On this page:

Columba 1400: Head Teacher Leadership Academy: Developing Enterprise Culture

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

COLUMBA 1400: HEAD TEACHER LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: DEVELOPING ENTERPRISE CULTURE

CHAPTER SEVEN: CONCLUSIONS

7.1 The Columba 1400 Head Teacher Leadership Academy (HTLA) is a unique pilot programme that focuses on realising and (eventually) fulfilling the potential for leadership that is in every head teacher (and deputy head teacher). It relies upon the facilitation and active monitoring of a unique learning experience and personal development that is acquired through the different elements of the programme, especially through the six-day residential element that takes place at the Columba 1400 Centre at Staffin on the Isle of Skye. Therefore, for each HT and DHT that has completed the pilot programme the learning experience, the personal development that takes place and the individual impact of the programme will vary. It will also vary with the dynamic of each HTLA - with the learning that takes place from the sharing of experience within each separate cohort of 15 HTs and DHTs that undertake an individual HTLA. Despite this recognised variety of the impacts of the programme, nevertheless, the study's findings suggest that there are identifiable, if subjective, impacts on changes in HT/DHT attitudes, in behaviour, in practices and in learning outcomes. These form the basis of the following conclusions. Recommendations are treated separately in the following section.

  • The study found evidence of changes in attitudes and behaviour of HT/DHTs post each HTLA. We have identified changes that included greater willingness of HT/DHTs to listen to and consult their staff, to be more confident and affirmative, to delegate, to improve communications, but particularly to utilise and practise individual coaching using skills acquired on the programme.
  • The study also found a greater determination of HTs and DHTs to seek to overcome barriers that may exist in achieving personal and school objectives, including those associated with DtS with an increased awareness of the value of external relationships.
  • The programme, as indicated, had the most impacts on individual HT/DHT leadership and management approaches and practices, in some cases, having powerful and deep impacts that led to a reassessment of personal goals, however, there were more limited impacts on objectives that could be associated with DtS. For example, limited evidence was found by the study of a greater resolution to achieve change associated with the direct introduction of enterprise in the curriculum, or with building links with the local business community, that would provide a foundation for the achievement of some of the objectives of DtS.
  • Practice and attitudes to E in E varied, although there was a high degree of awareness of different and varied practice in enterprise in education pre Columba 1400. There was little direct connection made by all the HTLAs with the Columba programme and E in E pre Columba, however, post Columba greater association was made between the nature of the HTLA and the aims of E in E.
  • Indeed there was some, apparently deliberately maintained, vagueness of knowledge of all members of each HTLA on the aims of the programme pre the residential element at Staffin. This created a certain 'mystery', even though some members had been in contact (e.g., at their school) with previous participants. This could be accounted for by the desire of the Columba 1400 trainers to focus upon individual personal development that was continually monitored.
  • Different elements of the programme varied in terms of their impacts. The most valuable, and those having the deepest and most profound impacts, were the intensive coaching sessions and the inter-active group seminar sessions. In particular the large degree of time spent on the programme on the development of individual coaching skills appeared to be worthwhile, since there was evidence of changes in practice and determination on the part of HT/DHTs to develop these individual coaching skills further in their schools.
  • The flexibility of trainers to be able and willing to respond to modifying the programme was an important feature. Not just to be able to respond to the nature of individual learning and development on each HTLA, but also being able to modify elements of the programme with later HTLAs. The study found that some elements were modified following feedback from participants, notably the whole group 'coracle' sessions. Although this element was retained, it was modified, which helped to increase the value of these sessions.
  • The role of the individual psychometric profiling, which was undertaken at the start of HTLA, was more problematic. Although this session was also modified with later HTLAs, to reduce time spent on the session and to reduce the need for travelling, the value of the session was never clearly identified by participants. It did not appear to have a role in determining the nature of subsequent sessions, for example, in the make-up of the 'trios' for the coaching sessions, so the value of this element of the HTLA programme must, at least, be questionable.
  • Other elements of the HTLA programme, the inter-active group sessions, personal reflection and graduation were highly valued by participants and could be seen as essential elements. The two day preparation, in Edinburgh, and the six day residential at Staffin on Skye, were needed to provide the time required for preparation and to allow for the individual personal development of leadership capacity and potential which were the main aims of the programme. Without such a period of preparation and the dramatic location on Skye, the programme could not have achieved such impacts on personal and leadership development of participating HTs and DHTs.
  • Individual HT/DHT development, however, also depended on an element that was difficult to predict, control and measure, that of the dynamic interaction that took place within each HTLA due to the composition and the breadth of experience brought by participating members within each HTLA. This raises the issue of whether there should be an element of selection, for example, by getting more vertical differences in experience. All participating HTs and DHTs were at the same stage of their career and were drawn from a relatively narrow age range, their experience varied horizontally (e.g., from different schools, rural or urban, primary or secondary), there may be a case for enriching the group dynamic by allowing more vertical differences in experience. In some HTLAs, there was a relatively large number from one education authority but this did not seem to detract from the variety of experience brought to the programme.
  • A related issue is how the HTLA programme fits into the framework for teacher CPD that has been established, especially post McCrone. A strong finding of the study was that the programme was very different from any other CPD undertaken by the participants, a unique and very valuable experience, but the Scottish Executive needs to consider how it best complements the existing CPD framework for teachers and this is dealt with further in the recommendations.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Thursday, March 24, 2005