On this page:

Evaluating Family Health Nursing Through Education and Practice

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

Evaluating Family Health Nursing Through Education and Practice

ANNEX SIX: KEY INFORMANTS

Signifier and duration of interview

Perspective
(discipline and level)

Level of Knowledge and personal stance

Quality of interview

Most important part of interview

A
40 mins

Strategic national regional and operational
Urban and rural
Nursing

High
Pro FHN
Suggested urban pilot

Very good information. Frameworks suggested

Section on Integrated approach and framework towards end of interview.

B
30mins

Health Council Local

Moderate
Sees nursing as looking after sick

Good in places. Concerned about plethora of nurses and titles and specialisms

Section on non-medical model and notion of family.

C
45mins

Strategic to regional and operational
Nursing

Moderate
Pro HV
Anti Dr

Good
Tuned into the morale of D/Ns feeling devalued.

Section at the beginning on the strengths and use of models and records.

D
30mins

LHCC Urban
Nursing

Moderate
Aware of deprivation and poverty issues. Post code health

Good
Sees need for more integration to avoid duplications

Section on education of community staff and section on the difficulties of the DN

E
25mins

Local
Nursing

Low
Lack of knowledge

Average
Emphasised potential for confusion amongst public.

Section on beefing up general skills of community nurses.

F
60 mins

Strategic operational and national
Rural and urban
Allied health professional

High
Good intellectual approach to the issues. Analytical problem solver
Learning from other contexts

Very good
Gave several leads for us to follow up. Keen on nursing development.

Section on Strengths and description of cohesive services. Section on Education and Multi-disciplinary approach and final section on FHN.

G
20 mins

Health council
Local

Low Lack of knowledge
acute and primary care differences

Average
Enthusiastic for nurse-led services

Section on patient assessment towards end.

H
25mins

LHCC urban
Medical

Moderate
Concerned about national projects which siphon off good staff

Average
Concerned about pace of change. Curative and treatment elements of care

Section on weaknesses re conflict and final statement about pace of change.

I
50mins

Strategic operational and national
Nursing

High
Concerned about professional boundaries and need to free people's minds

Good
Gave insight into matching workforce with population needs

Section on weaknesses and also one on up-skilling

J
35mins

LHCC
Remote and urban
Allied health professions

Moderate
Optimum use of workforce a concern

Good
Gave insight into notion of corporate caseload

Section on strengths and section on the FHN role as an aid to recruitment

K
30mins

LHCC
Urban & rural
Nursing

Moderate
Pro HV perspective

Average
Gave some insight into needs assessment and staffing levels

Section on skills of FHN at end and section on staffing levels.

L
25mins

Local rural
Nursing

High Keen on developing existing services and thinks DN service should be given a boost.

Good
Appreciates value of distance learning
Strength of existing service

Section on distance learning and section on FHN

M
50 mins

LHCC
Urban
Nursing

High Concerned about short-termism in the NHS.
Very pro nurse

Good
Raised issue of supervision and concern about just keeping changing nursing courses

Section on education and FHN at the end and section on need to roll out short term projects which work well.

N
45mins

Strategic and operational urban
Nursing

High
Need to integrate education practice and research

Very good
Raised awareness of care recording systems.
Concerned about how FHN would add to service. Need to
conduct service reviews to match workforce to patient needs

Section on reviews of service and section criticising literature available

O
25mins

Health council
Local

Moderate
Still coming to terms with problems faced as a carer herself.

Good
Brought to awareness the patient line.

Section on holism as it brings in personal experiences and ideological beliefs.

P
20mins

LHCC semi rural
Nursing

Low
Pro HV
Anti FHN without any real argument

Average
Raised issue that FHN was set up to solve recruitment problem only

Section at the beginning of the FHN conversation.

Q
20 mins

LHCC and national primary care
Medical

Moderate
Concerned with out of hours services and reshaping services

Good
Raised issue to workforce organisation

Section on practice attachment and geographic working

R
55mins

LHCC
Operational educational and developmental
Nursing

High
Concerned about patient expectations

Good
Provided insight into a framework for staff development

Section on demands under weaknesses and section on frameworks.

S
45mins

Strategic operational and national
Nursing

High
Concerned to match workforce skill mix to patient need
Pro FHN

Very good
Provided insight into use of Arbuthnott
Problems of remote nursing
Links with mental health nursing & gaps in education

Section
On Arbuthnott and bench marking also contact economist cited.
Section on FHN

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Monday, May 22, 2006