« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
MANAGING RADIOACTIVE WASTE SAFELY
References
Arnstein, S R (1971) 'A Ladder of Participation in the USA', Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute, pp 176-182
Asian Development Bank, Public consultation strategy (February 2001) http://www.adb.org/Environment/envpol/consultation-policy.asp
Beierle,T (1998) Public participation in environmental decisions; an evaluation framework using social goals. Resources for the Future. http://www.rff.org/about_rff/web_bios/beierle.htm
Beierle, T and Cahill, S (2000) ' Electronic Democracy and Environmental Governance: A Survey of the United States', RFF Discussion Paper 00-42
Beierle, T and Cahill, S (2001), Technology in Participatory Environmental Management in the US, Resources for the Future. http://www.rff.org/about_rff/web_bios/beierle.htm
Best Value Task Force (1997), Scottish Office Circular 22/97, Edinburgh: Report to Secretary of State
Boyes L, Davies M, Elrick, D, Lyons A, Leicester G and McCormick, J (2001) Out of the Ordinary: the Power of Ambition in an Uncertain World, Edinburgh: SCF
Brown, L (2000) Evaluation of the Local Rural Partnership Scheme, Edinburgh: Stationary Office. 39pp
Brown, M and Elrick, D (1999) 'Best Value from Local Government? A Community Development Perspective.' Scottish Journal of Community Work & Development, Vol 4, SCEC & SCDC, pp39-68
Burns, D, Hambleton, R and Hoggett, P (1994), The Politics of Decentralisation, Revitalising Local Democracy, MacMillan Press, London
Canadian Council on Social Development (CCSD), (2001), Talking with Canadians: Citizen Engagement and the Social Union, Ottawa
The City of Vancouver, How to Participate in City Processes: A Guide for the Publichttp://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/commsvcs/planning/pubinvolveguide/
Dr. Cunningham, Cabinet Office, (March 1999), Do People's Panels represent the people Public management and policy association lecture.
Code of practice on written consultation Applies to consultation documents issued after 1 January 2001, Cabinet Office, November 2000 ,www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/servicefirst/index/consultation.htm
COSLA 2002, Summary of Special Initiatives to Promote Community Engagement, Edinburgh: COSLA
Community Planning Task Force (2002) Engaging Communities: where to find out more information, Edinburgh: COSLA
Consultative Steering Group (1999) Shaping Scotland's Parliament Report of the Consultative Steering Group on the Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh: Stationary Office
DEFRA, (September 2001), Managing Radioactive Waste Safely: Proposals for developing a policy for managing solid radioactive waste in the UK DEFRA
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998) Modernising Local Government Local Democracy and Community Leadership, London: DETR
Downie, A and Forsyth, B (2001) The Report on the Proposal for a Loch Lomond and The Trossachs National Park Evaluation of the Consultation Programme, Report 4, Perth: SNH
Durant, J (1994), UK National Consensus Conference on Plant Biotechnology, Final report of the lay panel, London
Discussion Paper on Approaches to Consultation - Status of Women Canada, http://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/consult/consult-e.pdf
Donnison, D (1994) By What Authority? Ethics and Policy Analysis Social Policy Administration, Vol. 28, No 1, 1994, pp20-32
Edwards, L (2001) What role for the public in tackling crime? Public Participation in the Criminal Justice System, London: IPPR
Edwards, L (August 2001) LGA and IPPR, Involving young people in decision making - a survey of local authorities, Research briefing 10 http://www.lga.gov.uk/Documents/Publication/youngpeople.PDF
Edwards, L (January 2001), Why having a vote isn't enough New Democratic Spaces: focus group findings, London: IPPR
Elrick, D (1995) Decentralisation: An opportunity for Local Democracy and Community Empowerment, Edinburgh: SCEC
Elrick, D (1996) A Very Practical Process: Needs led participation, Edinburgh: SCEC
Elrick, D (1998) Scotland's Community Councils, Edinburgh: SCEC
Elrick, D (1999) Decentralisation: Analysis of the Scottish Local Authority Decentralisation Schemes, Edinburgh: SCEC & COSLA
Elrick, D and MacIntosh, J, (1999), Scotland's Community Council 1999 Survey, Edinburgh: SCEC
Estrella, M (2000). Learning from Change: Issues and Experiences in Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation. Intermediate
INRA (2002) Europeans and Radioactive Waste Report, (2002), INRA (Europe),
Ferguson, R and Malina, C (1999) Reaching out to Multiple Stakeholders - EPA's Public Outreach and Communications Programme for the WIPP, Second International Symposium on Ionizing Radiation, Ottawa, Ontario: Canada
Gregory, R (June 2000) Using Stakeholder Values to Make Smarter Environmental Decisions, Environment Magazine, Heldref Publications: Washington
Gram, S and Kluver, L (2001) Copenhagen Traffic, EUROPTA case studieswww.tekno.dk/europta
Hallhead, V, Say, P and Downie, A (2001) Act Local Community Planning for Sustainable Development The Duthchas Handbook, Inverness Duthchas 62pp
Hambleton, R and Hoggett, P (1990) Beyond Excellence: Quality Local Government in the 1990s, Paper 85, School for Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol
Harris, R and Robinson, S (2000) Designing the decision process for the managing radioactive waste safely consultation, The Environment Council, paper for stakeholder dialogue members
Harris, R (2000) Why Dialogue is Different, The Environment Council, paper for stakeholder dialogue members
Hunt, J and Wynne, B (May 2000), Forums for dialogue: developing legitimate authority through communication and consultation. Report for Nirex, Centre for Study of Environmental Change: Lancaster, Lancaster University.
Hunt, J and Wynne, B (2000) Forums for Dialogue: Developing Legitimate Authority through Communication and Consultation, Report for Nirex, Centre for the Study of Environmental Change: Lancaster: Lancaster University
Hunt, J, Day, K and Kemp, R (March 2001), Stakeholder Dialogue - experience and analysis. Lancaster University/Galson Sciences Limited, Environment Agency/Nirex, United Kingdom.
Laird, A, Fawcett J, Rait, F and Reid, S (2000) Assessment of Innovative Approaches to Testing Community Opinion, Edinburgh: The Stationary Office
Martin, S (1999) Achieving best value through public engagement, Paper Number 8, Steve Martin, London: DETR
Mitchell, C L (2001) Is Internet Strengthening the Democratic Strata in Developed and Underdeveloped Countries? Paper delivered for delivery at the Western Political Science Association Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada March 2001 www.casayego.com/webconf/papers/dstrata/dstrata.htm
Morkrid, A (2001) Consensus Conferences on genetically modified food in Norway, OECD www.oecd.org/puma/citizens
McCormick, J (2001) Evaluation of the Glasgow People's Jury on Drugs, Glasgow: Glasgow Alliance
McCormick, J (2000) Beyond Disappointment: Building Better Communities, Edinburgh: Scottish Council Foundation
Nath, V (2000) Networking Networks for Empowerment and Governance, Global Development Network World Bank, Japan, http://www.cddc.vt.edu/digitalgov/gov-menu.html
Draft paper on public participation in NEHAP, The National Environmental Health Action Plan (NEHAP), 2001 http://mama-86.org.ua/publications/nehap_eng/index.htm
Netvalue (November, 2001) http://uk.netvalue.com/
OECD (July 2001) Engaging Citizens in Policy Making, Puma Policy Brief No. 10, OECD Publications:Paris
OECD (2001) Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making (handbook), OECD Publications:Paris
OECD (2001) Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making, OECD Publications:Paris
OECD (2001) Engaging Citizens in Policy Making: information, consultation and public participation, OECD Publications:Paris
Rogers, S, Smith, M, Sullivan, H and Clarke, M (2000) Community Planning in Scotland An Evaluation of the Pathfinder Projects. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive and COSLA.
Reeder, F S (2001) Access to information on the environment in the United States, OECD www.oecd.org/puma/citizens
Scottish Consumer Council (1997) Best Value in Local Government: the Consumer Perspective. Paper given to meeting of the Scottish Quality Exchange
Scottish Executive (2000) Empowering Communities, Social Justice Action Note, Edinburgh
Scottish Executive Development Department (2000) Findings from Working for Communities: Influencing Mainstream Services, Edinburgh: Research Findings No. 134
Scottish Office (1998) Have Your Say Consultation with Young People on Local Government and the Scottish Parliament Edinburgh: The Stationary Office
Scottish Office and COSLA (1998) Report of the Community Planning Working Group The Edinburgh: Stationery Office
Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) (1993) Public consultation, Radioactive Substances Actwww.sepa.org.uk/consultations/rsa/htm
Small, N and Rhodes, P (February 2001) Too ill to talk? User involvement and palliative care, Routledge http://www.jrf.org.uk/knowledge/findings/socialcare/271.asp
Smith, E and Macintosh, A (December 2001) What sort of Scotland do we want to live in? Electronic Consultation Study for the Scottish Executive Environment Group, International Teledemocracy Centre, Napier University
SOLACE (1998) Partnership and the Power of Community Initiative - Getting the Most Out of Local Government, Edinburgh: SOLACE
Taylor, M and McConnell, C (1988) Editorial Introduction Community Development Journal, Volume 23 No. 4, pp 222-228
US Environmental Protection Agency (January 2001) Stakeholder involvement & public participation at the US EPA - lessons learned, barriers and innovative approaches EPA-100-R-00-040 www.epa/gov/stakeholders
The World Bank (1996) World Bank Participation Sourcebook. http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/sourcebook/sbhome.htm
« Previous | Contents | Next »