On this page:

Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003: Initial Report on Scotland's Performance in Mathematics, Science and Reading

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003: Initial Report on Scotland's Performance in Mathematics, Science and Reading

Gender Differences in Mathematical Literacy

Figure 2.d. Gender differences in mathematics mean score (score difference in favour of males)

Gender Differences in Mathematical Literacy

Figure 2.d shows the gender differences for the OECD countries and Scotland. This graph plots the difference between mean scores for male students and that for females. A bar to the right of the centre line means that male students scored higher than females, while one to the left means that female students did better than males. As can be seen, male 15 year olds achieve higher than female in all the countries except Iceland. The range of score differences is large. Korea shows the highest difference, at 23 points but many countries also show large differences. For the 29 OECD countries as a whole, the average difference is close to 11 points. In Scotland the mean score for male students is 7 points above that for female students. In PISA 2000 Scottish male students were 5 points ahead of female. The almost universal better performance by males contrasts with the position in reading literacy where, as will be seen later, the situation reverses and females do better than males.

Figure 2.e. Mathematics combined results scale: comparison of male and female student attainment for OECD and Scotland

Figure 2.e. Mathematics combined results scale: comparison of male and female student attainment for OECD and Scotland

The final two paragraphs of this section focus on the performance of male and female students in Scotland relative to those in the OECD as a whole. The next section of the chapter details the results for each of the four content areas: Space and Shape, Change and Relationships, Quantity, and Uncertainty.

Figure 2.e shows the percentages of OECD and Scottish male and female students attaining the various levels of performance on the combined mathematics scale. Relative to the OECD, as already noted, a greater percentage of students in Scotland attain Levels 4, 5, and 6, the higher levels, though an almost equal percentage reaches Level 6. Equally, fewer Scottish students fall below Level 3 than in the OECD as a whole: while 69% of Scottish students attain Level 3 or better, the corresponding figure for the OECD as a whole is 53%. This pattern is mirrored, with slight variation, for both male and female students, with 71% of Scottish male students and 68% of female attaining Level 3 or better, compared with 55% and 52% respectively in the OECD overall.

Comparing students within Scotland, a greater percentage of male students than female attain the higher levels of performance, but this difference in attainment only shifts in their favour one level above Level 3, at Level 4. While 43% of male students attain Level 4 or above, just 39% of female students do so.

Mathematical Literacy in PISA 2003 - Attainment in the Four Broad Content Areas

This section presents the results for:

Space and shape
Change and relationships
Quantity, and
Uncertainty.

Table 2.4 gives the mean scores for each of these four content areas.

Table 2.4: Mean score and proportion of students reaching top three proficiency levels for each content area

Mean score

Percentage of students gaining Level 3 or better

OECD country average

Scotland

Across the OECD area as a whole

Scotland

Space and shape

496

507

51

61

Change and relationships

499

529

54

70

Quantity

501

519

53

67

Uncertainty

502

536

54

74

Each content area shows a broadly similar pattern for Scotland and the whole OECD to that noted above for the overall performance levels. The mean scores for Scotland on every sub-scale are significantly higher than those for the OECD as a whole, and the proportions of Scottish students above Level 3 are, in general, substantially higher than those for the OECD as a whole.

The comparison of the Scottish mean scores with those for each of the individual 29 OECD countries is given in Table 2.5, and Table 2.6 summarises Scotland's position by giving the count of the number of OECD countries with mean scores; significantly above that for Scotland, and those not significantly different from, and significantly less than that for Scotland.

Table 2.5. Student performance on mathematics sub-scales, country mean scores

Sh&Sp

Ch&Rel

Quant

Uncertainty

Australia

521

525

517

531

Austria

515

500

513

494

Belgium

530

535

530

526

Canada

518

537

528

542

Czech Republic

527

515

528

500

Denmark

512

509

516

516

Finland

539

543

549

545

France

508

520

507

506

Germany

500

507

514

493

Greece

437

436

446

458

Hungary

479

495

496

489

Iceland

504

509

513

528

Ireland

476

506

502

517

Italy

470

452

475

463

Japan

553

536

527

528

Korea

552

548

537

538

Luxembourg

488

487

501

492

Mexico

382

364

394

390

Netherlands

526

551

528

549

New Zealand

525

526

511

532

Norway

483

488

494

513

Poland

490

484

492

494

Portugal

450

468

465

471

***Scotland ***

507

529

519

536

Slovak Republic

505

494

513

476

Spain

476

481

492

489

Sweden

498

505

514

511

Switzerland

540

523

533

517

Turkey

417

423

413

443

United States

472

486

476

491

OECD student mean

486

489

487

492

OECD country mean

496

499

501

502

Table 2.6. Number of OECD countries with mean scores

Number of OECD countries with mean scores:

Sub-scale

Significantly below the Scottish mean

Not significantly different from the Scottish mean

Above the Scottish mean

Significantly above the Scottish mean

Space and shape

12

8

13

9

Change and relationships

19

8

6

2

Quantity

12

12

8

5

Uncertainty

20

8

4

1

Both in respect of the OECD taken as a whole and relative to the individual countries that constitute the OECD, Scottish students do very well in the content area of Uncertainty. The Scottish mean score is significantly above the OECD mean, just four countries have higher mean scores and only one of these has a significantly higher mean score than Scotland. Change and Relationships is the next strongest area. Six countries have higher mean scores than Scotland, two of them significantly higher. The Scottish mean score is significantly above the OECD mean score, and the percentage of students attaining Level 3 or above is well above the OECD percentage.

In the other two content areas, the picture is less clear. Scottish performance is good but not strong. In Space and Shape, the difference between the Scottish mean score and the OECD value, though significant, is the smallest of the four differences. Similarly the difference in percentages of students attaining Level 3 or above is the smallest of the four differences. Thirteen (13) countries have higher mean scores, nine significantly so. Quantity has the second smallest difference in mean score, and similarly the second smallest difference in percentage of students at Level 3 or above. Eight countries have higher mean scores than Scotland, five significantly so.

Parallel to what has been found for the combined mathematics scores, in each content area, male students attain higher mean scores than female both in the OECD as a whole and in Scotland. The percentages of male students attaining Level 3 or above are similarly greater than those for female students.

In Space and Shape, 63% of Scottish male students gained Level 3 or above compared with 58% of female students, while for the OECD as a whole, the corresponding comparison is 53% of males and 48% of females. The mean score for Scottish males (514) is 13 points higher than that for females (501), slightly less than the difference of 17 points in the OECD as a whole. Scottish males scored 9 points above OECD males: Scottish females, 13 points above OECD females 9.

In Change and Relationships, 72% of Scottish male students gained Level 3 or above, compared with 69% of female students. In the OECD as a whole, 55% of male students attained these levels, and 52% of female. The mean score for Scottish males (535) is 11 points higher than that for females (524), the same as the difference in the OECD as a whole. Scottish males scored 30 points above OECD males; Scottish females, 31 points above OECD females.

In Quantity, Scottish male and female students did equally well in respect of proficiency Levels 3 and above, with 67% of both genders reaching these levels, while in the OECD as a whole, the two results were almost equal, at 54% and 52%, respectively. The mean score for Scottish males (521) was 4 points higher than that for females (517), slightly less than the difference of 6 in the OECD as a whole. Scottish males scored 17 points above OECD males; Scottish females, 19 points above OECD females.

In Uncertainty, male and female students in Scotland performed almost equally well in respect of attainment at proficiency Levels 3 or above, with 75% of males and 74% of females reaching these levels, while in the OECD, the gap was wider, with 56% of male students attaining these levels and 52% of female. The mean score for Scottish males (538) was 5 points higher than that for females (533), markedly less than the difference of 13 points in the OECD as a whole. Scottish males scored 30 points above OECD males; Scottish females, 37 points above OECD females.

It is reassuring to note that Scotland has scored so highly in the area of Uncertainty. From 2001, SQA changed the arrangements for Standard Grade Mathematics examinations to introduce statistical content papers at all levels. (This was to maintain consistency with the Intermediate 1 and 2 courses which were introduced as part of the Higher Still initiative). In addition to all pupils being taught statistics as part of their National Qualification courses at S3 and S4, many schools introduced an element of statistics into their courses at S1 and S2 to improve the continuity and progression of pupils' learning.

Variation in Combined Mathematics Scores Between Low and High Achievers

Figure 2.f shows the score gap between students at the 75 th percentile level, ie those at the top end of the attainment range, and those at the 25 th level, ie, those at the bottom of the attainment range. Each pair of joined points corresponds to one of the 29 OECD countries or to Scotland. Countries are sequenced from left to right in increasing gap size (from smallest to largest difference). The smallest gap (115 points) is found in Finland, and the largest (155 points) in Belgium.

Figure 2.f. Difference in mathematics combined score between students at the 25th and 75th percentile levels of attainment

Figure 2.f. Difference in mathematics combined score between students at the 25th and 75th percentile levels of attainment

The graph compares the degree of equity in mathematics attainment between countries. That is, how great the achievement gap is between those who do well and those who do not. Is this gap narrow or wide? A country may have high overall mathematics achievement, as indicated by its mean score, but may provide a very unequal education to its students, or it may not. The gaps shown in this graph reveal where each country is placed in this respect.

Scotland is very well placed with a gap equal to that of Finland (115 points).

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Monday, March 20, 2006