On this page:

Competitive Scottish Cities? Placing Scotland’s cities in the UK and European context

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

Competitive Scottish Cities?
Placing Scotland's cities in the UK and European context

Chapter 3. How do Scottish Cities match up to European Competitors?

3.1 The quantitative analysis in this section of the report focuses on a variety of indicators identified as potentially important to competitive cities. It reviews the evidence on the key characteristics of competitiveness identified in the Competitiveness European Cities study (Parkinson et al 2004): productivity; innovation; connectivity and a skilled workforce. It also provides evidence about social cohesion and the private sector's views of the relative attractiveness of different European cities.

3.2 This remains a complex and rather messy area; experts disagree about the relative merits of indicators, very little comparative data is available on a trans-national basis, and boundaries are not consistent. This section makes best use of the data available. There is never a perfect indicator, instead we have collected and used the most robust available evidence from the most reliable sources. And where urban data was not available we have used data for the wider region.

3.3 Wherever possible data for the six Scottish cities has been added to the data for 15 continental and the eight English Core Cities included in the original study. Unfortunately many of the data sources have limited coverage of Scotland and often data for only Glasgow and/or Edinburgh is available. In repeating the data collection exercise statistics have been updated where possible and in some cases improved sources have been found.

3.4 For further details on the selection of indicators of competitiveness, the challenges faced during data collection and the solutions adopted see the technical annex.

Productivity

3.5 Capital cities tend to be at the top of the league table for GDP. Large cities tend to do well. German cities, despite the country's current economic difficulties, perform very well. Edinburgh and Glasgow perform better than any of the English Core Cities, which do not perform as strongly.

Figure 3.1: GDP per capita: A sample of European cities 2001

Figure 3.1: GDP per capita: A sample of European cities 2001

Source: Barclays Private Clients 2003

Table 3.1: GDP per capita - for 61 leading European Cities 2001

Rank

City

Euros per capita

Rank

City

Euros per capita

1

Frankfurt am Main

74,465

32

The Hague

30,110

2

Karlsruhe

70,097

33

Essen

29,760

3

Paris

67,200

34

Bristol

29,437

4

Munich

61,360

35

Lyon

28,960

5

Düsseldorf

54,053

36

Bologna

28,282

6

Stuttgart

53,570

37

Bochum

27,900

7

Brussels

51,106

38

Parma

27,491

8

Copenhagen

50,775

39

Dortmund

26,548

9

Hanover

47,223

40

Rotterdam

26,217

10

Hamburg

43,098

41

Strasbourg

26,015

11

Mannheim

41,674

42

Florence

25,693

12

Nuremburg

41,456

43

Leeds

25,619

13

Augsburg

39,360

44

Duisburg

25,259

14

Cologne

39,108

45

Eindhoven

25,226

15

Amsterdam

38,203

46

Turin

25,042

16

Münster

38,139

47

Toulouse

24,852

17

Wiesbaden

37,454

48

Rome

24,766

18

Dublin

36,591

49

Bordeaux

24,252

19

Vienna

36,572

50

Malmo

24,233

20

Stockholm

35,733

51

Gothenberg

24,065

21

Gelsenkirchen

35,688

52

Grenoble

24,026

22

Helsinki

35,321

53

Verona

23,954

23

London

35,072

54

Berlin

23,428

24

Bremen

35,022

55

Marseilles

22,809

25

Edinburgh

35,018

56

Birmingham

22,069

26

Bonn

34,112

57

Manchester

21,099

27

Antwerp

33,090

58

Newcastle-upon-Tyne

20,499

28

Milan

32,122

59

Lille

20,191

29

Glasgow

31,893

60

Barcelona

18,449

30

Utrecht

31,712

61

Liverpool

16,466

31

Saarbrücken

30,368

Source: Barclays Private Clients 2003
Note: The European Competitive Cities, English Core Cities and Scottish cities are shaded

3.6 Business Strategies Limited used three measures of regional prosperity in their report 'What makes Euro Regions Prosper?':

  • GDP per head of working age population adjusted for commuting
  • employment rates - FTE divided by working age population adjusted for commuting)
  • productivity - GDP per head of working age population adjusted for commuting divided by FTE employment at purchasing power standard

3.7 Their analysis shows that, as expected, those regional cities with high levels of productivity tend to have high GDP. Many of the Scottish cities perform better than their English counterparts. North East Scotland (which includes Aberdeen) with its high employment rate and GDP per capita performs particularly well. Eastern Scotland (Edinburgh, Dundee and Stirling) performs better than the English Core Cities, but behind many other European cities.

Table 3.2: Measures of regional prosperity 2001

Region

City

GDP per head
(000 Euros)

Employment Rate

Productivity
(000 Euros)

Luxembourg

Luxembourg

57.4

58.5

98.2

Oberbayern

Munich

49.6

65.6

75.6

Hamburg

Hamburg

49.1

63.6

77.1

Darmstadt

Frankfurt

47.1

61.0

77.2

Brussels

Brussels

45.3

83.1

54.6

Ile de France

Paris

45.1

58.6

76.9

Picardie

44.2

83.1

53.2

North Eastern Scotland

Aberdeen

43.5

87.5

49.8

Berks, Bucks, Oxford

41.8

81.9

51.0

Uusimaa

Helsinki

41.5

68.6

60.5

Stockholm

Stockholm

40.4

69.8

57.9

Stuttgart

Stuttgart

38.5

64.5

59.7

Lombardy

Milan

38.4

58.6

65.5

Bedfordshire and Herts

37.2

80.2

46.3

Denmark

Copenhagen

36.7

68.1

54.0

Zuid-Holland

Rotterdam

36.7

60.4

60.8

Noord-Holland

Amsterdam

34.3

49.1

69.9

Piemonte

Turin

33.2

56.8

58.5

Catalonia

Barcelona

32.1

58.3

55.0

Eastern Scotland

Edinburgh, Dundee Stirling

31.7

60.8

52.1

Rhone-Alps

Lyon

30.2

52.4

57.7

Derbyshire Nottinghamshire

Nottingham

30.0

62.4

48.2

Glous, Wiltshire, N. Somerset

Bristol

29.8

68.0

43.8

Arnsberg

Dortmund

29.7

55.9

53.2

Nord-pas-de-Calais

Lille

28.9

49.3

58.7

Highlands and Islands

Inverness

28.7

62.0

46.4

South Western Scotland

Glasgow

28.2

53.6

52.6

Midi Pyrenees

Toulouse

27.9

54.3

51.4

West Yorkshire

Leeds

26.7

60.5

44.1

Greater Manchester

Manchester

25.5

58

43.9

West Midlands

Birmingham

25.1

55.9

45.0

Northumberland Tyne Wear

Newcastle

23.9

53.3

44.8

South Yorkshire

Sheffield

23.9

55.0

43.4

Merseyside

Liverpool

21.2

48.7

43.4

Source: Business Strategies Ltd. (2001) What makes Euro regions prosper? London: BSL

3.8 Figure 3.2 develops the productivity analysis and provides data about a smaller sample of cities. It shows productivity in terms of GDP per head of working age population adjusted for commuting divided by FTE employment at purchasing power standard. The Scottish regions perform ahead of the English regions but behind many European cities.

Figure 3.2: Productivity 2001 ('000 Euros per head)

Figure 3.2: Productivity 2001 ('000 Euros per head)

Source: Business Strategies Ltd.

How innovative are Scottish Cities

3.9 The European Innovation Scoreboard 6 uses measures of a number of factors that contribute to innovation to generate a score at regional level. The 2003 scoreboard incorporates a number of new measures from the Community Innovation Survey; due to small sample numbers the index is calculated at NUTS2 level. The Scoreboard now has 13 measures:

  • Population with tertiary education
  • Participation in lifelong learning
  • Employment in medium/high-tech manufacturing
  • Employment in high-tech services
  • Public R&D expenditure
  • Business R&D expenditure
  • European Patent Office (EPO) High-tech patent applications
  • All EPO applications
  • Plus five measures from unpublished Community Innovation Survey 2 data.

3.10 These are used to generate a Revealed Regional Summary Innovation Index, which can be used to compare the performance of European regions. This shows that Scotland performs ahead of many of the other UK regions, but behind the leading European regions and the South West (Bristol). Scotland's well-educated workforce contributes to its placing in the innovation index.

Figure 3.3: European Innovation Scoreboard 2003 Revealed Regional Summary Innovation Index (RRSII)

Figure 3.3: European Innovation Scoreboard 2003 Revealed Regional Summary Innovation Index (RRSII)

Source: 2003 European Innovation Scoreboard. Technical paper No. 3. EU Regions

3.11 UK cities have relatively low levels of employment in high tech manufacturing sectors. None of the Scottish cites have employment in these sectors ahead of the UK average. The German and Italian study cities perform particularly well in this area.

Figure 3.4: Percentage of employees in High-Tech manufacturing sectors 2001

Figure 3.4: Percentage of employees in High-Tech manufacturing sectors 2001

Source: Eurostat: Region: Statistical Yearbook 2003. Data for NE Scotland (Aberdeen) not available

3.12 Employment in the high-tech service sectors in UK cities is comparable with many of the European cities. However in the Scottish and English Core Cities employment in this sector is below the national average suggesting that these jobs are concentrated in London and the South East.

Figure 3.5: Percentage of employees working in High-Tech service sectors 2001

Figure 3.5: Percentage of employees working in High-Tech service sectors 2001

Source: Eurostat: Region: Statistical Yearbook 2003

3.13 In terms of the proportion of employees working in knowledge intensive sectors the UK performs well, with Eastern Scotland (Edinburgh, Dundee and Stirling) the strongest performing of the Scottish regions.

Figure 3.6: Percentage of employees working in Knowledge Intensive sectors 2001

Figure 3.6: Percentage of employees working in Knowledge Intensive sectors 2001

Source: Eurostat: Region: Statistical Yearbook 2003

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Tuesday, May 16, 2006