On this page:

2003 Sixth Annual Report of the Planning Audit Unit

« Previous | Contents |

Listen

2003 SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PLANNING AUDIT UNIT

SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE

Structure Plans

Scottish Ministers aim to approve structure plans within 40 weeks of submission, unless an EIP is necessary. Performance in processing submitted plans to approval against the 40-week target since March 2000 has been variable but in the last year the Perth and Kinross and Western Isles plans have been successfully determined in 38 and 34 weeks respectively.

STRUCTURE PLANS: TIME TAKEN FOR APPROVAL

Structure Plan

Submitted:

Approved:

Weeks:

Highland

17 March 2000

23 March 2001

53

Lothian (Opencast)

31 March 2000

19 March 2001

50

North East Scotland Together

26 April 2001

21 December 2001

34

Glasgow & The Clyde Valley

19 July 2000

1 May 2002

93

Stirling & Clackmannanshire

24 August 2000

21 March 2002

82

Shetland Islands

4 September 2000

19 January 2001

20

Fife

31 January 2001

3 July 2002

74

Falkirk

5 February 2001

29 May 2002

69

Orkney

18 May 2001

29 November 2001

28

Borders

31 May 2001

12 September 2002

67

Argyll & Bute

19 November 2001

14 November 2002

52

Dundee & Angus

8 February 2002

14 October 2002

36

Perth & Kinross

13 September 2002

5 June 2003

38

Western Isles

17 April 2003

11 December 2003

34

Casework Performance

In the period April 2003 to March 2004, 84% of cases notified to Scottish Ministers were determined within 28 days against a target of 80%, while 94% were determined within 2 months against a target of 100%. Since 1997/98 the the number of cases handled has increased by more than 50%.

In the same period the percentage of decisions on inquiry cases made within 2 and 3 months of receipt of report from Scottish Executive Inquiry Reporters Unit (SEIRU) was 74% against a target of 80% and 82% against a target of 100% respectively.

Notified Applications

(including NIDs): time taken to clear or call-in

Total
Cases

In 28
days

%

In 2
months

%

1997/98

213

179

84

204

96

1998/99

242

201

83

227

94

1999/00

261

213

82

243

93

2000/01

282

242

86

273

97

2001/02

251

230

92

247

98

2002/03

327

283

87

316

97

2003/04

329

277

84

308

94

Inquiry Cases

(including recalled appeals and called-in notified and NID cases): time taken to determine from receipt of report from SEIRU

Total
Cases

In 2
months

%

In 3
months

%

1997/98

49

41

84

46

94

1998/99

58

50

86

56

97

1999/00

47

28

60

37

79

2000/01

71

48

68

62

87

2001/02

58

44

75

47

81

2002/03

32

28

88

32

100

2003/04

34

25

74

28

82

Scottish Ministers' Involvement in Planning Cases

The table opposite sets out the number of planning decisions made in each local authority and the level of Scottish Executive involvement (the number of notified applications, Notice of Intention to Develop cases and recalled appeals). Since the number of cases annually is fairly small, the figures are given for the period April 1996 to September 2003. Ministers' involvement in casework is very limited in all parts of the country compared to the number of decisions made by councils.

PLANNING DECISIONS AND SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE CASES: April 1996-September 2003

Total decisions

Total Executive cases decided

Aberdeen City

16309

3

Aberdeenshire

25184

11

Angus

8627

1

Argyll & Bute

10104

18

Clackmannanshire

2497

0

Dumfries & Galloway

12866

3

Dundee City

5916

5

E. Ayrshire

6036

3

E. Dunbartonshire

6362

3

E. Lothian

8277

6

E. Renfrewshire

5299

5

Edinburgh

28004

19

Falkirk

6377

8

Fife

25439

11

Glasgow

22961

13

Highland

27081

37

Inverclyde

3636

2

Midlothian

5217

16

Moray

8025

2

N. Ayrshire

5919

2

N. Lanarkshire

11244

31

Orkney

2544

0

Perth and Kinross

13327

4

Renfrewshire

7649

3

Scottish Borders

12004

6

Shetland

2808

5

South Ayrshire

9379

4

South Lanarkshire

13638

23

Stirling

7064

6

W. Dunbartonshire

3253

1

W. Lothian

8090

1

Western Isles

2856

1

National Parks

293

0

Scotland TOTAL

334285

253

The table opposite shows notified cases. Over the period April 1996 to March 2004, 1,597 cases were notified to the Scottish Ministers. During that period 214 (13%) were called-in and a decision to refuse was made in 98 (6%). Edinburgh, Glasgow and North Lanarkshire Councils had the highest number of notified applications, while Highland Council had the highest number called-in and refused, most were trunk road referrals.

CASES NOTIFIED TO SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE, CALL-INS, REFUSALS: April 1996-March 2004

Notified cases

Called-in

Refused

Aberdeen City

42

8

3

Aberdeenshire

78

8

2

Angus

10

0

0

Argyll & Bute

48

13

9

Clackmannanshire

7

0

0

Dumfries & Galloway

43

6

3

Dundee City

23

1

0

E. Ayrshire

43

4

1

E. Dunbartonshire

24

0

0

E. Lothian

24

1

0

E. Renfrewshire

28

2

1

Edinburgh

165

10

3

Falkirk

42

8

3

Fife

65

4

1

Glasgow

157

6

4

Highland

96

35

19

Inverclyde

21

1

0

Midlothian

65

19

10

Moray

39

3

1

N. Ayrshire

31

3

2

N. Lanarkshire

152

29

16

Orkney

10

0

0

Perth and Kinross

19

6

3

Renfrewshire

43

2

1

Scottish Borders

26

5

3

Shetland

15

4

5

South Ayrshire

57

3

1

South Lanarkshire

88

22

6

Stirling

27

3

1

W. Dunbartonshire

13

0

0

W. Lothian

90

8

0

Western Isles

5

0

0

National Parks

1

0

0

Scotland TOTAL

1597

214

98

POINTS FOR THE SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE

In audits this year, these key points were made by service users, councillors and staff.

Guidance and Advice

  • The high number of SPPs, NPPGs, PANs and Circulars is resulting in information overload. The number of SPPs, NPPGs, PANs and Circulars is an unavoidable consequence of the complexity of the issues which the modern planning system has to address. We need to ensure that decision makers and users of the planning system have the information they require to carry out their jobs. New policy or advice is however, only produced when there is a clearly identifiable need and we aim to make any guidance as understandable and straightforward as possible. The number of NPPGs will be reduced through consolidation and review as SPPs.
  • SPPs, NPPGs and PANs can be vague, which means that both the supporters of development proposals and those against are able to find policy statements that support their viewpoint. We aim to provide clear policy and advice, however there are limits to how precise it can be without prejudicing its effectiveness. It is not possible for policy or advice to cover all situations and there is a need to allow flexibility. Planning authorities must balance policy and advice alongside the development plan and other material considerations when reaching a decision.
  • The Scottish Executive needs to encourage house builders to improve design standards. Designing Places was published in November 2001. This has been followed by PANs on Housing Quality and Design Statements. The importance of design is emphasised in our regular discussions with the house builders. The Executive is also undertaking some research to compare and contrast the process to achieve good housing design between Scotland and Bavaria. As part of this research representatives from the house builders and other interested parties were taken to Bavaria to look more closely at their housing developments. In addition, the publication of research into improving residential street design is due to be issued as a PAN this summer.
  • The resource implications of new initiatives such as Transport Assessment and SuDS need to be considered. Also how initiatives such as green travel plans are monitored and enforced. National policy is now subject to regulatory impact assessment which considers, amongst other things, the financial implications of new policy.
  • Need detailed publications on trees, as there is none available except those applicable to England. In 2002, the Executive commissioned research into the effectiveness of TPOs in Scotland. The report concluded that the present system is fundamentally sound, although it did make a number of recommendations for action by Ministers and local authorities. The need for additional guidance was highlighted in the report. Measures to amend TPO procedures will be considered for inclusion in the forthcoming Planning Bill. In this context the Executive is considering the need for additional guidance relating to trees and tree preservation orders.

Development Control

PLIs and appeals place a high level of demand on local authority resources. The consultation paper Modernising Public Local Inquiries was issued in June 2003. The paper considered the scope for modernising the inquiry process and opportunities for better practice. The responses to the consultation, which ended in November 2003, are being analysed.

« Previous | Contents |

Page updated: Thursday, April 6, 2006