On this page:

Columba 1400: Head Teacher Leadership Academy: Developing Enterprise Culture

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

COLUMBA 1400: HEAD TEACHER LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: DEVELOPING ENTERPRISE CULTURE

CHAPTER SIX: INTERPRETATION AND INTEGRATION OF FINDINGS

INTRODUCTION

6.1 This section provides an opportunity to synthesise and integrate as well as provide further interpretation on the findings from the survey, from observation and from the interviews, but in addition, to include findings from the internal evaluation provided to the research team by Columba 1400.

6.2 To do this it is worth revisiting the study's research questions:

  • How do attitudes of Heads and Deputy Head Teachers change towards an enterprise culture and management of change in schools as a result of participation in the programme?
  • How are changes in attitudes reflected in the management and culture of staff and students subsequently at the school?
  • What can be learned by policy makers and educational officers from the impact of the programme?

6.3 These can be distilled into the findings that affect changes in attitudes, changes in practices of HTs/DHTs and the implications of findings for policy and the programme. The third aspect of these findings has been left for a recommendations section. We also make comments on the findings from different sections for the Columba 1400 programme

CHANGES IN ATTITUDES

  • Both the survey returns and the interviews revealed positive views, if guarded, due to a lack of knowledge, on the value of objectives of DtS, but a high degree of uncertainty on the nature of the Columba 1400 programme and how this related to the objectives of E in E. After the Columba programme, there was a greater resolution to achieve the stated objectives of E in E and greater awareness of the place of the Columba 1400 programme within the broad E in E programme.
  • Although there were strongly held beliefs in the importance of their leadership role pre Columba, post Columba this was reaffirmed with increased levels of confidence by HTs and DHTs in their own abilities as a leader and to create and manage change.
  • There was some evidence that attitudes pre Columba was affected by perceived values of external influencers, such as colleagues, education authorities and the wider society. Post Columba there was a greater resolution in HT/DHT own abilities to achieve objectives irrespective of external factors.
  • There was less change in attitudes towards using or developing external links with the local community and with local businesses. This result may have been affected by the higher proportion of primary HTs/DHTs, compared to secondary HTs/DHTs on the programme.
  • There was increased personal resolution that important constraints on objectives, such as dealing with staff and pupils, could be resolved and overcome through the utilisation of techniques and competencies developed on the Columba programme.

CHANGES IN PRACTICES

6.4 It should be noted that changes in practices may be diluted over time as HTs/DHTs become absorbed more in the detailed running of their schools and to properly gauge the impact of Columba on changes in practice would require a tracking study over a period of time. With this caveat in mind, however, it was possible to identify some immediate impact on changes in practices.

  • A willingness to apply the non-directive coaching techniques in the school environment with staff and pupils
  • To spend more time listening to staff and pupils before taking action.
  • Increased delegation of responsibility to staff, pupils and parents.
  • In some cases, a reappraisal of their career and current role, with an associated determination to apply for a higher position within education.
  • An increased willingness to examine the development of links with local businesses and the local community.
  • The inclusion of enterprise activities in school development plans. Although this had already in most cases previously been included, the programme appeared to create a greater willingness to develop more specific plans.
  • To introduce some of the coaching techniques with development sessions with their own staff.

THE VALUE OF DIFFERENT ELEMENTS OF THE COLUMBA 1400 PROGRAMME

6.5 The Columba 1400's own internal evaluation feedback showed that the programme was very warmly received by each HTLA, with each element of the programme receiving high scoring marks from the participating HTs and DHTs. We can use our own findings to further interpret the value of the different elements which have been described in this report; the psychometric profiling, the 2 day residential preparation for coaching, the interactive seminar sessions, the intensive coaching sessions, the whole group discussion sessions and the meditation and group dynamic.

6.6 Individual Psychometric Profiling. Both the internal feedback forms and the interviews considered this to be the least valuable part of the programme. It was not clear either from respondents or from an interview with the Columba team how this was integrated in the full programme. However, some respondents found it to be valuable.

6.7 The 2 day residential preparation. Although there were some reservations associated with the time devoted to this session, it was regarded as very valuable preparation. It was also a chance for each HTLA to meet and get to know one another. With the weeklong programme to come, this was in itself valuable. However, it was also associated with some uncertainty over objectives of the full residential programme.

6.8 The interactive seminar sessions. The feedback forms, the course team observations and the interviews all revealed that these were highly valued by participants with an appropriate professional context.

6.9 The 'trio' coaching sessions. All sources of data including the internal feedback, the interviews and the observation confirmed that these sessions, although taking the most time and highly intensive, were regarded as having the most impact. In addition, the indications are they will also have had some lasting effects on practices and culture in their schools and with relationships with staff, pupils and parents. The interview with the Columba trainers revealed that the composition of the individual coaching trios was not contrived, but was formed 'naturally', nevertheless all the trios seemed to work well for each HTLA.

6.10 The whole group discussion sessions. Although these were still well regarded, there were some tensions reported from the interviews and observation. There was evidence that the programme team responded to feedback to modify the role of these sessions.

6.11 Meditation and personal reflection. These were valuable sessions and provided an important breathing space for participants to absorb and reflect on other sessions.

6.12 The group dynamic. Both the observation and the interviews revealed that this was an important part of each HTLA. It was an unpredictable, but nonetheless important, outcome that contributed to the overall experience.

6.13 In addition to providing a vehicle for the seminar/discussion components of the programme, it was clearly evident from observation that group dynamics play a key role in creating personal outcomes for individual participants, which may vary between cohort members depending on the personal experiences they bring with them to the programme.

6.14 This is evidently recognised by the Columba 1400 team, who continuously monitor and make adjustments during the programme delivery in order to facilitate an effective environment for personal reflection and development.

6.15 Furthermore, participants are engaged in facilitating group sessions based on their own experiences and views, and verbal feedback is sought immediately after the conclusion of each session, so the programme is continuously tailored to maximise the experience for each cohort of participants within a general process framework and consistent learning environment.

6.16 The time period involved in the delivery of the programme, particularly during the residential week, enables improvement adjustments to be made more effectively than would be the case in a shorter and more fragmented programme structure.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Thursday, March 24, 2005