Borders Reports
Full text of statement to Parliament by
Peter Peacock, Education and Young People Minister,
on Thursday, May 6, 2004
In March 2002, a woman with learning disabilities was
admitted toBordersGeneralHospitalhaving suffered extreme levels of physical and sexual
abuse over an extended period.
In September 2002, three men were imprisoned for
this abuse.
Following these events Scottish Borders Council
commissioned respectively David Stallard, Anne Black
and Peter Bates to undertake separate pieces of work to
help them in identifying actions necessary as a
consequence of the issues that had come to
light.
Following examination of the first two reports to
Scottish Borders, the Social Work Services Inspectorate
recommended to me that they conduct a full inspection
into the department of Lifelong Care of Scottish
Borders Council and their handling of this case.
Euan Robson and I agreed to that inspection and
today I am publishing the SWSI Report.
In addition, I am today publishing a joint
statement from SWSI and the Mental Welfare Commission
that includes the recommendations from a separate
report the Mental Welfare Commission undertook at their
own volition into the case, looking at the Health
Service dimension.
In all my experience in public life, dating back over
20 years and from my experience of dealing with social
welfare issues for a National voluntary organisation over
many years, I have never come across a more
harrowing, appalling case as this.
So horrific are many of the incidents that
Parliament will understand that details of the
individuals and what happened to them should not and
will not be revealed.
As MSPs and the wider public will see the SWSI
report is a damning verdict of a catalogue of repeated
and significant failings by individuals and key
managers within the Social Work Service in the
Borders.
The Mental Welfare Commission' has
highlighted failings in health services.
Both reports show that there are also some issues
the police need to address.
These failings are not of recent origin - they
span a prolonged period - those involved had their
first contacts with Social Work back in the early
1970s.
The conclusion of the report is that a number of
other individuals were the subject of neglect and abuse as
well as the individual admitted toBordersGeneralHospital.
Over a period of
three decades those individuals variously
suffered
severe forms of:
- Physical and emotional neglect
- Sexual abuse and exploitation, and
- Financial exploitation
The report concludes that much of the abuse and
exploitation over - I repeat - three decades -
could have been avoided had appropriate action
been taken by the agencies involved.
The report graphically illustrates not just
individual failings, but also failings in:
- Comprehensive assessment and care
planning
- The understanding of provisions for
guardianship
- adherence to local policy and national
guidelines
- a failure to follow Scottish Social Services
Council Codes of practice
- Failings in Information sharing between
agencies
- Grossly inadequate recording practices in
casework
- Failings of key managers at key times
- Inadequate supervision of and monitoring
staff performance
It is a depressingly familiar tale which resonates
with the findings of all too many inquiries down the years
into child abuse cases across theUK.
This case itself started as a child abuse case -
those children were failed by the system, just as they
were subsequently failed as adults.
As I have indicated, the report graphically
illustrates the failings - I refer to a number of
extracts from the report.
I quote:
"The repeated failures of social work to act
effectively in response to allegations of abuse over
some three decades undoubtedly contributed to the
serious sexual abuse of at least 3 individuals and to
the serious physical neglect of another.
"Unequivocal prompts to act occurred routinely
over the decades prior to March 2002. Between 1976 and
December 2001, 28 allegations of physical and/or sexual
abuse were reported to Social Work.
"Between December 2001 and24 February 2002, there were 16 separate contacts or referrals by the
individuals themselves, members of their family or social
work staff expressing concerns. Each one of these events
should have initiated decisive action,
but none did."
Most disturbingly of all Presiding Officer - and
again I quote:
"The repeated horrific sexual and physical abuse
for which 3 men were convicted in 2002,
could have been prevented had the department
acted on mounting evidence available over the previous
two decades."
I could go on making such references from the
report, but its full contents are available for Members
to read for themselves.
The report is, as I have said, a damning verdict
of a catalogue of repeated and significant
failures.
SWSI - and separately the mental Welfare
Commission make a number of key recommendations.
Those recommendations - 42 in all - are directed
at Scottish Borders Council, NHS Borders and Police, as
well as recommendations specifically for the Scottish
Executive to follow up.
The recommendations span many issues:
Of the SWSI recommendations, two are specific to the
individuals in the case.Twenty one relate to Scottish Borders Council and
span recommendations to:
- Review all cases involving vulnerable
adults
- Comply with Scottish Social Services Codes of
Practise
- Improve Training for Mental Health
Officers
- Develop better risk assessment methods
- Improve case recording & case review
mechanisms
- Introduce random case monitoring
processes
- Reform case transfer arrangements
- Share information more effectively
And a range of other related issues.
The Mental Welfare Commission recommendations
reflect all of these critical issues.
In addition the SE is specifically recommended to
take forward our existing work to reform, support and
develop Social Work practice through:
- Reviewing the role of the Chief Social Work
Officer
- Making provision to record all abuse
allegations in new data base frameworks we are
developing
- Auditing local guidelines to protect
vulnerable adults
- Introducing a vulnerable adults Bill
- Reinforcing the need for compliance with SSSC
Codes
We accept all the recommendations and will take
all the necessary actions to ensure they are acted
upon.
The SWSI report is based on a process which
involved the trawling of files for all of the period
during which the individuals involved had been known to
the Social Work Service.
Inspectors also had access to the other reports
commissioned by Scottish Borders Council, to staff
disciplinary and training records and transcripts of
interviews with key staff from the earlier
investigations.
A detailed chronology, drawing heavily on case
notes and this wider evidence base was produced as
Findings of Fact upon which to agree the facts
with the agencies and base the SWSI report.
The published report is an anonymised version of
the "Findings of Fact" which themselves cannot be
published in order to protect the identities of the
victims and what, in detail, happened to them.
I met yesterday with Scottish Borders Council and
with the Chief Constable of Lothian and Borders Police
and with the Chief Executive and Chair of Borders
Health Board.
Scottish Borders Council and the other agencies
have accepted without reservation the
Findings of Fact and the conclusions and
recommendations of the SWSI Report.
My purpose in meeting with the Council in
particular, but with the others also, was to impress
upon them the extremely serious nature of the findings
and to get their absolute assurance they:
- accepted the findings
- would take immediate steps to address the
remaining needs of the victims, and
- would take all the necessary actions to
ensure such failings would not occur again.
I can tell Parliament that I have received those
assurances.
I can also tell Parliament that I will ensure ongoing
liaison between my officials and Scottish Borders Council,
as will colleagues in Health and Justice in relation to NHS
Borders and the Police.
I have asked Scottish Borders Council to submit
their plans to address all the issues raised in the
report to SWSI.
SWSI will carry out a follow up inspection to
ensure the action plan is fully implemented and the
necessary change is brought about.
As members will be aware Scottish Borders Council has
a number of recently appointed officials in key positions,
not least a comparatively new Chief Executive and an acting
Director of Lifelong Care following the departure of the
previous Director.
Scottish Borders Council have a major set of
changes they need to make to the culture and operation
of their services and they will need dedicated effort
and clear political commitment to bring that change
about.
I can tell Parliament that they are fully aware of
the challenges they face and have started the process of
change that is necessary by allocating additional resources
and implementing, for example, the recommendations of the
Bates Report to the Council.
In the short term the Council still have a lot
they must do to support the individuals at the centre
of this case who have suffered so much.
Those individuals are still extremely vulnerable,
but are making significant progress in their lives in
new settings.
We too, in this Parliament, in the conduct of our
deliberations and proper scrutiny of events, need also
to protect those individuals from unnecessary exposure
or hurt as a consequence of that scrutiny.
In which regard I urge members not to refer to
this case by the former label as it is known to cause
distress to the individual concerned.
Beyond these particular individuals Scottish
Borders Council also has a duty to ensure no other
individuals with similar learning difficulties are
suffering as a consequence of systems or individual
failings.
They require - and are undertaking - an immediate
audit of cases to ensure adequate protection and
support for any such individuals.
The findings and recommendations in the SWSI Report
directed at Scottish Borders Council and the Police and
Health services have a relevance to every other Social Work
Service, Police force and Health Board inScotland.
I am writing today, together with Justice and
Health Ministers, to every Scottish Local Authority,
Health Board and Chief Constable to draw the report to
their attention and to ensure they ask
themselves:
- could this happen in my area?
- and asking them to work together to audit
their services to adults with learning
disabilities
- based on the Inspectorate's and Mental
Welfare Commission's recommendations.
Where that audit identifies areas needing
attention agencies should produce timetabled action
plans identifying how they will address these
issues.
Parliament recently made clear its intention to
raise standards in Social Work practice.
We have created the Scottish Social Services
Council to register Social Workers and required them to
publish Codes of Practice setting out standards of
conduct for social workers and social work
employers.
I have been deeply troubled and am deeply
concerned by what is revealed by this report by way of
systems and individual failings.
I am very clear I have a duty to act on those
concerns as they relate to systems and to the actions
of individuals.
I believe the proper way to deal with this is to
refer the SWSI findings and conclusions to the Scottish
Social Services Council.
I expect them to take these into account as they
develop standards of registration over time but also as
they go about their task of registering individual
Social Workers.
Parliament should be in no doubt about my
intentions here.
I expect the SSSC to exercise their statutory duties
and use the evidence we supply them to decide if any
individual is failing to meet the required standards and is
therefore not fit to be registered.
This would enable any potential employer to know
that they were unsuitable, and thereby protect the
interests of vulnerable clients.
I do not believe Parliament or the public would
expect any less than that assurance from me.
Practising Social Work is one of the most
demanding and complex tasks we ask any group of
professionals to conduct on our behalf.
Today, as we speak, there are Social Workers across
the length and breadth ofScotlandconfronting extraordinarily challenging
circumstances.
There are many, many social workers and health
staff and social work and health managers in Scottish
Borders and elsewhere exercising sound judgement,
assessing difficult situations, making the right
interventions and improving the lives of vulnerable
citizens.
We will hear little or nothing of their good work
on society's behalf.
But when things go wrong we have a duty to act,
to learn the lessons and ensure accountability
As an Executive and as a Parliament we also have
a duty to ask critical questions of whether we are
doing everything we can to be clear about what we
expect of Social Work in the modern era.
We have decided it is now the time to take a more
fundamental look at social work. We need to ask, as
Ministers and Parliamentarians what is the task we are
asking social work to do for our society in this ever
changing world.
We need to be clear what we expect in this early part
of the 21
st century - so different from the 1960s when
social work as we know it today found its statutory
basis.
We need to be clear where it fits and how it
relates to others in the complex landscape of public,
voluntary and private agencies.
We need to be clearer about the contribution we
want and need social work to make as we move through
this early part of the century in order to strengthen
that contribution.
We are already active on that agenda.
- We have introduced a new social work honours
degree,
- set minimum standards for CPD,
- run successful campaigns to attract new people
into the sector and introduced a fast track scheme for
graduates to boost by a third the number of social
workers qualifying over the next 3 years.
But it is clear we need to go further and beyond
what we are already doing.
For example - UNISON have recently written to my
officials stressing the importance they attach to the task
of identifying exactly what a social worker
does.
I will return to Parliament before the summer
recess to set out more fully the Executive's thinking
to progress the consideration of the issues.
In the meantime it is important to take action
now to improve services.
I am therefore immediately making changes in the
Social Work Service Inspectorate which will now
concentrate on inspection activity alone.
Its former policy role will stay within my
Department, but the Inspectorate will sit at arms
length from Ministers reflecting the arrangements put
in place in relation to Schools Inspection two years
ago.
The reports published today also raise issues
relevant to police, health, education and social
work.
One of the first tasks for the revamped SWSI will be
to develop with other inspectorates and regulatory bodies a
joint inspection of learning disability by the end of the
year.
That inspection will monitor the audits by
services providers I have already mentioned.
I have emphasised the importance of the Scottish
Social Services Council and the Codes of Practice
in raising standards and protecting vulnerable people.
We have already agreed to protect the social worker
title through the Regulation of Care Act.
I now intend to take further action to strengthen
the statutory basis of the Codes of Practice.
It is critical that agencies share and act on the
right information. The presumption must be to share information but too
often this does not happen.We must challenge this approach, particularly when it
involves vulnerable children and adults.
I will now make sure that the databases being
developed by the Scottish Consortium for Learning
Disabilities in partnership with local authorities
include a field for abuse and neglect.
Malcolm Chisholm is also asking the Health Department
to develop national guidelines to strengthen the protection
of vulnerable adults.
This will complement local guidelines recommended
by the report,
the same as you?
We will also introduce legislation to complement the
statutory measures that already exist to protect vulnerable
adults under the Adults with Incapacity Act and the Mental
Health Act of 2003.
As I said in opening this statement, the SWSI
Report is a damning catalogue of failings.
As I read the report I was not only profoundly
moved and deeply affected by what happened to the
individuals, but I became increasingly incredulous and
angry that such things could have been allowed to
happen over such a prolonged period of time.
But, I also became more and more committed and
resolute in my determination to do anything I can to
bring about the changes that are necessary.
Everyone must deeply regret what has happened to
the individuals involved, but apologising or regretting
does not go anywhere near far enough.
We need to take the actions we have set out to
seek to ensure we are doing all in our power to prevent
a repeat.
No one in this Parliament or more widely should
doubt the steely determination of this Executive to
ensure widespread action and change flows from this
report adding to all we know from the past.
Today marks a watershed in the way we need to think
about social work - we will ensure all the big questions
are asked in our determination to ensure Social Work can
make a stronger contribution to meetingScotland's modern needs.
And we will take whatever actions are necessary to
ensure - as far as it is humanly possible to do so -
thatScotland's vulnerable adults are not let down in this way
again.
News Archive