On this page:

Competitive Scottish Cities? Placing Scotland’s cities in the UK and European context

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

Competitive Scottish Cities?
Placing Scotland's cities in the UK and European context

A Well-Educated Workforce?

3.14 Figure 3.7 shows the proportion of the working age population qualified to degree level or above. The Scottish cities perform well here, in line with many of the German cities. And they are ahead of all the English Core Cities except Bristol. However, qualification levels remain highest in the Scandinavian countries.

Figure 3.7: Percentage of working age population with 3rd level education 2001

Figure 3.7: Percentage of working age population with 3rd level education 2001

Source: Eurostat: Region: Statistical Yearbook 2003

How Well Connected?

3.15 Connectivity has been measured in two ways: airport passenger numbers and Internet bandwidth connections. Figure 29 and table 16 show the airport data and a familiar pattern emerges. Among the European Competitive Cities Frankfurt, Amsterdam and Milan perform well. When ranked by passenger numbers Manchester is the best performing English Core City. Glasgow and Edinburgh feature in the European top 50, at 39 and 43 respectively. Passenger numbers at Glasgow increased by 4.2% between 2002 and 2003, during the same period passenger numbers at Edinburgh were up 7.9%.

Figure 3.8: Terminal passenger numbers 2003

Figure 3.8: Terminal passenger numbers 2003

Note: Where more than one airport serves a city the data has been combined to give an overall figure
Source: Airports Council International 2002. Civil Aviation Authority

Table 3.3: Terminal passenger numbers at Europe's 50 leading airports 2002

Rank

City

Passengers

% Change 2002/3

Rank

City

Passengers

% Change 2002/3

1

London Heathrow

63 468 620

0.2

15

Milan (MXP+ LIN)

17 630 452

1.1

2

Frankfurt

48 351 664

-0.2

16

Zurich

16 989 497

-5.1

3

Paris, Charles de Gaulle

48 122 038

-0.4

17

Dublin

15 856 265

5.1

4

Amsterdam

39 959 161

-1.9

18

Stockholm

15 206 411

-8.0

5

Madrid

35 694 331

5.2

19

Brussels

15 164 913

5.5

6

London Gatwick

30 007 209

1.3

20

Dusseldorf

14 273 082

-3.2

7

Rome

26 285 036

3.7

21

Istanbul

14 030 122

5.0

8

Munich

24 193 304

4.4

22

Oslo

13 646 890

1.8

9

Barcelona

22 748 758

6.6

23

Vienna

12 784 504

6.8

10

Paris Orly

22 390 236

-3.3

24

Athens

12 252 216

3.6

11

Manchester

19 867 912

4.6

25

Malaga

11 553 624

10.9

12

Palma de Mallorca

19 179 018

7.6

26

Moscow

11 540 990

5.9

13

London Stansted

18 716 692

16.6

27

Berlin

11 104 106

12.4

14

Copenhagen

17 643 641

-3.0

28

Antalya

10 482 036

0.5


Rank

City

Passengers

% Change 2002/3

Rank

City

Passengers

% Change 2002/3

29

Helsinki

9 698 431

1.0

40

Geneva

8 009 308

6.1

30

Lisbon

9 636 551

2.9

41

Cologne

7 758 355

44.3

31

Hamburg

9 529 924

6.5

42

Stuttgart

7 584 502

4.3

32

Moscow

9 379 037

40.3

43

Edinburgh

7 481 978

7.9

33

Gran Canaria

9 180 942

1.9

44

Prague

7 463 120

18.2

34

Nice

9 127 268

-0.8

45

London Luton

6 809 534

5.1

35

Birmingham

9 080 362

13.0

46

Lyon

5 939 895

2.8

36

Tenerife

8 841 180

-1.2

47

Lanzarote

5 383 097

5.0

37

Milan

8 757 038

12.0

48

Marseille

5 364 763

-1.7

38

Alicante

8 179 372

17.1

49

Toulouse

5 304 922

-0.6

39

Glasgow

8 131 688

4.2

50

Venice

5 304 597

25.8

Source: Airports Council International 2003

3.16 Total passenger figures only tell part of the tale, however. Ideally it would useful to distinguish between tourist and business travellers; unfortunately this data is not available. However it is possible to use passenger data for scheduled and charter flights and the final destination of scheduled passengers. The following tables do not change the bigger picture presented above, but they add light and shade to it. Hub and spoke airports such as Frankfurt and Amsterdam have a high proportion of scheduled passengers; these airports are home to national carriers which operate a high proportion of flights across domestic and European borders. Some of the smaller airports also have a high proportion of scheduled passengers; these are dominated by scheduled services run by the low-cost flight operators, and these services are predominately to domestic or EU destinations.

Table 3.4: Proportion of passengers travelling on scheduled services 2003

City

% Passengers on scheduled service

City

% Passengers on scheduled service

Dortmund

97.6

Stuttgart

84.8

Frankfurt

97.5

Lyon

84.4

Barcelona

95.4

Lille

75.5

Edinburgh

94.3

Aberdeen

75.2

Copenhagen

93.5

Glasgow

72.5

Turin

91.6

Leeds

68.7

Helsinki

91.0

Bristol

66.3

Milan

90.5

Birmingham

65.8

Toulouse

90.0

Newcastle

58.2

Amsterdam

89.4

Manchester

51.6

Liverpool

87.0

Source: Airports Council International 2003

Table 3.5: Final destinations of air passengers 2003

Total Scheduled Passengers

% Domestic

% EU

% Outside EU

Frankfurt

46,919,988

16.1

47.5

36.4

Amsterdam

35,589,774

0.3

55.2

44.5

Milan

26,342,948

39.5

40.4

20.1

Munich

24,013,458

35.5

39.3

25.2

Barcelona

21,496,919

50.6

46.2

3.2

Copenhagen

16,437,514

9.2

56.9

33.9

Stockholm

15,113,505

35.7

45.7

18.7

Manchester

10,079,642

30.2

43.5

26.2

Helsinki

8,830,829

30.4

50.0

19.6

Glasgow

7,228,631

72.4

11.1

16.5

Edinburgh

7,054,940

73.5

20.5

0.6

Stuttgart

6,330,615

38.4

51.3

10.4

Birmingham

5,871,814

23.9

63.9

12.1

Lyon

4,945,257

50.3

35.7

14.0

Toulouse

4,732,768

74.6

22.6

2.8

Liverpool

2,766,899

26.8

67.9

5.3

Nottingham

2,717,314

30.2

59.0

10.8

Bristol

2,577,267

41.6

55.1

3.3

Turin

2,569,598

63.6

35.8

0.6

Newcastle

2,292,622

63.6

33.9

2.5

Aberdeen

1,901,564

73.1

18.6

7.6

Leeds

1,385,674

35.9

63.0

1.2

Source: Airports Council International 2003

3.17 Table 3.6 shows the pattern of Internet bandwidth. The global cities of London, Paris and New York are best connected. Five of the sample continental cities appear in the top ten, but none of the Scottish or English Core Cities.

Table 3.6: Top 10 International Internet cities for Europe 2002

City

Internet Bandwidth 2002 (Mbps)

Rank 2002

Rank 2001

Rank 2000

London

319,475

1

1

1

Paris

227,803

2

2

3

Frankfurt

194,902

3

5

5

New York

174,180

4

3

4

Amsterdam

163,942

5

4

2

Copenhagen

109,204

6

8

20

Stockholm

94,741

7

7

7

Brussels

81,536

8

6

6

Milan

66,424

9

9

17

Zurich

51,488

10

Figures represent Internet bandwidth connected to European locations across international borders from Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas or equivalents including cities outside Europe
Source: TeleGeography Inc.

Demographic Trends

3.18 Views vary about the impact of sheer population size upon economic performance. It is clearly possible for medium and smaller sized cities to be economically successful. But there are reasons why large complex cities have economic advantages. Figure 3.9 shows the population of the sample cities. These are for cities defined by their local authority boundary rather than the wider conurbation or the functional urban region. But they demonstrate that many of the more successful cities are rather larger than UK cities. With the exception of Edinburgh and Glasgow, the Scottish cities are relatively small. If we expanded the boundaries to take in conurbation populations the comparative advantage of many continental cities would still be evident.

Figure 3.9: Residential population 2001

Figure 3.9: Residential population 2001

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Tuesday, May 16, 2006