| Description | Minutes of ScotStat Working Group on Local Government Finance Statistics 24 November 2004. |
|---|
| ISBN | (Web Only) |
|---|
| Official Print Publication Date | |
|---|
| Website Publication Date | January 27, 2005 |
|---|
MINUTES OF SCOTSTAT WORKING GROUP ON LOCAL
GOVERNMENT FINANCE STATISTICS (WGLGFS) Wednesday 24
November 2004 AT 10.30
CONFERENCE ROOM 9, VICTORIA QUAY
Present: Dave Signorini - (SE, LGF Stats)
Chair
Neil White - (SE, LGF Stats)
Stevan Croasdale -(SE,ASD6)
Hilary Pearce -(SE,LGF&P)
Sarah Parkin - (SE,LGF&P)
Hugh Coleman - (Aberdeen City Council, CoSLA)
Neil Reid - (South Lanarkshire Council, CoSLA)
Paul Hughes - (North Lanarkshire Council, CoSLA)
Gillian Woodcock - (Angus Council, CoSLA)
Graeme Strachan - (Assesser, Edinburgh)
Joyce Roberts - (SE, FCS)
Observers: Margaret Sellar - (SE, LGF
Stats)
Nigel Fender - (SE, LGF Stats) Secretary
Apologies: Stephen Herbert - (Scottish
Parliament Centre)
John Valentine - (SE,LGF Stats)
Graham Hope - (West Lothian, CoSLA)
Don Peebles - (CIPFA)
Robert Gibson - (Fife Council, CoSLA)
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Dave thanked everyone for attending. This has been
the only meeting this year. The last was 3rd December 2003.
The main items this session are to talk about the purpose
of the working group and about the change to recent returns
especially the new Capital Payment Return.
2. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING (HELD ON 15th
DECEMBER 2003)
Capital Reporting Forms
2.1 The revision of the CPRs has taken place. The new
returns have been issued to Local Authorities and now
include info for actual payments and receipts for current
quarter and forecast information for current year and next
3 financial years. The return also asks for Prudential
Indicators. The new returns are now reported on an accruals
basis rather than cash.
Council Tax Collection
2.2 Dave said that the consultation with Local
Authorities has had a mixed response. The view was
expressed that having more another published set of data
could be confusing. No plans for another publication at
present.
2.3 PPP Costs on LFRs - add a line to collect PPP.
Neil spoke to the Financial Partnership Unit. This data is
already held by them and so there is no need to pursue this
point.
Meeting notification
2.4 Dave said that we should circulate meeting agenda
and any relevant info 2 weeks prior to meeting.
3 PURPOSE AND REMIT OF WORKING GROUP
3.1 The original purpose of the working group was to
discuss specific issues relating to the Local Authority
financial returns that are issued by the Scottish
Executive. The aim was to identify statistical information
which is required by all parties, taking into account the
needs of consumers and the burdens upon suppliers.
3.2 Although the group was initially very productive in
reviewing the LFRs, recently the output has reduced and
some members do not always feel they are the correct
representative from their Local Authority.
3.3 Feedback from the Local Authorities is very useful,
however, and that link must be maintained, although the
group membership should be more fluid.
3.4 It was decided that the group should cover a
wider range of activities, with external representatives
from Local Authorities changing depending on the specific
task at hand.
ACTION: Dave to write to Directors of Finance
to notify them that in future we will contact them to
ask for appropriate people to attend and contribute, on
a more task-specific basis.
4 PROPOSED REVIEW OF CAPITAL PAYMENTS
RETURNS
4.1 Hugh and Paul both felt that there was too much
worked involved in getting the quarterly figures. Dave
pointed out that quarterly data is required to meet the HM
Treasury requirements for the Pre-Budget Report and the
Budget.
4.2 Gillian queried the section asking for actual
CFCR, as they do not know how much capital expenditure they
need to finance through CFCR until later in the year. Joyce
stated that finance require actual figures especially
supported borrowing, but council members said that they
just pro-rata the SB figure. Hilary also stated that the
Fire Boards also complete returns for the Justice Division
and we would have to watch out that we are not duplicating
data.
4.3 Given the above there is a need for review. The
group agreed that it would be useful to convene a group of
capital experts to take this forward.
ACTION: Neil to convene a group to look at the
CPR
5 TIMETABLE FOR 2005-06 FINANCIAL
RETURNS
5.1 Dave explained that we are bringing the SLGFS
publication forward by 3 months and thus it was crucial
that we received the data by the timescale and with no loss
to the quality.
5.2 It was agreed that the September deadline for the
LFR's was acceptable as most councils have had their
accounts audited by then, although Hugh stated that it was
October for his area.
30th June being the deadline for submission to
Audit Scotland of accounts. It was thought that
the 3rd September date was realistic.
5.3 Neil Reid asked if we could give councils notice of
any sections of forms that would not be changing thus
allowing the councils to get started on them earlier. Dave
Signorini replied that we could make the covering letter
clearer to highlight the changes from the previous return.
5.4 Dave also pointed out that from 1 January 2005,
under the Freedom of Information Act we are likely to
release upon request any data that we hold to the public
domain even if it has yet to be checked or validated.
6 REVALUATION 2005-06: NDR DATA
COLLECTION
6.1 This revised return has been discussed with the
Scottish Assessor Association to measure general growth and
shrinkage in taxable base and to see how this compares in
individual areas. No objections to rolling out this return
in 2005.
7 AOB
FRS 17
7.1 There would be an analysis of the FRS 17 data which
has been reported on the recent Local Financial Returns and
Dave asked if anybody had any comments on the reporting of
FRS on the LFRs.
7.2 Paul stated that the figures given for this can
fluctuate drastically explaining that this year the figure
was a credit, but the year before they were reporting
debits. The group felt that it was best to keep FRS 17
costs separate from the rest of the expenditure data.
ACTION: LGF Statistics will produce an analysis
of the effects of the FRS 17 for circulation.
8 DATE OF NEXT MEETING
8.1 This would take place around March 2005, to consider
the revised LFRs.