« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
FINAL EVALUATION OF THE ROUGH SLEEPERS
INITIATIVE
APPENDIX TWO: TOPIC GUIDE FOR THE TELEPHONE AND
FACE TO FACE INTERVIEWS WITH NATIONAL LEVEL AND LOCAL
AUTHORITY RESPONDENTS
Final evaluation of the Rough Sleepers Initiative
Topic guide for telephone interviews
Explain study. Ask if the respondent has any further
questions about the study. Tell respondent that interview
will be recorded and confirm that they are in agreement
with this. Inform respondent that their answers are in
confidence and will not be used in any form that will
identify them as an individual. However, the content of
their interview will be referred to and they may be quoted,
in an anonymous form, within the report of the
research.
1 Role
What is their role within their local authority (or
other organisation)?
How long have they had this role?
What does their role in relation to rough sleeping
entail?
- strategic planning
- day to day management of services (where
applicable)
- gathering and monitoring of statistics or
performance indicators across projects and services for
people sleeping rough in their area
- monitoring overall levels of rough sleeping
- Making returns to Scottish Exec on their
LOCAL OUTCOME AGREEMENT (what does
that involve?)
- other? What?
- If work in relation to people sleeping rough is a
part of their role, what proportion of their
time do they devote to it? How would that work on a
weekly basis, how many hours would they devote to work
related to rough sleeping in their area?
If role in relation to people sleeping rough is
restricted, ask if there is an individual who works more
directly in this field and whether it would be possible to
interview them
.
Terminate interview.
2 RSI services
We are aware of the following services supported by RSI
funds in their area (list and briefly describe known
services).
Are there any other services supported (in whole or in
part) by RSI money in their area, if so what are they?
- housing advice and information (including
preventative)
- access or rent deposit schemes (including
preventative)
- street work/outreach services (including
preventative)
- direct access accommodation (nightshelters, hostels
or other supported housing)
- move-on or transitional accommodation (including
preventative)
- tenancy sustainment services (including
preventative)
- resettlement services
- day centre or night centres
- drug and/or alcohol services
- mental health services
- medium and long stay supported housing
- vertically integrated services (e.g. outreach plus
direct access plus resettlement)
- prison discharge services
- anything else? What?
Has the pattern of RSI funded services changed over
time? How has it changed?
Which services are supported by other sources of money
as well as RSI funding, like the Supporting People budget,
Social Work or NHS funding?
How significant are the RSI funds as
compared with these other sources?
What about services that work with former, current or
potential rough sleepers but are
not RSI funded? Are there any of
those?
3 Perceptions of rough sleeping
How would they
describe the population using RSI funded
services in their area?
- What proportion are sleeping rough at the time they
present to services?
- What proportion have some history of rough
sleeping?
- What proportion have no particular experience of
rough sleeping?
- How geographically mobile are they? How many come
from other areas? (Where?)
- What types of households or individuals do they
see? (older people, couples, households containing one
or more children)
- What proportion are 'short term' rough
sleepers?
- What proportion are 'long term' rough
sleepers?
- Have these patterns
changed over time? How?
- What are their sources of evidence for this?
Are there rough sleepers
not using RSI funded services? Why is
this? Are they using other services?
Is there anything they can say about the
causes of rough sleeping in their area?
What do they think the important causes are?
- housing markets and house prices
- drugs and alcohol
- mental health needs
- changes in society ('uncaring' or unstable family
structures, poor social supports)
- economic change or decline
- childhood experiences and later experience of rough
sleeping
- migration of people sleeping rough from other areas
of Scotland
- other causes? What are they?
How would they describe the
levels of rough sleeping in their area? A
serious social problem?
Has this
increased or decreased over time?/ Any
change since the introduction of RSI
funding into their area?
4 Impact of RSI
What are their views on the effectiveness of
each of the RSI funded services? (
Review all services mentioned). Effective
in meeting the needs of people sleeping rough?/potential
rough sleepers?/reducing rough sleeping levels?
How effective has the RSI programme
overall been in reducing levels of rough
sleeping in their area/ the need to sleep rough in their
area?
Is there
evidence that these services have been
effective in helping reduce levels of rough sleeping in
their area?
- evidence from the core monitoring conducted by
Glasgow Homelessness Network?
- evidence from George Street Research monitoring on
the 'need' to sleep rough?
- evidence from any local evaluations of
services?
How would they describe the
quality of the evidence that there is
about how effective these services are?
Thinking in terms of the Scottish Executive target of
removing the
need to sleep rough in Scotland, has that target
been achieved in their area? What sort of progress has been
made toward it, if it has not been achieved as yet?
Services working with single homeless people and other
groups, not funded by RSI, may be providing support to
people sleeping rough and potential rough sleepers. In a
context in which Supporting People, NHS and in some
instances, social work and charitable funding may be
contributing towards services, what has the specific impact
of RSI been in their area?
- How do RSI projects compare with those working with
the same or overlapping groups compare with those
projects funded (in whole or in part) by Supporting
People, the NHS, Social Work or charitable
funding?
6 Future of RSI
What are their views on what the future of the RSI
programme should be?
How should the money be allocated? Any comments on the
existing system or how it might be revised?
(RSI funding is currently built in to Local Authority
Revenue Support Grant and will continue to distributed in
this way until at least 2005/6 - there are no plans for it
to cease as a separate grant imminently).
How would they describe the process of integrating RSI
activity within the strategies for their area, what level
of progress has been made in relation to successful
integration with:
- the homelessness strategy
- the Supporting People strategy
- the housing strategy
- the health and homelessness action plan
- Social Work/Community Care strategy
- Children's Plan
- any other local planning of relevance?
Have services for people sleeping rough and potential
rough sleepers become part of the mainstream services in
their area?
- For example, are mainstream housing, health and
social care services (for example), better equipped to
meet the needs of people sleeping rough?
7 Overall
How would they assess the overall impact of RSI in their
area? Is policy moving in the right direction?
Is there anything we have not discussed that they feel
is important or relevant that they would like to raise
now?
Ask respondent if they have any questions about the
interview or the study that they would like to ask now.
Conclude interview
« Previous | Contents | Next »