On this page:

News Release

This item was published during the term of a previous administration that ended in April 2007

Listen

Consultation on future of legal aid

17/06/2005

A new structure to allow more people to benefit from civil legal aid and assistance in Scotland is among more than 40 questions posed in the Executive's 'Advice for All' consultation published today.

Under the current system there is a maximum disposable income for civil legal aid - (£9,570) and one proposal is that those earning more than the threshold to receive some support.

A concern with the current system is that the level of the upper limit may mean that those on moderate incomes will often be deterred from pursuing worthwhile cases through fear of the cost of doing so, particularly given the potentially open-ended commitment for their own costs and the costs of their opponent.

Other options for consideration include:

  • Allow Scottish Legal Aid Board additional powers to improve delivery of civil publicly funded legal assistance and to ensure adequate provision by a range of methods, including the ability to fund non-solicitors
  • Transfer the granting of solemn criminal legal aid from the courts to SLAB. The transfer of these powers could ensure better transparency and consistency and ensure better value for money for the public purse
  • Consider the introduction of means tested contributions in criminal publicly funded legal assistance with the aim of making sure that those who can afford to pay towards their own defence should do so

Deputy Justice Minister Hugh Henry said:

"The Strategic Review of the Delivery of Legal Aid, Advice and Information reported to Scottish Ministers in June 2004. It found that the current system of publicly funded legal assistance in Scotland does provide valued services to a wide range of people but it is in need of reform and development.

"The review made a number of recommendations for change in the system of legal aid and advice services and that's why we are today seeking views on proposals to improve and modernise the system, and ensure better, fairer access to support and advice.

"In particular, we recognise that the upper limit for civil legal aid can appear very arbitrary for those just above that amount. That's why - as part of the considerable range of options in this consultation - we're asking if it would be preferable to change the system so that more Scots who deserve legal aid and assistance can benefit from it.

"Efficient and effective justice services founded on the basic principles of fairness and equality are central to delivering the peaceful, prosperous Scotland we all want to live in.

"But I also believe that we need to be very clear on the purposes of legal aid and about why taxpayers' money is spent - and that's what this consultation asks respondents to consider.

"Value for money needs to be foremost in our minds when taking forward modernisation of our legal aid system.

"Only if we drive efficiencies through the system through a more effective management of publicly funded legal advice will we be able to meet our goals, whether promoting access to justice or ensuring a fair reward for those who deliver legal services funded by legal aid.

"Working together we must remain focused on the purposes for public expenditure in this area, and we must work to build a system that meets all our expectations: clients, practitioners and the taxpayer. We have made progress already but much more can be done."

Options for change include both non-legislative proposals and others that would require Parliamentary legislation.

The Strategic Review, launched in 2003, was the first comprehensive review of the operation of the 1986 Legal Aid Act.

The 2003-04 expenditure was £51.247 million for Civil Legal Aid and £102.217 million for Criminal Legal Aid.

In addition to these major categories, another £3.840 million was spent on Children's legal aid, miscellaneous categories and the Public Defence Solicitors Office.

There are over 400,000 applications for Legal Aid received by SLAB every year.

Page updated: Friday, June 17, 2005