On this page:

Maintaining Houses-Preserving Homes - A Report on Responses to the Consultation

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

MAINTAINING HOUSES - PRESERVING HOMES: A REPORT ON RESPONSES TO THE CONSULTATION

APPENDIX 2 QUANTITATIVE DATA TABLES

RESPONDEE INFORMATION FORM

Are you responding as:

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

Individual

114

39.3

41.6

organisation

160

55.2

58.4

Total

274

94.5

100.0

Missing

no response

16

5.5

Total

290

100.0

LOCAL AUTHORITY POWERS

Dealing with Defects and Disrepair

Question 1

The proposed single statutory notice gives local authorities enhanced powers to deal with a wide range of condition problems. Is this the correct way forward?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

174

60.0

92.1

no

10

3.4

5.3

Don't know/unsure

5

1.7

2.6

Total

189

65.2

100.0

Missing

no response

101

34.8

Total

290

100.0

Question 2

Do you agree that local authorities should have the power to take out a maintenance order against a property or group of properties?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

174

60.0

91.6

no

14

4.8

7.4

Don't know/unsure

2

0.7

1.1

Total

190

65.5

100.0

Missing

no response

100

34.5

Total

290

100.0

Question 3

Should this maintenance order be limited to five years?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

97

33.4

57.1

no

67

23.1

39.4

Don't know/unsure

6

2.1

3.5

Total

170

58.6

100.0

Missing

no response

120

41.4

Total

290

100.0

Question 4

Do you agree that it is reasonable to require a sinking fund to be set up as part of the maintenance order requirements?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

145

50.0

80.6

no

33

11.4

18.3

Don't know/unsure

2

0.7

1.1

Total

180

62.1

100.0

Missing

no response

110

37.9

Total

290

100.0

Question 5a

Do you agree that there should be powers to control occupation of properties subject to statutory notices?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

133

45.9

75.6

no

36

12.4

20.5

Don't know/unsure

7

2.4

4.0

Total

176

60.7

100.0

Missing

no response

114

39.3

Total

290

100.0

Question 5b

and, if so, how exactly should these powers be enforced?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

Eviction notices

12

4.1

15.8

Prevent sale or lease by law until work completed

35

12.1

46.1

By a fine

3

1.0

3.9

Difficult to enforce

5

1.7

6.6

Other

21

7.2

27.6

Total

76

26.2

100.0

Missing

no response

214

73.8

Total

290

100.0

Question 6

Do you agree local authorities should be able to suspend a notice and, if so, that this suspension should be limited so it only applies until the property is sold or let?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

136

46.9

80.5

no

31

10.7

18.3

Don't know/unsure

2

0.7

1.2

Total

169

58.3

100.0

Missing

no response

121

41.7

Total

290

100.0

Question 7

Should local authorities be given powers to control occupation where owners cannot be identified?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

157

54.1

86.7

no

22

7.6

12.2

Don't know/unsure

2

0.7

1.1

Total

181

62.4

100.0

Missing

no response

109

37.6

Total

290

100.0

Question 8

Should local authorities have power to meet the cost of the share of communal repairs due from owners who will not contribute their share (to allow the works to go ahead), linked to a changing order to recover the costs of the works and administration?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

171

59.0

92.9

no

12

4.1

6.5

Don't know/unsure

1

0.3

0.5

Total

184

63.4

100.0

Missing

no response

106

36.6

Total

290

100.0

Question 9

Should local authorities have the power to inspect insurance policies of persons subject to the single notice?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

145

50.0

81.9

no

32

11.0

18.1

Total

177

61.0

100.0

Missing

no response

113

39.0

Total

290

100.0

The Tolerable Standard

Question 10

Are our proposed extensions to the Tolerable Standard the right ones?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

159

54.8

82.0

no

32

11.0

16.5

Don't know/unsure

3

1.0

1.5

Total

194

66.9

100.0

Missing

no response

96

33.1

Total

290

100.0

Question 11

Should there be national guidance produced by the Scottish Executive on the interpretation of the Standard?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

173

59.7

93.0

no

13

4.5

7.0

Total

186

64.1

100.0

Missing

no response

104

35.9

Total

290

100.0

Question 12

Do you think that an action plan on below Tolerable Standard housing should be required in local housing strategies and that promoting the improvement of housing condition and quality should be a specified purpose?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

161

55.5

87.5

no

20

6.9

10.9

Don't know/unsure

3

1.0

1.6

Total

184

63.4

100.0

Missing

no response

106

36.6

Total

290

100.0

Area Renewal

Question 13

Do you agree with the repeal of powers to declare Housing Action Areas and their replacement with powers to declare Housing Renewal Areas?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

154

53.1

92.2

no

9

3.1

5.4

Don't know/unsure

4

1.4

2.4

Total

167

57.6

100.0

Missing

no response

123

42.4

Total

290

100.0

Question 14a

Are the criteria for declaring a Housing Renewal Area the right ones?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

131

45.2

83.4

no

21

7.2

13.4

Don't know/unsure

5

1.7

3.2

Total

157

54.1

100.0

Missing

no response

133

45.9

Total

290

100.0

Question 14b

Should other criteria be included?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

50% criteria too high

14

4.8

41.2

Extend to include environment and regeneration issues.

5

1.7

14.7

Include structural issues.

2

0.7

5.9

Other

4

1.4

11.8

Criteria acceptable

7

2.4

20.6

Include fire safety and security

1

0.3

2.9

Local peoples' opinion

1

0.3

2.9

Total

34

11.7

100.0

Missing

no response

256

88.3

Total

290

100.0

Question 15

Are the proposed procedures for designating Housing Renewal Areas appropriate?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

143

49.3

90.5

no

12

4.1

7.6

Don't know/unsure

3

1.0

1.9

Total

158

54.5

100.0

Missing

no response

132

45.5

Total

290

100.0

Question 16

Are the proposed powers for local authorities following designation reasonable?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

146

50.3

92.4

no

7

2.4

4.4

Don't know/unsure

5

1.7

3.2

Total

158

54.5

100.0

Missing

no response

132

45.5

Total

290

100.0

Assistance to Private Owners

Question 17

Do you agree with the introduction of a range of types of assistance?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

158

54.5

77.5

no

43

14.8

21.1

Don't know/unsure

3

1.0

1.5

Total

204

70.3

100.0

Missing

no response

86

29.7

Total

290

100.0

Question 18

Are the types of assistance proposed the right ones?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

138

47.6

81.7

no

24

8.3

14.2

Don't know/unsure

7

2.4

4.1

Total

169

58.3

100.0

Missing

no response

121

41.7

Total

290

100.0

Question 19

Do you agree with the proposals for amending the legislation on grants?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

142

49.0

86.6

no

20

6.9

12.2

Don't know/unsure

2

0.7

1.2

Total

164

56.6

100.0

Missing

no response

126

43.4

Total

290

100.0

Question 20

With the exception of adaptations for disabled persons and fire precautions, should eligible works for financial assistance be limited to those relevant to the Tolerable and Scottish Housing Quality Standards?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

111

38.3

70.3

no

46

15.9

29.1

Don't know/unsure

1

0.3

0.6

Total

158

54.5

100.0

Missing

no response

132

45.5

Total

290

100.0

Question 21

Do you agree that subsidised loan should be available as an alternative to grant?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

137

47.2

80.1

no

30

10.3

17.5

Don't know/unsure

4

1.4

2.3

Total

171

59.0

100.0

Missing

no response

119

41.0

Total

290

100.0

Charging Orders

Question 22

Do you think that charging orders will be an effective means of releasing capital for carrying out repairs and improvements?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

Yes

135

46.6

81.8

No

25

8.6

15.2

Don't know/unsure

5

1.7

3.0

Total

165

56.9

100.0

Missing

no response

125

43.1

Total

290

100.0

Question 23

Have we identified the circumstances in which it would be appropriate to use charging orders?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

131

45.2

83.4

no

22

7.6

14.0

Don't know/unsure

4

1.4

2.5

Total

157

54.1

100.0

Missing

no response

133

45.9

Total

290

100.0

SINGLE SURVEY

Question 24

Should the Executive…

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

reserve powers to compel to make a single survey available

130

44.8

59.4

commence such powers along with the rest of the Bill

27

9.3

12.3

should this be left entirely to the market?

55

19.0

25.1

reserve powers & commence along with bill

7

2.4

3.2

Total

219

75.5

100.0

Missing

No response

71

24.5

Total

290

100.0

Question 25a

Should there be exemption from the requirement to provide a single survey?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

Yes

52

17.9

31.9

No

107

36.9

65.6

Don't know/unsure

4

1.4

2.5

Total

163

56.2

100.0

Missing

no response

127

43.8

Total

290

100.0

Question 25b

and, if so, what classes of property should be exempted?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

All classes exempt

9

3.1

20.0

Commercial Properties eg Bars, restaurants etc.

4

1.4

8.9

Right to buy property

14

4.8

31.1

Other

8

2.8

17.8

Property still under builders warranty

10

3.4

22.2

Total

45

15.5

100.0

Missing

no response

245

84.5

Total

290

100.0

Question 26a

Should there be a time limit on the survey?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

138

47.6

85.7

no

20

6.9

12.4

Don't know/unsure

3

1.0

1.9

Total

161

55.5

100.0

Missing

no response

129

44.5

Total

290

100.0

Question 26b

and what should these limits be?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

3 - 5 months

32

11.0

27.8

6 months

39

13.4

33.9

1 year maximum

28

9.7

24.3

2 - 5 years

12

4.1

10.4

5 years and over

4

1.4

3.5

Total

115

39.7

100.0

Missing

no response

175

60.3

Total

290

100.0

Question 27

What is an appropriate enforcement mechanism if the survey is not made available as required?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

A fine

39

13.4

27.3

Recover costs from seller

21

7.2

14.7

Prohibit sale

46

15.9

32.2

Market forces/Voluntary

18

6.2

12.6

Other

19

6.6

13.3

Total

143

49.3

100.0

Missing

No response

147

50.7

Total

290

100.0

Question 28

Should powers be wide enough to require sellers to provide other information, such as proposed for the Purchaser's Information Pack, or should it be restricted to a single survey?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes, require other information

106

36.6

64.2

no, restricted to single survey

54

18.6

32.7

Don't know/unsure

5

1.7

3.0

Total

165

56.9

100.0

Missing

no response

125

43.1

Total

290

100.0

Energy Performance Certificates

Question 29

There is the potential for sanctions to be applied where the EU Directive requirement on energy performance certificates is not complied with. What do you think would be appropriate sanctions?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

A fine

31

10.7

28.7

Recover cost of certificate from seller

18

6.2

16.7

Prohibit sale

18

6.2

16.7

Market forces/Voluntary, no sanctions

30

10.3

27.8

Other

11

3.8

10.2

Total

108

37.2

100.0

Missing

No response

182

62.8

Total

290

100.0

Question 30

Should the energy performance certificate incorporate an A to G coloured banding energy rating, similar to the energy labels displayed when household appliances are retailed?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

133

45.9

80.6

no

28

9.7

17.0

Don't know/unsure

4

1.4

2.4

Total

165

56.9

100.0

Missing

no response

125

43.1

Total

290

100.0

THE PRIVATELY RENTED SECTOR

The Repairing Standard

Question 31a

Are there any other elements that you would include in the modernised Repairing Standard for private landlords?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

68

23.4

41.5

no

95

32.8

57.9

Don't know/unsure

1

.3

.6

Total

164

56.6

100.0

Missing

no response

126

43.4

Total

290

100.0

Question 31b

other elements?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

Heating

1

0.3

1.1

Health and Safety

12

4.1

13.5

External areas

4

1.4

4.5

Decoration

4

1.4

4.5

Structural Integrity

3

1.0

3.4

Energy saving and Noise Insulation

8

2.8

9.0

Other

27

9.3

30.3

No other elements

30

10.3

33.7

Total

89

30.7

100.0

Missing

no response

201

69.3

Total

290

100.0

Question 32

Do you agree with the proposed range of tenancies to which the new standard would apply?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

143

49.3

86.7

no

21

7.2

12.7

Don't know/unsure

1

0.3

0.6

Total

165

56.9

100.0

Missing

no response

125

43.1

Total

290

100.0

Question 33

Should there be a statutory requirement that all written leases should include an explicit statement of the private landlords' repairing obligation?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

167

57.6

92.3

no

13

4.5

7.2

Don't know/unsure

1

0.3

0.6

Total

181

62.4

100.0

Missing

no response

109

37.6

Total

290

100.0

The Private Rented Housing Tribunal

Question 34

What changes do you think would need to be made to the Rent Assessment Panel and Committees to equip them for their extended role?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

Training

21

7.2

16.9

Support from professionals

9

3.1

7.3

Equipment

2

0.7

1.6

More power/funding

16

5.5

12.9

Other

16

5.5

12.9

As proposed

20

6.9

16.1

Don't know

16

5.5

12.9

Expand the range/number of people on the panel

15

5.2

12.1

Committee does not need to change

9

3.1

7.3

Total

124

42.8

100.0

Missing

No response

166

57.2

Total

290

100.0

Question 35

The name "Private Rented Housing Tribunal for Scotland" is a working title. Do you have any other suggestions for another name for the service?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

Anything shorter

8

2.8

6.0

Prefer 'Panel' to 'Tribunal'

18

6.2

13.5

'Scottish' rather than 'for Scotland'

3

1.0

2.3

Accept title

16

5.5

12.0

No alternative

69

23.8

51.9

Other

19

6.6

14.3

Total

133

45.9

100.0

Missing

No response

157

54.1

Total

290

100.0

Houses in Multiple Occupation

Question 36

Do you agree that a new legislative framework is necessary for Houses in Multiple Occupation?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

154

53.1

87.5

no

20

6.9

11.4

Don't know/unsure

2

0.7

1.1

Total

176

60.7

100.0

Missing

no response

114

39.3

Total

290

100.0

Question 37a

Do you agree that the repeal of part VIII powers is a good idea?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

115

39.7

79.9

no

18

6.2

12.5

Don't know/unsure

11

3.8

7.6

Total

144

49.7

100.0

Missing

no response

146

50.3

Total

290

100.0

Question 38a

Are you in favour of the proposed changes to the legislative framework for HMO licensing as set out?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

112

38.6

73.7

no

35

12.1

23.0

Don't know/unsure

5

1.7

3.3

Total

152

52.4

100.0

Missing

no response

138

47.6

Total

290

100.0

Question 38b

Would you add to or question any of these changes?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

Might discourage private landlords

2

0.7

3.8

Longer licensing period

6

2.1

11.5

More punitive powers for landlords without a license

8

2.8

15.4

Other

25

8.6

48.1

no

5

1.7

9.6

Landlords required to publicly display licence

6

2.1

11.5

Total

52

17.9

100.0

Missing

no response

238

82.1

Total

290

100.0

Adaptations

Question 39

Do you have any comments on the possible introduction of a right for tenants with disabilities to carry out adaptations to their homes and how it would operate?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

Social rented sector more suitable

19

6.6

9.9

By mutual agreement

30

10.3

15.6

Re-instatement arrangements and costs an issue.

52

17.9

27.1

Good idea, difficult in practice

12

4.1

6.3

Other

19

6.6

9.9

No comment

22

7.6

11.5

Don't know/unsure

1

.3

.5

Suggestions seem reasonable

27

9.3

14.1

Third party to mediate

10

3.4

5.2

Total

192

66.2

100.0

Missing

no response

98

33.8

Total

290

100.0

Extending the National Registration Scheme for Private Landlords

Question 40

Is it sensible to consider extending this scheme or will this place too great a regulatory burden on landlords?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes, consider extending this scheme

104

35.9

61.9

no, too great a burden on landlords

60

20.7

35.7

Don't know/unsure

4

1.4

2.4

Total

168

57.9

100.0

Missing

no response

122

42.1

Total

290

100.0

Question 41

If the registration scheme is to be strengthened should this be on the basis of "certification" approach set out above?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes, on the basis of certification

104

35.9

77.6

no, not on the basis of certification

27

9.3

20.1

Don't know/unsure

3

1.0

2.2

Total

134

46.2

100.0

Missing

no response

156

53.8

Total

290

100.0

Question 42

If the registration scheme is to be strengthened what conditions should be applied?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

Proposals acceptable

14

4.8

19.2

Similar conditions to SST

5

1.7

6.8

Deposits scheme

2

.7

2.7

Safety and security of tenants should be paramount

10

3.4

13.7

Cannot let without registration

8

2.8

11.0

Don't know

9

3.1

12.3

Other

25

8.6

34.2

Total

73

25.2

100.0

Missing

No response

217

74.8

Total

290

100.0

Question 43

If the registration scheme is to be strengthened should this be as an alternative to the proposals for Private Sector Housing Tribunals?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes, as an alternative to tribunals

35

12.1

29.2

no, not as an alternative to tribunals

78

26.9

65.0

Don't know

7

2.4

5.8

Total

120

41.4

100.0

Missing

no response

170

58.6

Total

290

100.0

Mobile Homes

Question 44

Do you agree with these proposals and, if not, why not?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

129

44.5

90.8

no

10

3.4

7.0

Don't know

3

1.0

2.1

Total

142

49.0

100.0

Missing

no response

148

51.0

Total

290

100.0

Question 45

Will these proposals, taken with the existing legislation, adequately protect mobile home occupiers?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Valid

yes

105

36.2

82.0

no

16

5.5

12.5

Don't know

7

2.4

5.5

Total

128

44.1

100.0

Missing

no response

162

55.9

Total

290

100.0

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Tuesday, May 16, 2006