On this page:

Early Approaches to Monitoring and Evaluation of the Better Neighbourhood Services Fund

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

Early Approaches to Monitoring and Evaluation of the Better Neighbourhood Services Fund

APPENDIX A: PATHFINDER INTERVIEW TOPIC GUIDE

BNSF Topic Reports

Best practice in monitoring and evaluating BNSF

Pathfinder: Date:
Consultee:

Notes from files:

What does your Pathfinder see as the purpose of monitoring and evaluation?

What resources have you allocated specifically to monitoring and evaluation (e.g. dedicated officer, baseline surveys, use of consultants etc.)

Is there a common definition and understanding of inputs, outputs and outcomes?

Capturing 'soft' outcomes and process issues, experience to date and what could be done now to ensure such benefits are recorded.

What are the difficulties faced in establishing attribution? What information gathering arrangements can be put in place to allow attribution to be assessed?

What kind of support is required or would have been helpful, from whom, at what stage (e.g. in identification outcomes and outputs, establishing M&E framework, collecting data etc.)?

What role can/should the Scottish Executive play in the process?

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Monday, May 22, 2006