On this page:

Scottish Diabetes Survey 2002

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

SCOTTISH DIABETES SURVEY 2002

  1. Community Health Index (CHI)

  2. The Community Health Index (CHI) is a unique patient number that enables records and results to be linked to produce a single patient record. Widespread use of the CHI has significant benefits in terms of administrative efficiency and patient safety. The CHI is also essential for the development of clinical management systems.

  3. Because of the importance of CHI, the Monitoring Group in its last report set a target that all areas should aim to achieve at least 90% of records including a CHI number. We report this year that 11 areas reached the target; eight areas achieving over 95%. The overall percentage increasing from 66.6% to 82.4%. The target of 90% remains for 2003.

  4. Figure 4: Diabetes register: percentage with CHI

    chart

    Note: Shetland - No data submitted

    Figure 5: Comparison - Scotland 2001 & 2002. Number on register with CHI

    chart

    Table 2: Diabetes register - number on register with CHI

    Total no.

    % with CHI

    Scotland 2001

    70,411

    66.6%

    Scotland 2002

    85,459

    82.4%

    Argyll & Clyde

    9,522

    100.0%

    Ayrshire & Arran

    8,541

    94.9%

    Borders

    2,897

    98.9%

    Dumfries & Galloway

    4,721

    91.6%

    Fife

    9,786

    99.0%

    Forth Valley

    6,845

    100.0%

    Grampian

    5,570

    97.3%

    Greater Glasgow

    4,061

    96.9%

    Highland

    1,481

    68.7%

    Lanarkshire

    3,208

    19.6%

    Lothian

    16,395

    86.7%

    Orkney

    377

    100.0%

    Shetland

    0

    0.0%

    Tayside

    11,266

    99.9%

    Western Isles

    789

    94.7%

    Table 3: Diabetes register - number included in survey with postcode

    Full postcode

    Partial postcode

    Missing postcode

    Scotland 2001

    93,682

    88.6%

    3,301

    3.1%

    8,794

    8.3%

    Scotland 2002

    91,689

    88.3%

    907

    0.9%

    11,187

    10.8%

    Argyll & Clyde

    9,518

    100.0%

    0

    0.0%

    4

    0.0%

    Ayrshire & Arran

    8,811

    97.9%

    0

    0.0%

    187

    2.1%

    Borders

    2,929

    100.0%

    0

    0.0%

    0

    0.0%

    Dumfries & Galloway

    4,787

    92.8%

    42

    0.8%

    327

    6.3%

    Fife

    8,998

    91.1%

    28

    0.3%

    855

    8.7%

    Forth Valley

    6,385

    93.3%

    389

    5.7%

    71

    1.0%

    Grampian

    5,218

    91.1%

    7

    0.1%

    501

    8.7%

    Greater Glasgow

    0

    0.0%

    0

    0.0%

    4,191

    100.0%

    Highland

    2,156

    100.0%

    0

    0.0%

    0

    0.0%

    Lanarkshire

    12,325

    75.3%

    303

    1.9%

    3,730

    22.8%

    Lothian

    18,242

    96.4%

    112

    0.6%

    572

    3.0%

    Orkney

    377

    100.0%

    0

    0.0%

    0

    0.0%

    Shetland

    0

    0.0%

    0

    0.0%

    608

    100.0%

    Tayside

    11,134

    98.7%

    14

    0.1%

    129

    1.1%

    Western Isles

    809

    97.1%

    12

    1.4%

    12

    1.4%

    Postcode

  5. At individual patient level, accurate collection of postcode data is important for ensuring that patients receive their clinic letters. For planning and epidemiological purposes, postcodes are also used to calculate deprivation categories. The Survey found that 88.4% of records include the full postcode, with eight areas achieving over 95%. Disappointingly, these figures are little changed from 2001. Given the importance of postcode, particularly in relation to the calculation deprivation ( see Annex B) the Monitoring Group is suggesting a target for the 2003 Survey that 95% of all records should have a full postcode.

  6. Figure 6: Diabetes register: percentage with postcode

    Note: Lanarkshire - data only available for secondary care. Shetland - no data submitted

    Figure 7: Comparison - Scotland 2001 & 2002. Number on register with full postcode recorded

    chart

  7. People in poorer areas tend to have more ill-health and less access to health services than people from more affluent areas; for example, socio-economic deprivation in Scotland is associated with an increased prevalence of Type 2 diabetes. (12, 13) In order to explore these issues it is proposed that submissions for the 2003 Survey should include deprivation categories for the registered diabetic population in comparison to the population as a whole.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Thursday, June 23, 2005