher
et al, 2000; McGivney, 1999a; McGivney, 1999c;
McKeeking
et al, 2002; Sargant, 2000; Scottish Executive,
2001), or have been suggested as good locations for this by
learners and other adults (Progressive Partnership, 2003;
Scottish Executive, 2001).
Libraries were not found to be a
significant location for finding out about learning in some
studies (Bond and Merrill, 1999). In a study on ALN and
other learners, several mentioned libraries as a source of
information, but mostly they had found out about the
library only after starting their course, and some had
found their library confusing because of the number of
brochures available (Scottish Executive, 2001).
Characteristics of services valued by potential
learners
The qualities that adults say they want
from information, advice and guidance services include:
- Informality and friendliness (Allen, 2003;
Clayton and McGill, 2000; McGivney, 1999a; NICEC,
1998a; NICEC, 1998b)
- Impartiality (NICEC, 1998a)
- Up-to-date information (NICEC, 1998a)
- Information and advice appropriate to their
circumstances (Lloyd, 2002; McGivney, 1999b; NICEC,
1999a; NICEC, 1998b; Powney
et al, 1998)
- Personal approach (McGivney, 1999a; NICEC,
1998a; NICEC, 1998b)
- Familiar location (Clayton and McGill, 2000;
McGivney, 1999a; McGivney, 1999c; NICEC,
1998a)
- Drop-in service (NICEC, 1998a)
- Accessibility (Clayton and McGill, 2000)
- A place where information can be picked up
without necessarily having to talk to anyone
(Scottish Executive, 2001)
- A single location where all information, advice
and guidance on learning, and related issues such
as finance, is available (Scottish Executive, 2001;
Stone
et al, 2000)
It was also reported that collective rather
than individual approaches to providing information on
learning for groups not used to engaging in educational
opportunities can be effective (McGivney, 2000a).
McGivney (1999b) states that specific
information on education and training opportunities for
returners is lacking. Those who were not involved in
training schemes knew little about training opportunities
available, and felt it difficult to judge the quality and
appropriateness of that which they did know about.
Ambassadors
Several studies point to the actual or
potential use of adults who are currently learners to act
as 'ambassadors', to encourage non-participants into
learning, or to encourage those engaged in informal
learning or other activities to engage in formal learning
(Bond and Merrill, 1999; McGivney, 1999a; McGivney, 1999c;
McGivney, 2000a; McKeeking
et al, 2002; Scottish Executive, 2001). For
example, McGivney (1999c) states that male learners
informing others from the same social background can be
effective with male manual workers. Stone
et al (2000) report the views of young people not
in education, training or employment who felt that people
like them should go into schools to talk about their
experiences so that pupils would understand the importance
of school.
McKeeking
et al (2002) found that an effective method of
recruitment to further education was for programme staff to
visit groups in the community to talk about courses and to
give visual displays, but that these were particularly
effective when current learners as well as staff took
part.
Involvement in activities other than
learning
Involvement in activities or organisations
not directly connected to learning can give adults access
to information and advice on learning (Bond and Merrill,
1999; McGivney, 1999c; NICEC, 1998a; Progressive
Partnership, 2003; Scottish Executive, 2001). Amongst the
activities that are named are toddlers' groups, family
learning schemes, literacy workshops, and community groups.
Word of mouth can be important in such settings.
Staff from further education colleges
sometimes arrange visits to these groups, or arrange for
groups to visit the college (McGivney, 1999a; McKeeking
et al, 2002). An example is also given of an
outreach guidance worker who visited a variety of community
groups providing information and guidance on informal
learning, and gave ongoing information and support on for
example childcare and travel to those who went on to enrol
on a college course (McGivney, 1999a).
Other professionals
Referrals, or more informal help, from
professionals other than those working in the careers
guidance field, such as social workers, health workers,
community education workers, housing officers, and / or
those working for religious organisations, can be important
ways for people to access information (Anderson and
Crossan, in press; Gallacher
et al, 2000; McGivney, 1999a; NICEC, 1998a;
Scottish Executive, 2001). Connor
et al (2001), investigating the issues affecting
decisions about participation in HE by lower social class
groups, found that FE college tutors can be an important
source of influence, encouraging young people to enter HE.
Allen (2003), reporting on young people leaving care in
England, state that professionals with long term engagement
with the young person were best placed to provide advice
and guidance on learning (eg Lifeskills mentors or New Deal
advisers).
Job centresand similar organisations
Sargant (2000) found in the NIACE survey on
adult participation in learning that 8% of the respondents
in social groups D and E gave their main source of
information on learning as the job centre, compared to 2%
for the overall sample. For unemployed men, the job club or
benefits office is a common location in which to access
information, advice and guidance on learning (McGivney,
1999c). Stone
et al (2000) found that the job centre was one of
the main sources of information and advice on training and
work for young people not in education, training or
employment. However, they were not satisfied with the
service, and some found staff unhelpful and hostile. The
Scottish Executive (2001) found that referrals from the job
centre were a commonly cited source of information amongst
Scottish ALN and other learners. Job centres were not found
to be very important in other studies (Bond and Merrill,
1999; McGivney, 1999b). Clayton and McGill (2000) found
that young job-seekers at a local development company in
Glasgow all felt they had not been helped to find
employment or education before, despite having been
registered with the Employment Service.
Prospectuses and other publicitymaterials
Conventional approaches to publicity do not
work very well with groups who do not traditionally
participate (McGivney, 2000b). It has been found that
adults from groups who do not traditionally participate in
learning do not often turn to prospectuses as their initial
source of information on further education opportunities
(Gallacher
et al, 2000)
Door-to-door leafleting or knocking house
to house is seldom worth the time and effort required. In
two studies, a small number of respondents did not think
that leaflets were an effective way of passing on
information as too many came through their letterbox
(Gallacher
et al, 2000; Merrill, 1999). NALS 2002 showed that
13% of non-learner respondents had received leaflets
relating to learning (Fitzgerald
et al, 2002). Putting Learndirect leaflets in with
social security payments during Adult Learners' Week was
deemed successful (Sargant, 2000), as was putting
information in with wage slips. A study by the Scottish
Executive (2001) showed that a small number of respondents
got information on learning from leaflets brought home by
their children from school.
The language used in publicity needs to be
targeted to the audience (Clayton and McGill, 2000;
McGivney, 1999c). For example, McGivney (1999c) states that
publicity aimed at men excluded from learning should avoid
non-specific course titles, acronyms and jargon. Content of
publicity is also important - for example, mention of
assessment can be off-putting (McGivney, 1999c). Clayton
and McGill (2000) suggest that posters publicising learning
should have pictures, community languages and give
information on other services available such as a free
crèche.
A range of publicity is suggested to be
needed by learners, and should be located in places that
people are most likely to see it (Scottish Executive,
2001).
Media
Adverts in local and community newspapers
can be effective (Gallacher
et al, 2000; Merrill, 1999; McGivney, 1999b;
Scottish Executive, 2001). Adverts on television were also
mentioned in a few studies (Scottish Executive, 2001).
However, 9% of non-learner respondents to NALS 2002
reported having received information on learning from the
media (Fitzgerald
et al, 2002).
Guidance services
Careers guidance has not generally been
found to be a significant source of guidance on learning
for adults in various studies (Bond and Merrill, 1999;
McGivney, 1999b). NICEC (1998b) in a briefing on career
guidance for disengaged young people comment that many such
young people will not be able to act on career guidance
before other personal difficulties are overcome, and they
have achieved a level of personal security. Lloyd (2002),
reporting on a pilot of an 'Into Work' programme for
underachieving young men preparing for work, comments on
the importance of an extended programme of careers advice
rather than a one-off interview. Stone
et al (2000) found in research on young people not
in education, employment or training in England that these
young people got most formal advice on training and work
from careers advisors and job centres, but they were not
satisfied with the service.
Educational institutions
A small number of adult learners in the
study by Scottish Executive (2001) went to the local
college to ask about courses. However, other learners in
this same study pointed out that many people want to be
able to go somewhere to pick up information and not be
asked questions, which they fear would happen in they went
into a college (Scottish Executive, 2001). Gallacher
et al (2000) commented that initial contact and
the way a potential student is received can be a deciding
factor as to whether or not someone who is not confident
actually makes it through the door. Evidence in this study
shows that the community based learning centres were better
at this than the more anonymous main colleges. Many do not
have the confidence to walk into a college to ask about
courses (Gallacher
et al, 2000; Merrill, 1999).
National initiatives
NALS 2002 showed that 16% of respondents
had heard of Adult Learners' Week, 7% Learning at Work Day,
and 3% Family Learning Weekend (Fitzgerald
et al, 2002).
Telephone helplines
McGivney (1999c) found that there is
evidence that men respond to information available over the
phone. However, the phone is not always the most
appropriate or effective method for non-traditional groups
(McGivney, 1999a; NICEC, 1998a). This can be because
phoning a helpline requires an understanding of the
information, advice or guidance one needs, and a level of
confidence, that many in the non-traditional groups do not
have. It is also suggested that some people in these groups
will not have a telephone (McGivney, 1999a). Face-to-face
provision is often appreciated or preferred by
non-traditional learners (Lloyd, 2002; McGivney, 1999a;
McGivney, 1999c).
« Previous | Contents | Next »