On this page:

'Voice of the Child' - Under the Children (Scotland) Act 1995

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

'Voice of the Child' Under the Children (Scotland) Act 1995: Volume 1-Mapping Paper

Appendix B Table by Section of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995

Sec

Subject

Summary

Rule/Reg

Guidance

Comment

1

Parental Responsibilities

Defines parental responsibilities.

Subsection (3): The child or someone acting on the child's behalf has title to sue or to defend any proceedings, as respects parental responsibilities

2

Parental Rights

Defines parental rights. These largely mirror parental responsibilities.

However, S2(3) says "Without prejudice to any court order, no person shall be entitled to remove a child habitually resident in Scotland from, or to retain any such child outwith, the United Kingdom without the consent of a person described in subsection (6) below."

Subsection (6) refers to "a person… who for the time being has and is exercising" rights of residence or regular contact as regards the child. Where both the child's parents fall into that category, the consent of both is required.

Whilst S6 (see below) could be interpreted as requiring those persons with the right to consent to consult the child, the absolute character of this section detracts from the responsibility to give due weight to the child's views. It is also arguable that the terms of this subsection override the rider to S1 which limits parental responsibility (and therefore rights) to action which is in the interests of the child. The child could apply for a court order under S11 to override the lack of consent. The practical significance of this is discussed in the main mapping paper

3

Provisions relating both to parental responsibilities and to parental rights

Sets out the starting point for the allocation of parental responsibilities and rights as regards mothers and married, or unmarried, fathers. Subsection (5) allows those with parental responsibilities and rights to arrange for them to be carried out by someone else on their behalf.

Action taken under subsection (5), although not defined as a "major" decision, might well fall within the scope of S6 as regards having regard to the child's views.

4

Acquisition of parental rights and responsibilities by natural father

Allows the natural parents to register an agreement conferring parental responsibilities and rights on the unmarried father.

Whilst it is not specifically designated as guidance, the material issued by The Scottish Office as an accompaniment to the form prescribed for this agreement, quotes S6 with regard to the views of the child and adds, "The mother should also pay attention to the child's views if he or she wishes to express them…. If the child really understands what it is about and doesn't want the mother to make the agreement, the mother should think very hard about whether it would still be in the child's interests to make the agreement.

While the Act itself does not specify this as a "major decision" in terms of S6, it appears to be being treated as such in official documentation.

5

Care or control of child by person without parental responsibilities or parental rights

Gives some responsibilities and rights to persons with care and control of a child but no formal authority.

(1) Someone with responsibility for a child (but no parental responsibilities or rights) may take action to safeguard the child's health, development and welfare; and may give consent to medical treatment for the child but (a) only where the child cannot give consent, and (b) it is not within the carer's knowledge that the parent would refuse consent.

S6(1)(a) requires the views of the child to be taken into account by those exercising responsibility under S5.

6

Views of children

Requires those exercising parental responsibility or authority under S5 to consult children on major decisions.

(1) A person reaching any 'major decision' in fulfilment of parental responsibilities, or as carer under S. 5 (1), or a person who is exercising a parental right or giving consent, must have regard 'so far as is practicable' to the views (if the child wishes to express them) of the child concerned, taking account of the child's age and maturity …

Presumption of sufficient age and maturity at age 12.

(2) A transaction entered into in good faith by a third party and a person acting as legal representative of a child cannot be challenged on the ground the child was not consulted or that due regard was not given to the child's views.

A significant and innovative provision, promoting regard for the views of the child. However it lacks weight in terms of enforcement, particularly because of S6(2). Neither does it identify what counts as a "major decision," (apart from in S7 below). It is debatable whether any definition would be helpful. This can be decided only after monitoring of how it has been interpreted.

7

Appointment of guardians

Regulates the appointment of testamentary guardians, which is defined as a "major decision" for the purposes of S6 regarding children's views.

The child's views are regarded as relevant when the decision to nominate a guardian is made. However, some time might elapse between this nomination and the appointment taking effect on the parent's death. The child's views are not required at that stage. The child can have recourse to the court in terms of S11 to have the appointment set aside, but perhaps this is not wholly satisfactory.

8

Revocation and other termination of appointment

Addresses problems which might arise where a number of successive appointments are made with no clear expression of the appointer's intention. Specifies when appointments terminate.

Refers back to S7, and therefore embraces S6 as regards the views of the child to the extent that these are relevant in relation to the matters regulated, some of which are formal and for the avoidance of doubt.

9

Safeguarding of child's property

Deals with situations in which property is due to be transferred to a parent to administer as the child's legal representative. Specifies monetary limits above which recourse may or must be made to the Accountant of Court, who may direct that the property be administered by himself, or by the child's parents or guardians (with the option of adding conditions), or who may apply to the court for appointment of a judicial factor.

S6 would apply to the actions of those exercising parental responsibility. Query - whether this would apply to the Accountant of Court's decision to apply for appointment of a judicial factor, or the court's decision to appoint one? The appointment of a judicial factor is regulated by S11(2)(g) "in the relevant circumstances", i.e., where application is made by persons specified in subsection (3), or, "that although no such application has been made, the court.. considers it should make such an order." Query, whether that is broad enough to embrace appointment of a judicial factor in terms of S9(5)(a) or 13(2)(a). If it is, then S11 (see below) would require account to be taken of children's views as appropriate.

10

Obligations and rights of person administering child's property

Obliges such a person to act with reasonable prudence, to account for his or her actions, etc., and restricts liability where money used for child's welfare

Query whether the S6 duty to take account of the views of the child applies to the Accountant of Court or the judicial factor? The definition of "legal representative" in S15(5) may well indicate that it does.

11

Court orders relating to parental responsibilities etc.

Identifies orders the Court of Session or sheriff court might make as regards parental responsibilities and rights.

(7) (b) In considering whether or not to make any order, the court (taking account of the child's age and maturity) shall so far as is practicable give the child an opportunity to indicate whether the child wishes to express a view. If the child does, the child should be given an opportunity to express his/ her views and the court must have regard to the child's views

(9) clarifies that this provision does not require the child to be legally represented, in the proceedings, if he does not want to be

(10) presumption a child 12 years of age or more is of sufficient age and maturity to form a view

Sheriff Court

A.S.93 4:

Rule 13. 1: A person not called as a defender or third party may apply by Minute to enter process (this applies to child in family action).

Rule33. 7 h: Notice in Form 9 must be sent to child, where section 11 order sought or, under 33.7 (7), pursuer should crave dispensation with intimation on child.

Rule 33.20: where child has expressed view (can be in various ways), sheriff or someone appointed by the sheriff must record views and the sheriff may decide they should be kept confidential.

Rule 33.22A (5): all parties and child who has expressed wish to attend, must attend child welfare hearing.

Rule 33.19 prohibits the sheriff from granting an order affecting any child who has indicated the wish to express views, unless the child had had the opportunity to express them, and the sheriff has given due weight to them.

The Rules seek to respect the requirement re the child's views by requiring intimation in a special form, by allowing a procedure for the child's views to be kept confidential, and by allowing the child who wishes to express views to attend the Child Welfare Hearing.

Rule 33.22A(5) is strangely worded as regards the Child Welfare Hearing, mixing obligations with expressions of desire. Query - the meaning of "party" in this context; it appears to legally restrict the provision to a child who is party to the proceedings, although in practice this may not be the case.

The sheriff's power to dispense with intimation on the child has the potential to undermine the requirements regarding the child's views. See main mapping paper for discussion.

11

Continued

Rule 33.26 extends this requirement to the sheriff's decision to issue a decree in respect of a joint minute by the parties. Court of Session

RCS 49.8(1)(h) requires warrant to intimate to any child for whom a S11 order is concluded. Form 49.8-N sent instead of summons.

Service/intimation may be dispensed with on application (r49.8(8))

The Court shall order intimation to any child for whom it is considering a S11 order in a divorce action, unless intimation has already been done or it decides to dispense and/or the child is considered too young (r49.15(2)).

An "interested party" may lodge a minute for leave to be sisted as a party (r.49.16).

Where a child had returned Form 49.8-N or otherwise indicated a wish to express a view, no order shall be granted unless an opportunity has been given for the child's views to be obtained or heard (r.49.20(1)).

There is no provision in the Court of Session Rules for the views of the child to be kept confidential.

11

Continued

The court is to order "appropriate" steps to ascertain the child's views, and "due weight" is to be given to them (rr.49.20(2) and (3)) .

Court reporter may be appointed, but no specific mention of ascertaining views (r49.22).

Re joint minutes - no decree until child's views expressed (r49.27)

Post-decree S11 applications, no mention of intimation to children. R. 49.20 will apply, but query whether r48.8(1)(h) does. Is this an "action" in terms of r.49.8(1)(h)?

12

Restrictions on decrees for divorce, separation or annulment affecting children

Requires the court to consider the arrangements for children, and decide whether to exercise its power to make orders under S11 or S54 (refer to the Children's Reporter).

If a court decides that: (a) the exercise of such powers may be appropriate; (b) it is no in a position to exercise them without further consideration; and (c) there are exceptional circumstances leading it to delay grant of decree until it is in a position to exercise those powers, it "shall postpone its decision on the granting of the decree in the action" until it is in a position to exercise them.

A.S. 93, Rule 33.15(2) addresses the situation in which a sheriff is considering whether to make a S11 order by virtue of S12. It requires the sheriff to order intimation on the child, unless the child has already received intimation, or the sheriff considers the child is not of sufficient age or maturity to express his views. He may also dispense with intimation where he considers it would be appropriate to do so, or postpone intimation

Two grounds are given for the sheriff's dispensation with the obligation to intimate on the child: one relates to "appropriateness" (which is the same as Rule 33.7(7), discussed re S11 above), the other relates to the child's age and maturity with regard to the expressions of views.

Re the S54 referral, there is no specific requirement to take account of the child's views.

See discussion in main mapping paper.

13

Awards of damages to children

Sets out the options open to a court when a sum of money becomes payable to or for a child in court proceedings. This includes the appointment of a judicial factor, or payment to the sheriff clerk, accountant of court or parent or guardian of the child, or to the child directly.

There is no requirement to take account of the views of the child. Norrie (1998) notes that this is "surprising." 5

14

Jurisdiction and choice of law in relation to certain matters

Largely formal issues of jurisdiction and choice of law. However, Subsection (4) says that, even if the Scottish courts are required to take cognisance of the law of another jurisdiction in relation to orders to which S11(1) applies, nothing in that law shall affect the application of S11(7), i.e., the three fundamental principles of the 1995 Act, including the provisions relating to the views of the child.

This is an important safeguard for children with international links whose cases are before the Scottish courts.

15

Interpretation of Part I

Defines "child," "parent" and other significant terms. S15(5) limits the authority of the child's "legal representatives" (the child's parents in most situations) to the administration of property, or to circumstances in which the child him or herself is incapable of acting or consenting. Nevertheless, allows the legal representative to sue or defend in civil proceedings relating to a competent child, where that child so agrees."

Acknowledges the growing autonomy of the child, and allows the competent child appropriate options as regards legal representation.

16

Welfare of child and consideration of his views

Identifies three basic principles to be respected by courts and children's hearings in specified matters: paramountcy of child's welfare, consideration of child's views, and no unnecessary orders.

S16(1) sets out the welfare principle.

S16(2) says: "In the circumstances mentioned in subsection (4) below, a children's hearing or as the case may be a sheriff, taking account of the age and maturity of the child concerned, shall so far as practicable - (a) give him an opportunity to indicate whether he wishes to express his views; (b) if he does so wish, give him an opportunity to express them; and (c) have regard to such views as he may express; and without prejudice to the generality of this subsection a child of twelve years of age shall be presumed to be of sufficient age and maturity to form a view."

S16(5) allows a children's hearing or court to depart form the principle of the paramountcy of the child's welfare where necessary to protect the public from serious harm.

A.S. 97 rr.3.2 - 3.5 prescribe the forms for applications in matters covered by S16(4); authorise the sheriff to dispense with the child's attendance at the hearing of the application, and with service on the child if, taking account of the age and maturity of the child, he is satisfied that it would be inappropriate to order service on the child; order that part of the application be not served on the child; and set out procedures for ascertainment of the child's views, where the child has expressed a wish to do so. The sheriff may direct that the views of the child be kept confidential. Rule 3.5 gives the sheriff discretion as to how to ascertain the views of the child, and sets out a number of illustrative examples, which are discussed in the main mapping paper. Rule 3.15 sets out modes of service.

While S16(1) applies the welfare principle to "any" decision of a court or children's hearing (subject to the "serious public harm" exception in S16(5)), S16(2) requires the views of the child to be taken into account only in specified circumstances. The relationship between the welfare and views of the child is discussed in the main mapping paper. Within this Appendix, the summary column relating to each section will indicate whether S16(2) applies. Sometimes an absence of application of S16(2) is redressed by a Rule or Regulation which does require ascertainment of the child's views, or guidance that suggests that this would be appropriate. Where this is the case, it is indicated in the appropriate columns.

The Rules of Court appear to dilute the strength of the Act with regard to the child's views, by making participation more optional. Thus, the S16(2) obligation to take account of the child's views, is reflected in AS3.2 by the word "may." The power to dispense with intimation on the child in AS3.3 uses the criterion of appropriateness; while S16(2) refers to the more restrictive criterion of practicability. It should be noted that S68(4)(b) gives the child a right to attend the hearing of the application for establishment of grounds of referral, See also the comment re S68 concerning the sheriff's power to exclude a child due to the nature of the evidence.

17

Duty of local authority to child looked-after by them

Defines "looked-after" children, and sets out the duties of the local authority towards them. S17(3) says: "Before making any decision with respect to a child whom they are looking after, or proposing to look after, a local authority shall, so far as is reasonably practicable, ascertain the views of - (a) the child…" S17(4) says: In making any such decision a local authority shall have regard so far as practicable - (a) to the views (if he wishes to express them) of the child concerned, taking account of his age and maturity....."

S17(5): "If, for the purpose of protecting members of the public from serious harm (whether or not physical harm) a local authority consider it necessary to exercise, in a manner which (but for this paragraph) would not be consistent with their duties under this section, their powers with respect to a child whom they are looking after, they may do so."

The Arrangements Regs:

  • Schedule 2 Part II (6) requires the local authority's care plan to address "arrangements for involving those persons and the child in decision-making".
  • Reg 5 (3): in regard to placement congruent with religious persuasion "having ascertained so far as practicable the views of the child having regard to his age and maturity .."
  • Reg. 5 (4) , regarding placement for more than one child in family, has the same requirement to consult children as in Reg. 5 (3)

The Scottish Office guidance (Vol. 2, Ch. 1) refers to the need to take account of the views of looked-after children in a number of contexts. It sometimes speaks of "feelings" or "wishes" rather than views:

  • monitoring of care plan: record feelings and wishes after each visit. See child and carer(s) alone as well as together. (Para 76)
  • case records should make it easy to find out the views of children and parents re any decision. Should distinguish between siblings. (Para 127)
  • good practice involves sharing information with looked-after children, even where they do not have a legal right of access to their records. (Para 129/30)
  • local authorities should discover a child's wishes about contact with parents and other family members. If a child is resistant to contact, the local authority should help the child clarify his or her views. If a child still insists on terminating or restricting contact, the local authority should consider doing so; although the decision should not ultimately rest with the child. (Para 44)

This is another general section which is relevant to some specific decisions re, e.g., Ss 72 and 73. It is referred to in the discussion of these sections. This section contains no presumption about the age of twelve.

The emphasis on the views of the child must be set within the context of S17(1)(a), which obliges the local authority to safeguard and promote the child's welfare as its paramount concern.

What counts as a 'decision' rather than a routine matter?

Any difference between "reasonably practicable" as regards the duty to ascertain views, and "as far as practicable" when "having regard" to them?

Does it make any difference to use the term 'wishes' (in guidance) versus 'views'? The emigration guidance refers to "opinion."

The Arrangements Reg 6 requires that the care plan be agreed with the parent if reasonably practicable. No requirement for children to agree, although Regs 4 and 5 refer to the child's views in relation to the making of the plan.

17

Continued

S17(6): "looked-after child" means a child:

  1. for whom accommodation is provided under s25:
  2. subject to a supervision requirement
  3. for whom a local authority has responsibilities in terms of various orders, authorisations or warrants made under this Act; or
  4. for whom a local authority has responsibilities in terms of cross-border arrangements with other parts of the UK.
  • local authorities who are satisfied that a particular placement is no longer in the child's best interests, should make arrangements to end it. Considerations in reaching such a decision include "the views of the child and his or her parents." (Para 116)
  • "Before a child who is looked-after emigrates, the local authority should satisfy itself that … the child, if he or she is old enough to form an opinion, wishes to emigrate." (Para 157)
  • local authorities considering the placement of siblings, should try to ensure that they are placed together, unless this would not be in the best interests of one or more of them. "The views of each child should be ascertained, as far as is possible given their age and understanding." (Para 19)

Re S17(5): while the equivalent provision for courts and children's hearings in S16(5) exempts these bodies only from application of the principle of paramountcy, the s17(5) exemption applies also to the views of the child.

Re S17(6): Note broad range of children included as looked-after.

Some children subject to legal orders and authorisations are omitted from this definition and therefore do not benefit from the provisions of S. 17, see text below re Ss 55, 57 and 61.

Fostering

This issue has been placed here because it follows on logically from S17. It is addressed in regulations rather than the provisions of the Act.

The Arrangements Regs set out the requirements for care plans, review of children's cases, record keeping and the monitoring and termination of placements. The Fostering Regs provide for approval and regulation of foster carers and the making and regulation of foster placements.

Considerable references within Vol 2, Ch 3 of the Scottish Office guidance, e.g.

  • Social workers should involve foster carers' own children in preparation process. (Para 23)
  • particular attention should be paid to children with disabilities and communications needs. (Para 85)
  • The more mature the child, the more fully the child will be able to enter into discussions about plans and proposals. Need for information, explanations and reassurance, especially for younger children. Children should not feel the burden of decision-making. (Para 89)
  • when an allegation against a foster carer is being investigated, decisions about whether a child should remain in the foster home during the investigation should take account of welfare and safety considerations and the views of the child. (Para 67)

The Fostering Regs do not have a specific focus on the views of the child, but must be interpreted against the background of S17 and also the care plan requirements of the Arrangements Regs.

The guidance recognises the need for the views of the foster carer's children to be taken into account during the preparation process. Should this not be an ongoing process, subject to review?

The guidance appropriately recognises the communication needs of disabled children. Perhaps there should be a more general and explicit commitment to this as regards all children.

Residential Care

This issue has been placed here because it follows on logically from S17. It is addressed in regulations rather than the provisions of the Act.

The Residential Regs:

  • Reg 5 requires residential establishments registered under Act to have statement of functions and objectives.
  • Reg 17: when a local authority places child in a residential establishment, it should provide the person in charge with "any other information which the local authority considers relevant to the placement including information about the child's wishes and feelings about the placement, so far as this is appropriate having regard to his age and maturity"

Scottish Office guidance, Vol 2, Ch. 4:

  • Children and their parents should be given a clear statement of their rights and responsibilities. They should have a confidential means of making complaints. They should be involved in decisions affecting them and the running of the home. (Para 23)
  • The home should convey to children the practical arrangements for them to exercise their rights and responsibilities - notably rights to be involved in decisions about their own lives and the running of the home and access to independent advocates. Staff should foster a culture in which children are encouraged to express their views. (Para 24)
  • Complaints procedure should be easily understood and readily accessible to the children and staff. It should include provision for children to gain access, e.g., through a private telephone, to a person independent of the establishment. (Para 25)
  • Children can also be happier about food when they are consulted about the menu. (Para 28)
  • Children should have some choice of leisure and recreation. (Para 29)
  • Personal records should include the views of the child and his or her parents about the placement. (Para 51)
  • External management should visit the establishment to talk with and listen to children, parents and staff. (Para 56)

The Residential Regs refer to "wishes and feelings" rather than "views."

Reg 17 requires written information about some matters, but only "information" about the child's wishes and feelings.; they do not have to be written down.

Residential Care - continued

  • Reg 14 "The managers in consultation with the person in charge should, so far as is practicable and having regard to the child's wishes and feelings, arrange that every child accommodated in the establishment is able to attend such religious services and to receive such religious instruction as may be appropriate to the child's religious persuasion"

18

Duty of persons with parental responsibilities to notify change of address to local authority looking after child

As per title

Not relevant

19

Local authority plans for services for children

Requires periodic publication by the local authority of plans for "relevant services" for children, preceded by a process of consultation.

(5) In preparing any plan, or carrying out any review … a local authority shall consult … (b) such voluntary organisations as appear to the authority - (i) to represent the interests of persons who us or are likely to use relevant services in that area; or …

(f) such other persons as the Secretary of State may direct.

Scottish Office Guidance, Vol 1, Ch. 2:

  • Children and families currently using the services should be consulted. (Para 22)
  • Before consulting on content, local authorities "may wish to consult first on … the means of taking views of children and their families" (Para 23)

No requirement in law to consult directly with children and young people. Must consult with voluntary organisations that represent interests - not necessarily self-advocacy. Could be dominance of welfare interests rather than children's views.

Secretary of State has not directed that children and young people be consulted.

However, guidance places greater emphasis on direct consultation with children and young people.

The Scottish Executive has issued a Child Strategy Statement encouraging departments to consult children and young people on proposed policy developments.

20

Publication of information about services for children

As per title

Not relevant

21

Co-operation between authorities

As per title

Not relevant

22

Promotion of welfare of children in need

Requires local authorities to safeguard and promote the welfare of children in need (defined in S 93) by provision of a range and level of services for such children and/or their families

Scottish Office guidance Vol 1, Ch. 1, para 22 states: "in arranging services to meet the assessed needs of individual children and their families … local authorities should … listen to children and take account of their views". However, para 16 does not require the child's views to be ascertained as part of the assessment on the basis of which the services are arranged.

Scottish Office Guidance Vol 1, Ch. 6, para 29 points out that children 'in need' may use the statutory local authority complaints procedures.

No requirement in law to give 'due regard' to children's views

"Child" is defined as up to age 18.

It is questionable whether the availability of complaints procedures is adequate compensation for lack of the opportunity to express views on assessment of need.

23

Children affected by disability

Defines 'disability.' Identifies the aims of services for disabled children and those children adversely affected by the disability of any person in the child's family. Obliges local authorities to assess such a child, or the other disabled person within the family, on the request of the child's parent or guardian.

Scottish Office guidance, Vol 1, Ch. 6:

  • "The plan and agreement should take account of the child's view and note any areas of disagreement between the social work department, the family or other agencies" (Para 18)
  • "When undertaking assessment of children affected by disability, workers should listen to the child or young person and respect his or her views … give time and privacy to help them talk about their situation and worries." (Para 21)
  • "Achieving partnerships with parents and children in the planning and delivery of services to children requires that … they should be given help to express their views and wishes … professionals and other workers should listen to and take account of parents' and children's views." (Para 23)
  • "It may not always be appropriate to have parents or other family members act as a means of communication between professionals and children and young people." Applies to children with complex needs or communication difficulties. Refers to availability of aids to communication. (Para 24)
  • An extensive discussion on balancing child's right to state their views with the danger of overburdening children. (Paras 24-27)
  • Advocacy for children and families … is one of the functions of the social worker. In addition, a child and family may want an independent person. (Para 28)

No requirement in law to give 'due regard' to children's views

Child's parent or guardian may request assessment - the child has no legal right to do so.

Guidance pays substantial attention to consultation with children, with some gaps

23

Continued

  • A Special Educational Needs assessment should take into account the views and wishes of the child and his or her parents. (Para 47)

24

Assessment of ability of carers to provide care for disabled children

Duty on local authority to carry out an assessment if a carer so requests.

No requirement in law to give 'due regard' to children's views.

Where a child is the carer, some might query The right of a child (under age 16) to request such an assessment: a question of the legal competency of the child.

25

Provision of accommodation for children, etc.

Sets out the duty of a local authority to provide accommodation for a child in certain circumstances, and a power to do so in other cases.

(5) Before providing a child with accommodation under this section, a local authority shall have regard, so far as practicable, to his views (if he wishes to express them), taking account of his age and maturity; and without prejudice to the generality of this subsection a child twelve years of age or more shall be presumed to be of sufficient age and maturity…

(6) and (7) prohibit the provision of accommodation against the wishes of anyone with parental responsibility who is willing and able to provide suitable accommodation. If there is a residence order, this right is restricted to the person named in the order. A young person aged 16 or over can give their own agreement, even if the parents object.

Scottish Office guidance, Vol 1, Ch. 4, merely reinforces the Act.

This provision includes the age of 12 presumption.

Up to the age of 16, a parent's ability and wish to provide accommodation would override the child's wish to be accommodated. A child in a difficult situation might qualify for safe refuge (S 38), or another route of emergency intervention or compulsory care might be considered in appropriate cases.

Norrie (1996) regrets that this provision concentrates on the age of 16 rather than the gradualist approach to competence of the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991 (ALCA 91).

"Accommodated" children are included within the definition of "looked-after" in S17(6), so subsequent decisions would also need to take account of the child's views.

26

Manner of provision of accommodation to child looked-after by local authority

Sets out placement options within the UK.

As this refers to looked-after children, S. 17 will require the local authority to have regard to the child's views.

27

Day care for pre-school and other children

Local authorities are obliged to make provision for day care, out of school care and holiday care for 'children in need' and empowered to provide it for other children. Facilities can be provided for those caring for children in day care or those who accompany them.

Refer back to guidance on S. 22.

There is no requirement to consult children about the provision of these services.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Monday, June 5, 2006