On this page:

National Planning Policy Guideline NPPG 4: LAND FOR MINERAL WORKING: page 4

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

National Planning Policy Guideline NPPG 4: LAND FOR MINERAL WORKING

operational considerations

Site Conditions

33. At both the application and operational stages, the acceptability of mineral working will depend on the control exercised by the planning authority over certain operational aspects 7. The nature of control required will vary according to the character of the site, the extraction proposals, adjacent land uses, and the guidance set out in development plans. The highest standard appropriate to the circumstances should always be required. Accordingly:

  • Policies for the control of mineral development should take into account the amenity of local communities and the sensitivity of the locality as set out in development plans. Policies should seek to minimise the impact of mineral extraction on the environment.

34. The main factors to be considered are visual intrusion, noise, blasting and vibration, dust, pollution of water courses and transport issues 8. Apart from visual intrusion, these considerations are also covered by other legislation specifically related to pollution control. Planning authorities should not therefore seek to control, through planning measures, matters that are the proper concern of the pollution control authority, except where planning interests can be clearly distinguished. It is intended that these matters should be covered more fully in related Planning Advice Notes to be issued later. A brief description of each is given in the following sections.

Visual Impact

35. Visual disturbance can arise from intrusion in the landscape, the form of site working, creation of overburden mounds during extraction and the presence of plant and mobile machinery. This disturbance cannot always be eliminated, but it can be reduced:

  • by locating mineral operations in landscapes where the landform and other features enable operations to be carried out inconspicuously;
  • by the optimum design and layout of the operation including the method of working, location of buildings, connection with the transport network, location of storage and disposal of waste material;
  • by agreeing a phased extraction programme over the longer term; it may often be found that the appearance of the operation can be enhanced if the obvious place to open a face is not selected, but workings commence well within the site, thus maximising the benefit of undisturbed ground between the operator and the public;
  • where appropriate, by tree planting in sufficient mass to provide dense and rapid growth. Where pockets of woodland or forest exist, consideration should be given to retaining these for their screening value and some potential to act as dust filters, although in the latter context their intrinsic amenity and ecological qualities may be reduced;
  • by a restoration and aftercare programme agreed to include early restoration of those areas most in public view.

Noise

36. Noise on site, arising from blasting, drilling, crushing, the operation of machines and fixed plant and the transporting of materials, should be controlled so that it does not become a major source of disturbance off site. Unless trees are dense and mature they form little barrier to noise and it is preferable to have a ridge, baffle mound or other solid feature between a mineral operation and nearby settlements.

Dust

37. Dust problems may arise through the handling of overburden and minerals, and the movement of plant and vehicles over worked areas. The severity of the problem will vary according to the type of mineral being extracted, time of year and day, moisture in the soil, temperature , humidity and wind direction. Key measures which can be applied, where appropriate, include surfacing of haulage roads with tarmac or concrete, dampening of haulage roads in dry weather, and ensuring vehicles using public roads undergo wheel washing before leaving the sites and are sheeted. In some cases it may be necessary to take additional preventative measures during periods of high wind.

37A Government sponsored research, Do Particulates from Opencast Coal Mining Impair Children's Respiratory Health?, was published in December 1999. This recommends a framework to guide the assessment of the implications of opencast coal proposals on National Air Quality Standards. The research findings have been endorsed by the Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants, the panel of independent experts which advises the UK Health Departments on these matters. The research concluded that increases in particle concentrations close to opencast coal sites was not due to the release of coal particles but was more likely caused by earth moving and excavation activities common to all mineral workings. In the circumstances, planning authorities and the industry should, as a minimum, adopt the researchers' assessment framework in drawing up and considering proposals for new surface mineral workings or extensions or modifications to existing sites. In doing so, use should be made of information collected by local authorities in undertaking their responsibilities for Local Air Quality Management. They should also continue to take account of developing good practice.

Watercourses and Groundwater

38. There is a substantial body of legislation in relation to water supply, pollution and land drainage. If they find their way into watercourses or groundwater, suspended solids and acidic drainage, in even small amounts or concentrations, can be harmful to fluvial habitats. The production of some metalliferrous minerals, for example gold, may involve processes potentially hazardous to water quality. There is a need to take into account the requirement to protect the quality of groundwater, watercourses and supplies in accordance with UK and EC legislation.

Transportation

39. The transportation of minerals from the extraction site to markets may have significant environmental consequences. The Government's aim is to conserve energy and reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases from transport. Accordingly:

  • New developments should be guided to locations which reduce journeys and distance and thereby contribute to reducing energy consumption and pollution.

While it is not likely to be feasible to make significant changes in the transport arrangements for existing workings, new workings provide an opportunity for greater account to be taken of the interaction between transport and planning. In appropriate circumstances operators may therefore be able to minimise disturbance by opting for alternatives to road transport. Under the Railway Act 1974, section 8 (Freight Facility) grants may be available in appropriate cases.

40. Rail or sea transport will not always be feasible or economical. Frequently minerals will have to be transported by road, particularly to serve local markets. Planning authorities should guide new developments to locations which reduce journeys and distance. By the same token operators will also wish to demonstrate that they have full regard both to energy efficiency and the environmental effects on routes to be used by lorries.

41. Transportation costs and the location of resources in relation to markets in Scotland, especially for aggregates, suggest that minerals generally will be transported by road, leading in specific areas to an increase in heavy vehicle movements and possibly problems of noise and dirt. The provision of new or improved accesses is a matter to be considered as part of the planning application and subject to planning conditions but while mineral operators can offer to restrict lorries to particular routes, planning conditions cannot control the right of passage over public highways. Where particular problems arise in relation to the use of highways, these may be controlled more appropriately using the powers in the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 or other statutes. Guidance on the powers of the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 is given in SDD Circular 38/1984.

Restoration, Aftercare and After-Use

42. Policy should be based on the following principle:

  • Once mineral working has ceased, the land should be made suitable for other uses at the earliest opportunity and this can be facilitated by progressive restoration over the life of the operation.

An important aim of Government policy is to ensure that land does not become derelict in the first place. There is an ongoing programme of Government sponsored research to address this issue 9. Mineral working has often, by reason of its nature, scale, duration and location, more impact on the environment than many other forms of development. In some cases the effects may be only temporary (eg opencast coal extraction) but in others (eg hard rock quarries) the effects are more long term. Restoration, aftercare and after-use are important and integral parts of the mineral planning system to ensure that workings do not leave a legacy of dereliction. Land taken for mineral operations should be restored to an acceptable and beneficial after-use as soon as possible after working has ceased. Successful restoration will often depend on the proper stripping and storage of soils separately from other materials, and other appropriate working practices. Wherever possible the working of a site should be phased to enable early restoration of that part of the site where mineral working has ceased. Consideration should also be given to maintaining and, where appropriate, reinstating rights of way.

43. The cost of meeting this requirement and other acceptable environmental standards falls on the industry in line with the "polluter pays" principle. In the case of new mineral developments, the requirement for restoration should be established when planning permission is being considered, taking into account the benefits that can be achieved, including reducing the impact of the development. The principles of restoration should be settled at the time planning permission is granted, although for longer term workings it may be sensible for details to be agreed at a later but clearly defined stage or date. The information should however be sufficiently detailed for a realistic view to be taken of the after-use intended, including phasing of progressive restoration and the final landform and landscape intended.

44. Planning authorities should consider the scope for environmental improvement when preparing development plans and assessing applications. In some cases the restoration of mineral workings with a relatively short life, such as opencast coal working, may provide an opportunity to bring about environmental improvement, for example by the subsequent restoration of previously derelict sites, earlier than would otherwise have been the case. Environmental benefits may also be obtained through the disposal of waste consistent with policies for the safe disposal of such materials. The provision of open space may be appropriate in other cases.

45. The responsibility for deciding on the intended after-use of a mineral working rests jointly with the applicant, the landowner and the planning authority. Within the framework of national policies there is a wide range of possible options for suitable after-use, including agriculture, amenity and recreation, forestry and nature conservation purposes.

46. Where agriculture or forestry is the proposed after-use, The Scottish Office Agriculture and Fisheries Department (SOAFD) or the Forestry Commission (FC) can provide advice and guidance to planning authorities on the appropriateness of the intended after-use and on suitable aftercare conditions. Depending on the type of "recreation" or "amenity" proposed, in addition to SOAFD and FC, advice may be sought from the Scottish Sports Council, Scottish Natural Heritage, the Scottish Tourist Board and a number of specialist voluntary organisations.

47. Often the mineral sought will be found in association with other minerals and a relevant consideration will be the extent to which the extraction of the primary mineral from a site would facilitate the efficient and economic working of other secondary minerals on the same site. This can avoid both the subsequent necessity for reworking the site and wasteful restoration and, in doing so, minimise the environmental disturbance arising from duplicate working on the same site. Where this is not possible restoration should have regard to the potential for working at some future date.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Wednesday, March 30, 2005