On this page:

News Release

This item was published during the term of a previous administration that ended in April 2007

Children's services

Listen

Stronger protection for Scotland's children

02/06/2005

New legislation to improve the protection of children from sexual predators - including those who groom youngsters on the internet - has been passed by the Scottish Parliament today.

The Protection of Children and Prevention of Sexual Offences (Scotland) Bill, introduced to Parliament by the Executive in October 2004, will:

  • Allow chief constables to apply to the sheriff court for a Risk of Sexual Harm Order to restrict the activities of individuals believed to pose a risk of sexual harm to children, even if they have not been convicted
  • Strengthen the law by creating a specific offence to deal with those who groom children for the purposes of carrying out unlawful sexual activity
  • Extend existing laws relating to those who seek to make and distribute indecent images of children and young people
  • Introduce new offences to deal with those who purchase sexual services from under 18s and for those who encourage, control and arrange such services
  • Enable a sentencing judge to impose a Sexual Offences Prevention Order to restrict the movements of sex offenders upon conviction, without the need - as at present - for further evidence of threatening behaviour post conviction and a chief constable's application

Justice Minister Cathy Jamieson said:

"Child sex abuse is one of the most evil, despicable crimes in society today. It can leave emotional and physical scars that last a life time and it is vital that we do all we can to support the police, courts and other organisations in tackling this problem.

"This new legislation - part of a series of measures we are taking to tighten controls around sex offenders, will help us further improve the protection of our children from those who seek to harm them. For example, it will allow chief constables to apply to the sheriff court for a Risk of Sexual Harm Order to restrict the activities of individuals who are believed to pose a risk of sexual harm to children - even if they have not been convicted. It will also tighten the law in relation to grooming by making this a specific offence.

"We are also taking the opportunity to strengthen the protection given to young people of 16 and 17. We aim to prevent them from being abused through prostitution, pornography and other forms of sexual exploitation. We have made it an offence to purchase such services and also to arrange or control youngsters involved in these businesses.

"Together with our child protection reforms, the review of the operation of the sex offenders' registration scheme, and the provisions in the Management of Offenders Bill, this legislation will help us ensure that there is no safe haven for sex offenders in Scotland."

The four categories of behaviour that can trigger a Risk of Sexual Harm Order (RSHO) are:

  • engaging in a sexual activity involving or in the presence of a child
  • causing a child to watch a person engaging in sexual activity - including still or moving images
  • giving a child anything that relates to sexual activity
  • communicating with a child where any part of the communication is sexual

An order can be imposed on individuals who have not been convicted of an offence if a chief constable considers that this is necessary to protect children. The RHSO will apply for a minimum of two years and will set out specific activities that the person in question must not do.

The new provisions in relation to 16 and 17 year olds will criminalise the possession, making and distribution of indecent pictures of all people under 18. The provisions will however allow a defence to the charge if:

  • the picture is of a 16 or 17 year old
  • the 16 or 17 year old consents to the picture being made and/or possessed
  • the picture is not distributed
  • the accused person and the 16 or 17 year old are married, civil partners or in an established relationship

The Bill relies on the existing definition of an indecent picture, as established by the courts, of a picture that tends to corrupt or deprave the viewer.

The new provisions will also criminalise those who purchase sexual services from 16 and 17 year olds. These sexual services might include prostitution or sex-chat lines. The precise activities to be included will be for a court to decide. The definition of sexual services in the bill refers to any activity that a reasonable person believes to be sexual or for the purposes of sexual gratification. The new law will also deal with those who facilitate or arrange the provision of such services by under 18s.

A Sexual Offence Prevention Order (SOPO) is an order placed on a person who has been convicted of crimes with a sexual/violent element. For example a person might be charged with and convicted of a serious assault in circumstances where the court took the view that the motive for the assault was sexual. The orders apply for a minimum of five years and require offenders to register under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Like RSHOs, SOPOs specify activities that the person concerned must not do.

"Grooming" is the use of contact with a child to facilitate the commission of a sexual offence against that child.

At present there are a number of statutory and common law offences that might be committed during the course of grooming behaviour:

  • Fraud
  • Offences under the Communications Act (2003)
  • Offences under the Civic Government (Scotland) Act
  • Lewd and libidinous practices
  • Breach of the peace

The proposed new offence in relation grooming will be committed by a person where all the following elements are present:

  • A person who travels to meet, or actually meets, with a child who is 16 or younger, or arranges for the child to travel to the meeting
  • The person intends to carry out unlawful sexual activity against the child - evidence for this might be from materials brought by the person such as condoms or the nature of previous communications on the part of the adult
  • The person has communicated with the child on at least one previous occasion beforehand
  • The person does not reasonably believe that the child is 16 or older
  • This offence would carry a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment

Page updated: Friday, June 3, 2005