On this page:

Reconviction Following Drug Treatment and Testing Orders

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

RECONVICTION FOLLOWING DRUG TREATMENT AND TESTING ORDERS

REFERENCES

Eley, S., Gallop, K., McIvor, G., Morgan, K. and Yates, R. (2002) Drug Treatment and Testing Orders: Evaluation of the Scottish Pilots, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research.

Eley, S., Malloch, M., McIvor, G., Yates, R. and Brown, A. (2002) Glasgow's Pilot Drug Court in Action: The First Six Months, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research.

Goldkamp, J. S., White, M.D. and Robinson, J.B. (2001) From Whether to How Drug Courts Work: Retrospective Evaluation of Drug Courts in Clark County (Las Vegas) and Multnomah County (Portland), Philadelphia, PA: Crime and Justice Research Institute.

Hough, M., Clancy, A., McSweeney, T. and Turnbull, P. (2003) The impact of Drug Treatment and Testing Orders on offending: two-year reconviction re s u l t s, HORSD Findings 184, London: Home Office.

Lloyd, C., Mair, G. and Hough, M. (1994) Explaining Reconviction Rates: A Critical Analysis, Home Office Research Study 136, London: HMSO.

Malloch, M., Eley, S., McIvor, G., Beaton, K. and Yates, R. (2003) The Fife Drug Court in Action: The First Six Months, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research.

May, C. (1999) Explaining Reconviction Following a Community Sentence: The Role of Social Factors, Home Office Research Study 192, London: Home Office.

Scottish Executive (2003) Reconvictions of Offenders Discharged from Custody or Given Non-custodial Sentences in 1997, Scotland, Edinburgh: Criminal Justice Series Statical Bulletin.

Turnbull, P.J., McSweeney, T., Webster, R., Edmunds, M. and Hough, M. (2000) Drug Treatment and Testing Orders: Final Evaluation Report, Home Office Research Study 212, London: Home Office.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Friday, May 19, 2006