On this page:

Road Network Management and Maintenance Division Development Control adjacent to Trunk Roads Annual Performance Report For 2002

DescriptionSets out the performance of RNMMD in meeting their targets and provides other statistics with regard to trunk road development control in 2002
ISBNN/A
Official Print Publication Date
Website Publication DateApril 22, 2003

Listen

Road Network Management and Maintenance Division
Development Control adjacent to Trunk Roads
Annual Performance Report For 2002

This document is also available in pdf format (32k)

Contents

Introduction
Summary
Detailed Analysis and Tables

Development Department
Road Network Management & Maintenance Division
Victoria Quay
Edinburgh EH6 6QQ
January 2003

Introduction

Planning Advice Note (PAN) 40 (Revised): Development Control, provides best practice advice on development control. It emphasises the priority that Scottish Ministers attach to the provision of a high standard development control service.

Para 41 of PAN 40 refers to the need for regular consultation on applications with other bodies and the need to periodically review working arrangements to identify where improvements might be made. Although not specifically mentioned, the Scottish Executive Roads Network Management and Maintenance Division (RNMMD) and its Operating Companies are such a body and have an important role to play in the processing of planning applications affecting trunk road interests.

The third annual report of the Scottish Executive's Planning Audit Unit (published March 2001 and available on the web at http://www/.scotland.gov.uk/planning ) sets out the main findings and recommendations for action to improve existing consultation arrangements. RNMMD have agreed to set targets for responding to all applications they are consulted on, and to increase the level of electronic communication between themselves and local authorities.

Delays in reaching decisions on planning applications have been a longstanding issue to many involved in the development process. There is a statutory duty for planning applications to be decided in 2 months from the receipt of a valid planning application (4 months where an Environmental Assessment is necessary), although an extension of time can be agreed in writing with the applicant. It has been a matter of concern to planning authorities that delays in responding to trunk road consultations by RNMMD or their agents have contributed to difficulties in meeting this deadline.

RNMMD are committed to issuing a consultation response (TRNPA/2) to 60% of minor applications within 14 days of receipt by the operating company, and to issue a response on all major applications within 14 days from receipt of acceptable supporting data provided by the applicant (i.e. an audited Transport Assessment). RNMMD will advise planning authorities where they are unlikely to be able to respond within 14 days. Progress against targets will be reported annually.

It has been agreed that these performance targets will be monitored and should be progressively improved. This report is the first such annual report and sets out the performance of RNMMD in meeting their targets and provides other statistics with regard to trunk road development control in 2002. As this is the first formal annual report only limited comparison with previous years performance is made.

Summary

1. RNMMD are committed to issuing a consultation response (TRNPA/2) to 60% of minor applications within 14 days of receipt by the operating company - this target has been met in 2002 with an on average performance across RNMMD of 62%. This is a significant improvement on 2001.

2. RNMMD are committed to issuing a response on all major applications within 14 days from receipt of acceptable supporting data provided by the applicant - this target has not been met in 2002 as only 78% of such applications (based upon a sample) were returned within this timescale in some instances the method of recording applications provides a pessimistic assessment of actual response times

3 It is acknowledged that performance in major applications could be improved and this will in part be aided by better data collection and recording in this area. With regard to minor applications performance varies across the Division with some Unit Management Teams requiring to improve overall performance. However it has been agreed that in line with the requirement for continuous improvement that a target of 65% should now be set for 2003.

4. With regard to the Operating Companies they are required to submit a recommendation to RNMMD within 5 days of receipt of the planning application and form TR/NPA/1. Performance in this area requires improvement although all Operating Companies are achieving a median response time of 6 days. Again the Operating Companies show a significant improvement in this area over 2001.

5. 778 trunk road development control consultations were received in 2002. Nearly 75% of these related to domestic or commercial applications. 13% of all consultations are considered to be major applications. It is of some concern that the time taken to consult with RNMMD on some applications is still quite lengthy and on average 29 days however the median time is 16 days.

6. Data was obtained from the RNMMD Development Control Database which is under constant development. The accuracy of data input needs to be improved and this will be addressed through development and training.

7. Early in 2003 RNMMD will write to all Planning Authorities inviting them to send consultations electronically to both ourselves and the Operating Companies. This should help remove sometimes lengthy postal delays but will require development and discussion to ensure that consultation remains effective.

Detailed Analysis and Tables

The following tables have been prepared using the RNMMD development control database. Data for 2002 analysed using those applications where the date of receipt of the TR/NPA/1 from the Planning Authority is recorded as being between 1/1/2002 and 31/12/2002. Spurious and incorrect data has been excluded from the analysis.

Table 1: Number of Trunk Road Applications by Planning Authority

Planning Authority

Number of Trunk Road Applications per Authority

Aberdeen City Council

24

Aberdeenshire Council

67

Angus Council

7

Argyll and Bute Council

67

City of Edinburgh Council

11

Dumfries and Galloway Council

44

Dundee City Council

6

East Ayrshire Council

9

East Lothian Council

12

East Renfrewshire Council

0

Falkirk Council

20

Fife Council

12

Glasgow City Council

19

The Highland Council

178

Inverclyde Council

23

Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park

9

Midlothian Council

6

North Ayrshire Council

26

North Lanarkshire Council

22

Perth and Kinross Council

36

Renfrewshire Council

20

Scottish Borders Council

18

South Ayrshire Council

54

South Lanarkshire Council

33

Stirling Council

17

The Moray Council

22

West Dunbartonshire Council

6

West Lothian Council

10

Total number of applications

778

Notes:

1. There were no applications in East Dunbartonshire or Clackmannanshire Council Areas affecting trunk roads. There are no trunk roads in the 3 Scottish Island Council Areas.

Table 2: Time taken between receipt of planning application by Planning Authority and receipt of consultation by RNMMD

Planning Authority

Minimum (days)

Maximum (days)

Average (days)

Median (days)

Aberdeen City Council

8

1018

96

25

Aberdeenshire Council

5

148

33

22

Angus Council

8

36

19

14

Argyll and Bute Council

1

73

17

11

City of Edinburgh Council

7

991

124

19

Dumfries and Galloway Council

1

141

18

8

Dundee City Council

21

50

32

25

East Ayrshire Council

8

32

19

15

East Lothian Council

7

52

29

25

East Renfrewshire Council

-

-

-

-

Falkirk Council

7

176

31

21

Fife Council

11

762

81

22

Glasgow City Council

10

60

26

19

The Highland Council

1

1262

24

11

Inverclyde Council

6

83

25

17

Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Authority

5

139

35

15

Midlothian Council

14

567

134

44

North Ayrshire Council

5

1113

66

15

North Lanarkshire Council

7

52

24

21

Perth and Kinross Council

6

54

17

15

Renfrewshire Council

6

306

38

18

Scottish Borders Council

6

58

22

22

South Ayrshire Council

8

358

33

26

South Lanarkshire Council

3

248

28

15

Stirling Council

12

365

50

23

The Moray Council

7

181

39

28

West Dunbartonshire Council

10

44

23

17

West Lothian Council

10

93

42

46

All Planning Authorities

1

1262

29

16

Notes:

1. Days calculated from date of receipt of TR/NPA/1 by RNMMD minus date of receipt of application reported by Planning Authority. Significant postal delays can occur at the start and end of the consultation period and this is critical when only 14 days is allowed for consultation. Increased use of electronic consultation should aid in reducing delays in this area.

2. As a long maximum period can seriously effect the average performance the median period was calculated as a better measure of overall consultation period.

3. This table is included as it is considered that consultation as early as possible with RNMMD will ensure that overall delays to the processing of an application by the Planning Authority will be minimised. RNMMD are often asked for their views on an application with little notice prior to a determination. The longest recorded consultation delay periods were for the following 10 applications:

  • Proposed Sand and Gravel Quarry
  • Erection of car wash
  • Installation of ATM Cash Dispenser within shop
  • Extraction of Coal by Opencast Mining
  • Industrial/Business Park
  • Change of use of Vacant Land to Housing
  • COU of farm building to form vehicle repair workshop
  • Business Park
  • Mixed use Development comprising offices and flats
  • Demolish existing house and erect new dwellinghouse

Table 3: Proportion of Application by Type

Type of Application

%

Commercial

51

Domestic

22

Quarrying/Mining

1

Residential

14

Telecommunications Masts

6

Other

6

Notes:

1. Residential applications deemed to be those for more than 2 dwellings within an application site. Consultations on advertisement consents are not included in the analysis.

Table 4: Performance of Operating Companies (Equivalent 2001 figures in brackets)

Operating Company

Range (days)

% in less than or equal to 6 days

Median Response time (days)

North East (BEAR Scotland Ltd)

0 - 49

51 (42)

6

North West (BEAR Scotland Ltd)

0 - 89

52 (30)

6

South East (Amey Highways Ltd)

0 -32

60 (39)

6

South West (Amey Highways Ltd)

0 - 53

52 (31)

6

Notes:

1. The Operating Companies are required to submit a recommendation to RNMMD within 5 days of receipt of the planning application and form TR/NPA/1 from the Planning Authority. 6 days is used as a measure to allow for the possibility of different date of receipt by RNMMD and the OC.

Table 5A: Performance of Scottish Executive - Minor Applications

% of replies in less than or equal to 14 days (2002)

62

Notes:

1. The target in this area is to reply to 60% of minor application consultations within 14 days of receipt. Performance calculated using date of transmission of TR/NPA/2 return minus date of receipt of TR/NPA/1 consultation in calendar days.

Table 5B: Performance of Scottish Executive - Major Applications

Number of applications as % of total number considered to be major applications

13

% of replies to consultations within 14 days of receipt of acceptable supporting data provided by the applicant (i.e. an audited Transport Assessment).

78

Notes:

1. The target in this area is to reply to 100% of major application consultations within 14 days of receipt of acceptable supporting data provided by the applicant.

Page updated: Thursday, April 6, 2006